This is equivalent to the AMDGPUTargetMachine now, but it is the
starting point for separating R600 and GCN functionality into separate
targets.
It is recommened that users start using the gcn triple for GCN-based
GPUs, because using the r600 triple for these GPUs will be deprecated in
the future.
llvm-svn: 225277
This patch improves the logic added at revision 224899 (see review D6728) that
teaches the backend when it is profitable to speculate calls to cttz/ctlz.
The original algorithm conservatively avoided speculating more than one
instruction from a basic block in a control flow grap modelling an if-statement.
In particular, the only allowed instruction (excluding the terminator) was a
call to cttz/ctlz. However, there are cases where we could be less conservative
and still be able to speculate a call to cttz/ctlz.
With this patch, CodeGenPrepare now tries to speculate a cttz/ctlz if the
result is zero extended/truncated in the same basic block, and the zext/trunc
instruction is "free" for the target.
Added new test cases to CodeGen/X86/cttz-ctlz.ll
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6853
llvm-svn: 225274
This also rolls in the changes discussed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D6766.
Defers migrating the debug info for new allocas until after all partitions
are created.
Thanks to Chandler for reviewing!
llvm-svn: 225272
In r225251, I removed an old entry from the README.txt file. While there are
several contributing factors (including pieces in Clang's ABI code), upon
further reflection, the backend part deserves a regression test.
llvm-svn: 225268
This is already handled in general when it is known the
conversion can't lose bits with smaller integer types
casted into wider floating point types.
This pattern happens somewhat often in GPU programs that cast
workitem intrinsics to float, which are often compared with 0.
Specifically handle the special case of compares with zero which
should also be known to not lose information. I had a more general
version of this which allows equality compares if the casted float is
exactly representable in the integer, but I'm not 100% confident that
is always correct.
Also fold cases that aren't integers to true / false.
llvm-svn: 225265
Use this to test that path of invalidation. This test actually shows
redundant invalidation here that is really bad. I'm going to work on
fixing that next, but wanted to commit the test harness now that its all
working.
llvm-svn: 225257
Requires new AsmParserOperand types that detect 16-bit and 32/64-bit mode so that we choose the right instruction based on default sizing without predicates. This is necessary since predicates mess up the disassembler table building.
llvm-svn: 225256
Try harder to get rid of bitcast'd calls by ptrtoint/inttoptr'ing
arguments and return values when DataLayout says it is safe to do so.
llvm-svn: 225254
remove an extra, redundant pass manager wrapping every run.
I had kept seeing these when manually testing, but it was getting really
annoying and was going to cause problems with overly eager invalidation.
The root cause was an overly complex and unnecessary pile of code for
parsing the outer layer of the pass pipeline. We can instead delegate
most of this to the recursive pipeline parsing.
I've added some somewhat more basic and precise tests to catch this.
llvm-svn: 225253
"ELF Handling for Thread-Local Storage" specifies that R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF
relocation target a movq or addq instruction.
Prohibit the truncation of such loads to movl or addl.
This fixes PR22083.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6839
llvm-svn: 225250
The old target DAG combine that allowed for performing int_to_fp(fp_to_int(x))
without a load/store pair is updated here with support for unsigned integers,
and to support single-precision values without a third rounding step, on newer
cores with the appropriate instructions.
llvm-svn: 225248
a specific analysis result.
This is quite handy to test things, and will also likely be very useful
for debugging issues. You could narrow down pass validation failures by
walking these invalidate pass runs up and down the pass pipeline, etc.
I've added support to the pass pipeline parsing to be able to create one
of these for any analysis pass desired.
Just adding this class uncovered one latent bug where the
AnalysisManager CRTP base class had a hard-coded Module type rather than
using IRUnitT.
I've also added tests for invalidation and caching of analyses in
a basic way across all the pass managers. These in turn uncovered two
more bugs where we failed to correctly invalidate an analysis -- its
results were invalidated but the key for re-running the pass was never
cleared and so it was never re-run. Quite nasty. I'm very glad to debug
this here rather than with a full system.
Also, yes, the naming here is horrid. I'm going to update some of the
names to be slightly less awful shortly. But really, I've no "good"
ideas for naming. I'll be satisfied if I can get it to "not bad".
llvm-svn: 225246
manager tests to use them and be significantly more comprehensive.
This, naturally, uncovered a bug where the CGSCC pass manager wasn't
printing analyses when they were run.
The only remaining core manipulator is I think an invalidate pass
similar to the require pass. That'll be next. =]
llvm-svn: 225240
is a no-op other than requiring some analysis results be available.
This can be used in real pass pipelines to force the usually lazy
analysis running to eagerly compute something at a specific point, and
it can be used to test the pass manager infrastructure (my primary use
at the moment).
I've also added bit of pipeline parsing magic to support generating
these directly from the opt command so that you can directly use these
when debugging your analysis. The syntax is:
require<analysis-name>
This can be used at any level of the pass manager. For example:
cgscc(function(require<my-analysis>,no-op-function))
This would produce a no-op function pass requiring my-analysis, followed
by a fully no-op function pass, both of these in a function pass manager
which is nested inside of a bottom-up CGSCC pass manager which is in the
top-level (implicit) module pass manager.
I have zero attachment to the particular syntax I'm using here. Consider
it a straw man for use while I'm testing and fleshing things out.
Suggestions for better syntax welcome, and I'll update everything based
on any consensus that develops.
I've used this new functionality to more directly test the analysis
printing rather than relying on the cgscc pass manager running an
analysis for me. This is still minimally tested because I need to have
analyses to run first! ;] That patch is next, but wanted to keep this
one separate for easier review and discussion.
llvm-svn: 225236
We now produce the desired code as noted in the README.txt file (no spurious
or). Remove the README entry and improve the regression test.
llvm-svn: 225214
This object is meant to own the ObjectFiles and their underlying
MemoryBuffer. It is basically the equivalent of an OwningBinary
except that it efficiently handles Archives. It is optimized for
efficiently providing mappings of members of the same archive when
they are opened successively (which is standard in Darwin debug
maps, objects from the same archive will be contiguous).
Of course, the BinaryHolder will also be used by the DWARF linker
once it is commited, but for now only the debug map parser uses it.
With this change, you can run llvm-dsymutil on your Darwin debug build
of clang and get a complete debug map for it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6690
llvm-svn: 225207
Consider this function from our README.txt file:
int foo(int a, int b) { return (a < b) << 4; }
We now explicitly track CR bits by default, so the comment in the README.txt
about not really having a SETCC is no longer accurate, but we did generate this
somewhat silly code:
cmpw 0, 3, 4
li 3, 0
li 12, 1
isel 3, 12, 3, 0
sldi 3, 3, 4
blr
which generates the zext as a select between 0 and 1, and then shifts the
result by a constant amount. Here we preprocess the DAG in order to fold the
results of operations on an extension of an i1 value into the SELECT_I[48]
pseudo instruction when the resulting constant can be materialized using one
instruction (just like the 0 and 1). This was not implemented as a DAGCombine
because the resulting code would have been anti-canonical and depends on
replacing chained user nodes, which does not fit well into the lowering
paradigm. Now we generate:
cmpw 0, 3, 4
li 3, 0
li 12, 16
isel 3, 12, 3, 0
blr
which is less silly.
llvm-svn: 225203
The 64-bit semantics of cntlzw are not special, the 32-bit population count is
stored as a 64-bit value in the range [0,32]. As a result, it is always zero
extended, and it can be added to the PPCISelDAGToDAG peephole optimization as a
frontier instruction for the removal of unnecessary zero extensions.
llvm-svn: 225192
lhbrx and lwbrx not only load their data with byte swapping, but also clear the
upper 32 bits (at least). As a result, they can be added to the PPCISelDAGToDAG
peephole optimization as frontier instructions for the removal of unnecessary
zero extensions.
llvm-svn: 225189
We used to generate code similar to:
umov.b w8, v0[2]
strb w8, [x0, x1]
because the STR*ro* patterns were preferred to ST1*.
Instead, we can avoid going through GPRs, and generate:
add x8, x0, x1
st1.b { v0 }[2], [x8]
This patch increases the ST1* AddedComplexity to achieve that.
rdar://16372710
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6202
llvm-svn: 225183
For 0-lane stores, we used to generate code similar to:
fmov w8, s0
str w8, [x0, x1, lsl #2]
instead of:
str s0, [x0, x1, lsl #2]
To correct that: for store lane 0 patterns, directly match to STR <subreg>0.
Byte-sized instructions don't have the special case for a 0 index,
because FPR8s are defined to have untyped content.
rdar://16372710
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6772
llvm-svn: 225181
Tag_compatibility takes two arguments, but before this patch it would
erroneously accept just one, it now produces an error in that case.
Change-Id: I530f918587620d0d5dfebf639944d6083871ef7d
llvm-svn: 225167
Claim conformance to version 2.09 of the ARM ABI.
This build attribute must be emitted first amongst the build attributes when
written to an object file. This is to simplify conformance detection by
consumers.
Change-Id: If9eddcfc416bc9ad6e5cc8cdcb05d0031af7657e
llvm-svn: 225166
This patch lowers patterns such as-
sub v0.4s, v0.4s, v1.4s
abs v0.4s, v0.4s
to
sabd v0.4s, v0.4s, v1.4s
on AArch64.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6781
llvm-svn: 225165
when all are being preserved.
We want to short-circuit this for a couple of reasons. One, I don't
really want passes to grow a dependency on actually receiving their
invalidate call when they've been preserved. I'm thinking about removing
this entirely. But more importantly, preserving everything is likely to
be the common case in a lot of scenarios, and it would be really good to
bypass all of the invalidation and preservation machinery there.
Avoiding calling N opaque functions to try to invalidate things that are
by definition still valid seems important. =]
This wasn't really inpsired by much other than seeing the spam in the
logging for analyses, but it seems better ot get it checked in rather
than forgetting about it.
llvm-svn: 225163
manager.
This starts to allow us to test analyses more easily, but it's really
only the beginning. Some of the code here is still untestable without
manual changes to create analysis passes, but I wanted to factor it into
a small of chunks as possible.
Next up in order to be able to test things are, in no particular order:
- No-op analyses passes so we don't have to use real ones to exercise
the pass maneger itself.
- Automatic way of generating dummy passes that require an analysis be
run, including a variant that calls a 'print' method on a pass to make
it even easier to print out the results of an analysis.
- Dummy passes that invalidate all analyses for their IR unit so we can
test invalidation and re-runs.
- Automatic way to print each analysis pass as it is re-run.
- Automatic but optional verification of analysis passes everywhere
possible.
I'm not claiming I'll get to all of these immediately, but that's what
is in the pipeline at some stage. I'm fleshing out exactly what I need
and what to prioritize by working on converting analyses and then trying
to test the conversion. =]
llvm-svn: 225162
{code}
// loop body
... = a[i] (1)
... = a[i+1] (2)
.......
a[i+1] = .... (3)
a[i] = ... (4)
{code}
The algorithm tries to collect memory access candidates from AliasSetTracker, and then check memory dependences one another. The memory accesses are unique in AliasSetTracker, and a single memory access in AliasSetTracker may map to multiple entries in AccessAnalysis, which could cover both 'read' and 'write'. Originally the algorithm only checked 'write' entry in Accesses if only 'write' exists. This is incorrect and the consequence is it ignored all read access, and finally some RAW and WAR dependence are missed.
For the case given above, if we ignore two reads, the dependence between (1) and (3) would not be able to be captured, and finally this loop will be incorrectly vectorized.
The fix simply inserts a new loop to find all entries in Accesses. Since it will skip most of all other memory accesses by checking the Value pointer at the very beginning of the loop, it should not increase compile-time visibly.
llvm-svn: 225159
PPC has an instruction for ctlz with defined zero behavior, and our lowering of
cttz (provided by DAGCombine) is also efficient and branchless, so speculating
these makes sense.
llvm-svn: 225150
assert out of the new pre-splitting in SROA.
This fix makes the code do what was originally intended -- when we have
a store of a load both dealing in the same alloca, we force them to both
be pre-split with identical offsets. This is really quite hard to do
because we can keep discovering problems as we go along. We have to
track every load over the current alloca which for any resaon becomes
invalid for pre-splitting, and go back to remove all stores of those
loads. I've included a couple of test cases derived from PR22093 that
cover the different ways this can happen. While that PR only really
triggered the first of these two, its the same fundamental issue.
The other challenge here is documented in a FIXME now. We end up being
quite a bit more aggressive for pre-splitting when loads and stores
don't refer to the same alloca. This aggressiveness comes at the cost of
introducing potentially redundant loads. It isn't clear that this is the
right balance. It might be considerably better to require that we only
do pre-splitting when we can presplit every load and store involved in
the entire operation. That would give more consistent if conservative
results. Unfortunately, it requires a non-trivial change to the actual
pre-splitting operation in order to correctly handle cases where we end
up pre-splitting stores out-of-order. And it isn't 100% clear that this
is the right direction, although I'm starting to suspect that it is.
llvm-svn: 225149
r225135 added the ability to materialize i64 constants using rotations in order
to reduce the instruction count. Sometimes we can use a rotation only with some
extra masking, so that we take advantage of the fact that generating a bunch of
extra higher-order 1 bits is easy using li/lis.
llvm-svn: 225147
The required functionality has been there for some time, but I never
managed to actually wire it into the command line registry of passes.
Let's do that.
llvm-svn: 225144
