The cleanupret instruction has an invariant that it's 'from' operand be
a cleanuppad. This invariant was violated when we removed a dead block
which removed a cleanuppad leaving behind a cleanupret with an undef
'from' operand.
This was solved in r261731 by staving off the removal of the dead block
to a later pass.
However, it occured to me that we do not need to do this.
Instead, we can simply avoid processing the cleanupret if it has an
undef 'from' operand because we know that it will be removed soon.
llvm-svn: 261754
This is part of the payoff for the refactoring in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL261649http://reviews.llvm.org/rL261707
In addition to removing a pile of duplicated code, the xor case was
missing the optimization for vector types because it checked
"SrcTy->isIntegerTy()" rather than "SrcTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy()"
like 'and' and 'or' were already doing.
This solves part of:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
llvm-svn: 261750
Part 2 of 2
This patch add support for combining target shuffles into blends-with-zero.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17483
llvm-svn: 261745
Part 1 of 2
This patch attempts to replace the insertion of zero scalars with a vector blend with zero, avoiding the use of the integer insertion instructions (which are particularly slow on many targets).
(Part 2 will add support for combining multiple blends-with-zero).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17483
llvm-svn: 261743
Prepare to support DPP encodings.
For DPP encodings, we want row_mask/bank_mask/bound_ctrl to be optional operands. However this means that when parsing instruction which has no mnemonic prefix, we cannot add both default values for VOP3 and for DPP optional operands to OperandVector - neither instructions would match. So add default values for optional operands to MCInst during conversion instead.
Mark more operands as IsOptional = 1 in .td files.
Do not add default values for optional operands to OperandVector in AMDGPUAsmParser.
Add default values for optional operands during conversion using new helper addOptionalImmOperand.
Change to cvtVOP3_2_mod to check instruction flag instead of presence of modifiers. In the future, cvtVOP3* functions can be combined into one.
Separate cvtFlat and cvtFlatAtomic.
Fix CNDMASK_B32 definition to have no modifiers.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17445
Reviewers: tstellarAMD
llvm-svn: 261742
This is a part of the refactoring to unify isSafeToLoadUnconditionally and isDereferenceablePointer functions. In subsequent change I'm going to eliminate isDerferenceableAndAlignedPointer from Loads API, leaving isSafeToLoadSpecualtively the only function to check is load instruction can be speculated.
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16180
llvm-svn: 261736
lit tests passed before and after because it doesn't test the binary representation of amd_kernel_code_t.
Patch by: Valery Pykhtin (Valery.Pykhtin@amd.com)
Reviewers: arsenm
llvm-svn: 261732
DeleteDeadBlock was called indiscriminately, leading to cleanuprets with
undef cleanuppad references.
Instead, try to drain the BB of most of it's instructions if it is
unreachable. We can then remove the BB if it solely consists of a
terminator (and maybe some phis).
llvm-svn: 261731
PerformShuffleCombine should be usable by unary and binary target shuffles, but was attempting to get the first two operands whatever the instruction type. Since these are only used for VECTOR_SHUFFLE instructions for one particular combine I've moved them inside the relevant if statement.
llvm-svn: 261727
This function is used in exactly one place, and only in asserts
builds. Move it a few lines up before the use and only define it when
asserts are enabled. Fixes the release build under -Werror.
Also remove the forward declaration and commentary that was basically
identical to the code itself.
llvm-svn: 261722
Note: The 'and' case in foldCastedBitwiseLogic() is inheriting one extra
check from the nearly identical 'or' case:
if ((!isa<ICmpInst>(Cast0Src) || !isa<ICmpInst>(Cast1Src))
But I'm not sure how to expose that difference in a regression test.
Without that check, the 'or' path will infinite loop on:
test/Transforms/InstCombine/zext-or-icmp.ll
because the zext-or-icmp fold is attempting a reverse transform.
The refactoring should extend to the 'xor' case next to solve part of
PR26702.
llvm-svn: 261707
Looks like the global rename last year was a bit over-zealous. These things
really are referred to with ARM64 elsewhere (ld64, libunwind, ...).
llvm-svn: 261698
The idea here is to provide a customizable install target that only depends on building the things you actually want to install. It relies on each component being installed having an auto-generated install-${component}, which in turn depends only on the target being installed.
This is fundamentally a workaround for the fact that CMake generates build files which have their "install" target depend on the "all" target. This results in "ninja install" building a bunch of unneeded things.
llvm-svn: 261681
We were emitting only one half of a the paired relocations needed for these
instructions because we decided that an offset needed a scattered relocation.
In fact, movw/movt relocations can be paired without being scattered.
llvm-svn: 261679
Summary:
Currently, the ARM Constant Island may not converge (or not converge quickly).
This patch let it move to the closest water after the user if it doesn't converge after 15 iterations.
This address https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25339
Reviewers: t.p.northover, srhines, kristof.beyls, aadg, rengolin
Subscribers: weimingz, aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16890
llvm-svn: 261665
Implements a mostly-conventional redzone for the userspace
stack. Because we have unsigned load/store offsets we continue to use a
local SP subtracted from the incoming SP but do not write it back to
memory.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17525
llvm-svn: 261662
It is problematic if the inlinee has a cleanupret which unwinds to
caller and we inline it into a call site which doesn't unwind.
If the funclet unwinds anywhere other than to the caller,
then we will give the funclet two unwind destinations.
This will result in a verifier failure.
Seeing as how the caller wasn't an invoke (which would locally unwind)
and that the funclet cannot unwind to caller, we must conclude that an
'unwind to caller' cleanupret is dynamically unreachable.
This fixes PR26698.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17536
llvm-svn: 261656
Summary:
Fix a bug in epilog generation where the incoming stack arguments were
not being popped for fastcc functions when -tailcallopt was passed.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, jmolloy, rengolin
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16894
llvm-svn: 261650
This is a straight cut and paste of the existing code and is intended to
be the first step in solving part of PR26702:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
We should be able to reuse most of this and delete the nearly identical
existing code in visitOr(). Then, we can enhance visitXor() to use the
same code too.
llvm-svn: 261649
pattern that triggers it. This essentially requires an immutable
function analysis, as that will survive anything we do to invalidate it.
When we have such patterns, the function analysis manager will not get
cleared between runs of the proxy.
If we actually need an assert about how things are queried, we can add
more elaborate machinery for computing it, but so far I'm not aware of
significant value provided.
Thanks to Justin Lebar for noticing this when he made a (seemingly
innocuous) change to FunctionAttrs that is enough to trigger it in one
test there. Now it is covered by a direct test of the pass manager code.
llvm-svn: 261627
system.
Previously, this was only being tested with larger integration tests.
That makes it hard to isolated specific issues with it, and makes the
APIs themselves less well tested. Add a unittest based around the same
patterns used for testing the general pass manager.
llvm-svn: 261624
Summary:
If we want classify OoO or not, using getSchedModel().isOutOfOrder()
could be more proper way than using Subtarget->isLikeA9().
Reviewers: jmolloy, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17433
llvm-svn: 261623