Change --no-pgo-warn-missing to -pgo-warn-missing-function
and negate the default. /NFC
Add more test to make sure the warning is off by default
llvm-svn: 278314
It's more than just inttoptr, but the others can't be tested until we have
support for non-trivial constants (they currently get unavoidably folded to a
ConstantInt).
llvm-svn: 278303
Summary:
This patch define and implement amdgcn image intrinsics with sampler.
1. define vdata type to be llvm_anyfloat_ty, address type to be llvm_anyfloat_ty,
and rsrc type to be llvm_anyint_ty. As a result, we expect the intrinsics name
to have three suffixes to overload each of these three types;
2. D128 as well as two other flags are implied in the three types, for example,
if you use v8i32 as resource type, then r128 is 0!
3. don't expose TFE flag, and other flags are exposed in the instruction order:
unrm, glc, slc, lwe and da.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22838
Reviewed by:
arsenm and tstellarAMD
llvm-svn: 278291
If AnalyzeBranch can't analyze a block and it is possible to
fallthrough, then duplicating the block doesn't make sense, as only one
block can be the layout predecessor for the un-analyzable fallthrough.
Submitted wit a test case, but NOTE: the test case doesn't currently
fail. However, the test case fails with D20505 and would have saved me
some time debugging.
llvm-svn: 278288
The export table is not considered part of the object file symbol table,
so we have to look through it separately.
Reviewers: kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23321
llvm-svn: 278284
Insert before the skip branch if one is created.
This is a somewhat more natural placement relative
to the skip branches, and makes it possible to implement
analyzeBranch for skip blocks.
The test changes are mostly due to a quirk where
the block label is not emitted if there is a terminator
that is not also a branch.
llvm-svn: 278273
Add the $arch-registered-target features that clang uses to disable
tests that require a registered backend, so that we can run the sancov
tests on Windows. LLVM's lit suite did not appear to have a per-test way
to do this, and I would rather not split up the sancov tests into
architecture directories.
Split out of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23321
llvm-svn: 278271
Summary:
See the new test case for one that was (non-deterministically) crashing
on trunk and deterministically hit the assertion that I added in D23302.
Basically, the machine function contains a sequence
DS_WRITE_B32 %vreg4, %vreg14:sub0, ...
DS_WRITE_B32 %vreg4, %vreg14:sub0, ...
%vreg14:sub1<def> = COPY %vreg14:sub0
and SILoadStoreOptimizer::mergeWrite2Pair merges the two DS_WRITE_B32
instructions into one before calling repairIntervalsInRange.
Now repairIntervalsInRange wants to repair %vreg14, in particular, and
ends up trying to repair %vreg14:sub1 as well, but that only becomes
active _after_ the range that is to be repaired, hence the crash due
to LR.find(...) == LR.begin() at the start of repairOldRegInRange.
I believe that just skipping those subrange is fine, but again, not too
familiar with that code.
Reviewers: MatzeB, kparzysz, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: llvm-commits, MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23303
llvm-svn: 278268
This change makes it possible for tail-duplication and tail-merging to
be disjoint. By being less aggressive when merging during layout, there are no
overlapping cases between tail-duplication and tail-merging, provided the
thresholds are disjoint.
There is a remaining TODO to benchmark the succ_size() test for non-layout tail
merging.
llvm-svn: 278265
If the value produced by the bitcast hasn't been referenced yet, we can simply
reuse the input register avoiding an unnecessary COPY instruction.
llvm-svn: 278245
Floating point instructions use general purpose registers, so the few
instructions that can put floating point immediates into registers are,
in fact, integer instruction. Use them explicitly instead of having
pseudo-instructions specifically for dealing with floating point values.
Simplify the constant loading instructions (from sdata) to have only two:
one for 32-bit values and one for 64-bit values: CONST32 and CONST64.
llvm-svn: 278244
Summary:
A particular coroutine usage pattern, where a coroutine is created, manipulated and
destroyed by the same calling function, is common for coroutines implementing
RAII idiom and is suitable for allocation elision optimization which avoid
dynamic allocation by storing the coroutine frame as a static `alloca` in its
caller.
coro.free and coro.alloc intrinsics are used to indicate which code needs to be suppressed
when dynamic allocation elision happens:
```
entry:
%elide = call i8* @llvm.coro.alloc()
%need.dyn.alloc = icmp ne i8* %elide, null
br i1 %need.dyn.alloc, label %coro.begin, label %dyn.alloc
dyn.alloc:
%alloc = call i8* @CustomAlloc(i32 4)
br label %coro.begin
coro.begin:
%phi = phi i8* [ %elide, %entry ], [ %alloc, %dyn.alloc ]
%hdl = call i8* @llvm.coro.begin(i8* %phi, i32 0, i8* null,
i8* bitcast ([2 x void (%f.frame*)*]* @f.resumers to i8*))
```
and
```
%mem = call i8* @llvm.coro.free(i8* %hdl)
%need.dyn.free = icmp ne i8* %mem, null
br i1 %need.dyn.free, label %dyn.free, label %if.end
dyn.free:
call void @CustomFree(i8* %mem)
br label %if.end
if.end:
...
```
If heap allocation elision is performed, we replace coro.alloc with a static alloca on the caller frame and coro.free with null constant.
Also, we need to make sure that if there are any tail calls referencing the coroutine frame, we need to remote tail call attribute, since now coroutine frame lives on the stack.
Documentation and overview is here: http://llvm.org/docs/Coroutines.html.
Upstreaming sequence (rough plan)
1.Add documentation. (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22603)
2.Add coroutine intrinsics. (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22659)
3.Add empty coroutine passes. (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22847)
4.Add coroutine devirtualization + tests.
ab) Lower coro.resume and coro.destroy (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22998)
c) Do devirtualization (https://reviews.llvm.org/D23229)
5.Add CGSCC restart trigger + tests. (https://reviews.llvm.org/D23234)
6.Add coroutine heap elision + tests. <= we are here
7.Add the rest of the logic (split into more patches)
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23245
llvm-svn: 278242
Teach LVI how to gather information from conditions in the form of (cond1 && cond2). Our out-of-tree front-end emits range checks in this form.
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23200
llvm-svn: 278231
This is a resubmission of previously reverted r277592. It was hitting overly strong assertion in getConstantRange which was relaxed in r278217.
Use LVI to prove that adds do not wrap. The change is motivated by https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28620 bug and it's the first step to fix that problem.
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23059
llvm-svn: 278220
If the input vector to INSERT_SUBVECTOR is another INSERT_SUBVECTOR, and this inserted subvector replaces the last insertion, then insert into the common source vector.
i.e.
INSERT_SUBVECTOR( INSERT_SUBVECTOR( Vec, SubOld, Idx ), SubNew, Idx ) --> INSERT_SUBVECTOR( Vec, SubNew, Idx )
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23330
llvm-svn: 278211
Created a Thumb2 predicated pattern matcher that uses Thumb2 and
HasT2ExtractPack and used it to redefine the patterns for sxta{b|h}
and uxta{b|h}. Also used the similar patterns to fill in isel pattern
gaps for the corresponding instructions in the ARM backend.
The patch is mainly changes to tests since most of this functionality
appears not to have been tested.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23273
llvm-svn: 278207
Hal pointed out that the semantic of our intrinsic and the libc
call are slightly different. Add a comment while I'm here to
explain why we can't emit an intrinsic. Thanks Hal!
llvm-svn: 278200
Summary:
The inliner not being a function pass requires the work-around of
generating the OptimizationRemarkEmitter and in turn BFI on demand.
This will go away after the new PM is ready.
BFI is only computed inside ORE if the user has requested hotness
information for optimization diagnostitics (-pass-remark-with-hotness at
the 'opt' level). Thus there is no additional overhead without the
flag.
Reviewers: hfinkel, davidxl, eraman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22694
llvm-svn: 278185
Summary:
This hopefully fixes PR28825. The problem now was that a value from the
original loop was used in a subloop, which became a sibling after separation.
While a subloop doesn't need an lcssa phi node, a sibling does, and that's
where we broke LCSSA. The most natural way to fix this now is to simply call
formLCSSA on the original loop: it'll do what we've been doing before plus
it'll cover situations described above.
I think we don't need to run formLCSSARecursively here, and we have an assert
to verify this (I've tried testing it on LLVM testsuite + SPECs). I'd be happy
to be corrected here though.
I also changed a run line in the test from '-lcssa -loop-unroll' to
'-lcssa -loop-simplify -indvars', because it exercises LCSSA
preservation to the same extent, but also makes less unrelated
transformation on the CFG, which makes it easier to verify.
Reviewers: chandlerc, sanjoy, silvas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23288
llvm-svn: 278173
This patch adds -emscripten-cxx-exceptions-whitelist option to
WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenExceptions pass. This options is the list of
function names in which Emscripten-style exception handling is enabled.
This is to support emscripten's EXCEPTION_CATCHING_WHITELIST which
exists because of the performance impact of emscripten's non-zero-cost
EH method.
Patch by Heejin Ahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23292
llvm-svn: 278171
For now put them all in the entry block. This should be correct but may give
poor runtime performance. Hopefully MachineSinking combined with
isReMaterializable can solve those issues, but if not the interface is sound
enough to support alternatives.
llvm-svn: 278168
The patch is to fix the bug in PR28705. It was caused by setting wrong return
value for SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansion. The return values of findExistingExpansion
have different meanings when the function is used in different ways so it is easy to make
mistake. The fix creates two new interfaces to replace SCEVExpander::findExistingExpansion,
and specifies where each interface is expected to be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22942
llvm-svn: 278161
The fix for PR28705 will be committed consecutively.
In D12090, the ExprValueMap was added to reuse existing value during SCEV expansion.
However, const folding and sext/zext distribution can make the reuse still difficult.
A simplified case is: suppose we know S1 expands to V1 in ExprValueMap, and
S1 = S2 + C_a
S3 = S2 + C_b
where C_a and C_b are different SCEVConstants. Then we'd like to expand S3 as
V1 - C_a + C_b instead of expanding S2 literally. It is helpful when S2 is a
complex SCEV expr and S2 has no entry in ExprValueMap, which is usually caused
by the fact that S3 is generated from S1 after const folding.
In order to do that, we represent ExprValueMap as a mapping from SCEV to
ValueOffsetPair. We will save both S1->{V1, 0} and S2->{V1, C_a} into the
ExprValueMap when we create SCEV for V1. When S3 is expanded, it will first
expand S2 to V1 - C_a because of S2->{V1, C_a} in the map, then expand S3 to
V1 - C_a + C_b.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21313
llvm-svn: 278160
In the coverage report, the line and count columns have been swapped to make it more readable.
A follow-up commit in compiler-rt is needed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23281
llvm-svn: 278152
A UD2 might make its way into the program via a call to @llvm.trap.
Obviously, calls are not terminators. However, we modeled the X86
instruction, UD2, as a terminator. Later on, this confuses the epilogue
insertion machinery which results in the epilogue getting inserted
before the UD2. For some platforms, like x64, the result is a
violation of the ABI.
Instead, model UD2/UD2B as a side effecting instruction which may
observe memory.
llvm-svn: 278144
As detailed on D22726, much of the shift combining code assume constant values will fit into a uint64_t value and calls ConstantSDNode::getZExtValue where it probably shouldn't (leading to asserts). Using APInt directly avoids this problem but we encounter other assertions if we attempt to compare/operate on 2 APInt of different bitwidths.
This patch adds a helper function to ensure that 2 APInt values are zero extended as required so that they can be safely used together. I've only added an initial example use for this to the '(SHIFT (SHIFT x, c1), c2) --> (SHIFT x, (ADD c1, c2))' combines. Further cases can easily be added as required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23007
llvm-svn: 278141
