As a side effect, the .debug_line section will be dumped in physical
order, rather than in the order that compile units refer to their
associated portions of the .debug_line section. These are probably
always the same order anyway, and no tests noticed the difference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39854
llvm-svn: 318839
Summary:
This bug seems to have gone unnoticed because critical cases with LDS
instructions are eliminated by the peephole optimizer.
However, equivalent situations arise with buffer loads and stores
as well, so this fixes regressions since r317751 ("AMDGPU: Merge
S_BUFFER_LOAD_DWORD_IMM into x2, x4").
Fixes at least:
KHR-GL45.shader_storage_buffer_object.basic-operations-case1-cs
KHR-GL45.cull_distance.functional
piglit tes-input-gl_ClipDistance.shader_test
... and probably more
Change-Id: I0e371536288eb8e6afeaa241a185266fd45d129d
Reviewers: arsenm, mareko, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40303
llvm-svn: 318829
Since i1 is a legal type, this:
NumBytes = Op1->getMemoryVT().getSizeInBits() >> 3;
is wrong and should be instead
NumBytes = Op0->getMemoryVT().getStoreSize();
There seems to be more places where this should be fixed outside DAGCombiner.
Review: Hal Finkel
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35366
llvm-svn: 318824
This makes the fact that X86 needs an explicit mask output not part of the type constraint for the ISD::MSCATTER.
This also gives the X86ISD::MGATHER/MSCATTER nodes a common base class simplifying the address selection code in X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp
llvm-svn: 318823
RecordKeeper::getDef() is a hot place, it shows up in profiling
and it creates std::string instance for each search in RecordMap
though RecordKeeper::RecordMap can use StringRef as a key
instead to avoid that. Patch do that change.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40170
llvm-svn: 318822
Now we consistently represent the mask result without relying on isel ignoring it.
We now have a more general SDNode and type constraints to represent these nodes in isel patterns. This allows us to present both both vXi1 and XMM/YMM mask types with a single set of constraints.
llvm-svn: 318821
Given loops `L1` and `L2` with AddRecs `AR1` and `AR2` varying in them respectively.
When identifying loop disposition of `AR2` w.r.t. `L1`, we only say that it is varying if
`L1` contains `L2`. But there is also a possible situation where `L1` and `L2` are
consecutive sibling loops within the parent loop. In this case, `AR2` is also varying
w.r.t. `L1`, but we don't correctly identify it.
It can lead, for exaple, to attempt of incorrect folding. Consider:
AR1 = {a,+,b}<L1>
AR2 = {c,+,d}<L2>
EXAR2 = sext(AR1)
MUL = mul AR1, EXAR2
If we incorrectly assume that `EXAR2` is invariant w.r.t. `L1`, we can end up trying to
construct something like: `{a * {c,+,d}<L2>,+,b * {c,+,d}<L2>}<L1>`, which is incorrect
because `AR2` is not available on entrance of `L1`.
Both situations "`L1` contains `L2`" and "`L1` preceeds sibling loop `L2`" can be handled
with one check: "header of `L1` dominates header of `L2`". This patch replaces the old
insufficient check with this one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39453
llvm-svn: 318819
After the dataflow algorithm proves that an argument is constant,
it replaces it value with the integer constant and drops the lattice
value associated to the DEF.
e.g. in the example we have @f() that's called twice:
call @f(undef, ...)
call @f(2, ...)
`undef` MEET 2 = 2 so we replace the argument and all its uses with
the constant 2.
Shortly after, tryToReplaceWithConstantRange() tries to get the lattice
value for the argument we just replaced, causing an assertion.
This function is a little peculiar as it runs when we're doing replacement
and not as part of the solver but still queries the solver.
The fix is that of checking whether we replaced the value already and
get a temporary lattice value for the constant.
Thanks to Zhendong Su for the report!
Fixes PR35357.
llvm-svn: 318817
Change the representation of COFF comdats so that a COFF linker
is able to accurately resolve comdats between IR and native object
files. Specifically, apply name mangling to comdat names consistently
with native object files, and do not export comdats with an internal
leader because they do not affect symbol resolution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40278
llvm-svn: 318805
When searching for a resource unit, use the reference location instead of
the definition location in case of an error.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40263
llvm-svn: 318803
This is based on table 1-1 of the October 2017 revision of Intel® Architecture Instruction Set Extensions and Future Features Programming Reference
llvm-svn: 318799
This partially reverts r298851. The the underlying issue is that we don't
currently model the dependency between mrs (read system register) and
msr (write system register) instructions.
Something like the below should never be reordered:
msr TPIDR_EL0, x0 ;; set thread pointer
mrs x8, TPIDR_EL0 ;; read thread pointer
but was being reordered after r298851. The functional part of the patch
that wasn't reverted needed to remain in place in order to not break
r299462.
PR35317
llvm-svn: 318788
These are pre-UAL syntax, and we don't support any other pre-UAL instructions,
with the exception of FLDMX/FSTMX, which don't have a UAL equivalent. Therefore
there's no reason to keep them or their AsmParser hacks around.
With the AsmParser hacks removed, the FLDMX and FSTMX instructions get the same
operand diagnostics as the UAL instructions.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39196
llvm-svn: 318777
Summary:
First step in adding MemorySSA as dependency for loop pass manager.
Adding the dependency under a flag.
New pass manager: MSSA pointer in LoopStandardAnalysisResults can be null.
Legacy and new pass manager: Use cl::opt EnableMSSALoopDependency. Disabled by default.
Reviewers: sanjoy, davide, gberry
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40274
llvm-svn: 318772
This was causing the (invalid) predicated versions of the NEON VRINTX and
VRINTZ instructions to be accepted, with the condition code being ignored.
Also, there is no NEON VRINTR instruction, so that part of the check was not
necessary.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39193
llvm-svn: 318771
- We can still emit this error if the actual instruction has two or more
operands missing compared to the expected one.
- We should only emit this error once per instruction.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36746
llvm-svn: 318770
This is NFC, as the matcher would continue looping up to the maximum
number of operands with no effect, but this should improve performance a
bit, and makes the debug trace clearer.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36744
llvm-svn: 318769
Summary:
The generated diagnostic by the AsmMatcher isn't always applicable to the AsmOperand.
This is because the code will only update the diagnostic if it is more specific than the previous diagnostic. However, when having validated operands and 'moved on' to a next operand (for some instruction/alias for which all previous operands are valid), if the diagnostic is InvalidOperand, than that should be set as the diagnostic, not the more specific message about a previous operand for some other instruction/alias candidate.
Reviewers: craig.topper, olista01, rengolin, stoklund
Reviewed By: olista01
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40011
llvm-svn: 318759
As pointed out in post-commit review of r318738, `return ReplaceNode(..)` when
both ReplaceNode and the current function return void is confusing. This patch
moves to using a more obvious early return, and moves to just using an if to
catch the one case we currently care about. A future patch that adds further
custom instruction selection can introduce a switch.
llvm-svn: 318757
properlyDominates() shouldn't be used as sort key. It causes different output between stdlibc++ and libc++.
Instead, I introduced RPOT. In most cases, it works for CSE.
llvm-svn: 318743
The obvious approach of defining a pattern like the one below actually doesn't
work:
`def : Pat<(i32 0), (i32 X0)>;`
As was noted when Lanai made this change (https://reviews.llvm.org/rL288215),
attempting to handle the constant 0 in tablegen leads to assertions due to a
physical register being used where a virtual register is expected.
llvm-svn: 318738
Previous patches primarily ensured that codegen was possible for the standard
RISC-V instructions. However, there are a number of IR inputs that wouldn't be
appropriately lowered. This patch both adds test cases and supports lowering
for a number of these cases:
* Improved sext/zext/trunc support
* Support for setcc variants that don't map directly to RISC-V instructions
* Lowering mul, and hence support for external symbols
* addc, adde, subc, sube
* mulhs, srem, mulhu, urem, udiv, sdiv
* {srl,sra,shl}_parts
* brind
* br_jt
* bswap, ctlz, cttz, ctpop
* rotl, rotr
* BlockAddress operands
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29938
llvm-svn: 318737
Although ISD::SELECT_CC is a more natural match for RISCVISD::SELECT_CC (and
ultimately the integer RISC-V conditional branch instructions), we choose to
expand ISD::SELECT_CC and lower ISD::SELECT. The appropriate compare+branch
will be created in the case where an ISD::SELECT condition value is created by
an ISD::SETCC node, which operates on XLen types. Other datatypes such as
floating point don't have conditional branch instructions, and lowering
ISD::SELECT allows more flexibility for handling these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29937
llvm-svn: 318735
