A call to removeEmptySubranges() is necessary after every operation that
potentially removes all segments from a subregister range; this case in
the register coalescer was missing.
llvm-svn: 241027
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
LaneMasks as given by getSubRegIndexLaneMask() have a limited number of
of bits, so for targets with more than 31 disjunct subregister there may
be cases where:
getSubReg(Reg,A) does not overlap getSubReg(Reg,B)
but we still have
(getSubRegIndexLaneMask(A) & getSubRegIndexLaneMask(B)) != 0.
I had hoped to keep this an implementation detail of the tablegen but as
my next commit shows we can avoid unnecessary imp-defs operands if we
know that the lane masks in use are precise.
This is in preparation to http://reviews.llvm.org/D10470.
llvm-svn: 239837
MIOperands/ConstMIOperands are classes iterating over the MachineOperand
of a MachineInstr, however MachineInstr::mop_iterator does the same
thing.
I assume these two iterators exist to have a uniform interface to
iterate over the operands of a machine instruction bundle and a single
machine instruction. However in practice I find it more confusing to have 2
different iterator classes, so this patch transforms (nearly all) the
code to use mop_iterators.
The only exception being MIOperands::anlayzePhysReg() and
MIOperands::analyzeVirtReg() still needing an equivalent, I leave that
as an exercise for the next patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9932
This version is slightly modified from the proposed revision in that it
introduces MachineInstr::getOperandNo to avoid the extra counting
variable in the few loops that previously used MIOperands::getOperandNo.
llvm-svn: 238539
demanded by the machine verifier.
After shrinking a live-range to its uses, it is possible to create several
smaller live-ranges. When this happens, shrinkToUses returns true and we need to
split the different components into their own live-ranges.
The problem does not reproduce on any in-tree target but Jonas Paulsson
<jonas.paulsson@ericsson.com>, who reported the problem, checked that this patch
fixes the issue.
llvm-svn: 236658
I couldn't provide a testcase as none of the public targets has wide
register classes with alot of subregisters and at the same time an
instruction which "ReMaterializable" and "AsCheapAsAMove" (could
probably be added for R600).
llvm-svn: 235668
nodes.
When a node is terminal it is pushed at the end of the list of the copies to
coalesce instead of being completely ignored. In effect, this reduces its
priority over non-terminal nodes.
Because of that, we do not miss the rematerialization opportunities, nor the
copies that can be merged with more complex, than the terminal rule,
interference checks.
Related to PR22768.
llvm-svn: 233395
those are in the same basic block.
The previous approach was the topological order of the basic block.
By default this rule is disabled.
Related to PR22768.
llvm-svn: 233241
If liveranges induced by an IMPLICIT_DEF get completely covered by a
proper liverange the IMPLICIT_DEF instructions and its corresponding
definitions have to be removed from the live ranges. This has to happen
in the subregister live ranges as well (I didn't see this case earlier
because in most programs only some subregisters are covered and the
IMPLCIT_DEF won't get removed).
No testcase, I spent hours trying to create one for one of the public
targets, but ultimately failed because I couldn't manage to properly
control the placement of COPY and IMPLICIT_DEF instructions from an .ll
file.
llvm-svn: 233217
Some subregisters are only to indicate different access sizes, while not
providing any way to actually divide the register up into multiple
disjunct parts. Avoid tracking subregister liveness in these cases as it
is not beneficial.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8429
llvm-svn: 232695
that control, individually, all of the disparate things it was
controlling.
At the same time move a FIXME in the Hexagon port to a new
subtarget function that will enable a user of the machine
scheduler to avoid using the source scheduler for pre-RA-scheduling.
The FIXME would have this removed, but involves either testcase
changes or adding -pre-RA-sched=source to a few testcases.
llvm-svn: 231980
There is a known bug where the register coalescer fails to merge
subranges when multiple ranges end up in the "overflow" bit 32 of the
lanemasks. A proper fix for this is complicated so for now this is a
workaround which lets the register coalescer drop the subregister
liveness information (we just loose some precision by that) and
continue.
llvm-svn: 231186
We cannot simply rematerialize instructions which only defining a
subregister, as the final value also depends on the previous
instructions.
This fixes test/CodeGen/R600/subreg-coalescer-bug.ll with subreg
liveness enabled.
llvm-svn: 229444
IMPLICIT_DEF is a generic instruction and has no (fixed) output register
class defined. The rematerialization code of the register coalescer
should not scan the instruction description for a register class.
This fixes a problem showing up in
test/CodeGen/R600/subreg-coalescer-crash.ll with subregister liveness
enabled.
llvm-svn: 229443
The previous fix in r225503 was needlessly complicated. The problem goes
away as well if the arguments to MergeValueNumberInto are supplied in the
correct order.
This was previously missed because the existing code already had the
wrong order but an additional later Merge was hiding the bug for the
main liverange VNI.
llvm-svn: 229424
This cleans up code and is more in line with the general philosophy of
modifying LiveIntervals through LiveIntervalAnalysis instead of changing
them directly.
This also fixes a case where SplitEditor::removeBackCopies() would miss
the subregister ranges.
llvm-svn: 226690
This cleans up code and is more in line with the general philosophy of
modifying LiveIntervals through LiveIntervalAnalysis instead of changing
them directly.
llvm-svn: 226687
- Consistenly put comments above the function declaration, not the
definition. To achieve this some duplicate comments got merged and
some comment parts describing implementation details got moved into their
functions.
- Consistently use doxygen comments above functions.
- Do not use doxygen comments inside functions.
llvm-svn: 226351
Reapply r226071 with fixes. Two fixes:
1. We need to manually remove the old and create the new 'deaf defs'
associated with physical register definitions when we move the definition of
the physical register from the copy point to the point of the original vreg def.
This problem was picked up by the machinstr verifier, and could trigger a
verification failure on test/CodeGen/X86/2009-02-12-DebugInfoVLA.ll, so I've
turned on the verifier in the tests.
2. When moving the def point of the phys reg up, we need to make sure that it
is neither defined nor read in between the two instructions. We don't, however,
extend the live ranges of phys reg defs to cover uses, so just checking for
live-range overlap between the pair interval and the phys reg aliases won't
pick up reads. As a result, we manually iterate over the range and check for
reads.
A test soon to be committed to the PowerPC backend will test this change.
Original commit message:
[RegisterCoalescer] Remove copies to reserved registers
This allows the RegisterCoalescer to join "non-flipped" range pairs with a
physical destination register -- which allows the RegisterCoalescer to remove
copies like this:
<vreg> = something (maybe a load, for example)
... (things that don't use PHYSREG)
PHYSREG = COPY <vreg>
(with all of the restrictions normally applied by the RegisterCoalescer: having
compatible register classes, etc. )
Previously, the RegisterCoalescer handled only the opposite case (copying
*from* a physical register). I don't handle the problem fully here, but try to
get the common case where there is only one use of <vreg> (the COPY).
An upcoming commit to the PowerPC backend will make this pattern much more
common on PPC64/ELF systems.
llvm-svn: 226200
Reverting this while I investigate some bad behavior this is causing. As a
possibly-related issue, adding -verify-machineinstrs to one of the test cases
now fails because of this change:
llc test/CodeGen/X86/2009-02-12-DebugInfoVLA.ll -march=x86-64 -o - -verify-machineinstrs
*** Bad machine code: No instruction at def index ***
- function: foo
- basic block: BB#0 return (0x10007e21f10) [0B;736B)
- liverange: [128r,128d:9)[160r,160d:8)[176r,176d:7)[336r,336d:6)[464r,464d:5)[480r,480d:4)[624r,624d:3)[752r,752d:2)[768r,768d:1)[78
4r,784d:0) 0@784r 1@768r 2@752r 3@624r 4@480r 5@464r 6@336r 7@176r 8@160r 9@128r
- register: %DS
Valno #3 is defined at 624r
*** Bad machine code: Live segment doesn't end at a valid instruction ***
- function: foo
- basic block: BB#0 return (0x10007e21f10) [0B;736B)
- liverange: [128r,128d:9)[160r,160d:8)[176r,176d:7)[336r,336d:6)[464r,464d:5)[480r,480d:4)[624r,624d:3)[752r,752d:2)[768r,768d:1)[78
4r,784d:0) 0@784r 1@768r 2@752r 3@624r 4@480r 5@464r 6@336r 7@176r 8@160r 9@128r
- register: %DS
[624r,624d:3)
LLVM ERROR: Found 2 machine code errors.
where 624r corresponds exactly to the interval combining change:
624B %RSP<def> = COPY %vreg16; GR64:%vreg16
Considering merging %vreg16 with %RSP
RHS = %vreg16 [608r,624r:0) 0@608r
updated: 608B %RSP<def> = MOV64rm <fi#3>, 1, %noreg, 0, %noreg; mem:LD8[%saved_stack.1]
Success: %vreg16 -> %RSP
Result = %RSP
llvm-svn: 226086
This allows the RegisterCoalescer to join "non-flipped" range pairs with a
physical destination register -- which allows the RegisterCoalescer to remove
copies like this:
<vreg> = something (maybe a load, for example)
... (things that don't use PHYSREG)
PHYSREG = COPY <vreg>
(with all of the restrictions normally applied by the RegisterCoalescer: having
compatible register classes, etc. )
Previously, the RegisterCoalescer handled only the opposite case (copying
*from* a physical register). I don't handle the problem fully here, but try to
get the common case where there is only one use of <vreg> (the COPY).
An upcoming commit to the PowerPC backend will make this pattern much more
common on PPC64/ELF systems.
llvm-svn: 226071
utils/sort_includes.py.
I clearly haven't done this in a while, so more changed than usual. This
even uncovered a missing include from the InstrProf library that I've
added. No functionality changed here, just mechanical cleanup of the
include order.
llvm-svn: 225974
This is a fixed version of reverted r225500. It fixes the too early
if() continue; of the last patch and adds a comment to the unorthodox
loop.
llvm-svn: 225652
The code that eliminated additional coalescable copies in
removeCopyByCommutingDef() used MergeValueNumberInto() which internally
may merge A into B or B into A. In this case A and B had different Def
points, so we have to reset ValNo.Def to the intended one after merging.
llvm-svn: 225503
The register coalescer used to remove implicit_defs when they are
covered by the main range anyway. With subreg liveness tracking we can't
do that anymore in places where the IMPLICIT_DEF is required as begin of
a subregister liverange.
llvm-svn: 225416
I got confused and assumed SrcIdx/DstIdx of the CoalescerPair is a
subregister index in SrcReg/DstReg, but they are actually subregister
indices of the coalesced register that get you back to SrcReg/DstReg
when applied.
Fixed the bug, improved comments and simplified code accordingly.
Testcase by Tom Stellard!
llvm-svn: 225415
This also fixes problems with undef copies of subregisters. I can't
attach a testcase for that as none of the targets in trunk has
subregister liveness tracking enabled.
llvm-svn: 224560
This fixes a problem where stripCopies() would switch to values in the
main liverange when it crossed a copy instruction. However when joining
subranges we need to stay in the respective subregister ranges.
llvm-svn: 224461