I foresee two uses for this:
1) It's easier to use those in debugger.
2) Once we start implementing more VPlan-to-VPlan transformations (especially
inner loop massaging stuff), using the vectorized LLVM IR as CHECK targets in
LIT test would become too obscure. I can imagine that we'd want to CHECK
against VPlan dumps after multiple transformations instead. That would be
easier with plain text dumps than with DOT format.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96628
This reverts commit 6b053c9867a3ede32e51cef3ed972d5ce5b38bc0.
The build is broken:
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: llvm::VPlan::printDOT(llvm::raw_ostream&) const
>>> referenced by LoopVectorize.cpp
>>> LoopVectorize.cpp.o:(llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::printPlans(llvm::raw_ostream&)) in archive lib/libLLVMVectorize.a
I foresee two uses for this:
1) It's easier to use those in debugger.
2) Once we start implementing more VPlan-to-VPlan transformations (especially
inner loop massaging stuff), using the vectorized LLVM IR as CHECK targets in
LIT test would become too obscure. I can imagine that we'd want to CHECK
against VPlan dumps after multiple transformations instead. That would be
easier with plain text dumps than with DOT format.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96628
BasicAA stores a reference to LoopInfo inside. This imposes an implicit
requirement of keeping it up to date whenever we modify the IR (in particular,
whenever we modify terminators of blocks that belong to loops). Failing
to do so leads to incorrect state of the LoopInfo.
Because general AA does not require loop info updates and provides to API to
update it properly, the users of AA reasonably assume that there is no need to
update the loop info. It may be a reason of bugs, as example in PR43276 shows.
This patch drops dependence of BasicAA on LoopInfo to avoid this problem.
This may potentially pessimize the result of queries to BasicAA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98627
Reviewed By: nikic
Add support to widen select instructions in VPlan native path by using a correct recipe when such instructions are encountered. This is already used by inner loop vectorizer.
Previously select instructions get handled by the wrong recipe and resulted in unreachable instruction errors like this one: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48139.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97136
The individual recipes have been updated to manage their operands using
VPUser a while back. Now that the transition is done, we can instead
make VPRecipeBase a VPUser and get rid of the toVPUser helper.
I am trying to untangle the fast-math-flags propagation logic
in the vectorizers (see a6f022127 for SLP).
The loop vectorizer has a mix of checking FP function attributes,
IR-level FMF, and just wrong assumptions.
I am trying to avoid regressions while fixing this, and I think
the IR-level logic is good enough for that, but it's hard to say
for sure. This would be the 1st step in the clean-up.
The existing test that I changed to include 'fast' actually shows
a miscompile: the function only had the equivalent of nnan, but we
created new instructions that had fast (all FMF set). This is
similar to the example in https://llvm.org/PR35538
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95452
This patch unifies the way recipes and VPValues are printed after the
transition to VPDef.
VPSlotTracker has been updated to iterate over all recipes and all
their defined values to number those. There is no need to number
values in Value2VPValue.
It also updates a few places that only used slot numbers for
VPInstruction. All recipes now can produce numbered VPValues.
The new test case here contains a first order recurrences and an
instruction that is replicated. The first order recurrence forces an
instruction to be sunk _into_, as opposed to after the replication
region. That causes several things to go wrong including registering
vector instructions multiple times and failing to create dominance
relations correctly.
Instead we should be sinking to after the replication region, which is
what this patch makes sure happens.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93629
This patch makes VPRecipeBase a direct subclass of VPDef, moving the
SubclassID to VPDef.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90564
This patch turns updates VPInterleaveRecipe to manage the values it defines
using VPDef. The VPValue is used during VPlan construction and
codegeneration instead of the plain IR reference where possible.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90562
1. Removed #include "...AliasAnalysis.h" in other headers and modules.
2. Cleaned up includes in AliasAnalysis.h.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92489
Interleave groups also depend on the values they store. Manage the
stored values as VPUser operands. This is currently a NFC, but is
required to allow VPlan transforms and to manage generated vector values
exclusively in VPTransformState.
This is a follow-up to 00a66011366c7b037d6680e6015524a41b761c34 to make
isa<VPReductionRecipe> work and unifies the VPValue ID names, by making
sure they all consistently start with VPV*.
This patch introduces a new VPDef class, which can be used to
manage VPValues defined by recipes/VPInstructions.
The idea here is to mirror VPUser for values defined by a recipe. A
VPDef can produce either zero (e.g. a store recipe), one (most recipes)
or multiple (VPInterleaveRecipe) result VPValues.
To traverse the def-use chain from a VPDef to its users, one has to
traverse the users of all values defined by a VPDef.
VPValues now contain a pointer to their corresponding VPDef, if one
exists. To traverse the def-use chain upwards from a VPValue, we first
need to check if the VPValue is defined by a VPDef. If it does not have
a VPDef, this means we have a VPValue that is not directly defined
iniside the plan and we are done.
If we have a VPDef, it is defined inside the region by a recipe, which
is a VPUser, and the upwards def-use chain traversal continues by
traversing all its operands.
Note that we need to add an additional field to to VPVAlue to link them
to their defs. The space increase is going to be offset by being able to
remove the SubclassID field in future patches.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90558
Update the code responsible for deleting VPBBs and recipes to properly
update users and release operands.
This is another preparation for D84680 & following patches towards
enabling modeling def-use chains in VPlan.
This adds a helper to convert a VPRecipeBase pointer to a VPUser, for
recipes that inherit from VPUser. Once VPRecipeBase directly inherits
from VPUser this helper can be removed.
When updating operands of a VPUser, we also have to adjust the list of
users for the new and old VPValues. This is required once we start
transitioning recipes to become VPValues.
Now that VPUser is not inheriting from VPValue, we can take the next
step and turn the recipes that already manage their operands via VPUser
into VPUsers directly. This is another small step towards traversing
def-use chains in VPlan.
This is NFC with respect to the generated code, but makes the interface
more powerful.
This is a speculative fix to silence the spurious C4129 warning that
some version of MSVC generate for the raw string literals in the changed
files.
Before disabling the warning (D76428), try a potential fix suggested in
the review.
This patch changes VPWidenRecipe to only store a single original IR
instruction. This is the first required step towards modeling it's
operands as VPValues and also towards breaking it up into a
VPInstruction.
Discussed as part of D74695.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76988
The latest improvements to VPValue printing make this mapping clear when
printing the operand. Printing the mapping separately is not required
any longer.
Reviewers: rengolin, hsaito, Ayal, gilr
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76375
When the an underlying value is available, we can use its name for
printing, as discussed in D73078.
Reviewers: rengolin, hsaito, Ayal, gilr
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76200
Currently when printing VPValues we use the object address, which makes
it hard to distinguish VPValues as they usually are large numbers with
varying distance between them.
This patch adds a simple slot tracker, similar to the ModuleSlotTracker
used for IR values. In order to dump a VPValue or anything containing a
VPValue, a slot tracker for the enclosing VPlan needs to be created. The
existing VPlanPrinter can take care of that for the existing code. We
assign consecutive numbers to each VPValue we encounter in a reverse
post order traversal of the VPlan.
Reviewers: rengolin, hsaito, fhahn, Ayal, dorit, gilr
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73078
This patch adds a getPlan accessor to VPBlockBase, which finds the entry
block of the plan containing the block and returns the plan set for this
block.
VPBlockBase contains a VPlan pointer, but it should only be set for
the entry block of a plan. This allows moving blocks without updating
the pointer for each moved block and in the future we might introduce a
parent relationship between plans and blocks, similar to the one in LLVM IR.
Reviewers: rengolin, hsaito, fhahn, Ayal, dorit, gilr
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74445
getReductionVars, getInductionVars and getFirstOrderRecurrences were all
being returned from LoopVectorizationLegality as pointers to lists. This
just changes them to be references, cleaning up the interface slightly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75448
The file is intended to gather various VPlan transformations, not only
CFG related transforms. Actually, the only transformation there is not
CFG related.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, hsaito, rengolin
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70732
InnerLoopVectorizer's code called during VPlan execution still relies on
original IR's def-use relations to decide which vector code to generate,
limiting VPlan transformations ability to modify def-use relations and still
have ILV generate the vector code.
This commit moves GEP operand queries controlling how GEPs are widened to a
dedicated recipe and extracts GEP widening code to its own ILV method taking
those recorded decisions as arguments. This reduces ingredient def-use usage by
ILV as a step towards full VPlan-based def-use relations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69067
This recommits 11ed1c0239fd51fd2f064311dc7725277ed0a994 (reverted in
9f08ce0d2197d4f163dfa4633eae2347ce8fc881 for failing an assert) with a fix:
tryToWidenMemory() now first checks if the widening decision is to interleave,
thus maintaining previous behavior where tryToInterleaveMemory() was called
first, giving priority to interleave decisions over widening/scalarization. This
commit adds the test case that exposed this bug as a LIT.
This recommits 100e797adb433724a17c9b42b6533cd634cb796b (reverted in
009e032634b3bd7fc32071ac2344b12142286477 for failing an assert). While the
root cause was independently reverted in eaff3004019f97c64c88ab76da6b25106b659b30,
this commit includes a LIT to make sure IVDescriptor's SinkAfter logic does not
try to sink branch instructions.
This recommits 2be17087f8c38934b7fc9208ae6cf4e9b4d44f4b (reverted in
d3ec06d219788801380af1948c7f7ef9d3c6100b for heap-use-after-free) with a fix
in IAI's reset() which was not clearing the set of interleave groups after
deleting them.
The sink-after and interleave-group vectorization decisions were so far applied to
VPlan during initial VPlan construction, which complicates VPlan construction – also because of
their inter-dependence. This patch refactors buildVPlanWithRecipes() to construct a simpler
initial VPlan and later apply both these vectorization decisions, in order, as VPlan-to-VPlan
transformations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68577
This patch adds a moveAfter method to VPRecipeBase, which can be used to
move elements after other elements, across VPBasicBlocks, if necessary.
Reviewers: dcaballe, hsaito, rengolin, hfinkel
Reviewed By: dcaballe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46825
llvm-svn: 374565
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
VPlan-native path
Context: Patch Series #2 for outer loop vectorization support in LV
using VPlan. (RFC:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119523.html).
Patch series #2 checks that inner loops are still trivially lock-step
among all vector elements. Non-loop branches are blindly assumed as
divergent.
Changes here implement VPlan based predication algorithm to compute
predicates for blocks that need predication. Predicates are computed
for the VPLoop region in reverse post order. A block's predicate is
computed as OR of the masks of all incoming edges. The mask for an
incoming edge is computed as AND of predecessor block's predicate and
either predecessor's Condition bit or NOT(Condition bit) depending on
whether the edge from predecessor block to the current block is true
or false edge.
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, hsaito, dcaballe
Reviewed By: fhahn
Patch by Satish Guggilla, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53349
llvm-svn: 351990
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch adds an initial implementation of the look-ahead SLP tree
construction described in 'Look-Ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the Presence
of Commutative Operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
Luís F. W. Góes'.
It returns an SLP tree represented as VPInstructions, with combined
instructions represented as a single, wider VPInstruction.
This initial version does not support instructions with multiple
different users (either inside or outside the SLP tree) or
non-instruction operands; it won't generate any shuffles or
insertelement instructions.
It also just adds the analysis that builds an SLP tree rooted in a set
of stores. It does not include any cost modeling or memory legality
checks. The plan is to integrate it with VPlan based cost modeling, once
available and to only apply it to operations that can be widened.
A follow-up patch will add a support for replacing instructions in a
VPlan with their SLP counter parts.
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, hsaito, dcaballe, vporpo, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4949
llvm-svn: 346857
The patch introduces loop analysis (VPLoopInfo/VPLoop) for VPBlockBases.
This analysis will be necessary to perform some H-CFG transformations and
detect and introduce regions representing a loop in the H-CFG.
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, mssimpso
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48816
llvm-svn: 338346
The patch introduces dominator analysis for VPBlockBases and extend
VPlan's GraphTraits specialization with the required interfaces. Dominator
analysis will be necessary to perform some H-CFG transformations and
to introduce VPLoopInfo (LoopInfo analysis on top of the VPlan representation).
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, mssimpso
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48815
llvm-svn: 338310
Memory leaks in tests.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/6289/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio
Direct leak of 192 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x554ea8 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:106
#1 0x56cef1 in llvm::VPlanTestBase::doAnalysis(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTestBase.h:53:14
#2 0x56bec4 in llvm::VPlanTestBase::buildHCFG(llvm::BasicBlock*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTestBase.h:57:3
#3 0x571f1e in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::VPlanHCFGTest_testVPInstructionToVPRecipesInner_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanHCFGTest.cpp:119:15
#4 0xed2291 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#5 0xed44c8 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
#6 0xed5890 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
#7 0xef3634 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
#8 0xef27e0 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#9 0xebbc23 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
#10 0xebbc23 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:51
#11 0x7f65569592e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
and more.
llvm-svn: 336718
