Provide special isLoadFromStackSlotPostFE and isStoreToStackSlotPostFE
interfaces to explicitly request checking for post-frame ptr elimination
operands. This uses a heuristic so it isn't reliable for correctness.
llvm-svn: 87047
machine instruction loads or stores from/to a stack slot. Unlike
isLoadFromStackSlot and isStoreFromStackSlot, the instruction may be
something other than a pure load/store (e.g. it may be an arithmetic
operation with a memory operand). This helps AsmPrinter determine when
to print a spill/reload comment.
This is only a hint since we may not be able to figure this out in all
cases. As such, it should not be relied upon for correctness.
Implement for X86. Return false by default for other architectures.
llvm-svn: 87026
and don't assume that the call doesn't throw. It would be nice if there were a
way to determine which is the callee and which is a parameter. In practice, the
architecture we care about normally only have one operand for a call instruction
(x86 and arm).
llvm-svn: 87023
slots. The AsmPrinter will use this information to determine whether to
print a spill/reload comment.
Remove default argument values. It's too easy to pass a wrong argument
value when multiple arguments have default values. Make everything
explicit to trap bugs early.
Update all targets to adhere to the new interfaces..
llvm-svn: 87022
making it visible to clients and adding LLVM-style cast capability.
This will be used by AsmPrinter to determine when to emit spill comments
for an instruction.
llvm-svn: 87019
running IPSCCP early, and we run functionattrs interlaced with the inliner,
we often (particularly for small or noop functions) completely propagate
all of the information about a call to its call site in IPSSCP (making a call
dead) and functionattrs is smart enough to realize that the function is
readonly (because it is interlaced with inliner).
To improve compile time and make the inliner threshold more accurate, realize
that we don't have to inline dead readonly function calls. Instead, just
delete the call. This happens all the time for C++ codes, here are some
counters from opt/llvm-ld counting the number of times calls were deleted vs
inlined on various apps:
Tramp3d opt:
5033 inline - Number of call sites deleted, not inlined
24596 inline - Number of functions inlined
llvm-ld:
667 inline - Number of functions deleted because all callers found
699 inline - Number of functions inlined
483.xalancbmk opt:
8096 inline - Number of call sites deleted, not inlined
62528 inline - Number of functions inlined
llvm-ld:
217 inline - Number of allocas merged together
2158 inline - Number of functions inlined
471.omnetpp:
331 inline - Number of call sites deleted, not inlined
8981 inline - Number of functions inlined
llvm-ld:
171 inline - Number of functions deleted because all callers found
629 inline - Number of functions inlined
Deleting a call is much faster than inlining it, and is insensitive to the
size of the callee. :)
llvm-svn: 86975
cannot be folded into target cmp instruction.
- Avoid a phase ordering issue where early cmp optimization would prevent the
later count-to-zero optimization.
- Add missing checks which could cause LSR to reuse stride that does not have
users.
- Fix a bug in count-to-zero optimization code which failed to find the pre-inc
iv's phi node.
- Remove, tighten, loosen some incorrect checks disable valid transformations.
- Quite a bit of code clean up.
llvm-svn: 86969
