IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.
At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle
Default or if has already been mapped to a concrete value. In this
case in particular, only the target can do the mapping and it is nice
to make sure it is always done.
This deletes the two default enum values of CodeModel and uses an
explicit Optional<CodeModel> when it is possible that it is
unspecified.
llvm-svn: 309911
This patch is update after the first patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/rL309651) based on the post-commit comments.
Stack coloring pass need to maintain AliasAnalysis information when merging stack slots of different types.
Actually, there is a FIXME comment in StackColoring.cpp
// FIXME: In order to enable the use of TBAA when using AA in CodeGen,
// we'll also need to update the TBAA nodes in MMOs with values
// derived from the merged allocas.
But, TBAA has been already enabled in CodeGen without fixing this pass.
The incorrect TBAA metadata results in recent failures in bootstrap test on ppc64le (PR33928) by allowing unsafe instruction scheduling.
Although we observed the problem on ppc64le, this is a platform neutral issue.
This patch makes the stack coloring pass maintains AliasAnalysis information when merging multiple stack slots.
This patch fixes PR33928.
llvm-svn: 309849
During store merge we construct a sorted list of consecutive store
candidates and consider subsequences for merging into a single
store. For each subsequence we check if the stored value type is legal
the merged store would have valid and fast and if the constructed
value to be stored is valid. The only properties that affect this
check between subsequences is the size of the subsequence, the
alignment of the first store, the alignment of the stored load value
(when merging stores-of-loads), and whether the merged value is a
constant zero.
If we do not find a viable mergeable subsequence starting from the
first store of length N, we know that a subsequence starting at a
later store of length N will also fail unless the new store's
alignment, the new load's alignment (if we're merging store-of-loads),
or we've dropped stores of nonzero value and could construct a merged
stores of zero (for merging constants).
As a result if we fail to find a valid subsequence starting from the
first store we can safely skip considering subsequences that start
with subsequent stores unless one of the above properties is
true. This significantly (2x) improves compile time in some
pathological cases.
Reviewers: RKSimon, efriedma, zvi, spatel, waltl
Subscribers: grandinj, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35901
llvm-svn: 309830
This should enable us to test the generation of target-specific constant
pools, e.g. for ARM:
constants:
- id: 0
value: 'g(GOT_PREL)-(LPC0+8-.)'
alignment: 4
isTargetSpecific: true
I intend to use this to test PIC support in GlobalISel for ARM.
This is difficult to test outside of that context, since the existing
MIR tests usually rely on parser support as well, and that seems a bit
trickier to add. We could try to add a unit test, but the setup for that
seems rather convoluted and overkill.
We do test however that the parser reports a nice error when
encountering a target-specific constant pool.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36092
llvm-svn: 309806
This pattern shows up when lowering byval copies on AMDGPU.
The byval object access is split into 4-byte chunks, adding a
constant offset to the FixedStack base. When some of the offsets
turn into ors, this prevents combining the constant offsets.
This makes it not apparent that the object is there when matching
addressing modes, so it ends up using a scratch wave offset
relative access and the lengthy frame index expansion for that.
llvm-svn: 309775
instead of using the deprecated offset field of DBG_VALUE.
This has no observable effect on the generated DWARF, but the
assembler comments will look different.
rdar://problem/33580047
llvm-svn: 309773
In the last half-dozen commits to LLVM I removed code that became dead
after removing the offset parameter from llvm.dbg.value gradually
proceeding from IR towards the backend. Before I can move on to
DwarfDebug and friends there is one last side-called offset I need to
remove: This patch modifies PrologEpilogInserter's use of the
DBG_VALUE's offset argument to use a DIExpression instead. Because the
PrologEpilogInserter runs at the Machine level I had to play a little
trick with a named llvm.dbg.mir node to get the DIExpressions to print
in MIR dumps (which print the llvm::Module followed by the
MachineFunction dump).
I also had to add rudimentary DwarfExpression support to CodeView and
as a side-effect also fixed a bug (CodeViewDebug::collectVariableInfo
was supposed to give up on variables with complex DIExpressions, but
would fail to do so for fragments, which are also modeled as
DIExpressions).
With this last holdover removed we will have only one canonical way of
representing offsets to debug locations which will simplify the code
in DwarfDebug (and future versions of CodeViewDebug once it starts
handling more complex expressions) and make it easier to reason about.
This patch is NFC-ish: All test case changes are for assembler
comments and the binary output does not change.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36125
llvm-svn: 309751
Summary:
We already have information about static alloca stack locations in our
side table. Emitting instructions for them is inefficient, and it only
happens when the address of the alloca has been materialized within the
current block, which isn't often.
Reviewers: aprantl, probinson, dblaikie
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, llvm-commits, aheejin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36117
llvm-svn: 309729
Summary:
FEntryInserter pass unconditionally derefs the first Instruction
in the first Basic Block. The pass crashes when the first
BasicBlock is empty. Fix the crash by not dereferencing the basic
Block iterator. This fixes an issue observed when building Linux kernel
4.4 with clang.
Fixes PR33971.
Reviewers: hfinkel, niravd, dblaikie
Reviewed By: niravd
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35979
llvm-svn: 309694
Stack coloring pass need to maintain AliasAnalysis information when merging stack slots of different types.
Actually, there is a FIXME comment in StackColoring.cpp
// FIXME: In order to enable the use of TBAA when using AA in CodeGen,
// we'll also need to update the TBAA nodes in MMOs with values
// derived from the merged allocas.
But, TBAA has been already enabled in CodeGen without fixing this pass.
The incorrect TBAA metadata results in recent failures in bootstrap test on ppc64le (PR33928) by allowing unsafe instruction scheduling.
Although we observed the problem on ppc64le, this is a platform neutral issue.
This patch makes the stack coloring pass maintains AliasAnalysis information when merging multiple stack slots.
llvm-svn: 309651
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31536 didn't really solve the problem it was
trying to solve; it got rid of the assertion failure, but we were still
scheduling the DAG incorrectly (mixing together instructions from
different calls), leading to a MachineVerifier failure.
In order to schedule the DAG correctly, we have to make sure we don't
schedule a node which should be blocked by an interference. Fix
ScheduleDAGRRList::PickNodeToScheduleBottomUp so it doesn't pick a node
like that.
The added call to FindAvailableNode() is the key change here; this makes
sure we don't try to schedule a call while we're in the middle of
scheduling a different call. I'm not sure this is the right approach; in
particular, I'm not sure how to prove we don't end up with an infinite
loop of repeatedly backtracking.
This also reverts the code change from D31536. It doesn't do anything
useful: we should never schedule an ADJCALLSTACKDOWN unless we've
already scheduled the corresponding ADJCALLSTACKUP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33818
llvm-svn: 309642
Chromium's gold build seems to have trouble with this (gold produces
errors) - not sure if it's gold that's not coping with the valid
representation, or a bug in the implementation in LLVM, etc.
llvm-svn: 309630
When the first instruction of a basic block has no location (consider a
LEA materializing the address of an alloca for a call), we want to start
the line table for the block with the first valid source location in the
block. We need to ignore DBG_VALUE instructions during this scan to get
decent line tables.
llvm-svn: 309628
This patch refactors the code used in llc such that all the users of the
addPassesToEmitFile API have access to a homogeneous way of handling
start/stop-after/before options right out of the box.
In particular, just invoking addPassesToEmitFile will set the proper
pipeline without additional effort (modulo parsing a .mir file if the
start-before/after options are used.
NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30913
llvm-svn: 309599
As noted in the code comment, transforming this in the other direction might require
a separate transform here in CGP given the block-at-a-time DAG constraint.
Besides that theoretical motivation, there are 2 practical motivations for the
subtract-of-cmps form:
1. The codegen for both x86 and PPC is better for this IR (though PPC could be better still).
There is discussion about canonicalizing IR to the select form
( http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/114885.html ),
so we probably need to add DAG transforms for those patterns anyway, but this improves the
memcmp output without waiting for that step.
2. If we allow vector-sized chunks for the load and compare, x86 is better prepared to convert
that to optimal code when using subtract-of-cmps, so another prerequisite patch is avoided
if we choose to enable that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34904
llvm-svn: 309597
PR33883 shows that calls to intrinsic functions should not have their vector
arguments or returns subject to ABI changes required by the target.
This resolves PR33883.
Thanks to Alex Crichton for reporting the issue!
Reviewers: zoran.jovanovic, atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35765
llvm-svn: 309561
Summary:
Since r293359, most dump() function are only defined when
`!defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)` holds. print() functions
only used by dump() functions are now unused in release builds,
generating lots of warnings. This patch only defines some print()
functions if they are used.
Reviewers: MatzeB
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: arsenm, mzolotukhin, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35949
llvm-svn: 309553
Missed the resetting base address selections when going from a base
address version to zero base address for non-base-addressed entries.
llvm-svn: 309529
(from comments in the test)
Group ranges in a range list that apply to the same section and use a base
address selection entry to reduce the number of relocations to one reloc per
section per range list. DWARF5 debug_rnglist will be more efficient than this
in terms of relocations, but it's still better than one reloc per entry in a
range list.
This is an object/executable size tradeoff - shrinking objects, but growing
the linked executable. In one large binary tested, total object size (not just
debug info) shrank by 16%, entirely relocation entries. Linked executable
grew by 4%. This was with compressed debug info in the objects, uncompressed
in the linked executable. Without compression in the objects, the win would be
smaller (the growth of debug_ranges itself would be more significant).
llvm-svn: 309526
This patch is in 2 parts:
1 - replace combineBT's use of SimplifyDemandedBits (hasOneUse only) with SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits to more aggressively determine the lower bits used by BT.
2 - update SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits to support ANY_EXTEND - if the demanded bits are only in the non-extended portion, then peek through and demand from the source value and then ANY_EXTEND that if we found a match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35896
llvm-svn: 309486
This commit
- Removes IsTailCall and replaces it with a target-defined unsigned
- Refactors getOutliningCallOverhead and getOutliningFrameOverhead so that they don't use IsTailCall
- Adds a call class + frame class classification to OutlinedFunction and Candidate respectively
This accomplishes a couple things.
Firstly, we don't need the notion of *tail call* in the general outlining algorithm.
Secondly, we now can have different "outlining classes" for each candidate within a set of candidates.
This will make it easy to add new ways to outline sequences for certain targets and dynamically choose
an appropriate cost model for a sequence depending on the context that that sequence lives in.
Ultimately, this should get us closer to being able to do something like, say avoid saving the link
register when outlining AArch64 instructions.
llvm-svn: 309475
There is no situation where this rarely-used argument cannot be
substituted with a DIExpression and removing it allows us to simplify
the DWARF backend. Note that this patch does not yet remove any of
the newly dead code.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35951
llvm-svn: 309426
The conditional tail call logic did the wrong thing when both
destinations of a conditional branch were the same:
BB#1: derived from LLVM BB %entry
Live Ins: %EFLAGS
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#0
JE_1 <BB#5>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill>
JMP_1 <BB#5>
BB#5: derived from LLVM BB %sw.epilog
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#1
TCRETURNdi64 <ga:@mergeable_conditional_tailcall>, 0, ...
We would fold the JE_1 to a TCRETURNdi64cc, and then remove our BB#5
successor. Then BB#5 would be deleted as it had no predecessors, leaving
a dangling "JMP_1 <BB#5>" reference behind to cause assertions later.
This patch checks that both conditional branch destinations are
different before doing the transform. The standard branch folding logic
is able to remove both the JMP_1 and the JE_1, and for my test case we
end up forming a better conditional tail call later.
Fixes PR33980
llvm-svn: 309422
This is some more cleanup in preparation for some actual
functional changes. This splits getOutliningBenefit into
two cost functions: getOutliningCallOverhead and
getOutliningFrameOverhead. These functions return the
number of instructions that would be required to call
a specific function and the number of instructions
that would be required to construct a frame for a
specific funtion. The actual outlining benefit logic
is moved into the outliner, which calls these functions.
The goal of refactoring getOutliningBenefit is to:
- Get us closer to getting rid of the IsTailCall flag
- Further split up "target-specific" things and
"general algorithm" things
llvm-svn: 309356
This can come up in ThinLTO & wastes space & makes degenerate IR.
As per the added FIXME, ultimately, local imported entities should hang
off the function and that way the imported entity list on the CU can be
tested for emptiness like all the other CU lists.
(function-attached local imported entities are probably also the best
path forward for fixing how imported entities are handled both in
cross-module use (currently, while ThinLTO preserves the imported
entities, they would not get used at the imported inlined location -
only in the abstract origin that appears in the partial CU created by
the import (which isn't emitted under Fission due to cross-CU
limitations there)) and to reduce the number of points where imported
entities are emitted (they're currently emitted into every inlined
instance, concrete instance, and abstract origin - they should only go
in teh abstract origin if there is one, otherwise in the concrete
instance - but this requires lots of delayed handling and wiring up,
same as abstract variables & subprograms))
llvm-svn: 309354
