LICM can sink instructions that have uses inside the loop, as
long as these uses are considered "free". However, if there were
only free uses inside the loop, and no uses outside the loop at
all, the instruction would still count towards the NumSunk
statistic. This resulted in a wild inflation of the NumSunk metric.
After this patch it drops down from 1141787 to 5852 on test-suite O3.
FindAvailableLoadedValue() relies on FindAvailablePtrLoadStore() to run
the alias analysis when searching for an equivalent value. However,
FindAvailablePtrLoadStore() calls the alias analysis framework with a
memory location for the load constructed from an address and a size,
which thus lacks TBAA metadata info. This commit modifies
FindAvailablePtrLoadStore() to accept an optional memory location as
parameter to allow FindAvailableLoadedValue() to create it based on the
load instruction, which would then have TBAA metadata info attached.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99206
As reported here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48378#c0
and here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81051
since 79657e2339b58bc01fe1b85a448bb073d57d90bb, some programs such as llvm-ar
don't work properly on Windows 7.
The issue is shown in the snippet by Oleksandr Prodan:
https://pastebin.com/v51m3uBU
In essence, once the 'DeleteFile' flag has been set on FILE_DISPOSITION_INFO,
the file path can't be queried anymore with GetFinalPathNameByHandleW. This
however works on Windows 10, GetFinalPathNameByHandleW would return sucessfully.
To workaround the issue, we simply reset the 'DeleteFile' flag before even
checking if we're dealing with a network file.
Tested with `llvm-ar r empty.a a.obj` ran on a network mount. At the moment, we
cannot specifically add a test coverage for this, since it requres mounting a
network drive.
This UpperBound unrolling was already enabled so long as a series of
conditions in ARMTTIImpl::getUnrollingPreferences pass. This just always
enables it as it can help fully unroll loops that would not otherwise
pass those tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99174
This patch changes the interface to take a RegisterKind, to indicate
whether the register bitwidth of a scalar register, fixed-width vector
register, or scalable vector register must be returned.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98874
The VSelectCombine handler within AArch64ISelLowering,
uses an interface call which only expects fixed vectors.
This generates a warning when the call is made on a
scalable vector. This warning has been suppressed with this change,
by using the ElementCount interface, which supports both fixed and scalable vectors.
I have also added a regression test which recreates the warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98249
- https://reviews.llvm.org/rGb605cfb336989705f391d255b7628062d3dfe9c3 was reverted due to sanitizer bugs in the introduced unit-test (specifically in the Address sanitizer https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/5697)
- This patch attempts to rectify that, as well as re-factor parts of the test
- The issue was previously, within the `setupCallToAsmParser` function in the unit-test, `SrcMgr` was declared as a local variable. `SrcMgr` owns a unique pointer. Since the variable goes out of scope at the end of the function, the unique pointer is released.
- This patch, moves the declaration of the `SrcMgr` variable to a class field, since the scope will remain until the class's destructor is invoked (which in this case is at the end of the unit test)
- Furthermore, this patch also moves the `MCContext Ctx` declaration from a local variable instance inside a function, to a unique pointer class field. This ensures the instantiation of the MCContext remains until the tear down of the test.
Reviewed By: abhina.sreeskantharajan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99004
If we're truncating to vXi1 from a wider type, then prefer the original wider vector as is simplifies folding the separate truncations + extensions.
AVX1 this is only worth it for v8i1 cases, not v4i1 where we're always better off truncating down to v4i32 for movmsk.
Helps with some regressions encountered in D96609
Add an option to tell the compiler that it can use privileged instructions.
This patch only adds the option. Backend implementation will be added in a
future patch.
Reviewed By: lei, amyk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99193
The option `--prefix-strip` is only used when `--prefix` is not empty.
It removes N initial directories from absolute paths before adding the
prefix.
This matches GNU's objdump behavior.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96679
Summary:
Currently the OMPIRBuilder overwrites the function's existing attributes
when it assigns the ones defined in OMPKinds.def. This changes the
behaviour to append the current function's attributes with them instead.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98740
Prefer broadcast from scalar on AVX targets as this makes it easier for later folds to strip away bitcasts etc.
This helps a lot with the AVX1 poor codegen from PR49658.
There's a trivial regression in bitcast-int-to-vector-bool-*ext.ll tests due to SimplifyDemandedBits not being able to see a multi-use case, but there's bigger existing codegen issues to be addressed first in those tests (unnecessary NOTs).
Cleanup the gather_v8i32_v8i32 IR to more closely match how the middle-end will optimise the vector geps (exposing more splats).
This helps the gather scalarization case a lot, but shows a missed opportunity for AVX512 gathers to recognise uniform-constant indices.
And none of the cases realise that some of the gathers are really blended broadcasts....
Folding EXEC copy into it's single use may lead to constant bus constraint violation as it adds one more SGPR operand.
This change makes it validate the user instruction with the new SGPR operand and only fold it if it is legal.
Reviewed By: rampitec, arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98888
We know if the loop contains FP instructions preventing vectorization
after we are done with legality checks. This patch updates the code the
check for un-vectorizable FP operations earlier, to avoid unnecessarily
running the cost model and picking a vectorization factor. It also makes
the code more direct and moves the check to a position where similar
checks are done.
I might be missing something, but I don't see any reason to handle this
check differently to other, similar checks.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98633
This is a follow-up for:
D98604 [MCA] Ensure that writes occur in-order
When instructions are aligned by the order of writes, they retire
in-order naturally. There is no need for an RCU, so it is disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98628
In order to have the same option on power PC LLVM and power PC gcc
the option will be changed from -mrop-protection to -mrop-protect.
The feature will be off by default and turned on when the option is used.
Reviewed By: lei, amyk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99185
The `InductionPHI` is not necessarily the increment instruction, as
demonstrated in pr49571.ll.
This patch removes the assertion and instead bails out from the
`LoopFlatten` pass if that happens.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49571
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99252
XCore default subtarget does not support 8-byte stack alignment. These failures
can be seen on builder clang-xcore-ubuntu-20-x64 on staging buildbot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99092
This commit adds a full WasmTableType to MCSymbolWasm, differing from
the current situation (just an ElemType) in that it additionally records
a WasmLimits.
We add support for specifying the limits in .S files also, via the
following syntax variations:
.tabletype SYM, ELEMTYPE
.tabletype SYM, ELEMTYPE, MINSIZE
.tabletype SYM, ELEMTYPE, MINSIZE, MAXSIZE
Depends on D99186.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99191
This patch renames the "Initial" member of WasmLimits to the name used
in the spec, "Minimum".
In the core WebAssembly specification, the Limits data type has one
required "min" member and one optional "max" member, indicating the
minimum required size of the corresponding table or memory, and the
maximum size, if any.
Although the WebAssembly spec does instantiate locally-defined tables
and memories with the initial size being equal to the minimum size, it
can't impose such a requirement for imports. It doesn't make sense to
require an initial size for a memory import, for example. The compiler
can only sensibly express the minimum and maximum sizes.
See
https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-types/blob/master/proposals/js-types/Overview.md#naming-of-size-limits
for a related discussion that agrees that the right name of "initial" is
"minimum" when querying the type of a table or memory from JavaScript.
(Of course it still makes sense for JS to speak in terms of an initial
size when it explicitly instantiates memories and tables.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99186
Copysign from double and to double patterns have lack of HasStdExtD predicate.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99234
The original comment says the same thing twice, and does not mention that
edges entering the block are also in the same bundle (which seems true from
what the underlying code is doing).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99144
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Statepoint instruction is known to have a variable and big number of operands.
It is possible that Register Allocator will split live intervals in the way that all
physical registers are occupied by "zero-length" live intervals which are marked
as not-spillable.
While intervals are marked as not-spillable in the moment of creation when they are
really zero-length it is possible that in future as part of re-materialization there will
need for physical register between def and use of such tiny interval (the use is not
related to this interval at all).
As all physical registers are assigned to not-spillable intervals there is not avaialbe
registers and RA reports an error.
The idea of the fix is avoid marking tiny live intervals where there is a use in statepoint
instruction in var args section. Such interval may be perfectly spilled and folded to
operand of statepoint.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin, qcolombet, dsanders, dmgreen
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98766
None of the code in this function was written to handle
vectors. Most of the cases already fail for vectors for one
reason or another. The exception is an optimization that
detects identical operands. This can be triggered by vectors,
but the code always creates a 0 or 1 constants in a scalar
register which is incorrect for vectors.
Fixes PR49706.
The current implementation keeps buffers generated for each object file
until it completes loading of all files. This approach requires a lot of memory
if there are a lot of huge object files. Thus, make it to load coverage records
immediately rather than waiting for other binaries to be loaded.
This reduces memory usage of llvm-cov from >128GB to 5GB when
loading Chromium binaries in Windows.
Additional testing: check-profile, check-llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99110
This patch addresses the removal of register size information done in
commit c8b782c.
Without this change, there is no viable option to get register size
information outside libTarget. We need this information to run
analysis that know the register size from the MC layer, used by
BOLT.
Discussion D50285 and D47199.
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97891
As mentioned in [[ https://reviews.llvm.org/D96979 | D96979 ]], I'm extending the **IsGuaranteedLoopInvariant** check also to the `MemorySSA.cpp` file.
@fhahn For now I didn't unify the function into `MemorySSA.h` because, as you mentioned, it's not directly MSSA related. I'm open to suggestions to find a better place so we can improve the unification process.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97155
