When a field is optional we can use the `=<none>` syntax in macros.
This patch makes `Value`/`Size` fields of `Symbol` optional
and adds test cases for them.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93010
This was requested in comments for D93209:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93209#inline-871192
D93209 fixes an issue with `ELFFile<ELFT>::getEntry`,
after what `getSymbol` starts calling `report_fatal_error` for previously
missed invalid cases.
This patch makes it return `Expected<>` and updates callers.
For few of them I had to add new `report_fatal_error` calls. But I see no
way to avoid it currently. The change would affects too many places, e.g:
`getSymbolBinding` and other methods are used from `ELFSymbolRef`
which is used in too many places across LLVM.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93297
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45698.
Specification says that
"Loadable segment entries in the program header table appear
in ascending order, sorted on the p_vaddr member."
Our `toMappedAddr()` relies on this condition. This patch
adds a warning when the sorting order of loadable segments is wrong.
In this case we force segments sorting and that allows
`toMappedAddr()` to work as expected.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92641
Calling Instruction::copyFastMathFlags() assumes the caller is
FPMathOperator. Avoid calling the function for instructions
that are not instances of FPMathOperator.
I think the global_load/store_dword_addtid instructions support
switching off the scalar address.
Add assembler and disassembler support for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93288
If both flags created through BoolOption are CC1Option and the keypath has a non-default or non-implied value, the denormalizer gets called twice. If the denormalizer has the ability to generate both flags, we can end up generating the same flag twice.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith, Bigcheese
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93094
Separates link graph creation from linking. This allows raw LinkGraphs to be
created and passed to a link. ObjectLinkingLayer is updated to support emission
of raw LinkGraphs in addition to object buffers.
Raw LinkGraphs can be created by in-memory compilers to bypass object encoding /
decoding (though this prevents caching, as LinkGraphs have do not have an
on-disk representation), and by utility code to add programatically generated
data structures to the JIT target process.
Refine tablegen pattern for vector load/store, and follow
D93012 to separate masked and unmasked definitions for
pseudo load/store instructions.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93284
Given we haven't yet enabled multiple exiting blocks, this is currently non functional, but it's an obvious extension which cleans up a later patch.
I don't think this is worth review (as it's pretty obvious), if anyone disagrees, feel feel to revert or comment and I will.
There is a build error with gcc-5 [0], investigating now.
[0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D91980#2456526
This reverts commit a5a14cbe7f87e01882ecaa14df5d596cbf38823a.
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
The REX prefix is needed to allow linker relaxations: even if the
instruction we emit may not need it, the linker may change it to a
different instruction which does need it.
The `assumes` directive is an OpenMP 5.1 feature that allows the user to
provide assumptions to the optimizer. Assumptions can refer to
directives (`absent` and `contains` clauses), expressions (`holds`
clause), or generic properties (`no_openmp_routines`, `ext_ABCD`, ...).
The `assumes` spelling is used for assumptions in the global scope while
`assume` is used for executable contexts with an associated structured
block.
This patch only implements the global spellings. While clauses with
arguments are "accepted" by the parser, they will simply be ignored for
now. The implementation lowers the assumptions directly to the
`AssumptionAttr`.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91980
The OpenMP 5.1 assumptions `no_openmp` and `no_openmp_routines` allow us
to ignore calls that would otherwise prevent ICV tracking.
Once we track more ICVs we might need to distinguish the ones that could
be impacted even with `no_openmp_routines`.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92050
The `assume` attribute is a way to provide additional, arbitrary
information to the optimizer. For now, assumptions are restricted to
strings which will be accumulated for a function and emitted as comma
separated string function attribute. The key of the LLVM-IR function
attribute is `llvm.assume`. Similar to `llvm.assume` and
`__builtin_assume`, the `assume` attribute provides a user defined
assumption to the compiler.
A follow up patch will introduce an LLVM-core API to query the
assumptions attached to a function. We also expect to add more options,
e.g., expression arguments, to the `assume` attribute later on.
The `omp [begin] asssumes` pragma will leverage this attribute and
expose the functionality in the absence of OpenMP.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91979
Undef subranges are not present in the live range values, except when
they cross block boundaries. In this situation, a identity copy is
inside a loop, and one of the lanes is undefined. It only appears
alive inside the loop due to the copy. Once the copy was erased, it
would leave behind a segment inside the loop body with no
corresponding def anywhere in the program.
When RenameIndependentSubregs processed this dummy interval, it would
introduce a "Multiple connected components in live interval" verifier
error when IMPLICIT_DEFs were added to the other two blocks. I believe
there is a missing verifier check for this type of dummy interval.
I have found additional cases from the same fundamental problem in
other areas I haven't managed to fix yet (e.g. the commented out
prune_subrange_phi_value_* cases).
Define vfadd/vfsub/vfrsub intrinsics and lower to V instructions.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93291
Two observations:
1. Unavailability of DomTree makes it impossible to make
`FoldBranchToCommonDest()` transform in certain cases,
where the successor is dominated by predecessor,
because we then don't have PHI's, and can't recreate them,
well, without handrolling 'is dominated by' check,
which doesn't really look like a great solution to me.
2. Avoiding invalidating DomTree in SimplifyCFG will
decrease the number of `Dominator Tree Construction` by 5
(from 28 now, i.e. -18%) in `-O3` old-pm pipeline
(as per `llvm/test/Other/opt-O3-pipeline.ll`)
This might or might not be beneficial for compile time.
So the plan is to make SimplifyCFG preserve DomTree, and then
eventually make DomTree fully required and preserved by the pass.
Now, SimplifyCFG is ~7KLOC. I don't think it will be nice
to do all this uplifting in a single mega-commit,
nor would it be possible to review it in any meaningful way.
But, i believe, it should be possible to do this in smaller steps,
introducing the new behavior, in an optional way, off-by-default,
opt-in option, and gradually fixing transforms one-by-one
and adding the flag to appropriate test coverage.
Then, eventually, the default should be flipped,
and eventually^2 the flag removed.
And that is what is happening here - when the new off-by-default option
is specified, DomTree is required and is claimed to be preserved,
and SimplifyCFG-internal assertions verify that the DomTree is still OK.
This patch enables the Clang type __vector_pair and its associated LLVM
intrinsics even when MMA is disabled. With this patch, the type is now controlled
by the PPC paired-vector-memops option. The builtins and intrinsics will be
renamed to drop the mma prefix in another patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91819
This should be purely non-functional. When touching this code for another reason, I found the handling of the PredicateOrDontVectorize piece here very confusing. Let's make it an explicit state (instead of an implicit combination of two variables), and use early return for options/hint processing.
- Clarify documentation on initializing scratch.
- Rename compute_pgm_rsrc2 field for enabling scratch from
ENABLE_SGPR_PRIVATE_SEGMENT_WAVEFRONT_OFFSET to
ENABLE_PRIVATE_SEGMENT to match hardware definition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93271
Similar to D69312, and documented in D69839, the IRBuilder needs to add
the strictfp attribute to invoke instructions when constrained floating
point is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93134
ResultPtr is guaranteed to be non-null - and using dyn_cast_or_null causes unnecessary static analyzer warnings.
We can't say the same for FirstResult AFAICT, so keep dyn_cast_or_null for that.
The cmake variable LLVM_ENABLE_DIA_SDK was being used here but
was undefined because config.h wasn't included.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93309
