void bork() {
int *address = 0;
*address = 0;
}
It's compiled into LLVM code that looks like this:
define void @bork() noreturn nounwind {
entry:
unreachable
}
This is bad on some platforms (like PPC) because it will generate the label for
the function but no body. The label could end up being associated with some
non-code related stuff, like a section. This places a "trap" instruction if the
SimplifyCFG pass removed all code from the function leaving only one
"unreachable" instruction.
llvm-svn: 46387
delete a node even if it was not dead in some cases. Instead, just add it to
the worklist. Also, make sure to use the CombineTo methods, as it was doing
things that were unsafe: the top level combine loop could touch dangling memory.
This fixes CodeGen/Generic/2008-01-25-dag-combine-mul.ll
llvm-svn: 46384
was actually passing a completely incorrect size to sys_icache_invalidate.
Instead of having the JITEmitter do this (which doesn't have the correct
size), just make the target sync its own stubs.
llvm-svn: 46354
This case returns the value in ST(0) and then has to convert it to an SSE
register. This causes significant codegen ugliness in some cases. For
example in the trivial fp-stack-direct-ret.ll testcase we used to generate:
_bar:
subl $28, %esp
call L_foo$stub
fstpl 16(%esp)
movsd 16(%esp), %xmm0
movsd %xmm0, 8(%esp)
fldl 8(%esp)
addl $28, %esp
ret
because we move the result of foo() into an XMM register, then have to
move it back for the return of bar.
Instead of hacking ever-more special cases into the call result lowering code
we take a much simpler approach: on x86-32, fp return is modeled as always
returning into an f80 register which is then truncated to f32 or f64 as needed.
Similarly for a result, we model it as an extension to f80 + return.
This exposes the truncate and extensions to the dag combiner, allowing target
independent code to hack on them, eliminating them in this case. This gives
us this code for the example above:
_bar:
subl $12, %esp
call L_foo$stub
addl $12, %esp
ret
The nasty aspect of this is that these conversions are not legal, but we want
the second pass of dag combiner (post-legalize) to be able to hack on them.
To handle this, we lie to legalize and say they are legal, then custom expand
them on entry to the isel pass (PreprocessForFPConvert). This is gross, but
less gross than the code it is replacing :)
This also allows us to generate better code in several other cases. For
example on fp-stack-ret-conv.ll, we now generate:
_test:
subl $12, %esp
call L_foo$stub
fstps 8(%esp)
movl 16(%esp), %eax
cvtss2sd 8(%esp), %xmm0
movsd %xmm0, (%eax)
addl $12, %esp
ret
where before we produced (incidentally, the old bad code is identical to what
gcc produces):
_test:
subl $12, %esp
call L_foo$stub
fstpl (%esp)
cvtsd2ss (%esp), %xmm0
cvtss2sd %xmm0, %xmm0
movl 16(%esp), %eax
movsd %xmm0, (%eax)
addl $12, %esp
ret
Note that we generate slightly worse code on pr1505b.ll due to a scheduling
deficiency that is unrelated to this patch.
llvm-svn: 46307
1. we already know the value is dead, so don't bother replacing
it with undef.
2. The very case the comment describes actually makes the load
live which asserts in deletenode. If we do the replacement
and the node becomes live, just treat it as new. This fixes
a failure on X86/2008-01-16-InvalidDAGCombineXform.ll with
some local changes in my tree.
llvm-svn: 46306
dead stuff around. This gets fed into the isel pass and causes certain foldings from
happening because nodes have extraneous uses floating around. For example, if we turned
foo(bar(x)) -> baz(x), we sometimes left bar(x) around.
llvm-svn: 46305
precision integers. This won't actually work
(and most of the code is dead) unless the new
legalization machinery is turned on. While
there, I rationalized the handling of i1, and
removed some bogus (and unused) sextload patterns.
For i1, this could result in microscopically
better code for some architectures (not X86).
It might also result in worse code if annotating
with AssertZExt nodes turns out to be more harmful
than helpful.
llvm-svn: 46280
NDEBUG. This is in response to a really nasty bug I introduced that
Dale tracked down, hopefully this won't happen in the future.
Many thanks Dale.
llvm-svn: 46254
integers. Handle truncstore of a legal type to an unusual
number of bits. Most of this code is not reachable unless
the new legalize infrastructure is turned on.
llvm-svn: 46249
that return an opaque type by value, as long as you don't
call it or provide a body (you can take the address of it).
So it is wrong to insist that sret parameters not be an
opaque*. And I guess it is really up to codegen to complain
if someone tries to call such a function. I'm also removing
the analogous check from byval parameters, since I don't
see why we shouldn't allow them as long as no-one tries to
call the function or give it a body.
llvm-svn: 46216
