void bork() {
int *address = 0;
*address = 0;
}
It's compiled into LLVM code that looks like this:
define void @bork() noreturn nounwind {
entry:
unreachable
}
This is bad on some platforms (like PPC) because it will generate the label for
the function but no body. The label could end up being associated with some
non-code related stuff, like a section. This places a "trap" instruction if the
SimplifyCFG pass removed all code from the function leaving only one
"unreachable" instruction.
llvm-svn: 46387
delete a node even if it was not dead in some cases. Instead, just add it to
the worklist. Also, make sure to use the CombineTo methods, as it was doing
things that were unsafe: the top level combine loop could touch dangling memory.
This fixes CodeGen/Generic/2008-01-25-dag-combine-mul.ll
llvm-svn: 46384
was actually passing a completely incorrect size to sys_icache_invalidate.
Instead of having the JITEmitter do this (which doesn't have the correct
size), just make the target sync its own stubs.
llvm-svn: 46354
arrays. Also, as a convenience, don't barf, just
return false, if someone calls isTruncStoreLegal
or isLoadXLegal with an extended type for the in
memory type.
llvm-svn: 46352
APInt.
While some operators were already specifically overloaded for APSInt, others
resulted in using the overloaded operator methods in APInt, which would result
in the signedness bit being lost.
Modified the APSInt(APInt&) constructor to be "explicit" and to take an
extra (optional) flag to indicate the signedness. Making the ctor explicit
will catch any implicit conversations between APSInt -> APInt -> APSInt that
results in the signedness flag being lost.
llvm-svn: 46316
This case returns the value in ST(0) and then has to convert it to an SSE
register. This causes significant codegen ugliness in some cases. For
example in the trivial fp-stack-direct-ret.ll testcase we used to generate:
_bar:
subl $28, %esp
call L_foo$stub
fstpl 16(%esp)
movsd 16(%esp), %xmm0
movsd %xmm0, 8(%esp)
fldl 8(%esp)
addl $28, %esp
ret
because we move the result of foo() into an XMM register, then have to
move it back for the return of bar.
Instead of hacking ever-more special cases into the call result lowering code
we take a much simpler approach: on x86-32, fp return is modeled as always
returning into an f80 register which is then truncated to f32 or f64 as needed.
Similarly for a result, we model it as an extension to f80 + return.
This exposes the truncate and extensions to the dag combiner, allowing target
independent code to hack on them, eliminating them in this case. This gives
us this code for the example above:
_bar:
subl $12, %esp
call L_foo$stub
addl $12, %esp
ret
The nasty aspect of this is that these conversions are not legal, but we want
the second pass of dag combiner (post-legalize) to be able to hack on them.
To handle this, we lie to legalize and say they are legal, then custom expand
them on entry to the isel pass (PreprocessForFPConvert). This is gross, but
less gross than the code it is replacing :)
This also allows us to generate better code in several other cases. For
example on fp-stack-ret-conv.ll, we now generate:
_test:
subl $12, %esp
call L_foo$stub
fstps 8(%esp)
movl 16(%esp), %eax
cvtss2sd 8(%esp), %xmm0
movsd %xmm0, (%eax)
addl $12, %esp
ret
where before we produced (incidentally, the old bad code is identical to what
gcc produces):
_test:
subl $12, %esp
call L_foo$stub
fstpl (%esp)
cvtsd2ss (%esp), %xmm0
cvtss2sd %xmm0, %xmm0
movl 16(%esp), %eax
movsd %xmm0, (%eax)
addl $12, %esp
ret
Note that we generate slightly worse code on pr1505b.ll due to a scheduling
deficiency that is unrelated to this patch.
llvm-svn: 46307
1. we already know the value is dead, so don't bother replacing
it with undef.
2. The very case the comment describes actually makes the load
live which asserts in deletenode. If we do the replacement
and the node becomes live, just treat it as new. This fixes
a failure on X86/2008-01-16-InvalidDAGCombineXform.ll with
some local changes in my tree.
llvm-svn: 46306
dead stuff around. This gets fed into the isel pass and causes certain foldings from
happening because nodes have extraneous uses floating around. For example, if we turned
foo(bar(x)) -> baz(x), we sometimes left bar(x) around.
llvm-svn: 46305
