As noted in D34071, there are some IR optimization opportunities that could be
handled by normal IR passes if this expansion wasn't happening so late in CGP.
Regardless of that, it seems wasteful to knowingly produce suboptimal IR here,
so I'm proposing this change:
%s = sub i32 %x, %y
%r = icmp ne %s, 0
=>
%r = icmp ne %x, %y
Changing the predicate to 'eq' mimics what InstCombine would do, so that's just
an efficiency improvement if we decide this expansion should happen sooner.
The fact that the PowerPC backend doesn't eliminate the 'subf.' might be
something for PPC folks to investigate separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34416
llvm-svn: 306471
Without this check, COPY instructions can actually be one of the generic casts
in disguise. That's confusing and bad.
At some point during ISel this restriction has to be relaxed since the fully
selected instructions will usually use COPY for those purposes. Right now I
think it's possible that relaxation occurs during RegBankSelect (hence the
change there). I'm not convinced that's where it belongs long-term though.
llvm-svn: 306470
This patch enables significant performance enhancements to the
Cavium ThunderX2T99 LLVM backend, as observed by running SPEC2K6,
by adding more detailed scheduling information.
Related Bugzilla bug: http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32562
Patch by: steleman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31801
llvm-svn: 306462
The overal size of the data section (including BSS)
is otherwise not included in the wasm binary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34657
llvm-svn: 306459
The check to see if we can propagate the nsw flag used m_ConstantInt(uint64_t*&) which doesn't work with splat vectors and has a restriction that the bitwidth of the ConstantInt must be 64-bits are less.
This patch changes it to use m_APInt to remove both these issues
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34699
llvm-svn: 306457
BlockAddress are only valid within their function context, which does not
interact well with CodeExtractor. Detect this case and prevent it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33839
llvm-svn: 306448
Depending on the compare code that can be either an argument of
sext or negate of it. This helps to avoid v_cndmask_b64 instruction
for sext. A reversed value can be further simplified and folded into
its parent comparison if possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34545
llvm-svn: 306446
Apparently this replacement can really be substituting the
same as the original register. Avoid restarting the loop
when there's been no change in the register uses.
llvm-svn: 306441
SROA assumes alloca address space is 0, which causes assertion. This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34104
llvm-svn: 306440
Also factored out function to check if a boolean is an already
deserialized value which does not require v_cndmask_b32 to be
loaded. Added binary logical operators to its check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34500
llvm-svn: 306439
- DenseMap should be faster than std::map
- Use the `InsertRes = insert() if (!InsertRes.inserted)` pattern rather
than the `if (!X.contains(...)) { X.insert(...); }` to save one map
lookup.
llvm-svn: 306436
This canonicalization was suggested in D33172 as a way to make InstCombine behavior more uniform.
We have this transform for icmp+br, so unless there's some reason that icmp+select should be
treated differently, we should do the same thing here.
The benefit comes from increasing the chances of creating identical instructions. This is shown in
the tests in logical-select.ll (PR32791). InstCombine doesn't fold those directly, but EarlyCSE
can simplify the identical cmps, and then InstCombine can fold the selects together.
The possible regression for the tests in select.ll raises questions about poison/undef:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/113261.html
...but that transform is just as likely to be triggered by this canonicalization as it is to be
missed, so we're just pointing out a commutation deficiency in the pattern matching:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL228409
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34242
llvm-svn: 306435
•static latency
•number of uOps from which the instructions consists
•all ports used by the instruction
Reviewers:
RKSimon
zvi
aymanmus
m_zuckerman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33897
llvm-svn: 306414
Summary:
1. Instruction V_CVT_U32_F32 allow omod operand (see SIInstrInfo.td:1435). In fact this operand shouldn't be allowed here. This fix checks if SDWA pseudo instruction has OMod operand and then copy it.
2. There were several problems with support of VOPC instructions in SDWA peephole pass.
Reviewers: tstellar, arsenm, vpykhtin, airlied, kzhuravl
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, sarnex, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34626
llvm-svn: 306413
This patch modifies the conditional compares pass so that it keeps successor
probabilities up-to-date after the conversion. Previously, successor
probabilities were being normalized to a uniform distribution, even though they
may have been heavily biased prior to the conversion (e.g., if one of the edges
was the back edge of a loop). This loss of information affected passes later in
the pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34109
llvm-svn: 306412
Instead of getBackEdgeTakenCount, use getExitCount on the latch exiting block
(which is proven to be the only exiting block in the loop to be unrolled).
llvm-svn: 306410
Add the instruction aliases for ds(r|l)l for the two operand alias
of ds(r|l)lv and the aliases ds(r|l)l with the three register operands.
llvm-svn: 306405
When SelectionDAG merges consecutive stores and loads in MergeConsecutiveStores, it does not set dereferenceable flag for a created load instruction. This results in an assertion failure if SelectionDAG commonizes this load instruction with other load instructions, as well as it may miss optimization opportunities.
This patch sat dereferenceable flag for the newly created load instruction if all the load instructions to be merged are dereferenceable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34679
llvm-svn: 306404
[X86][AVX512] Improve lowering of AVX512 compare intrinsics (remove redundant shift left+right instructions).
AVX512 compare instructions return v*i1 types.
In cases where the number of elements in the returned value are less than 8, clang adds zeroes to get a mask of v8i1 type.
Later on it's replaced with CONCAT_VECTORS, which then is lowered to many DAG nodes including insert/extract element and shift right/left nodes.
The fact that AVX512 compare instructions put the result in a k register and zeroes all its upper bits allows us to remove the extra nodes simply by copying the result to the required register class.
When lowering, identify these cases and transform them into an INSERT_SUBVECTOR node (marked legal), then catch this pattern in instructions selection phase and transform it into one avx512 cmp instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33188
llvm-svn: 306402
Summary:
After this patch, we finally have test cases that require multiple
instruction emission.
Depends on D33590
Reviewers: ab, qcolombet, t.p.northover, rovka, kristof.beyls
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33596
llvm-svn: 306388
Borrow from the logic for 'jal' in MipsAsmParser::processInstruction
and add the extra condition of bypassing CALL16 if the destination symbol
is an ELF symbol with STB_LOCAL binding.
Patch by: John Baldwin
Reviewers: sdardis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33999
llvm-svn: 306387
* Mark as legal for (s32, i1, s32, s32)
* Map everything into GPRs
* Select to two instructions: a CMP of the condition against 0, to set
the flags, and a MOVCCr to select between the two inputs based on the
flags that we've just set
llvm-svn: 306382
Undoing revert 306338 after fixed bug: add metadata to the load instead of the
reverse shuffle added to it, retaining the original ValueMap implementation.
llvm-svn: 306381
This is based heavily on the work done ni D34285. I mostly wanted to do
test cleanup for the author to save them some time, but I had a really
hard time understanding why it was so hard to write better test cases
for these issues.
The problem is that because SROA does a second rewrite of the loads and
because we *don't* propagate !nonnull for non-pointer loads, we first
introduced invalid !nonnull metadata and then stripped it back off just
in time to avoid most ways of this PR manifesting. Moving to the more
careful utility only fixes this by changing the predicate to look at the
new load's type rather than the target type. However, that *does* fix
the bug, and the utility is much nicer including adding range metadata
to model the nonnull property after a conversion to an integer.
However, we have bigger problems because we don't actually propagate
*range* metadata, and the utility to do this extracted from instcombine
isn't really in good shape to do this currently. It *only* handles the
case of copying range metadata from an integer load to a pointer load.
It doesn't even handle the trivial cases of propagating from one integer
load to another when they are the same width! This utility will need to
be beefed up prior to using in this location to get the metadata to
fully survive.
And even then, we need to go and teach things to turn the range metadata
into an assume the way we do with nonnull so that when we *promote* an
integer we don't lose the information.
All of this will require a new test case that looks kind-of like
`preserve-nonnull.ll` does here but focuses on range metadata. It will
also likely require more testing because it needs to correctly handle
changes to the integer width, especially as SROA actively tries to
change the integer width!
Last but not least, I'm a little worried about hooking the range
metadata up here because the instcombine logic for converting from
a range metadata *to* a nonnull metadata node seems broken in the face
of non-zero address spaces where null is not mapped to the integer `0`.
So that probably needs to get fixed with test cases both in SROA and in
instcombine to cover it.
But this *does* extract the core PR fix from D34285 of preventing the
!nonnull metadata from being propagated in a broken state just long
enough to feed into promotion and crash value tracking.
On D34285 there is some discussion of zero-extend handling because it
isn't necessary. First, the new load size covers all of the non-undef
(ie, possibly initialized) bits. This may even extend past the original
alloca if loading those bits could produce valid data. The only way its
valid for us to zero-extend an integer load in SROA is if the original
code had a zero extend or those bits were undef. And we get to assume
things like undef *never* satifies nonnull, so non undef bits can
participate here. No need to special case the zero-extend handling, it
just falls out correctly.
The original credit goes to Ariel Ben-Yehuda! I'm mostly landing this to
save a few rounds of trivial edits fixing style issues and test case
formulation.
Differental Revision: D34285
llvm-svn: 306379
