It may be detrimental to vectorize loops with very small trip count, as various
costs of the vectorized loop body as well as enclosing overheads including
runtime tests and scalar iterations may outweigh the gains of vectorizing. The
current cost model measures the cost of the vectorized loop body only, expecting
it will amortize other costs, and loops with known or expected very small trip
counts are not vectorized at all. This patch allows loops with very small trip
counts to be vectorized, but under OptForSize constraints, which ensure the cost
of the loop body is dominant, having no runtime guards nor scalar iterations.
Patch inspired by D32451.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34373
llvm-svn: 306803
There are two conditions ORed here with similar checks and each contain two matches that must be true for the if to succeed. With the commutable match on the first half of the OR then both ifs basically have the same first part and only the second part distinguishs. With this change we move the commutable match to second half and make the first half unique.
This caused some tests to change because we now produce a commuted result, but this shouldn't matter in practice.
llvm-svn: 306800
It served us well, helped kick-start much of the vectorization efforts
in LLVM, etc. Its time has come and past. Back in 2014:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-November/079091.html
Time to actually let go and move forward. =]
I've updated the release notes both about the removal and the
deprecation of the corresponding C API.
llvm-svn: 306797
In rL300494 there was an attempt to deal with excessive compile time on
invocations of getSign/ZeroExtExpr using local caching. This approach only
helps if we request the same SCEV multiple times throughout recursion. But
in the bug PR33431 we see a case where we request different values all the time,
so caching does not help and the size of the cache grows enormously.
In this patch we remove the local cache for this methods and add the recursion
depth limit instead, as we do for arithmetics. This gives us a guarantee that the
invocation sequence is limited and reasonably short.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34273
llvm-svn: 306785
Summary:
DFS InOut numbers currently get eagerly computer upon DomTree construction. They are only needed to answer dome dominance queries and they get invalidated by updates and recalculations. Because of that, it is faster in practice to compute them lazily when they are actually needed.
Clang built without this patch takes 6m 45s to boostrap on my machine, and with the patch applied 6m 38s.
Reviewers: sanjoy, dberlin, chandlerc
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34296
llvm-svn: 306778
Previously it doesn't actually invoke the designated new PM builder
functions.
This patch moves NameAnonGlobalPass out from PassBuilder, as Chandler
points out that PassBuilder is used for non-O0 builds, and for
optimizations only.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34728
llvm-svn: 306756
Summary:
Arguably non-integral pointers probably shouldn't show up here at all,
but since the backend doesn't complain and this takes valid (according
to the Verifier) IR and makes it invalid, make sure not to introduce
any inttoptr instructions if we're dealing with non-integral pointers.
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33110
llvm-svn: 306737
This patch verifies the number of atoms, the validity of the form for each atom, as well as the validity of the
hashdata. For hashdata, we're verifying that the hashdata offset is correct and that the offset in the .debug_info for
each DIE in the hashdata is also valid.
llvm-svn: 306735
Summary:
When we have patterns like
loop:
%la = load %ptr, !tbaa
%lba = load %ptr, !tbaa !noalias
AliasSetTracker would previously think that the two types of annotation for
the pointer conflict, dropping both for the purpose of determining alias sets.
That is clearly way too conservative, as the tbaa is still valid whether or
not one of the memory accesses has additional AA metadata. We could go
one step further and attempt to properly merge the AA metadata,
but it's not clear that that would be worth it since that may introduce
additional MD nodes, which may be undesirable since this is merely an
Analysis.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32139
llvm-svn: 306727
Summary:
Indices for GEPs that index into a struct type should always be
constants. This added more checks in `collectConstantCandidates:` which make
sure constants for GEP pointer type are not hoisted.
This fixed Bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33538
Reviewers: ributzka, rnk
Reviewed By: ributzka
Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits, srhines, javed.absar, pirama
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34576
llvm-svn: 306704
In LLVM IR the following code:
%r = urem <ty> %t, %b
is equivalent to:
%q = udiv <ty> %t, %b
%s = mul <ty> nuw %q, %b
%r = sub <ty> nuw %t, %q ; (t / b) * b + (t % b) = t
As UDiv, Mul and Sub are already supported by SCEV, URem can be
implemented with minimal effort this way.
Note: While SRem and SDiv are also related this way, SCEV does not
provides SDiv yet.
llvm-svn: 306695
For networking-type bpf program, it often needs to access
packet data. A context data structure is provided to the bpf
programs with two fields:
u32 data;
u32 data_end;
User can access these two fields with ctx->data and ctx->data_end.
During program verification process, the kernel verifier modifies
the bpf program with loading of actual pointer value from kernel
data structure.
r = ctx->data ===> r = actual data start ptr
r = ctx->data_end ===> r = actual data end ptr
A typical program accessing ctx->data like
char *data_ptr = (char *)(long)ctx->data
will result in a 32-bit load followed by a zero extension.
Such an operation is combined into a single LDW in DAG combiner
as bpf LDW does zero extension automatically.
In cases like the below (which can be a result of global value numbering
and partial redundancy elimination before insn selection):
B1:
u32 a = load-32-bit &ctx->data
u64 pa = zext a
...
B2:
u32 b = load-32-bit &ctx->data
u64 pb = zext b
...
B3:
u32 m = PHI(a, b)
u64 pm = zext m
In B3, "pm = zext m" cannot be removed, which although is legal
from compiler perspective, will generate incorrect code after
kernel verification.
This patch recognizes this pattern and traces through PHI node
to see whether the operand of "zext m" is defined with LDWs or not.
If it is, the "zext m" itself can be removed.
The patch also recognizes the pattern where the load and use of
the load value not in the same basic block, where truncate operation
may be removed as well.
The patch handles 1-byte, 2-byte and 4-byte truncation.
Two test cases are added to verify the transformation happens properly
for the above code pattern.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 306685
Summary:
The original intent of test/Transforms/InstCombine/memset.ll was to test for lowering of llvm.memset into stores when the size of the memset is 1, 2, 4, or 8. Sometime between then and now the test has stopped testing for that, but remained passing due to testing for the absence of llvm.memset calls rather than the presence of store instructions. Right now this test ends up with an empty function body because the alloca is eliminated as safe-to-remove, which results in the llvm.memset calls's being eliminated due to their pointer args being undef; so it is not testing for conversion of llvm.memset into store instructions at all.
This change alters the test to verify that store instructions are created, and moves the target of the memset to an arg of the proc to avoid it being eliminated as unused.
Reviewers: anna, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34642
llvm-svn: 306681
Summary:
Rather than testing for expected results, test/Transforms/InstCombine/memmove.ll is testing for the absence of calls to llvm.memmove.
In the case of test3, the test has stopped testing for materialization of loads/stores, but remained passing due to testing for the absence of llvm.memset calls rather than the presence of load/store instructions. Right now this test ends up with an empty function body because the alloca is eliminated as safe-to-remove, which results in the llvm.memmove calls being eliminated due to a pointer arg being undef; so it is not testing for conversion of llvm.memmove into load/store instructions at all.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, anna, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34645
llvm-svn: 306679
This patch fixes a verification error with -verify-machineinstrs while expanding __tls_get_addr by not creating ADJCALLSTACKUP and ADJCALLSTACKDOWN if there is another ADJCALLSTACKUP in this basic block since nesting ADJCALLSTACKUP/ADJCALLSTACKDOWN is not allowed.
Here, ADJCALLSTACKUP and ADJCALLSTACKDOWN are created as a fence for instruction scheduling to avoid _tls_get_addr is scheduled before mflr in the prologue (https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=25839). So if another ADJCALLSTACKUP exists before _tls_get_addr, we do not need to create a new ADJCALLSTACKUP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34347
llvm-svn: 306678
Summary:
Support vector type G_MERGE_VALUES selection. For now G_MERGE_VALUES marked as legal for any type, so nothing to do in legalizer.
Split from https://reviews.llvm.org/D33665
Reviewers: qcolombet, t.p.northover, zvi, guyblank
Reviewed By: guyblank
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, guyblank, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33958
llvm-svn: 306665
Summary:
TBB and THH allow using a Thumb GPR or the PC as destination operand.
A few machine verifier failures where due to those instructions not
expecting PC as destination operand.
Add -verify-machineinstrs to test/CodeGen/ARM/jump-table-tbh.ll to add
test coverage even if expensive checks are disabled.
Reviewers: MatzeB, t.p.northover, jmolloy
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34610
llvm-svn: 306654
Summary:
As discussed on the mailing list it is legal to propagate TBAA to loads/stores
from/to smaller regions of a larger load tagged with TBAA. Do so for
(load->extractvalue)=>(gep->load) and similar foldings.
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31954
llvm-svn: 306615
Given no NaNs and no signed zeroes it folds:
(fmul X, (select (fcmp X > 0.0), -1.0, 1.0)) -> (fneg (fabs X))
(fmul X, (select (fcmp X > 0.0), 1.0, -1.0)) -> (fabs X)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34579
llvm-svn: 306592
I think we only need to make sure the value fits in 64-bits not that bit width is 64-bit.
This helps places that use this for shift amounts since the shift amount needs to be the same bitwidth as the LHS, but can't be larger than the bit width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34737
llvm-svn: 306577
r306381 caused PR33613, by reversing the order in which insertelements were
generated per unroll part. This patch fixes PR33613 by retraining this order,
placing each set of insertelements per part immediately after the last scalar
being packed for this part. Includes a test case derived from PR33613.
Reference: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33613
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34760
llvm-svn: 306575
