mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-24 03:33:20 +01:00
06d4a892b3
Summary: Fixes crash that could occur when a divergent terminator has an unreachable parent. Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle, arsenm Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73323
471 lines
15 KiB
C++
471 lines
15 KiB
C++
//===- DivergenceAnalysis.cpp --------- Divergence Analysis Implementation -==//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// This file implements a general divergence analysis for loop vectorization
|
|
// and GPU programs. It determines which branches and values in a loop or GPU
|
|
// program are divergent. It can help branch optimizations such as jump
|
|
// threading and loop unswitching to make better decisions.
|
|
//
|
|
// GPU programs typically use the SIMD execution model, where multiple threads
|
|
// in the same execution group have to execute in lock-step. Therefore, if the
|
|
// code contains divergent branches (i.e., threads in a group do not agree on
|
|
// which path of the branch to take), the group of threads has to execute all
|
|
// the paths from that branch with different subsets of threads enabled until
|
|
// they re-converge.
|
|
//
|
|
// Due to this execution model, some optimizations such as jump
|
|
// threading and loop unswitching can interfere with thread re-convergence.
|
|
// Therefore, an analysis that computes which branches in a GPU program are
|
|
// divergent can help the compiler to selectively run these optimizations.
|
|
//
|
|
// This implementation is derived from the Vectorization Analysis of the
|
|
// Region Vectorizer (RV). That implementation in turn is based on the approach
|
|
// described in
|
|
//
|
|
// Improving Performance of OpenCL on CPUs
|
|
// Ralf Karrenberg and Sebastian Hack
|
|
// CC '12
|
|
//
|
|
// This DivergenceAnalysis implementation is generic in the sense that it does
|
|
// not itself identify original sources of divergence.
|
|
// Instead specialized adapter classes, (LoopDivergenceAnalysis) for loops and
|
|
// (GPUDivergenceAnalysis) for GPU programs, identify the sources of divergence
|
|
// (e.g., special variables that hold the thread ID or the iteration variable).
|
|
//
|
|
// The generic implementation propagates divergence to variables that are data
|
|
// or sync dependent on a source of divergence.
|
|
//
|
|
// While data dependency is a well-known concept, the notion of sync dependency
|
|
// is worth more explanation. Sync dependence characterizes the control flow
|
|
// aspect of the propagation of branch divergence. For example,
|
|
//
|
|
// %cond = icmp slt i32 %tid, 10
|
|
// br i1 %cond, label %then, label %else
|
|
// then:
|
|
// br label %merge
|
|
// else:
|
|
// br label %merge
|
|
// merge:
|
|
// %a = phi i32 [ 0, %then ], [ 1, %else ]
|
|
//
|
|
// Suppose %tid holds the thread ID. Although %a is not data dependent on %tid
|
|
// because %tid is not on its use-def chains, %a is sync dependent on %tid
|
|
// because the branch "br i1 %cond" depends on %tid and affects which value %a
|
|
// is assigned to.
|
|
//
|
|
// The sync dependence detection (which branch induces divergence in which join
|
|
// points) is implemented in the SyncDependenceAnalysis.
|
|
//
|
|
// The current DivergenceAnalysis implementation has the following limitations:
|
|
// 1. intra-procedural. It conservatively considers the arguments of a
|
|
// non-kernel-entry function and the return value of a function call as
|
|
// divergent.
|
|
// 2. memory as black box. It conservatively considers values loaded from
|
|
// generic or local address as divergent. This can be improved by leveraging
|
|
// pointer analysis and/or by modelling non-escaping memory objects in SSA
|
|
// as done in RV.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/DivergenceAnalysis.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/Passes.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/InstIterator.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Value.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "divergence-analysis"
|
|
|
|
// class DivergenceAnalysis
|
|
DivergenceAnalysis::DivergenceAnalysis(
|
|
const Function &F, const Loop *RegionLoop, const DominatorTree &DT,
|
|
const LoopInfo &LI, SyncDependenceAnalysis &SDA, bool IsLCSSAForm)
|
|
: F(F), RegionLoop(RegionLoop), DT(DT), LI(LI), SDA(SDA),
|
|
IsLCSSAForm(IsLCSSAForm) {}
|
|
|
|
void DivergenceAnalysis::markDivergent(const Value &DivVal) {
|
|
assert(isa<Instruction>(DivVal) || isa<Argument>(DivVal));
|
|
assert(!isAlwaysUniform(DivVal) && "cannot be a divergent");
|
|
DivergentValues.insert(&DivVal);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void DivergenceAnalysis::addUniformOverride(const Value &UniVal) {
|
|
UniformOverrides.insert(&UniVal);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool DivergenceAnalysis::updateTerminator(const Instruction &Term) const {
|
|
if (Term.getNumSuccessors() <= 1)
|
|
return false;
|
|
if (auto *BranchTerm = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(&Term)) {
|
|
assert(BranchTerm->isConditional());
|
|
return isDivergent(*BranchTerm->getCondition());
|
|
}
|
|
if (auto *SwitchTerm = dyn_cast<SwitchInst>(&Term)) {
|
|
return isDivergent(*SwitchTerm->getCondition());
|
|
}
|
|
if (isa<InvokeInst>(Term)) {
|
|
return false; // ignore abnormal executions through landingpad
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
llvm_unreachable("unexpected terminator");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool DivergenceAnalysis::updateNormalInstruction(const Instruction &I) const {
|
|
// TODO function calls with side effects, etc
|
|
for (const auto &Op : I.operands()) {
|
|
if (isDivergent(*Op))
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool DivergenceAnalysis::isTemporalDivergent(const BasicBlock &ObservingBlock,
|
|
const Value &Val) const {
|
|
const auto *Inst = dyn_cast<const Instruction>(&Val);
|
|
if (!Inst)
|
|
return false;
|
|
// check whether any divergent loop carrying Val terminates before control
|
|
// proceeds to ObservingBlock
|
|
for (const auto *Loop = LI.getLoopFor(Inst->getParent());
|
|
Loop != RegionLoop && !Loop->contains(&ObservingBlock);
|
|
Loop = Loop->getParentLoop()) {
|
|
if (DivergentLoops.find(Loop) != DivergentLoops.end())
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool DivergenceAnalysis::updatePHINode(const PHINode &Phi) const {
|
|
// joining divergent disjoint path in Phi parent block
|
|
if (!Phi.hasConstantOrUndefValue() && isJoinDivergent(*Phi.getParent())) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// An incoming value could be divergent by itself.
|
|
// Otherwise, an incoming value could be uniform within the loop
|
|
// that carries its definition but it may appear divergent
|
|
// from outside the loop. This happens when divergent loop exits
|
|
// drop definitions of that uniform value in different iterations.
|
|
//
|
|
// for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) { // 'i' is uniform inside the loop
|
|
// if (i % thread_id == 0) break; // divergent loop exit
|
|
// }
|
|
// int divI = i; // divI is divergent
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < Phi.getNumIncomingValues(); ++i) {
|
|
const auto *InVal = Phi.getIncomingValue(i);
|
|
if (isDivergent(*Phi.getIncomingValue(i)) ||
|
|
isTemporalDivergent(*Phi.getParent(), *InVal)) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool DivergenceAnalysis::inRegion(const Instruction &I) const {
|
|
return I.getParent() && inRegion(*I.getParent());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool DivergenceAnalysis::inRegion(const BasicBlock &BB) const {
|
|
return (!RegionLoop && BB.getParent() == &F) || RegionLoop->contains(&BB);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// marks all users of loop-carried values of the loop headed by LoopHeader as
|
|
// divergent
|
|
void DivergenceAnalysis::taintLoopLiveOuts(const BasicBlock &LoopHeader) {
|
|
auto *DivLoop = LI.getLoopFor(&LoopHeader);
|
|
assert(DivLoop && "loopHeader is not actually part of a loop");
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 8> TaintStack;
|
|
DivLoop->getExitBlocks(TaintStack);
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise potential users of loop-carried values could be anywhere in the
|
|
// dominance region of DivLoop (including its fringes for phi nodes)
|
|
DenseSet<const BasicBlock *> Visited;
|
|
for (auto *Block : TaintStack) {
|
|
Visited.insert(Block);
|
|
}
|
|
Visited.insert(&LoopHeader);
|
|
|
|
while (!TaintStack.empty()) {
|
|
auto *UserBlock = TaintStack.back();
|
|
TaintStack.pop_back();
|
|
|
|
// don't spread divergence beyond the region
|
|
if (!inRegion(*UserBlock))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
assert(!DivLoop->contains(UserBlock) &&
|
|
"irreducible control flow detected");
|
|
|
|
// phi nodes at the fringes of the dominance region
|
|
if (!DT.dominates(&LoopHeader, UserBlock)) {
|
|
// all PHI nodes of UserBlock become divergent
|
|
for (auto &Phi : UserBlock->phis()) {
|
|
Worklist.push_back(&Phi);
|
|
}
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// taint outside users of values carried by DivLoop
|
|
for (auto &I : *UserBlock) {
|
|
if (isAlwaysUniform(I))
|
|
continue;
|
|
if (isDivergent(I))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
for (auto &Op : I.operands()) {
|
|
auto *OpInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(&Op);
|
|
if (!OpInst)
|
|
continue;
|
|
if (DivLoop->contains(OpInst->getParent())) {
|
|
markDivergent(I);
|
|
pushUsers(I);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// visit all blocks in the dominance region
|
|
for (auto *SuccBlock : successors(UserBlock)) {
|
|
if (!Visited.insert(SuccBlock).second) {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
TaintStack.push_back(SuccBlock);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void DivergenceAnalysis::pushPHINodes(const BasicBlock &Block) {
|
|
for (const auto &Phi : Block.phis()) {
|
|
if (isDivergent(Phi))
|
|
continue;
|
|
Worklist.push_back(&Phi);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void DivergenceAnalysis::pushUsers(const Value &V) {
|
|
for (const auto *User : V.users()) {
|
|
const auto *UserInst = dyn_cast<const Instruction>(User);
|
|
if (!UserInst)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (isDivergent(*UserInst))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// only compute divergent inside loop
|
|
if (!inRegion(*UserInst))
|
|
continue;
|
|
Worklist.push_back(UserInst);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool DivergenceAnalysis::propagateJoinDivergence(const BasicBlock &JoinBlock,
|
|
const Loop *BranchLoop) {
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tpropJoinDiv " << JoinBlock.getName() << "\n");
|
|
|
|
// ignore divergence outside the region
|
|
if (!inRegion(JoinBlock)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// push non-divergent phi nodes in JoinBlock to the worklist
|
|
pushPHINodes(JoinBlock);
|
|
|
|
// JoinBlock is a divergent loop exit
|
|
if (BranchLoop && !BranchLoop->contains(&JoinBlock)) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// disjoint-paths divergent at JoinBlock
|
|
markBlockJoinDivergent(JoinBlock);
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void DivergenceAnalysis::propagateBranchDivergence(const Instruction &Term) {
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "propBranchDiv " << Term.getParent()->getName() << "\n");
|
|
|
|
markDivergent(Term);
|
|
|
|
// Don't propagate divergence from unreachable blocks.
|
|
if (!DT.isReachableFromEntry(Term.getParent()))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
const auto *BranchLoop = LI.getLoopFor(Term.getParent());
|
|
|
|
// whether there is a divergent loop exit from BranchLoop (if any)
|
|
bool IsBranchLoopDivergent = false;
|
|
|
|
// iterate over all blocks reachable by disjoint from Term within the loop
|
|
// also iterates over loop exits that become divergent due to Term.
|
|
for (const auto *JoinBlock : SDA.join_blocks(Term)) {
|
|
IsBranchLoopDivergent |= propagateJoinDivergence(*JoinBlock, BranchLoop);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Branch loop is a divergent loop due to the divergent branch in Term
|
|
if (IsBranchLoopDivergent) {
|
|
assert(BranchLoop);
|
|
if (!DivergentLoops.insert(BranchLoop).second) {
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
propagateLoopDivergence(*BranchLoop);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void DivergenceAnalysis::propagateLoopDivergence(const Loop &ExitingLoop) {
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "propLoopDiv " << ExitingLoop.getName() << "\n");
|
|
|
|
// don't propagate beyond region
|
|
if (!inRegion(*ExitingLoop.getHeader()))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
const auto *BranchLoop = ExitingLoop.getParentLoop();
|
|
|
|
// Uses of loop-carried values could occur anywhere
|
|
// within the dominance region of the definition. All loop-carried
|
|
// definitions are dominated by the loop header (reducible control).
|
|
// Thus all users have to be in the dominance region of the loop header,
|
|
// except PHI nodes that can also live at the fringes of the dom region
|
|
// (incoming defining value).
|
|
if (!IsLCSSAForm)
|
|
taintLoopLiveOuts(*ExitingLoop.getHeader());
|
|
|
|
// whether there is a divergent loop exit from BranchLoop (if any)
|
|
bool IsBranchLoopDivergent = false;
|
|
|
|
// iterate over all blocks reachable by disjoint paths from exits of
|
|
// ExitingLoop also iterates over loop exits (of BranchLoop) that in turn
|
|
// become divergent.
|
|
for (const auto *JoinBlock : SDA.join_blocks(ExitingLoop)) {
|
|
IsBranchLoopDivergent |= propagateJoinDivergence(*JoinBlock, BranchLoop);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Branch loop is a divergent due to divergent loop exit in ExitingLoop
|
|
if (IsBranchLoopDivergent) {
|
|
assert(BranchLoop);
|
|
if (!DivergentLoops.insert(BranchLoop).second) {
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
propagateLoopDivergence(*BranchLoop);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void DivergenceAnalysis::compute() {
|
|
for (auto *DivVal : DivergentValues) {
|
|
pushUsers(*DivVal);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// propagate divergence
|
|
while (!Worklist.empty()) {
|
|
const Instruction &I = *Worklist.back();
|
|
Worklist.pop_back();
|
|
|
|
// maintain uniformity of overrides
|
|
if (isAlwaysUniform(I))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
bool WasDivergent = isDivergent(I);
|
|
if (WasDivergent)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// propagate divergence caused by terminator
|
|
if (I.isTerminator()) {
|
|
if (updateTerminator(I)) {
|
|
// propagate control divergence to affected instructions
|
|
propagateBranchDivergence(I);
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// update divergence of I due to divergent operands
|
|
bool DivergentUpd = false;
|
|
const auto *Phi = dyn_cast<const PHINode>(&I);
|
|
if (Phi) {
|
|
DivergentUpd = updatePHINode(*Phi);
|
|
} else {
|
|
DivergentUpd = updateNormalInstruction(I);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// propagate value divergence to users
|
|
if (DivergentUpd) {
|
|
markDivergent(I);
|
|
pushUsers(I);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool DivergenceAnalysis::isAlwaysUniform(const Value &V) const {
|
|
return UniformOverrides.find(&V) != UniformOverrides.end();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool DivergenceAnalysis::isDivergent(const Value &V) const {
|
|
return DivergentValues.find(&V) != DivergentValues.end();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool DivergenceAnalysis::isDivergentUse(const Use &U) const {
|
|
Value &V = *U.get();
|
|
Instruction &I = *cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
|
|
return isDivergent(V) || isTemporalDivergent(*I.getParent(), V);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void DivergenceAnalysis::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module *) const {
|
|
if (DivergentValues.empty())
|
|
return;
|
|
// iterate instructions using instructions() to ensure a deterministic order.
|
|
for (auto &I : instructions(F)) {
|
|
if (isDivergent(I))
|
|
OS << "DIVERGENT:" << I << '\n';
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// class GPUDivergenceAnalysis
|
|
GPUDivergenceAnalysis::GPUDivergenceAnalysis(Function &F,
|
|
const DominatorTree &DT,
|
|
const PostDominatorTree &PDT,
|
|
const LoopInfo &LI,
|
|
const TargetTransformInfo &TTI)
|
|
: SDA(DT, PDT, LI), DA(F, nullptr, DT, LI, SDA, false) {
|
|
for (auto &I : instructions(F)) {
|
|
if (TTI.isSourceOfDivergence(&I)) {
|
|
DA.markDivergent(I);
|
|
} else if (TTI.isAlwaysUniform(&I)) {
|
|
DA.addUniformOverride(I);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
for (auto &Arg : F.args()) {
|
|
if (TTI.isSourceOfDivergence(&Arg)) {
|
|
DA.markDivergent(Arg);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DA.compute();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool GPUDivergenceAnalysis::isDivergent(const Value &val) const {
|
|
return DA.isDivergent(val);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool GPUDivergenceAnalysis::isDivergentUse(const Use &use) const {
|
|
return DA.isDivergentUse(use);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void GPUDivergenceAnalysis::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module *mod) const {
|
|
OS << "Divergence of kernel " << DA.getFunction().getName() << " {\n";
|
|
DA.print(OS, mod);
|
|
OS << "}\n";
|
|
}
|