Summary:
ThinLTO is relying on linkInModule to import selected function.
However a lot of "magic" was hidden in linkInModule and the IRMover,
who would rename and promote global variables on the fly.
This is moving to an approach where the steps are decoupled and the
client is reponsible to specify the list of globals to import.
As a consequence some test are changed because they were relying on
the previous behavior which was importing the definition of *every*
single global without control on the client side.
Now the burden is on the client to decide if a global has to be imported
or not.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18122
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 263863
On Rafael's suggestion!
(also fix a discrepancy between this error message format and the others)
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 263860
We need to be careful on which registers can be explicitly handled
via copies. Prologue, Epilogue use physical registers and if one belongs
to the set of CSRsViaCopy, it will no longer be CSRed, since PEI overwrites
it after the explicit copies.
llvm-svn: 263857
Avoid modifying other modules in `AArch64PromoteConstant` when the
constant is `ConstantData` (a horrible accident, I'm sure, caught by an
experimental follow-up to r261464).
Previously, this walked through all the users of a constant, but that
reaches into other modules when the constant doesn't depend transitively
on a `GlobalValue`! Since we're walking instructions anyway, just
modify the instructions we actually see.
As a drive-by, instead of storing `Use` and getting the instructions
again via `Use::getUser()` (which is not a constantant time lookup),
store `std::pair<Instruction, unsigned>`. Besides being cheaper, this
makes it easier to drop use-lists form `ConstantData` in the future.
(I threw this in because I was touching all the code anyway.)
Because the patch completely changes the traversal logic, it looks
like a rewrite of the pass, but the core logic is all the same (or
should be, minus the out-of-module changes). In other words, there
should be NFC as long as the LLVMContext only has a single Module.
I didn't think of a good way to test this, but I hope to submit a patch
eventually that makes walking these use-lists illegal/impossible.
llvm-svn: 263853
While not strictly necessary, since we don't support large integer
types, this avoids bugs due to silent truncation from uint64_t to a
32-bit unsigned (e.g. DL.isLegalInteger(DL.getTypeSizeInBits(Ty) )
This fixes PR26972.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18258
llvm-svn: 263850
* Renamed to be camel case, consistent with other docs.
* Fixed non-ascii characters (this is what I get for writing docs on an iPad).
llvm-svn: 263840
The loop on IVOperand's incoming values assumes IVOperand to be an
induction variable on the loop over which `S Pred X` is invariant;
otherwise loop invariant incoming values to IVOperand are not guaranteed
to dominate the comparision.
This fixes PR26973.
llvm-svn: 263827
In the <DisplayString> of PointerIntPair , I cast the pointer to the actual type, so VS can leverage it while visualizing, not unlike the recent change to PointerUnion visualization.
In the expansion, the current code is casting to the incorrect type (wrong number of stars), so I fixed that as well.
llvm-svn: 263821
This patch adds unscaled loads and sign-extend loads to the TII
getMemOpBaseRegImmOfs API, which is used to control clustering in the MI
scheduler. This is done to create more opportunities for load pairing. I've
also added the scaled LDRSWui instruction, which was missing from the scaled
instructions. Finally, I've added support in shouldClusterLoads for clustering
adjacent sext and zext loads that too can be paired by the load/store optimizer.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18048
llvm-svn: 263819
Summary:
These dependencies would be used in the future to reduce the number
of instrumented blocks(http://reviews.llvm.org/rL262103)
This is submitted as a separate CL because of previous problems with
ARM.
Subscribers: aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18227
llvm-svn: 263797
Summary:
Allow the selection of BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_x and _XY. Do this now before
the frontend patches land in Mesa. Eventually, we may want to automatically
reduce the size of loads at the LLVM IR level, which requires such overloads,
and in some cases Mesa can generate them directly.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18255
llvm-svn: 263792
Summary:
These intrinsics expose the BUFFER_ATOMIC_* instructions and will be used
by Mesa to implement atomics with buffer semantics. The intrinsic interface
matches that of buffer.load.format and buffer.store.format, except that the
GLC bit is not exposed (it is automatically deduced based on whether the
return value is used).
The change of hasSideEffects is required for TableGen to accept the pattern
that matches the intrinsic.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, rivanvx, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18151
llvm-svn: 263791
Summary:
We cannot easily deduce that an offset is in an SGPR, but the Mesa frontend
cannot easily make use of an explicit soffset parameter either. Furthermore,
it is likely that in the future, LLVM will be in a better position than the
frontend to choose an SGPR offset if possible.
Since there aren't any frontend uses of these intrinsics in upstream
repositories yet, I would like to take this opportunity to change the
intrinsic signatures to a single offset parameter, which is then selected
to immediate offsets or voffsets using a ComplexPattern.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18218
llvm-svn: 263790
Now that the resolved path cache stores the StringRef's, its
best to just always cache the results, even when realpath isn't
used. This way we'll still avoid the StringMap hashing and lookup.
This also conveniently reorganises this code in a way I need for
a future patch.
llvm-svn: 263777
ResolvedPaths was storing std::string's as a cache. We would then take those strings and look them up in the internString pool to get a unique StringRef for each path.
This patch changes ResolvedPaths to store the StringRef pointing in to the internString pool itself. This way, when getResolvedPath returns a string, we know we have the StringRef we would find in the pool anyway. We can avoid the duplicate memory of the std::string's, and also the time from the lookup.
Unfortunately my profiles show no runtime change here, but it should still save memory allocations which is nice.
Reviewed by Frederic Riss.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18259
llvm-svn: 263774
Summary:
It can hurt performance to prefetch ahead too much. Be conservative for
now and don't prefetch ahead more than 3 iterations on Cyclone.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17949
llvm-svn: 263772
Summary:
And use this TTI for Cyclone. As it was explained in the original RFC
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/92758), the HW
prefetcher work up to 2KB strides.
I am also adding tests for this and the previous change (D17943):
* Cyclone prefetching accesses with a large stride
* Cyclone not prefetching accesses with a small stride
* Generic Aarch64 subtarget not prefetching either
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17945
llvm-svn: 263771
Summary:
This wires up the pass for Cyclone but keeps it off for now because we
need a few more TTIs.
The getPrefetchMinStride value is not very well tuned right now but it
works well with CFP2006/433.milc which motivated this.
Tests will be added as part of the upcoming large-stride prefetching
patch.
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson, hfinkel, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17943
llvm-svn: 263770
A virtual index of -1u indicates that the subprogram's virtual index is
unrepresentable (for example, when using the relative vtable ABI), so do
not emit a DW_AT_vtable_elem_location attribute for it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18236
llvm-svn: 263765