expansion is the same as that used by LegalizeDAG.
The resulting code sucks in terms of performance/codesize on x86-32 for a
64-bit operation; I haven't looked into whether different expansions might be
better in general.
llvm-svn: 105378
otherwise the SmallVector it contains doesn't free its memory.
In most cases LiveIntervalAnalysis could get away by not calling the destructor,
because VNInfos are bumpptr-allocated, and smallvectors usually don't grow.
However when the SmallVector does grow it always leaks.
This is the valgrind shown leak from the original testcase:
==8206== 18,304 bytes in 151 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 164 of 164
==8206== at 0x4A079C7: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:220)
==8206== by 0x4DB7A7E: llvm::SmallVectorBase::grow_pod(unsigned long, unsigned long) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/defaul
t/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4F90382: llvm::VNInfo::addKill(llvm::SlotIndex) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libcl
amav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x5126B5C: llvm::LiveIntervals::handleVirtualRegisterDef(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::M
achineInstr>, llvm::SlotIndex, llvm::MachineOperand&, unsigned int, llvm::LiveInterval&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/defau
lt/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x512725E: llvm::LiveIntervals::handleRegisterDef(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineI
nstr>, llvm::SlotIndex, llvm::MachineOperand&, unsigned int) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav
.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x51278A8: llvm::LiveIntervals::computeIntervals() (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libc
lamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x5127CB4: llvm::LiveIntervals::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/de
fault/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAE935: llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclama
v/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAEB10: llvm::FunctionPassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclama
v/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAED3D: llvm::FunctionPassManager::run(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.l
ibs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4D8BE8E: llvm::JIT::runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(llvm::Function*, llvm::MutexGuard const&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4D8CA72: llvm::JIT::getPointerToFunction(llvm::Function*) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
llvm-svn: 99400
to LLVM IR changes with addr label weirdness. In the testcase, we
generate references to the two bb's when codegen'ing the first
function:
_test1: ## @test1
leaq Ltmp0(%rip), %rax
..
leaq Ltmp1(%rip), %rax
Then continue to codegen the second function where the blocks
get merged. We're now smart enough to emit both labels, producing
this code:
_test_fun: ## @test_fun
## BB#0: ## %entry
Ltmp1: ## Block address taken
Ltmp0:
## BB#1: ## %ret
movl $-1, %eax
ret
Rejoice.
llvm-svn: 98595
label is generated, but then the block is deleted. Since the
value is undefined, we just emit the label right after the entry
label of the function. It might matter that the label is in the
same section as the function was afterall.
llvm-svn: 98579
the problem only shows for msp430 and pic16 which is why it specifies
them using -march. But it is wrong to put such tests in CodeGen/Generic,
since not everyone builds these targets. Put a copy of the test in each
of the target test directories.
llvm-svn: 90005
which was an expensive checks failure due to a bug in the checking. This
patch in essence reverts the original fix for PR3393, and refixes it by a
tweak to the way expensive checking is done.
llvm-svn: 89454
to break up CFG diamonds by banishing one of the blocks to the end of
the function, which is bad for code density and branch size.
This does pessimize MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2, the
benchmark cited as the reason for the change, however I've examined
the code and it looks more like a case of gaming a particular
branch than of being generally applicable.
llvm-svn: 84803
input filename so that opt doesn't print the input filename in the
output so that grep lines in the tests don't unintentionally match
strings in the input filename.
llvm-svn: 81537
all Darwin targets; could be split into separate tests for
the chip subdirectories, but from Chris' last mail on testing
I assume he'd rather have only one test. Generic seems to be
the best available, maybe there should be a Darwin subdirectory?
llvm-svn: 79877
