Knowing the address/symbolnum field values makes it easier to identify the
unsupported relocation, and provides enough information for the full bit
pattern of the relocation to be reconstructed.
llvm-svn: 358833
Summary:
JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld:
it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target
process.
JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways:
(1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling.
RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and
this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in
RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more
difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate
format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code.
(2) Support for native code models.
RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external
functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its
restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows
arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be
added naturally.
(3) Native support for asynchronous linking.
JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these
callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the
linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent
ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if
asynchrony is not needed.
To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code:
(1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and
| memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures.
|
+ -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to
| atom-graph parsing.
|
+ -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g.
JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation
support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph.
To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for
these operations take continuations as arguments:
using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation =
std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>;
using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction =
std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols,
JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>;
using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>;
virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize);
In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements:
- Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR
definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process
(In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions,
but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory).
- Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive
eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many
eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on.
- More extensive validation and error handling throughout.
This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for
other architectures and formats will happen in-tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704
llvm-svn: 358818
Summary:
If you pass two 1024 bit vectors in IR with AVX2 on Windows 64. Both vectors will be split in four 256 bit pieces. The four pieces of the first argument will be passed indirectly using 4 gprs. The second argument will get passed via pointers in memory.
The PartOffsets stored for the second argument are all in terms of its original 1024 bit size. So the PartOffsets for each piece are 32 bytes apart. So if we consider it for copy elision we'll only load an 8 byte pointer, but we'll move the address 32 bytes. The stack object size we create for the first part is probably wrong too.
This issue was encountered by ISPC. I'm working on getting a reduce test case, but wanted to go ahead and get feedback on the fix.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: dbabokin, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60801
llvm-svn: 358817
Summary:
Teach CorrelatedValuePropagation to also handle sub instructions in addition to add. Relatively simple since makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion already understood sub instructions. Only subtle change is which range is passed as "Other" to that function, since sub isn't commutative.
Note that CorrelatedValuePropagation::processAddSub is still hidden behind a default-off flag as IndVarSimplify hasn't yet been fixed to strip the added nsw/nuw flags and causes a miscompile. (PR31181)
Reviewers: sanjoy, apilipenko, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60036
llvm-svn: 358816
This is very minor issue. The returned section index is only used by
DWARFDebugLine as an llvm::upper_bound input and the use case shouldn't
cause any behavioral change.
llvm-svn: 358814
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41477. On the x32 ABI
with stack probing a dynamic alloca will result in a WIN_ALLOCA_32
with a 32-bit size. The current implementation tries to copy it into
RAX, resulting in a physreg copy error. Fix this by copying to EAX
instead. Also fix incorrect opcodes or registers used in subs.
llvm-svn: 358807
The MOVZX doesn't require an immediate to be encoded at all. Though it does use
a 2 byte opcode so its the same size as a 1 byte immediate. But it has a
separate source and dest register so can help avoid copies.
llvm-svn: 358805
There's one slight regression in here because we don't check that the immediate
already allowed movzx before the shift. I'll fix that next.
llvm-svn: 358804
Exactly the same as G_FCEIL, G_FABS, etc.
Add tests for the fp16/nofp16 behaviour, update arm64-vfloatintrinsics, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60895
llvm-svn: 358799
My understanding is that once BuildMI has been called we can't fallback
to SelectionDAG.
This change moves the fallback for when getRegForValue() fails for
that target of an indirect call. This was failing in -fPIC mode when
the callee is GlobalValue.
Add a test case that tickles this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60908
llvm-svn: 358793
This is a follow-up to r291037+r291258, which used null debug locations
to prevent jumpy line tables.
Using line 0 locations achieves the same effect, but works better for
crash attribution because it preserves the right inline scope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913
llvm-svn: 358791
VK_SABS is part of the SymLoc bitfield in the variant kind which should
be compared for equality, not by checking the VK_SABS bit.
As far as I know, the existing code happened to produce the correct
results in all cases, so this is just a cleanup.
Patch by Stephen Crane.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60596
llvm-svn: 358788
Summary:
This emits labels around heapallocsite calls and S_HEAPALLOCSITE debug
info in codeview. Currently only changes FastISel, so emitting labels still
needs to be implemented in SelectionDAG.
Reviewers: hans, rnk
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60800
llvm-svn: 358783
This allows the cross compiled build targets to configure the LLVM tools and sub-projects that are part of the main build.
This is needed for generating native non llvm *-tablegen tools when cross compiling clang in the monorepo build environment.
llvm-svn: 358779
Summary:
Make the flags in LICM + MemorySSA tuning options in the old and new
pass managers.
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60490
llvm-svn: 358772
This instruction is legalized in the same way as G_FSIN, G_FCOS, G_FLOG10, etc.
Update legalize-pow.mir and arm64-vfloatintrinsics.ll to reflect the change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60218
llvm-svn: 358764
Summary:
Trying to add the plumbing necessary to add tuning options to the new pass manager.
Testing with the flags for loop vectorize.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, jlebar, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59723
llvm-svn: 358763
