When manually finishing the object writer in dsymutil, it's possible
that there are pending labels that haven't been resolved. This results
in an assertion when the assembler tries to fixup a label that doesn't
have an address yet.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49131
llvm-svn: 336688
This was originally intended with D48893, but as discussed there, we
have to make the folds safe from producing extra poison. This should
give the single binop folds the same capabilities as the existing
folds for 2-binops+shuffle.
LLVM binary opcode review: there are a total of 18 binops. There are 7
commutative binops (add, mul, and, or, xor, fadd, fmul) which we already
fold. We're able to fold 6 more opcodes with this patch (shl, lshr, ashr,
fdiv, udiv, sdiv). There are no folds for srem/urem/frem AFAIK. We don't
bother with sub/fsub with constant operand 1 because those are
canonicalized to add/fadd. 7 + 6 + 3 + 2 = 18.
llvm-svn: 336684
This accessor is useful and could be slightly more efficient than
Str.val().data() because you can avoid StringRef instantiation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49133
llvm-svn: 336683
If a machine function satisfies SSA, the IsSSA property is assumed even
if the pass to be executed runs after existing from SSA. If the pass
output then does not conform to SSA, a verifier error will be flagged
(with expensive checks enabled).
llvm-svn: 336682
debug compilation dir when compiling assembly files with -g.
Part of PR38050.
Patch by Siddhartha Bagaria!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48988
llvm-svn: 336680
This patch adds support for the following instructions:
CLS (Count Leading Sign bits)
CLZ (Count Leading Zeros)
CNT (Count non-zero bits)
CNOT (Logically invert boolean condition in vector)
NOT (Bitwise invert vector)
FABS (Floating-point absolute value)
FNEG (Floating-point negate)
All operations are predicated and unary, e.g.
clz z0.s, p0/m, z1.s
- CLS, CLZ, CNT, CNOT and NOT have variants for 8, 16, 32
and 64 bit elements.
- FABS and FNEG have variants for 16, 32 and 64 bit elements.
llvm-svn: 336677
The case with 2 variables is more complicated than the case where
we eliminate the shuffle entirely because a shuffle with an undef
mask element creates an undef result.
I'm not aware of any current analysis/transform that recognizes that
undef propagating to a div/rem/shift, but we have to guard against
the possibility.
llvm-svn: 336668
An explicit untied use is not sufficient to maintain liveness of a
register redefined in a predicated instruction. For example
%1 = COPY %0
...
%1 = A2_paddif %2, %1, 1
could become
$r1 = COPY $r0
...
$r1 = A2_paddif $p0, $r1, 1
and later
$r1 = COPY $r0 ;; this is not really dead!
...
$r1 = A2_paddif $p0, $r0, 1
llvm-svn: 336662
Summary:
Fixed two cases of where PHI nodes need to be updated by lowerswitch.
When lowerswitch find out that the switch default branch is not
reachable it remove the old default and replace it with the most
popular block from the cases, but it forget to update the PHI
nodes in the default block.
The PHI nodes also need to be updated when the switch is replaced
with a single branch.
Reviewers: hans, reames, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47203
llvm-svn: 336659
Parsing invalid UTF-8 input is now a parse error.
Creating JSON values from invalid UTF-8 now triggers an assertion, and
(in no-assert builds) substitutes the unicode replacement character.
Strings retrieved from json::Value are always valid UTF-8.
llvm-svn: 336657
As suggested by @efriedma on D48975, this patch separates the BuildDiv/Pow2 style optimizations from the rest of the visitSDIV/visitUDIV to make it easier to reuse the combines and will allow us to avoid some rather nasty node recursive combining in visitREM.
llvm-svn: 336656
switch unswitching.
The core problem was that the way we handled unswitching trivial exit
edges through the default successor of a switch. For some reason
I thought the right way to do this was to add a block containing
unreachable and point the default successor at this block. In
retrospect, this has an amazing number of problems.
The first issue is the one that this pass has always worked around -- we
have to *detect* such edges and avoid unswitching them again. This
seemed pretty easy really. You juts look for an edge to a block
containing unreachable. However, this pattern is woefully unsound. So
many things can break it. The amazing thing is that I found a test case
where *simple-loop-unswitch itself* breaks this! When we do
a *non-trivial* unswitch of a switch we will end up splitting this exit
edge. The result will be a default successor that is an exit and
terminates in ... a perfectly normal branch. So the first test case that
I started trying to fix is added to the nontrivial test cases. This is
a ridiculous example that did just amazing things previously. With just
unswitch, it would create 10+ copies of this stuff stamped out. But if
you combine it *just right* with a bunch of other passes (like
simplify-cfg, loop rotate, and some LICM) you can get it to do this
infinitely. Or at least, I never got it to finish. =[
This, in turn, uncovered another related issue. When we are manipulating
these switches after doing a trivial unswitch we never correctly updated
PHI nodes to reflect our edits. As soon as I started changing how these
edges were managed, it became obvious there were more issues that
I couldn't realistically leave unaddressed, so I wrote more test cases
around PHI updates here and ensured all of that works now.
And this, in turn, required some adjustment to how we collect and manage
the exit successor when it is the default successor. That showed a clear
bug where we failed to include it in our search for the outer-most loop
reached by an unswitched exit edge. This was actually already tested and
the test case didn't work. I (wrongly) thought that was due to SCEV
failing to analyze the switch. In fact, it was just a simple bug in the
code that skipped the default successor. While changing this, I handled
it correctly and have updated the test to reflect that we now get
precise SCEV analysis of trip counts for the outer loop in one of these
cases.
llvm-svn: 336646
This patch adds fast-isel tests for the IR patterns produced for truncation
intrinsics in rC336643.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48822
llvm-svn: 336645
Now that rL336250 has landed, we should prefer 2 immediate shifts + a shuffle blend over performing a multiply. Despite the increase in instructions, this is quicker (especially for slow v4i32 multiplies), avoid loads and constant pool usage. It does mean however that we increase register pressure. The code size will go up a little but by less than what we save on the constant pool data.
This patch also adds support for v16i16 to the BLEND(SHIFT(v,c1),SHIFT(v,c2)) combine, and also prevents blending on pre-SSE41 shifts if it would introduce extra blend masks/constant pool usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48936
llvm-svn: 336642
We're missing the EVEX equivalents of these patterns and seem to get along fine.
I think we end up with X86vzload for the obvious IR cases that would produce this DAG.
llvm-svn: 336638
This is prep for DWARF v5 range list emission. Emission of a single range list is moved
to a static helper function.
Reviewer: jdevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49098
llvm-svn: 336621
getSafeVectorConstantForBinop() was calling getBinOpIdentity() assuming
that the constant we wanted was operand 1 (RHS). That's wrong, but I
don't think we could expose a bug or even a suboptimal fold from that
because the callers have other guards for any binop that would have
been affected.
llvm-svn: 336617
Summary:
This adds support for binary atomic read-modify-write instructions:
add, sub, and, or, xor, and xchg.
This does not yet support translations of some of LLVM IR atomicrmw
instructions (nand, max, min, umax, and umin) that do not have a direct
counterpart in wasm instructions.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49088
llvm-svn: 336615
Summary:
Support for this option is needed for building Linux kernel.
This is a very frequently requested feature by kernel developers.
More details : https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/4/601
GCC option description for -fdelete-null-pointer-checks:
This Assume that programs cannot safely dereference null pointers,
and that no code or data element resides at address zero.
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks is the inverse of this implying that
null pointer dereferencing is not undefined.
This feature is implemented in LLVM IR in this CL as the function attribute
"null-pointer-is-valid"="true" in IR (Under review at D47894).
The CL updates several passes that assumed null pointer dereferencing is
undefined to not optimize when the "null-pointer-is-valid"="true"
attribute is present.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, efriedma, jyknight, chandlerc, rnk, srhines, void, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: efriedma, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: eraman, haicheng, george.burgess.iv, drinkcat, theraven, reames, sanjoy, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47895
llvm-svn: 336613
I don't think there's a need to use `const char *`. In most (probably all?)
cases, we need a length of a name later, so discarding a length will
lead to a wasted effort.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49046
llvm-svn: 336612
In non-zero address spaces, we were reporting that an object at `null`
always occupies zero bytes. This is incorrect in many cases, so just
return `unknown` in those cases for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48860
llvm-svn: 336611
delegate method (and unit test).
The name 'replace' better captures what the old delegate method did: it
returned materialization responsibility for a set of symbols to the VSO.
The new delegate method delegates responsibility for a set of symbols to a new
MaterializationResponsibility instance. This can be used to split responsibility
between multiple threads, or multiple materialization methods.
llvm-svn: 336603
Added __float128 support for a number of rounding operations:
trunc
rint
nearbyint
round
floor
ceil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48415
llvm-svn: 336601
Summary:
- Changed variable/function names to be more consistent
- Improved comments in test files
- Added more tests
- Fixed a few typos
- Misc. cosmetic changes
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49087
llvm-svn: 336598
Summary:
This patch adds support for the atomicrmw instructions and the strong
cmpxchg instruction to the IRTranslator.
I've left out weak cmpxchg because LangRef.rst isn't entirely clear on what
difference it makes to the backend. As far as I can tell from the code, it
only matters to AtomicExpandPass which is run at the LLVM-IR level.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, javed.absar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, javed.absar, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40092
llvm-svn: 336589
Build error on Android; reported by and fix provided by (thanks) by Mauro Rossi <issor.oruam@gmail.com>
Fixes the following building error:
external/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIInsertWaitcnts.cpp:1903:61:
error: comparison of integers of different signs:
'typename iterator_traits<__wrap_iter<MachineBasicBlock **> >::difference_type'
(aka 'int') and 'unsigned int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
BlockWaitcntProcessedSet.end(), &MBB) < Count)) {
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~
1 error generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49089
llvm-svn: 336588
These won't work for the forseeable future. These aren't allowed
from OpenCL, but IPO optimizations can make them appear.
Also directly set the attributes on functions, regardless
of the linkage rather than cloning functions like before.
llvm-svn: 336587
Summary:
This adds a reverse transform for the instcombine canonicalizations
that were added in D47980, D47981.
As discussed later, that was worse at least for the code size,
and potentially for the performance, too.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Zmpl
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48768
llvm-svn: 336585
