v2: add tests
rename LowerSDIV24 to LowerSDIVREM24
handle the rem part in this function
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
llvm-svn: 215460
An optional third field was added to `llvm.global_ctors` (and
`llvm.global_dtors`) in r209015. Most of the code has been changed to
deal with both versions of the variables. Users of the C API might
create either version, the helper functions in LLVM create the two-field
version, and clang now creates the three-field version.
However, the BitcodeReader was changed to always upgrade to the
three-field version. This created an unnecessary inconsistency in the
IR before/after serializing to bitcode.
This commit resolves the inconsistency by making the third field truly
optional (and not upgrading in the bitcode reader). Since `llvm-link`
was relying on this upgrade code, rather than deleting it I've moved it
into `ModuleLinker`, where it upgrades these arrays as necessary to
resolve inconsistencies between modules.
The ideal resolution would be to remove the 2-field version and make the
third field required. I filed PR20506 to track that.
I changed `test/Bitcode/upgrade-global-ctors.ll` to a negative test and
duplicated the `llvm-link` check in `test/Linker/global_ctors.ll` to
check both upgrade directions.
Since I came across this as part of PR5680 (serializing use-list order),
I've also added the missing `verify-uselistorder` RUN line to
`test/Bitcode/metadata-2.ll`.
llvm-svn: 215457
I initially thought I could implement COMDATs with aliases by just
internalizing GVs instead of dropping them. This is a counter
example: Internalizing one of the @a would make @b and @c point
to different variables.
llvm-svn: 215447
The combiner ignored DBG nodes when checking
the uses of a virtual register.
It combined a sequence like
%vreg1 = madd %vreg2, %vreg3,...
DBG_VALUE (%vreg1 ...)
%vreg4 = add %vreg1,...
to
%vreg4 = madd %vreg2, %vreg3
leaving behind a dangling DBG_VALUE with
a definition. This triggered an assertion
in the MachineTraceMetrics.cpp module.
llvm-svn: 215431
Type::dump() doesn't print a newline, which makes for a poor
experience in a debugger. This looks like it was an ommission
considering Value::dump() two lines above, so I've changed Type to add
a newline as well.
Of the two in-tree callers, one added a newline anyway, and I've
updated the other one to use Type::print instead.
llvm-svn: 215421
refactoring in 215384. This way it can unique multiple entries describing
the same piece even if they don't have the exact same location.
(The same piece may get merged in and be added from OpenRanges).
There ought to be a more elegant solution for this, though.
llvm-svn: 215418
First, avoid calling setTailCall(false) on musttail calls. The funciton
prototypes should be "congruent", so the shadow layout should be exactly
the same.
Second, avoid inserting instrumentation after a musttail call to
propagate the return value shadow. We don't need to propagate the
result of a tail call, it should already be in the right place.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4331
llvm-svn: 215415
No functional change. To be used in future commits that need to look
for such instructions.
Reviewed By: rafael
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4504
llvm-svn: 215413
as long as possible.
** Context **
Each time the dominance information is modified, the dominator tree analysis
switches in a slow query mode. After a few queries without any modification on
the dominator tree, it performs an expensive update of its internal structure to
provide fast queries again.
** Problem **
Prior to this patch, the MachineSink pass was splitting the critical edges on
demand while relying heavy on the dominator tree information. In some cases,
this leads to pathological behavior where:
- We end up in the slow query mode right after splitting an edge.
- We update the dominance information.
- We break the dominance information again, thus ending up in the slow query
mode and so on.
** Proposed Solution **
To mitigate this effect, this patch postpones all the splitting of the edges at
the end of each iteration of the main loop.
The benefits are:
- The dominance information is valid for the life time of an iteration.
- This simplifies the code as we do not have to special treat instructions that
are sunk on critical edges. Indeed, the related block will be available
through the next iteration.
The downside is that when edges splitting is required, this incurs an additional
iteration of the main loop compared to the previous scheme.
** Performance **
Thanks to this patch, the motivating example compiles in 6+ minutes instead of
10+ minutes. No test case added as the motivating example as nothing special but
being huge!
I have measured only noise for both the compile time and the runtime on the llvm
test-suite + SPECs with Os and O3.
Note: The current implementation of MachineBasicBlock::SplitCriticalEdge also
uses the dominance information and therefore, hits this problem. A subsequent
patch will address that.
<rdar://problem/17894619>
llvm-svn: 215410
What follows bellow is a correctness proof of the transform using CVC3.
$ < t.cvc
A, B : BITVECTOR(32);
QUERY BVPLUS(32, A & B, A | B) = BVPLUS(32, A, B);
$ cvc3 < t.cvc
Valid.
llvm-svn: 215400
There are no variable values like registers encoded in the low 32 bits of MUBUF
instructions, so it is relatively easy to check these bits, and it will
help prevent us from introducing encoding bugs.
llvm-svn: 215397
This bit was left uninitialized, which was causing some random failures
of piglit tests.
NOTE: This is a candidate for the 3.5 branch.
llvm-svn: 215396
This patch adds a new property: isRegSequence and the related target hooks:
TargetIntrInfo::getRegSequenceInputs and
TargetInstrInfo::getRegSequenceLikeInputs to specify that a target specific
instruction is a (kind of) REG_SEQUENCE.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 215394
buildLocationLists easier to read.
The previous implementation conflated the merging of individual pieces
and the merging of entire DebugLocEntries.
By splitting this functionality into two separate functions the intention
of the code should be clearer.
llvm-svn: 215383
For many Thumb-1 register register instructions, setting the CPSR is not
permitted inside an IT block. We would not correctly flag those instructions.
The previous change to identify this scenario was insufficient as it did not
actually catch all the instances. The current list is formed by manual
inspection of the ARMv6M ARM.
The change to the Thumb2 IT block test is due to the fact that the new more
stringent checking of the MIs results in the If Conversion pass being prevented
from executing (since not all the instructions in the BB are predicable). This
results in code gen changes.
Thanks to Tim Northover for pointing out that the previous patch was
insufficient and hinting that the use of the v6M ARM would be much easier to use
than the v7 or v8!
llvm-svn: 215382
