Unaligned access is supported on PPC for non-vector types, and is generally
more efficient than manually expanding the loads and stores.
A few of the existing test cases were using expanded unaligned loads and stores
to test other features (like load/store with update), and for these test cases,
unaligned access remains disabled.
llvm-svn: 177160
In preparation for the addition of other SIMD ISA extensions (such as QPX) we
need to make sure that all Altivec patterns are properly predicated on having
Altivec support.
No functionality change intended (one test case needed to be updated b/c it
assumed that Altivec intrinsics would be supported without enabling Altivec
support).
llvm-svn: 177152
This is a very late complement to r130637 which fixed this on x86_64. Fixes
pr15448.
Since it looks like that every elf architecture uses this encoding when using
cfi, make it the default for elf. Just exclude mips64el. It has a lovely
.ll -> .o test (ef_frame.ll) that tests that nothing changes in the binary
content of the .eh_frame produced by llc. Oblige it.
llvm-svn: 177141
For spills into a large stack frame, the FI-elimination code uses the register
scavenger to obtain a free GPR for use with an r+r-addressed load or store.
When there are no available GPRs, the scavenger gets one by using its spill
slot. Previously, we were not always allocating that spill slot and the RS
would assert when the spill slot was needed.
I don't currently have a small test that triggered the assert, but I've
created a small regression test that verifies that the spill slot is now
added when the stack frame is sufficiently large.
llvm-svn: 177140
The new InstrSchedModel is easier to use than the instruction
itineraries. It will be used to model instruction latency and throughput
in modern Intel microarchitectures like Sandy Bridge.
InstrSchedModel should be able to coexist with instruction itinerary
classes, but for cleanliness we should switch the Atom processor model
to the new InstrSchedModel as well.
llvm-svn: 177122
See the Mips16ISetLowering.cpp patch to see a use of this.
For now now the extra code in Mips16ISetLowering.cpp is a nop but is
used for test purposes. Mips32 registers are setup and then removed and
then the Mips16 registers are setup.
Normally you need to add register classes and then call
computeRegisterProperties.
llvm-svn: 177120
This allows abitrary groups of processor resources. Using something in
a subset automatically counts againts the superset. Currently, this
only works if the superset is also a ProcResGroup as opposed to a
SuperUnit.
This allows SandyBridge to be expressed naturally, which will be
checked in shortly.
def SBPort01 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort0, SBPort1]>;
def SBPort15 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort1, SBPort5]>;
def SBPort23 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort2, SBPort3]>;
def SBPort015 : ProcResGroup<[SBPort0, SBPort1, SBPort5]>;
llvm-svn: 177112
This is a generic function (derived from PEI); moving it into
MachineFrameInfo eliminates a current redundancy between the ARM and AArch64
backends, and will allow it to be used by the PowerPC target code.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177111
Add the current PEI register scavenger as a parameter to the
processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized callback.
This change is necessary in order to allow the PowerPC target code to
set the register scavenger frame index after the save-area offset
adjustments performed by processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized. Only
after these adjustments have been made is it possible to estimate
the size of the stack frame.
llvm-svn: 177108
Make requiresFrameIndexScavenging return true, and create virtual registers in
the spilling code instead of using the register scavenger directly. This makes
the target-level code simpler, and importantly, delays the scavenging until
after callee-saved register processing (which will be important for later
changes).
Also cleans up trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc (makes it inline in the header with
the other related functions). This makes it clear that it always returns true.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177107
We used to add a spill slot for the register scavenger whenever the function
has a frame pointer. This is unnecessarily conservative: We may need the spill
slot for dynamic stack allocations, and functions with dynamic stack
allocations always have a FP, but we might also have a FP for other reasons
(such as the user explicitly disabling frame-pointer elimination), and we don't
necessarily need a spill slot for those functions.
The structsinregs test needed adjustment because it disables FP elimination.
llvm-svn: 177106
By terrible I mean we store/load from the stack.
This matters on PAQp8 in _Z5trainPsS_ii (which is inlined into Mixer::update)
where we decide to vectorize a loop with a VF of 8 resulting in a 25%
degradation on a cortex-a8.
LV: Found an estimated cost of 2 for VF 8 For instruction: icmp slt i32
LV: Found an estimated cost of 2 for VF 8 For instruction: select i1, i32, i32
The bug that tracks the CodeGen part is PR14868.
radar://13403975
llvm-svn: 177105
I don't think that it is otherwise clear how the overlapping offsets
are processed into distinct spill slots. Comment that this is done
in processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized.
llvm-svn: 177094
Rules include:
1)1 x*y +/- x*z => x*(y +/- z)
(the order of operands dosen't matter)
2) y/x +/- z/x => (y +/- z)/x
The transformation is disabled if the new add/sub expr "y +/- z" is a
denormal/naz/inifinity.
rdar://12911472
llvm-svn: 177088
The fundamental problem is that SROA didn't allow for overly wide loads
where the bits past the end of the alloca were masked away and the load
was sufficiently aligned to ensure there is no risk of page fault, or
other trapping behavior. With such widened loads, SROA would delete the
load entirely rather than clamping it to the size of the alloca in order
to allow mem2reg to fire. This was exposed by a test case that neatly
arranged for GVN to run first, widening certain loads, followed by an
inline step, and then SROA which miscompiles the code. However, I see no
reason why this hasn't been plaguing us in other contexts. It seems
deeply broken.
Diagnosing all of the above took all of 10 minutes of debugging. The
really annoying aspect is that fixing this completely breaks the pass.
;] There was an implicit reliance on the fact that no loads or stores
extended past the alloca once we decided to rewrite them in the final
stage of SROA. This was used to encode information about whether the
loads and stores had been split across multiple partitions of the
original alloca. That required threading explicit tracking of whether
a *use* of a partition is split across multiple partitions.
Once that was done, another problem arose: we allowed splitting of
integer loads and stores iff they were loads and stores to the entire
alloca. This is a really arbitrary limitation, and splitting at least
some integer loads and stores is crucial to maximize promotion
opportunities. My first attempt was to start removing the restriction
entirely, but currently that does Very Bad Things by causing *many*
common alloca patterns to be fully decomposed into i8 operations and
lots of or-ing together to produce larger integers on demand. The code
bloat is terrifying. That is still the right end-goal, but substantial
work must be done to either merge partitions or ensure that small i8
values are eagerly merged in some other pass. Sadly, figuring all this
out took essentially all the time and effort here.
So the end result is that we allow splitting only when the load or store
at least covers the alloca. That ensures widened loads and stores don't
hurt SROA, and that we don't rampantly decompose operations more than we
have previously.
All of this was already fairly well tested, and so I've just updated the
tests to cover the wide load behavior. I can add a test that crafts the
pass ordering magic which caused the original PR, but that seems really
brittle and to provide little benefit. The fundamental problem is that
widened loads should Just Work.
llvm-svn: 177055
