Summary:
This is achieved by generalizing the expression selecting the StringRef
format_provider. Now, anything that can be converted to a StringRef will
use it's formatter.
Reviewers: zturner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29898
llvm-svn: 295064
This reapplies commit r294967 with a fix for the execution time regressions
caught by the clang-cmake-aarch64-quick bot. We now extend the truncate
optimization to non-primary induction variables only if the truncate isn't
already free.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29847
llvm-svn: 295063
back into a vector
Previously the cost of the existing ExtractElement/ExtractValue
instructions was considered as a dead cost only if it was detected that
they have only one use. But these instructions may be considered
dead also if users of the instructions are also going to be vectorized,
like:
```
%x0 = extractelement <2 x float> %x, i32 0
%x1 = extractelement <2 x float> %x, i32 1
%x0x0 = fmul float %x0, %x0
%x1x1 = fmul float %x1, %x1
%add = fadd float %x0x0, %x1x1
```
This can be transformed to
```
%1 = fmul <2 x float> %x, %x
%2 = extractelement <2 x float> %1, i32 0
%3 = extractelement <2 x float> %1, i32 1
%add = fadd float %2, %3
```
because though `%x0` and `%x1` have 2 users each other, these users are
part of the vectorized tree and we can consider these `extractelement`
instructions as dead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29900
llvm-svn: 295056
Prevent memory objects of different address spaces to be part of
the same load/store groups when analysing interleaved accesses.
This is fixing pr31900.
Reviewers: HaoLiu, mssimpso, mkuper
Reviewed By: mssimpso, mkuper
Subscribers: llvm-commits, efriedma, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29717
llvm-svn: 295038
Summary:
Function isCompatibleIVType is already used as a guard before the call to
SE.getMinusSCEV(OperExpr, PrevExpr);
in LSRInstance::ChainInstruction. getMinusSCEV requires the expressions
to be of the same type, so we now consider two pointers with different
address spaces to be incompatible, since it is possible that the pointers
in fact have different sizes.
Reviewers: qcolombet, eli.friedman
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: nhaehnle, Ka-Ka, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29885
llvm-svn: 295033
Launch policies provided a mechanism for running RPC handlers on a background
thread (unblocking the main RPC receiver thread). Async handlers generalize
this by passing the responder function (the function that sends the RPC return
value) as an argument to the handler. The handler can optionally do its work on
a background thread (the same way launch policies do), but can also (a) can
inspect the call arguments before deciding to run the work on a different
thread, or (b) can use the responder in a subsequent RPC call (e.g. in the
handler of a callAsync), allowing the handler to call back to the originator (or
to a 3rd party) without blocking the listener thread, and without launching a
new thread.
llvm-svn: 295030
Extend our store promotion code to deal with unordered atomic accesses. Ordered atomics continue to be unhandled.
Most of the change is straight-forward, the only complicated bit is in the reasoning around mixing of atomic and non-atomic memory access. Rather than trying to reason about the complex semantics in these cases, I simply disallowed promotion when both atomic and non-atomic accesses are present. This is conservatively correct.
It seems really tempting to just promote all access to atomics, but the original accesses might have been conditional. Since we can't lower an arbitrary atomic type, it might not be safe to promote all access to atomic. Consider a loop like the following:
while(b) {
load i128 ...
if (can lower i128 atomic)
store atomic i128 ...
else
store i128
}
It could be there's no race on the location and thus the code is perfectly well defined even if we can't lower a i128 atomically.
It's not clear we need to be this conservative - arguably the program above is brocken since it can't be lowered unless the branch is folded - but I didn't want to have to fix any fallout which might result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D15592
llvm-svn: 295015
Previously we could not use it because std::once_flag's default
constructor was not constexpr. Today, all supported versions of VS
correctly mark it constexpr. I confirmed that MSVC 2015 does not emit
any problematic racy dynamic initialization code, so we should be safe
to use this now.
llvm-svn: 295013
This will later be used by ThinLTOBitcodeWriter to add copies of readnone
functions to the regular LTO module.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29695
llvm-svn: 295008
This adds MXCSR to the set of recognized registers for X86 targets and updates the instructions that read or write it. I do not intend for all of the various floating point instructions that implicitly use the control bits or update the status bits of this register to ever have that usage modeled by default. However, when constrained floating point modes (such as strict FP exception status modeling or dynamic rounding modes) are enabled, implicit use/def information for MXCSR will be added to those instructions.
Until those additional updates are made this should cause (almost?) no functional changes. Theoretically, this will prevent instructions like LDMXCSR and STMXCSR from being moved past one another, but that should be prevented anyway and I haven't found a case where it is happening now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29903
llvm-svn: 295004
Summary:
This change edits the language reference to explicitly allow the
existence of readnone and readonly functions that can throw. Full
discussion at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/108637.html
Reviewers: dberlin, chandlerc, hfinkel, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28740
llvm-svn: 295000
Summary:
Update the TBAA section to mention the struct path TBAA that LLVM
implements today. This is not a proposal or change in semantics -- it
is intended only to **document** what LLVM already does today.
This is related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D26438 where I've tried to
implement some of the constraints as verifier checks.
Reviewers: anna, reames, rsmith, chandlerc, hfinkel, rjmccall, mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, manmanren
Reviewed By: manmanren
Subscribers: dberlin, dberris, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26831
llvm-svn: 294999
This revealed that we actually have 8 more unused flag bits, and byval
size doesn't need to be a bitfield at all.
This came up during code review here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29668#inline-258469
llvm-svn: 294989
Backends don't support this yet. They would have to move to the swifterror
register before the tail call to make sure it is live-in to the call.
rdar://30495920
llvm-svn: 294982
Make the whole thing testable by adding YAML I/O support for the WPD
summary information and adding some negative tests that exercise the
YAML support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29782
llvm-svn: 294981
This reverts commit r294967. This patch caused execution time slowdowns in a
few LLVM test-suite tests, as reported by the clang-cmake-aarch64-quick bot.
I'm reverting to investigate.
llvm-svn: 294973
This is consistent with what we do for GlobalISel. That way, it is easy
to see whether or not FastISel is able to fully select a function.
At some point we may want to switch that to an optimization remark.
llvm-svn: 294970
This patch extends the optimization of truncations whose operand is an
induction variable with a constant integer step. Previously we were only
applying this optimization to the primary induction variable. However, the cost
model assumes the optimization is applied to the truncation of all integer
induction variables (even regardless of step type). The transformation is now
applied to the other induction variables, and I've updated the cost model to
ensure it is better in sync with the transformation we actually perform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29847
llvm-svn: 294967
