This is achieved through a substitution of FileCheck in lit.cfg.py,
where we explicitly set -allow-unused-prefixes to false.
We also introduce a %FileCheckWithUnusedPrefixes% substitution that can
be used in those cases where we want to allow unused prefixes, even if
the folder policy is to disallow them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91275
SUMMARY:
1. decode the Vector extension if has_vec is set
2. decode long table fields, if longtbtable is set.
There is conflict on the bit order of HasVectorInfoMask and HasExtensionTableMask between AIX os header and IBM aix compiler XLC.
In the /usr/include/sys/debug.h defines
static constexpr uint32_t HasVectorInfoMask = 0x0040'0000;
static constexpr uint32_t HasExtensionTableMask = 0x0080'0000;
but the XLC defines as
static constexpr uint32_t HasVectorInfoMask = 0x0080'0000;
static constexpr uint32_t HasExtensionTableMask = 0x0040'0000;
we follows the definition of the IBM AIX compiler XLC here.
Reviewer: Jason Liu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86461
Support/Compiler.h is included by c files (e.g. regcomp.c) where
__cplusplus is not defined at all. Avoid evaluating the undefined
macro for such files.
These are all lightweight to compute and helps avoid issues with Known being used to hold both the shift amount and then the shifted result.
Minor cleanup for D90479.
This was already something that was handled by one of the "else"
branches in maybeLoweredToCall, so this patch is an NFC but makes it
explicit and adds a test. We may in the future want to support this
under certain situations but for the moment just don't try and create
low overhead loops with inline asm in them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91257
D57663 allowed us to reuse broadcasts of the same scalar value by extracting low subvectors from the widest type.
Unfortunately we weren't ensuring the broadcasts were from the same SDValue, just the same SDNode - which failed on multiple-value nodes like ISD::SDIVREM
FYI: I intend to request this be merged into the 11.x release branch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91709
The assertion that vector widths are <= 256 elements was hard wired in the LV code. Eg, VE allows for vectors up to 512 elements. Test again the TTI vector register bit width instead - this is an NFC for non-asserting builds.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91518
In some cases, the values passed to `asm sideeffect` calls cannot be
mapped directly to simple MVTs. Currently, we crash in the backend if
that happens. An example can be found in the @test_vector_too_large_r_m
test case, where we pass <9 x float> vectors. In practice, this can
happen in cases like the simple C example below.
using vec = float __attribute__((ext_vector_type(9)));
void f1 (vec m) {
asm volatile("" : "+r,m"(m) : : "memory");
}
One case that use "+r,m" constraints for arbitrary data types in
practice is google-benchmark's DoNotOptimize.
This patch updates visitInlineAsm so that it use MVT::Other for
constraints with complex VTs. It looks like the rest of the backend
correctly deals with that and properly legalizes the type.
And we still report an error if there are no registers to satisfy the
constraint.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91710
This defines the vec_broadcast SDNode along with lowering and isel code.
We also remove unused type mappings for the vector register classes (all vector MVTs that are not used in the ISA go).
We will implement support for short vectors later by intercepting nodes with illegal vector EVTs before LLVM has had a chance to widen them.
Reviewed By: kaz7
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91646
Some nested loops may share the same ExitingBB, so after we finishing FoldExit,
we need to notify OuterLoop and SCEV to drop any stored trip count.
Patched by: guopeilin
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91325
The lookup logic is also reusable.
Also refactored the API to return the loaded vector - this makes it more
clear what state it is in in the case of error (as it won't be
returned).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91759
This code wasn't valid, and 5abf76fbe37380874a88cc9aa02164800e4e10f3
started asserting. This is a speculative fix since I don't have a
Windows machine handy.
2c196bbc6bd897b3dcc1d87a3baac28e1e88df41 asserted that
`SmallVector::push_back` doesn't invalidate the parameter when it needs
to grow. Do the same for `resize`, `append`, `assign`, `insert`, and
`emplace_back`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91744
In some places the parser guards against dereferencing `End`, while in
others it relies on the presence of a trailing `'\0'` to elide checks.
Add the remaining guards needed to ensure the parser never attempts to
dereference `End`, making it safe to not require a null-terminated input
buffer.
Update the parser fuzzer harness so that it tests with buffers that are
guaranteed to be non-null-terminated, null-terminated, and 1-terminated,
additionally ensuring the result of the parse is the same in each case.
Some of the regression tests were written by inspection, and some are
cases caught by the fuzzer which required additional fixes in the
parser.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84050
This is essentially a clone of the existing fuzzer added in D50839, but
for the whole parser Streamer, and currently only testing for sanitizer
violations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91573
@tangxingxin1008 found a bug that regard vadd.vv v1, v3, a0 as a valid V
instruction. We should remove the VRegAsmOperand operand class and use
VR register class directly.
Patched by: tangxingxin1008, Hsiangkai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91712
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4acf8c78e659833be8be047ba2f8561386a11d4b
(1994) introduced this behavior:
if a fixup symbol is equated to an expression with an undefined symbol, convert
the fixup to be against the target symbol. glibc relies on this behavior to perform
assembly level indirection
```
asm("memcpy = __GI_memcpy"); // from sysdeps/generic/symbol-hacks.h
...
// call memcpy@PLT
// The relocation references __GI_memcpy in GNU as, but memcpy in MC (without the patch)
memcpy (...);
```
(1) It complements `extern __typeof(memcpy) memcpy asm("__GI_memcpy");` The frontend asm label does not redirect synthesized memcpy in the middle-end. (See D88712 for details)
(2) `asm("memcpy = __GI_memcpy");` is in every translation unit, but the memcpy declaration may not be visible in the translation unit where memcpy is synthesized.
MC already redirects `memcpy = __GI_memcpy; call memcpy` but not `memcpy = __GI_memcpy; call memcpy@plt`.
This patch fixes the latter by allowing MCExpr::evaluateAsRelocatableImpl to
evaluate a non-VK_None MCSymbolRefExpr, which is only done after the layout is available.
GNU as allows `memcpy = __GI_memcpy+1; call memcpy@PLT` which seems nonsensical, so we don't allow it.
`MC/PowerPC/pr38945.s` `NUMBER = 0x6ffffff9; cmpwi 8,NUMBER@l` requires the
`symbol@l` form in AsmMatcher, so evaluation needs to be deferred. This is the
place whether future simplification may be possible.
Note, if we suppress the VM_None evaluation when MCAsmLayout is nullptr, we may
lose the `invalid reassignment of non-absolute variable` diagnostic
(`ARM/thumb_set-diagnostics.s` and `MC/AsmParser/variables-invalid.s`).
We know that this diagnostic is troublesome in some cases
(https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1008), so we can consider
making simplification in the future.
Reviewed By: jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88625
In some situations, the compiler may insert an accumulator prime instruction and
an accumulator unprime instruction with no use of that accumulator between the two.
That's for example the case when we store an accumulator after assembling it or
restoring it. This patch adds a peephole to remove these prime and unprime instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91386
These tests implicitly depend on the target supporting generic pointers,
so to prepare for testing them on GFX6 (which lacks FLAT) remove the
dependency where possible.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91666
The GEP aliasing implementation currently has two pieces of code
that solve two different subsets of the same basic problem: If you
have GEPs with offsets 4*x + 0 and 4*y + 1 (assuming access size 1),
then they do not alias regardless of whether x and y are the same.
One implementation is in aliasSameBasePointerGEPs(), which looks at
this in a limited structural way. It requires both GEP base pointers
to be exactly the same, then (optionally) a number of equal indexes,
then an unknown index, then a non-equal index into a struct. This
set of limitations works, but it's overly restrictive and hides the
core property we're trying to exploit.
The second implementation is part of aliasGEP() itself and tries to
find a common modulus in the scales, so it can then check that the
constant offset doesn't overlap under modular arithmetic. The second
implementation has the right idea of what the general problem is,
but effectively only considers power of two factors in the scales
(while aliasSameBasePointerGEPs also works with non-pow2 struct sizes.)
What this patch does is to adjust the aliasGEP() implementation to
instead find the largest common factor in all the scales (i.e. the GCD)
and use that as the modulus.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91027
This reverts commit 562addba652e8bdabe49f9123fd92c21b7a0d640.
Reverted change too quickly, the failing test cases passed on the next build.
So reverting revert (to include the changes).
Summary:
This patch adds support for passing in the original delcaration name in the source file to the libomptarget runtime. This will allow the runtime to provide more intelligent debugging messages. This patch takes the original expression parsed from the OpenMP map / update clause and provides a textual representation if it was explicitly mapped, otherwise it takes the name of the variable declaration as a fallback. The information in passed to the runtime in a global array of strings that matches the existing ident_t source location strings using ";name;filename;column;row;;"
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89802
This is the same fix as 23aeadb89df38406dc4d929d08286f7ce31040eb,
just for CloneScopedAliasMetadata rather than PropagateCallSiteMetadata.
In this case the previous outcome was incorrectly dropped metadata,
as it was not part of the computed metadata map.
The real change in the test is that the first load now retains
metadata, the rest of the changes are due to changes in metadata
numbering.
The VMap also contains a mapping from Argument => Instruction,
where the instruction is part of the original function, not the
inlined one. The code was assuming that all the instructions in
the VMap were inlined.
This was a pre-existing problem for the loop access metadata, but
was extended to the more common noalias metadata by
27f647d117087ca11959e232e6443f4aee31e966, thus causing miscompiles.
There is a similar assumption inside CloneAliasScopeMetadata(), so
that one likely needs to be fixed as well.
Summary:
Expand existing loopsink testing to also test loopsinking using new pass
manager. Enable memoryssa for loopsink with new pass manager. This
combination exposed a bug that was previously fixed for loopsink
without memoryssa. When sinking an instruction into a loop, the source
block may not be part of the loop but still needs to be checked for
pointer invalidation. This is the fix for bugzilla #39695 (PR 54659)
expanded to also work with memoryssa.
Respond to review comments. Enable Memory SSA in legacy Loop Sink pass
under EnableMSSALoopDependency option control. Update tests accordingly.
Respond to review comments. Add options controlling whether memoryssa is
used for loop sink, defaulting to off. Expand testing based on these
options.
Respond to review comments. Properly indicated preserved analyses.
Author: Jamie Schmeiser <schmeise@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed By: asbirlea (Alina Sbirlea)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90249
