Intrinsics can only be called directly, taking their address is not
legal. This is currently only enforced for intrinsics that have an
ID, rather than all intrinsics. Adjust the check to cover all
intrinsics.
This came up in D106013.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106095
This implements the elementtype attribute specified in D105407. It
just adds the attribute and the specified verifier rules, but
doesn't yet make use of it anywhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106008
With the current deref semantics, this is redundant - since we assume that anything which is dereferenceable (ever) can't be freed - but it becomes neccessary for the deref-at-point semantics.
Testing wise, this is covered by test/CodeGen/X86/hoist-invariant-load.ll when -use-dereferenceable-at-point-semantics is active. I didn't bother duplicating the command line since a) it's an in-development mode, and b) the change is pretty obvious.
While it is nice to have separate methods in the public AttributeSet
API, we can fetch the type from the internal AttributeSetNode
using a generic API for all type attribute kinds.
A couple of attributes had explicit checks for incompatibility
with pointer types. However, this is already handled generically
by the typeIncompatible() check. We can drop these after adding
SwiftError to typeIncompatible().
However, the previous implementation of the check prints out all
attributes that are incompatible with a given type, even though
those attributes aren't actually used. This has the annoying
result that the error message changes every time a new attribute
is added to the list. Improve this by explicitly finding which
attribute isn't compatible and printing just that.
Add tests for D105088, as well as an option to disable the
(generally) unsound inttoptr of ptrtoint optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105771
It is possible that the remangled name for an intrinsic already exists with a different (and wrong) prototype within the module.
As the bitcode reader keeps both versions of all remangled intrinsics around for a longer time, this can result in a
crash, as can be seen in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50923
This patch makes 'remangleIntrinsicFunction' aware of this situation. When it is detected, it moves the version with the wrong prototype to a different name. That version will be removed anyway once the module is completely loaded.
With thanks to @asbirlea for reporting this issue when trying out an lto build with the full restrict patches, and @efriedma for suggesting a sane resolution mechanism.
Reviewed By: apilipenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105118
Continuing from D105763, this allows placing certain properties
about attributes in the TableGen definition. In particular, we
store whether an attribute applies to fn/param/ret (or a combination
thereof). This information is used by the Verifier, as well as the
ForceFunctionAttrs pass. I also plan to use this in LLParser,
which also duplicates info on which attributes are valid where.
This keeps metadata about attributes in one place, and makes it
more likely that it stays in sync, rather than in various
functions spread across the codebase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105780
This is now the same as isIntAttrKind(), so use that instead, as
it does not require manual maintenance. The naming is also more
accurate in that both int and type attributes have an argument,
but this method was only targeting int attributes.
I initially wanted to tighten the AttrBuilder assertion, but we
have some in-tree uses that would violate it.
Assert that enum/int/type attributes go through the constructor
they are supposed to use.
To make sure this can't happen via invalid bitcode, explicitly
verify that the attribute kind if correct there.
Followup to D105658 to make AttrBuilder automatically work with
new type attributes. TableGen is tweaked to emit First/LastTypeAttr
markers, based on which we can handle type attributes
programmatically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105763
In the spirit of TRegions [0], this patch analyzes a kernel and tracks
if it can be executed in SPMD-mode. If so, we flip the arguments of
the __kmpc_target_init and deinit call to enable the mode. We also
update the `<kernel>_exec_mode` flag to indicate to the runtime we
changed the mode to SPMD.
The code analysis is done interprocedurally by extending the
AAKernelInfo abstract attribute to track SPMD compatibility as well.
[0] https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-28596-8_11
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102307
Broke check-clang, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D102307#2869065
Ran `git revert -n ebbe149a6f08535ede848a531a601ae6591cfbc5..269416d41908bb670f67af689155d5ab8eea689a`
In the spirit of TRegions [0], this patch analyzes a kernel and tracks
if it can be executed in SPMD-mode. If so, we flip the arguments of
the __kmpc_target_init and deinit call to enable the mode. We also
update the `<kernel>_exec_mode` flag to indicate to the runtime we
changed the mode to SPMD.
The code analysis is done interprocedurally by extending the
AAKernelInfo abstract attribute to track SPMD compatibility as well.
[0] https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-28596-8_11
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102307
While working on the elementtype attribute, I felt that the type
attribute handling in AttrBuilder is overly repetitive. This patch
converts the separate Type* members into an std::array<Type*>, so
that all type attribute kinds can be handled generically.
There's more room for improvement here (especially when it comes to
converting the AttrBuilder to an Attribute), but this seems like a
good starting point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105658
To support options like -print-before=<pass> and -print-after=<pass>
the PassBuilder will register PassInstrumentation callbacks as well
as a mapping between internal pass class names and the pass names
used in those options (and other cmd line interfaces). But for
some reason all the passes that takes options where missing in those
maps, so for example "-print-after=loop-vectorize" didn't work.
This patch will add the missing entries by also taking care of
function and loop passes with params when setting up the class to
pass name maps.
One might notice that even with this patch it might be tricky to
know what pass name to use in options such as -print-after. This
because there only is a single mapping from class name to pass name,
while the PassRegistry currently is a bit messy as it sometimes
reuses the same class for different pass names (without using the
"pass with params" scheme, or the pass-name<variant> syntax).
It gets extra messy in some situations. For example the
MemorySanitizerPass can run like this (with debug and print-after)
opt -passes='kmsan' -print-after=msan-module -debug-only=msan
The 'kmsan' alias for 'msan<kernel>' is just confusing as one might
think that 'kmsan' is a separate pass (but the DEBUG_TYPE is still
just 'msan'). And since the module pass version of the pass adds
a mapping from 'MemorySanitizerPass' to 'msan-module' one need to
use 'msan-module' in the print-before and print-after options.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105006
C++23 will make these conversions ambiguous - so fix them to make the
codebase forward-compatible with C++23 (& a follow-up change I've made
will make this ambiguous/invalid even in <C++23 so we don't regress
this & it generally improves the code anyway)
Several subclasses of User override operator new without also overriding
operator delete. This means that delete expressions fall back to using
operator delete of the base class, which would be User. However, this is
only allowed if the base class has a virtual destructor which is not the
case for User, so this is UB.
See also [expr.delete] (3) for the exact wording.
This is actually detected in some cases by GCC 11's
-Wmismatched-new-delete now which is how I found this error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103143
Avoid enumerating all attributes here and instead use
getNameFromAttrKind(), which is based on the tablegen data.
This only leaves us with custom handling for int attributes,
which don't have uniform printing.
Same as other CreateLoad-style APIs, these need an explicit type
argument to support opaque pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105395
Specifically the CreateMaskedStore and CreateMaskedScatter APIs.
The CreateMaskedLoad and CreateMaskedGather APIs will need an
additional type argument.
This reverts commit 8cd35ad854ab4458fd509447359066ea3578b494.
It breaks `TestMembersAndLocalsWithSameName.py` on GreenDragon and
Mikael Holmén points out in D104827 that bitcode files created with the
patch cannot be parsed with binaries built before it.
While this should not matter for most architectures (where the program
address space is 0), it is important for CHERI (and therefore Arm Morello).
We use address space 200 for all of our code pointers and without this
change we assert in the SelectionDAG handling of BlockAddress nodes.
It is also useful for AVR: previously programs targeting
AVR that attempt to read their own machine code
via a pointer to a label would instead read from RAM
using a pointer relative to the the start of program flash.
Reviewed By: dylanmckay, theraven
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48803
This adds support for opaque pointers in intrinsic type checks
of IIT kind Pointer and PtrToElt.
This is less straight-forward than it might initially seem, because
we should only accept opaque pointers here in --force-opaque-pointers
mode. Otherwise, there would be more than one valid type signature
for a given intrinsic name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105155
This patch adds intrinsic definitions and SDNodes for predicated
load/store/gather/scatter, based on the work done in D57504.
Reviewed By: simoll, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99355
Currently UREM & SREM on constant ranges produces overly pessimistic
results for single element constant ranges.
Delegate to APInt's implementation if both operands are single element
constant ranges. We already do something similar for other binary
operators, like binary AND.
Fixes PR49731.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105115
Currently, LLParser will create a Function/GlobalVariable forward
reference based on the desired pointer type and then modify it when
it is declared. With opaque pointers, we generally do not know the
correct type to use until we see the declaration.
Solve this by creating the forward reference with a dummy type, and
then performing a RAUW with the correct Function/GlobalVariable when
it is declared. The approach is adopted from
b5b55963f6.
This results in a change to the use list order, which is why we see
test changes on some module passes that are not stable under use list
reordering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104950
There can be a use after free in the Value::replaceUsesWithIf()
if two uses point to the same constant. Patch defers handling
of the constants past the iterator scan.
Another potential issue is that handleOperandChange updates all
the uses in a given Constant, not just the one passed to
ShouldReplace. Added a FIXME comment.
Both issues are not currently exploitable as the only use of
this call with constants avoids it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105061
Add UNIQUED and DISTINCT properties in Metadata.def and use them to
implement restrictions on the `distinct` property of MDNodes:
* DIExpression can currently be parsed from IR or read from bitcode
as `distinct`, but this property is silently dropped when printing
to IR. This causes accepted IR to fail to round-trip. As DIExpression
appears inline at each use in the canonical form of IR, it cannot
actually be `distinct` anyway, as there is no syntax to describe it.
* Similarly, DIArgList is conceptually always uniqued. It is currently
restricted to only appearing in contexts where there is no syntax for
`distinct`, but for consistency it is treated equivalently to
DIExpression in this patch.
* DICompileUnit is already restricted to always being `distinct`, but
along with adding general support for the inverse restriction I went
ahead and described this in Metadata.def and updated the parser to be
general. Future nodes which have this restriction can share this
support.
The new UNIQUED property applies to DIExpression and DIArgList, and
forbids them to be `distinct`. It also implies they are canonically
printed inline at each use, rather than via MDNode ID.
The new DISTINCT property applies to DICompileUnit, and requires it to
be `distinct`.
A potential alternative change is to forbid the non-inline syntax for
DIExpression entirely, as is done with DIArgList implicitly by requiring
it appear in the context of a function. For example, we would forbid:
!named = !{!0}
!0 = !DIExpression()
Instead we would only accept the equivalent inlined version:
!named = !{!DIExpression()}
This essentially removes the ability to create a `distinct` DIExpression
by construction, as there is no syntax for `distinct` inline. If this
patch is accepted as-is, the result would be that the non-canonical
version is accepted, but the following would be an error and produce a diagnostic:
!named = !{!0}
; error: 'distinct' not allowed for !DIExpression()
!0 = distinct !DIExpression()
Also update some documentation to consistently use the inline syntax for
DIExpression, and to describe the restrictions on `distinct` for nodes
where applicable.
Reviewed By: StephenTozer, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104827
Currently, AsmWriter will stick uselistorder directives for global
values inside individual functions. This doesn't make a lot of sense,
and interacts badly with D104950, as use list order adjustments will
be performed while still working on a forward reference.
This patch instead always prints uselistorder directives for globals
at the module level. This isn't really compatible with the previously
used implementation approach. Rather than walking through all values
again, use the OrderMap (after stabilizing its order) to go through
all values and compute the use list shuffles for them. Classify them
per-function, or nullptr for globals.
Even independently of D104950, this seems to fix a few
verify-uselistorder failures. Conveniently, there is even a
pre-existing failing test that this fixes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104976
I added an assertion in D91816 (documenting behavior added in D93422)
that callers and callees with mismatched fn attr's related to stack
protectors should not occur unless the callee was attributed
always_inline.
This falls apart when a call, invoke, or callbr (any instruction
inheriting from CallBase) itself has an always_inline attribute. Clang
will emit such attributes on Instructions when __attribute__((flatten))
is used to recursively force inlining from a caller.
Since these assertions only had the caller and callee Functions, and not
the call site (CallBase derived classes), we would have to search the
caller for such instructions to reconstruct the call site information.
But at that point, inlining has already occurred; the call site has
already been removed from the caller.
Remove the assertions, add a unit test for always_inline call sites, and
update the LangRef.
Another curiosity is that the always_inline Attribute on Instructions is
only expanded by the inline pass, not the always_inline pass.
Thanks to @pcc on this report when building Android's RunTime (ART)
interpreter.
Reviewed By: pcc, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104944
Fix the use-list-order for br instructions by setting the operands in
order of their index to match the use-list-order prediction. The case
where this matters is when there is a condition but the if-true and
if-false branches are identical.
Bug was found when reviewing failures pointed at by
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104950. Fix is similar to
3cf415c6c367ced43175ebd1dc4bd9582c7f5376.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104959
the call's return type is void
Instead of trying hard to prevent global optimization passes such as
deadargelim from changing the return type to void, just ignore the
bundle if the return type is void. clang currently emits calls to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which consumes the function call result,
immediately after the function call to prevent changes to the return
type, but optimization passes can delete the call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use if the function call doesn't return, which
enables deadargelim to change the return type.
rdar://76671438
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103062
Do this by making opaque pointers a valid pointer element type,
for which we implicitly create an opaque pointer (moving the logic
from getPointerTo into PointerType::get).
We'll never create something like a "pointer to opaque pointer",
but accept it in the API, because a lot of code reasonably assumes
that you can create a pointer to pointer type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104902
We don't want to start updating tests to use opaque pointers until we're
close to the opaque pointer transition. However, before the transition
we want to run tests as if pointers are opaque pointers to see if there
are any crashes.
At some point when we have a flag to only create opaque pointers in the
bitcode and textual IR readers, and when we have fixed all places that
try to read a pointee type, this flag will be useless. However, until
then, this can help us find issues more easily.
Since the cl::opt is read into LLVMContext, we need to make sure
LLVMContext is created after cl::ParseCommandLineOptions().
Previously ValueEnumerator would visit the value types of global values
via the pointer type, but with opaque pointers we have to manually visit
the value type.
Reviewed By: nikic, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103503
This is a partial reapply of the original commit and the followup commit
that were previously reverted; this reapply also includes a small fix
for a potential source of non-determinism, but also has a small change
to turn off variadic debug value salvaging, to ensure that any future
revert/reapply steps to disable and renable this feature do not risk
causing conflicts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91722
This reverts commit 386b66b2fc297cda121a3cc8a36887a6ecbcfc68.
Fix the use-list-order for call and invoke instructions by setting the
operands in order of their index. This matches the use-list-order
prediction. Note that the verifier precludes sharing operands in callbr
(so there was no bug to fix), but that code was updated for consistency.
Bug was found during review of https://reviews.llvm.org/D104740.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104805
