Due to the SGPR init bug, every program claims to use the same number
of SGPRs anyway, so there's no point in trying to shift those registers
down from their initial spot of reservation.
Add a test that uses VGPR spilling and blocks most SGPRs from being used for
the scratch resource register. Previously, this would run into an assertion.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15724
llvm-svn: 256870
Summary:
Most of the tool chain is able to optimize scalar and memcpy like operation effisciently while it isn't that good with aggregates. In order to improve the support of aggregate, we try to change aggregate manipulation into either scalar or memcpy like ones whenever possible without loosing informations.
This is one such opportunity.
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, dexonsmith, Prazek, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15894
llvm-svn: 256868
In r256814, we managed to remove catchpads which were trivially redudant
because they were the same SSA value. We can do better using the same
algorithm but with a smarter datastructure by hashing the SSA values
within the catchpad and comparing them structurally.
llvm-svn: 256815
Summary:
At least for CoreCLR, a catchpad which immediately executes an
`unreachable` instruction indicates that the exception can never have a
matching type, and so such catchpads can be removed, and so can their
catchswitches if the catchswitch becomes empty.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15846
llvm-svn: 256809
The red zone consists of 128 bytes beyond the stack pointer so that the
allocation of objects in leaf functions doesn't require decrementing
rsp. In r255656, we introduced an optimization that would cheaply
materialize certain constants via push/pop. Push decrements the stack
pointer and stores it's result at what is now the top of the stack.
However, this means that using push/pop would encroach on the red zone.
PR26023 gives an example where this corrupts an object in the red zone.
llvm-svn: 256808
Unfortunately this fix had the effect of exposing the
-verify-machineinstrs FIXME of X86InstrInfo.cpp in two testcases for
which I disabled it for now.
Two testcases also have additional pushq/popq where the corrected code
cannot prove that %rax is dead any longer. Looking at the examples, this
could potentially be fixed by improving computeRegisterLiveness() to check
the live-in lists of the successors blocks when reaching the end of a
block.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR25951.
llvm-svn: 256799
Summary:
Enabling this feature will account for the two SGPRs used by the hardware
to store the XNACK_MASK physically.
The hardware only requires this reservation when the XNACK feature is
explicitly enabled. At some point, HSA will probably want to do that, but
it does increase SGPR register pressure, so leave it disabled by default
for now (but do add a small test).
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15869
llvm-svn: 256794
Summary: This patch fixes a bug in prepareICWorklistFromFunction, where the loop becomes infinite with instructions of token type. The patch checks if the instruction is token type, and if so it updates EndInst with the current instruction.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15859
llvm-svn: 256792
r256763 had promoteLoopAccessesToScalars check for the existence of a
catchswitch when the exit blocks were populated but
promoteLoopAccessesToScalars may be called with a prepopulated set of
exit blocks which would also need to be checked.
This fixes PR26019.
llvm-svn: 256788
This patch removes the isOperatorNewLike predicate since it was only being used to establish a non-null return value and we have attributes specifically for that purpose with generic handling. To keep approximate the same behaviour for existing frontends, I added the various operator new like (i.e. instances of operator new) to InferFunctionAttrs. It's not really clear to me why this isn't handled in Clang, but I didn't want to break existing code and any subtle assumptions it might have.
Once this patch is in, I'm going to start separating the isAllocLike family of predicates. These appear to be being used for a mixture of things which should be more clearly separated and documented. Today, they're being used to indicate (at least) aliasing facts, CSE-ability, and default values from an allocation site.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15820
llvm-svn: 256787
Before reevaluating instructions, iterate over all instructions
to be reevaluated and remove trivially dead instructions and if
any of it's operands become trivially dead, mark it for deletion
until all trivially dead instructions have been removed
llvm-svn: 256773
Summary:
Fix the CLR state numbering to generate correct tables, and update the lit
test to verify them.
The CLR numbering assigns one state number to each catchpad and
cleanuppad.
It also computes two tree-like relations over states:
1) Each state has a "HandlerParentState", which is the state of the next
outer handler enclosing this state's handler (same as nearest ancestor
per the ParentPad linkage on EH pads, but skipping over catchswitches).
2) Each state has a "TryParentState", which:
a) for a catchpad that's not the last handler on its catchswitch, is
the state of the next catchpad on that catchswitch.
b) for all other pads, is the state of the pad whose try region is the
next outer try region enclosing this state's try region. The "try
regions are not present as such in the IR, but will be inferred
based on the placement of invokes and pads which reach each other
by exceptional exits.
Catchswitches do not get their own states, but each gets mapped to the
state of its first catchpad.
Table generation requires each state's "unwind dest" state to have a lower
state number than the given state.
Since HandlerParentState can be computed as a function of a pad's
ParentPad, and TryParentState can be computed as a function of its unwind
dest and the TryParentStates of its children, the CLR state numbering
algorithm first computes HandlerParentState in a top-down pass, then
computes TryParentState in a bottom-up pass.
Also reword some comments/names in the CLR EH table generation to make the
distinction between the different kinds of "parent" clear.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: AndyAyers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15325
llvm-svn: 256760
We had two bugs here:
- We might try to sink into a catchswitch, causing verifier failures.
- We will succeed in sinking into a cleanuppad but we didn't update the
funclet operand bundle.
This fixes PR26000.
llvm-svn: 256728
Summary:
There are a number of files in the tree which have been accidentally checked in with DOS line endings. Convert these to native line endings.
There are also a few files which have DOS line endings on purpose, and I have set the svn:eol-style property to 'CRLF' on those.
Reviewers: joerg, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, sanjoy, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15848
llvm-svn: 256707
Summary:
The handler list must be nonempty and consist solely of CatchPads.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15842
llvm-svn: 256691
Summary: A catchswitch cannot be a parent of a cleanuppad or another catchswitch.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15841
llvm-svn: 256690
Summary:
Add a pass to update catchrets when their successors get cloned; the
existing pass doesn't catch these because it walks the funclet whose
blocks are being cloned but the catchret is in a child funclet.
Also update the test for removing incoming PHI values; when the
predecessor is a catchret, the relevant color is the catchret's parentPad,
not its block's color.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15840
llvm-svn: 256689
LLVM's targets need to know if stack pointer adjustments occur after the
prologue. This is needed to correctly determine if the red-zone is
appropriate to use or if a frame pointer is required.
Normally, LLVM can figure this out very precisely by reasoning about the
contents of the MachineFunction. There is an interesting corner case:
inline assembly.
The vast majority of inline assembly which will perform a push or pop is
done so to pair up with pushf or popf as appropriate. Unfortunately,
this inline assembly doesn't mark the stack pointer as clobbered
because, well, it isn't. The stack pointer is decremented and then
immediately incremented. Because of this, LLVM was changed in r256456
to conservatively assume that inline assembly contain a sequence of
stack operations. This is unfortunate because the vast majority of
inline assembly will not end up manipulating the stack pointer in any
way at all.
Instead, let's provide a more principled solution: an intrinsic.
FWIW, other compilers (MSVC and GCC among them) also provide this
functionality as an intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 256685
Not folding these cases tends to avoid partial register updates:
sqrtss (%eax), %xmm0
Has a partial update of %xmm0, while
movss (%eax), %xmm0
sqrtss %xmm0, %xmm0
Has a clobber of the high lanes immediately before the partial update,
avoiding a potential stall.
Given this, we only want to fold when optimizing for size.
This is consistent with the patterns we already have for some of
the fp/int converts, and in X86InstrInfo::foldMemoryOperandImpl()
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15741
llvm-svn: 256671
The code that was meant to adjust the duplication cost based on the
terminator opcode was not being executed in cases where the initial
threshold was hit inside the loop.
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15536
llvm-svn: 256568
