The big/small ordering here is based on signed values so SmallValue will
be INT_MIN and BigValue 0. This shouldn't be a problem but the code
assumed that BigValue always had more bits set than SmallValue.
We used to just miss the transformation, but a recent refactoring of
mine turned this into an assertion failure.
llvm-svn: 239105
Summary:
1) The only caller, ARMTargetParser::parseArch, uses the results for an "endswith" test; so, including the "arm" prefix into the result is unnecessary.
2) Most ARMTargetParser::parseArch callers pass it the output from ARMTargetParser::getCanonicalArchName; so, make this behaviour the default. Then, including the "arm" prefix into the cases is unnecessary.
Reviewers: rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10249
llvm-svn: 239099
Apparently this functionality isn't used in-tree (or I would go & make
the explicit unique_ptr constructions into implicit constructions to
make them more self documenting now that clone doesn't return a raw
owning pointer anymore) but only by the Julia frontend. This isn't
ideal.
llvm-svn: 239091
Basic block selection involves checking successor BBs for PHI nodes
that depend on the current BB. In case such BBs are found, the value
being selected is a constant and such constant already exists in
current BB, it's value is reused.
This might lead to wrong locations in some situations, especially if
same constant value ends up being materialized twice in two different
ways, which discards that sharing and leaves us with wrong debug
location in the successor BB.
In code this involves the following sequence of calls:
SelectionDAGBuilder::HandlePHINodesInSuccessorBlocks ->
SelectionDAGBuilder::CopyValueToVirtualRegister ->
SelectionDAGBuilder::getNonRegisterValue
llvm-svn: 239089
Originally committed in r237975, GCC 4.7 gave a compilation error
regarding "looser throw specification" though it seemed to be pointing
to a virtual defaulted dtor in a base class and an override defaulted
dtor in a derived class - so I'm not quite sure why/how they could end
up with different throw specifications. To simplify and reduce the risk
of this, I've just removed the pointless override in the derived class,
the base class's should be sufficient. *fingers crossed*
llvm-svn: 239088
Now that we can look at users, we can trivially do this: when we would
have otherwise disabled GlobalMerge (currently -O<3), we can just run
it for minsize functions, as it's usually a codesize win.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10054
llvm-svn: 239087
Fix the FIXME and remove this old as(1) compat option. It was useful for
bringup of the integrated assembler to diff object files, but now it's
just causing more relocations than strictly necessary to be generated.
rdar://21201804
llvm-svn: 239084
I made a few changes here in a couple of commits - breaking them out
into smaller ones in case I hit the GCC oddities again.
I'm still not /entirely/ sure what the issues were, so apologies if any
of these experiments break things again. Feel free to revert
immediately.
llvm-svn: 239083
Summary:
With this patch, NVPTXLowerKernelArgs converts a kernel pointer argument to a
pointer in the global address space. This change, along with
NVPTXFavorNonGenericAddrSpaces, allows the NVPTX backend to emit ld.global.*
and st.global.* for accessing kernel pointer arguments.
Minor changes:
1. refactor: extract function convertToPointerInAddrSpace
2. fix a bug in the test case in bug21465.ll
Test Plan: lower-kernel-ptr-arg.ll
Reviewers: eliben, meheff, jholewinski
Reviewed By: jholewinski
Subscribers: wengxt, jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10154
llvm-svn: 239082
Summary:
Properly report the error in segment load commands from MachOObjectFile
constructor instead of crashing the program.
Adjust the test case accordingly.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rafael, filcab
Subscribers: llvm-commits
llvm-svn: 239081
Summary:
Currently all load commands are parsed in MachOObjectFile constructor.
If the next load command cannot be parsed, or if command size is too
small, properly report it through the error code and fail to construct
the object, instead of crashing the program.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rafael, filcab
Subscribers: llvm-commits
llvm-svn: 239080
Summary: Instead, properly report this error from MachOObjectFile constructor.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
llvm-svn: 239078
Enabling Ninja Job Pools needs to be dependent on the CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM not the CMAKE_GENERATOR. There are generators (like "Sublime Text 2 - Ninja") that also generate ninja build files. Basing of the CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM is the best future-proof way to handle this.
llvm-svn: 239076
Summary:
Avoid parsing object file each time MachOObjectFile::getHeader() is
called. Instead, cache the header in MachOObjectFile constructor, where
it's parsed anyway. In future, we must avoid constructing the object
at all if the header can't be parsed.
Test Plan: regression test suite.
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
llvm-svn: 239075
Summary:
-march=bpf -> host endian
-march=bpf_le -> little endian
-match=bpf_be -> big endian
Test Plan:
v1 was tested by IBM s390 guys and appears to be working there.
It bit rots too fast here.
Reviewers: chandlerc, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10177
llvm-svn: 239071
Method 'visitBUILD_VECTOR' in the DAGCombiner knows how to combine a
build_vector of a bunch of extract_vector_elt nodes and constant zero nodes
into a shuffle blend with a zero vector.
However, method 'visitBUILD_VECTOR' forgot that a floating point
build_vector may contain negative zero as well as positive zero.
Example:
define <2 x double> @example(<2 x double> %A) {
entry:
%0 = extractelement <2 x double> %A, i32 0
%1 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %0, i32 0
%2 = insertelement <2 x double> %1, double -0.0, i32 1
ret <2 x double> %2
}
Before this patch, llc (with -mattr=+sse4.1) wrongly generated
movq %xmm0, %xmm0 # xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero
So, the sign bit of the negative zero was effectively lost.
This patch fixes the problem by adding explicit checks for positive zero.
With this patch, llc produces the following code for the example above:
movhpd .LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm0
where .LCPI0_0 referes to a 'double -0'.
llvm-svn: 239070
The current check never passes, because CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM, at least on Linux,
includes the full path to the "ninja" binary; this effectively disables
compile/link jobs pools.
Use CMAKE_GENERATOR STREQUAL "Ninja" as a more reliable check.
llvm-svn: 239069
* If the input file is missing;
* If the type of input object file can't be recognized;
* If the object file can't be parsed correctly.
llvm-svn: 239065
Now that we sometimes know the address space, this can
theoretically do a better job.
This needs better test coverage, but this mostly depends on
first updating the loop optimizatiosn to provide the address
space.
llvm-svn: 239053
When checking (High - Low + 1).sle(BitWidth), BitWidth would be truncated
to the size of the left-hand side. In the case of this PR, the left-hand
side was i4, so BitWidth=64 got truncated to 0 and the assert failed.
llvm-svn: 239048
Section symbols exist as an optimization: instead of having multiple relocations
point to different symbols, many of them can point to a single section symbol.
When that optimization is unused, a section symbol is also unused and adds no
extra information to the object file.
This saves a bit of space on the object files and makes the output of
llvm-objdump -t easier to read and consequently some tests get quite a bit
simpler.
llvm-svn: 239045
Summary: I've gotten feedback from users on CMake 2.8 that the compile and link pool options were not working. This is expected so I'm adding a warning so we can report invalid configurations to users.
Reviewers: eugenis
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10193
llvm-svn: 239044
If the compare in a select pattern has another use then it can't be removed, so we'd just
be creating repeated code if we created a min/max node.
Spotted by Matt Arsenault!
llvm-svn: 239037
