This change introduces a GC parseable lowering for element atomic
memcpy/memmove intrinsics. This way runtime can provide an
implementation which can take a safepoint during copy operation.
See "GC-parseable element atomic memcpy/memmove" thread on llvm-dev
for the background and details:
https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/NnENHzmX-b8/m/3PyN8Y2pCAAJ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88861
It's currently ambiguous in IR whether the source language explicitly
did not want a stack a stack protector (in C, via function attribute
no_stack_protector) or doesn't care for any given function.
It's common for code that manipulates the stack via inline assembly or
that has to set up its own stack canary (such as the Linux kernel) would
like to avoid stack protectors in certain functions. In this case, we've
been bitten by numerous bugs where a callee with a stack protector is
inlined into an __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) caller, which
generally breaks the caller's assumptions about not having a stack
protector. LTO exacerbates the issue.
While developers can avoid this by putting all no_stack_protector
functions in one translation unit together and compiling those with
-fno-stack-protector, it's generally not very ergonomic or as
ergonomic as a function attribute, and still doesn't work for LTO. See also:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200915172658.1432732-1-rkir@google.com/https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200918201436.2932360-30-samitolvanen@google.com/T/#u
Typically, when inlining a callee into a caller, the caller will be
upgraded in its level of stack protection (see adjustCallerSSPLevel()).
By adding an explicit attribute in the IR when the function attribute is
used in the source language, we can now identify such cases and prevent
inlining. Block inlining when the callee and caller differ in the case that one
contains `nossp` when the other has `ssp`, `sspstrong`, or `sspreq`.
Fixes pr/47479.
Reviewed By: void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956
This does not change anything at the moment, but needed for
D89170. In that change I am probing a physical SGPR to see if
it is legal. RC is SReg_32, but DRC for scratch instructions
is SReg_32_XEXEC_HI and test fails.
That is sufficient just to check if DRC contains a register
here in case of physreg. Physregs also do not use subregs
so the subreg handling below is irrelevant for these.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90064
The change in 0ba98433971f changed the behaviour of the build when
using an XL build compiler because `-G` is not a pure linker option:
it also implies `-shared`. This was accounted for in the base CMake
configuration, so an analysis of the change from 0ba98433971f in
relation to a build using Clang (where `-shared` is introduced by CMake)
would not identify the issue. This patch resolves this particular issue
by adding `-shared` alongside `-Wl,-G`.
At the same time, the investigation reveals that several aspects of the
various build configurations are not operating in the manner originally
intended.
The other issue related to the `-G` linker option in the build is that
the removal of it (to avoid unnecessary use of run-time linking) is not
effective for the build using the Clang compiler. This patch addresses
this by adjusting the regular expressions used to remove the broadly-
applied `-G`.
Finally, the issue of specifying the export list with `-Wl,` instead of
a compiler option is flagged with a FIXME comment.
Reviewed By: daltenty, amyk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90041
This was initiated from the uses of MCRegUnitIterator, so while likely
not exhaustive, it's a step forward.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89975
I'm not sure whether this can cause actual non-determinism in the
compiler output, but at least it causes non-determinism in the
statistics collected by BasicAA.
Use SetVector to have a predictable iteration order.
There are two optimizations here:
1. Consider the following code:
FCMPSrr %0, %1, implicit-def $nzcv
%sel1:gpr32 = CSELWr %_, %_, 12, implicit $nzcv
%sub:gpr32 = SUBSWrr %_, %_, implicit-def $nzcv
FCMPSrr %0, %1, implicit-def $nzcv
%sel2:gpr32 = CSELWr %_, %_, 12, implicit $nzcv
This kind of code where we have 2 FCMPs each feeding a CSEL can happen
when we have a single IR fcmp being used by two selects. During selection,
to ensure that there can be no clobbering of nzcv between the fcmp and the
csel, we have to generate an fcmp immediately before each csel is
selected.
However, often we can essentially CSE these together later in MachineCSE.
This doesn't work though if there are unrelated flag-setting instructions
in between the two FCMPs. In this case, the SUBS defines NZCV
but it doesn't have any users, being overwritten by the second FCMP.
Our solution here is to try to convert flag setting operations between
a interval of identical FCMPs, so that CSE will be able to eliminate one.
2. SelectionDAG imported patterns for arithmetic ops currently select the
flag-setting ops for CSE reasons, and add the implicit-def $nzcv operand
to those instructions. However if those impdef operands are not marked as
dead, the peephole optimizations are not able to optimize them into non-flag
setting variants. The optimization here is to find these dead imp-defs and
mark them as such.
This pass is only enabled when optimizations are enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89415
Runs an executable on a remote host.
This is meant to be used as an executor when running the LLVM and the Libraries tests on a target.
Reviewed By: vvereschaka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89349
This re-applies e2fceec2fd1 with fixes. Apparently we already *do* support
relaxation for ELF, so we need to make sure the test case allocates a slab at
a fixed address, and that the R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX test references an external
that is guaranteed to be out of range.
Immediate must be in an integer range [0,255] for umin/umax instruction.
Extend pattern matching helper SelectSVEArithImm() to take in value type
bitwidth when checking immediate value is in range or not.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89831
In this patch, Predicates fix added for the following:
* disable prefix-instrs will disable pcrelative-memops
* set two predicates PairedVectorMemops and PrefixInstrs for PLXVP/PSTXVP definitions
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89727
Reviewed by: amyk, steven.zhang
I was wrong in thinking that MRI.use_instructions return unique instructions and mislead Jay in his previous patch D64393.
First loop counted more instructions than it was in reality and the second loop went beyond the basic block with that counter.
I used Jay's previous code that relied on MRI.use_operands to constrain the number of instructions to check among.
modifiesRegister is inlined to reduce the number of passes over instruction operands and added assert on BB end boundary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89386
Implementation of instructions table.get, table.set, table.grow,
table.size, table.fill, table.copy.
Missing instructions are table.init and elem.drop as they deal with
element sections which are not yet implemented.
Added more tests to tables.s
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89797
Deciding where to place debugging instructions when normal instructions
sink between blocks is difficult -- see PR44117. Dealing with this with
instruction-referencing variable locations is simple: we just tolerate
DBG_INSTR_REFs referring to values that haven't been computed yet. This
patch adds support into InstrRefBasedLDV to record when a variable value
appears in the middle of a block, and should have a DBG_VALUE added when it
appears (a debug use before def).
While described simply, this relies heavily on the value-propagation
algorithm in InstrRefBasedLDV. The implementation doesn't attempt to verify
the location of a value unless something non-trivial occurs to merge
variable values in vlocJoin. This means that a variable with a value that
has no location can retain it across all control flow (including loops).
It's only when another debug instruction specifies a different variable
value that we have to check, and find there's no location.
This property means that if a machine value is defined in a block dominated
by a DBG_INSTR_REF that refers to it, all the successor blocks can
automatically find a location for that value (if it's not clobbered). Thus
in a sense, InstrRefBasedLDV is already supporting and implementing
use-before-defs. This patch allows us to specify a variable location in the
block where it's defined.
When loading live-in variable locations, TransferTracker currently discards
those where it can't find a location for the variable value. However, we
can tell from the machine value number whether the value is defined in this
block. If it is, add it to a set of use-before-def records. Then, once the
relevant instruction has been processed, emit a DBG_VALUE immediately after
it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85775
This follows on from D89558 which added the new intrinsic and D88955
which added similar combines for llvm.amdgcn.fmul.legacy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90028
Downstream testing revealed some problems with this patch.
Reverting while investigating.
This reverts commit 2b96dcebfae65485859d956954f10f409abaae79.
Apparently there are some Microsoft headers which
`#define interface struct`. This method is only used
in pending changes so far.
Change-Id: Ic68fe8e1958ec9b015f817ee218431f4146b888a
Handle DBG_INSTR_REF instructions in LiveDebugValues, to determine and
propagate variable locations. The logic is fairly straight forwards:
Collect a map of debug-instruction-number to the machine value numbers
generated in the first walk through the function. When building the
variable value transfer function and we see a DBG_INSTR_REF, look up the
instruction it refers to, and pick the machine value number it generates,
That's it; the rest of LiveDebugValues continues as normal.
Awkwardly, there are two kinds of instruction numbering happening here: the
offset into the block (which is how machine value numbers are determined),
and the numbers that we label instructions with when generating
DBG_INSTR_REFs.
I've also restructured the TransferTracker redefVar code a little, to
separate some DBG_VALUE specific operations into its own method. The
changes around redefVar should be largely NFC, while allowing
DBG_INSTR_REFs to specify a value number rather than just a location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85771
This reverts commit b3ca53e14274642274be8fe7db8b43dc3c146366.
This reverts commit 8b7dac81d378c339d3e55f6f51cd0c42803903ad.
This reverts commit 37c030f81a9fdd7a7e1b6fa5407b277c1ab1afa1.
This is a massive revert of the following commits (from most revent to oldest):
2b9b7b5775a1d8fcd7aa5abaa8fc0bc303434f1a.
529ac33197f6408952ae995075ac5e2dc5287e81
28270234f1478047e35879f4ba8838b47edfcc14
69c2087283cf7b17ca75f69daebf4ffc158b754a
b5aa67446e01bd277727b05710a42e69ac41e74b
5d796645d6c8cadeb003715c33e231a8ba05b6de
After checking-in the __config_site change, a lot of things started breaking
due to widespread reliance on various aspects of libc++'s build, notably the
fact that we can include the headers from the source tree, but also reliance
on various "internal" CMake variables used by the runtimes build and compiler-rt.
These were unintended consequences of the change, and after two days, we
still haven't restored all the bots to being green. Instead, now that I
understand what specific areas this will blow up in, I should be able to
chop up the patch into smaller ones that are easier to digest.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D89041 for more details on this adventure.
As discussed in D89952,
instcombine can sometimes find a way to reduce similar patterns,
but it is incomplete.
InstSimplify uses the computeConstantRange() ValueTracking analysis
via simplifyICmpWithConstant(), so we just need to fill in the max
value of cttz to process any "icmp pred cttz(X), C" pattern (the
min value is initialized to zero automatically).
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Z_SLWZ
Follow-up to D89976.
As discussed in D89952,
instcombine can sometimes find a way to reduce similar patterns,
but it is incomplete.
InstSimplify uses the computeConstantRange() ValueTracking analysis
via simplifyICmpWithConstant(), so we just need to fill in the max
value of ctlz to process any "icmp pred ctlz(X), C" pattern (the
min value is initialized to zero automatically).
Follow-up to D89976.
As discussed in D89952,
instcombine can sometimes find a way to reduce similar patterns,
but it is incomplete.
InstSimplify uses the computeConstantRange() ValueTracking analysis
via simplifyICmpWithConstant(), so we just need to fill in the max
value of ctpop to process any "icmp pred ctpop(X), C" pattern (the
min value is initialized to zero automatically).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89976
matchBSwapOrBitReverse was hardcoded to just match bswaps - we're going to need to expose the ability to match bitreverse as well, so make this part of the function call.
This patch adds a specialized implementation of getIntrinsicInstrCost
and add initial cost-modeling for min/max vector intrinsics.
AArch64 NEON support umin/smin/umax/smax for vectors
<8 x i8>, <16 x i8>, <4 x i16>, <8 x i16>, <2 x i32> and <4 x i32>.
Notably, it does not support vectors with i64 elements.
This change by itself should have very little impact on codegen, but in
follow-up patches I plan to teach the vectorizers to consider using
those intrinsics on platforms where it is profitable, e.g. because there
is no general 'select'-like instruction.
The current cost returned should be better for throughput, latency and size.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89953
