This patch adds support for fragment expressions
TryToShrinkGlobalToBoolean() which were previously just dropped.
Thanks to Reid Kleckner for providing me a reproducer!
llvm-svn: 331086
Summary:
Currently, we
1. match `LHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `RHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
If that does not match, we swap the `LHS` and `RHS` matchers:
1. match `RHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `LHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
This works ok.
But it complicates writing of commutative matchers, where one would like to match
(`m_Value()`) the value on one side, and use (`m_Specific()`) it on the other side.
This is additionally complicated by the fact that `m_Specific()` stores the `Value *`,
not `Value **`, so it won't work at all out of the box.
The last problem is trivially solved by adding a new `m_c_Specific()` that stores the
`Value **`, not `Value *`. I'm choosing to add a new matcher, not change the existing
one because i guess all the current users are ok with existing behavior,
and this additional pointer indirection may have performance drawbacks.
Also, i'm storing pointer, not reference, because for some mysterious-to-me reason
it did not work with the reference.
The first one appears trivial, too.
Currently, we
1. match `LHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `RHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
If that does not match, we swap the ~~`LHS` and `RHS` matchers~~ **operands**:
1. match ~~`RHS`~~ **`LHS`** matcher to the ~~`first`~~ **`second`** operand of binary operator,
2. and then match ~~`LHS`~~ **`RHS`** matcher to the ~~`second`~ **`first`** operand of binary operator.
Surprisingly, `$ ninja check-llvm` still passes with this.
But i expect the bots will disagree..
The motivational unittest is included.
I'd like to use this in D45664.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, arsenm, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: xbolva00, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45828
llvm-svn: 331085
As suggested in D45842
(although still not sure if we're going to advance that),
we must invalidate references to instructions that have
been recycled (operands were changed, so result is different).
llvm-svn: 331083
Some of the bots were failing in a different way to the others. These were
unable to compare tuples. Fix this by changing to a struct, thereby avoiding
the quirks of tuples.
llvm-svn: 331081
We currently have a hard to solve analysis problem around the order of instructions within a potentially throwing block. We can't cheaply determine whether a given instruction is before the first potential throw in the block. While we're working on that in the background, special case the first instruction within the header.
why this particular special case? Well, headers are guaranteed to execute if the loop does, and it turns out we tend to produce this form in practice.
In a follow on patch, I tend to extend LICM with an alternate approach which works for any instruction in the header before the first throw, but this is the best I can come up with other users of the analysis (such as store promotion.)
Note: I can't show the difference in the analysis result since we're ORing in the expensive instruction walk used by SCEV. Using the full walk is not suitable for a general solution.
llvm-svn: 331079
Summary:
Only allow a single unique .symver alias per symbol. This matches the
behavior of gas. I noticed that we ignored multiple mismatched symver
directives looking at https://reviews.llvm.org/D45798
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson, espindola
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45845
llvm-svn: 331078
Extend the live-in check for all aliased registers so that we can
allow sinking Copy instructions when only implicit def is in successor's
live-in.
llvm-svn: 331072
Summary:
Currently only the memory size is supported but others can be added as
needed.
narrowScalar for G_LOAD and G_STORE now correctly update the
MachineMemOperand and will refuse to legalize atomics since those need more
careful expansions to maintain atomicity.
Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, aemerson, javed.absar
Reviewed By: aemerson
Subscribers: aemerson, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45466
llvm-svn: 331071
The idea is to have a pass which performs the same transformation as GuardWidening, but can be run within a loop pass manager without disrupting the pass manager structure. As demonstrated by the test case, this doesn't quite get there because of issues with post dom, but it gives a good step in the right direction. the motivation is purely to reduce compile time since we can now preserve locality during the loop walk.
This patch only includes a legacy pass. A follow up will add a new style pass as well.
llvm-svn: 331060
These branches were previously unanalyzable and unselectable. Add them and
recognize how to generate their inverses.
Reviewers: smaksimovic, atanasyan, abeserminji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46113
llvm-svn: 331050
Put the first ldp at the end, so that the load-store optimizer can run
and merge the ldp and the add into a post-index ldp.
This didn't work in case no frame was needed and resulted in code size
regressions.
llvm-svn: 331044
Summary:
`HandleLLVMOptions` adds `-w` to the cflags if `LLVM_ENABLE_WARNINGS` is not on.
With `-w`, `check_cxx_compiler_flag` doesn't error out for unsupported flags
(for example `-mcrc` on x86_64), and those flags end up being detected as
working - and really they aren't.
I am not entirely sure what the best way to solve this is, but setting
`LLVM_ENABLE_WARNINGS` prior to including `HandleLLVMOptions` does the job.
Reviewers: phosek, beanz
Reviewed By: phosek
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46079
llvm-svn: 331042
If the MachineInstr uses a custom inserter and is then erased after
instruction selection, there is no use for mapping it to a sched class.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 331040
We currently support LCSSA PHI nodes in the outer loop exit, if their
incoming values do not come from the outer loop latch or if the
outer loop latch has a single predecessor. In that case, the outer loop latch
will be executed only if the inner loop gets executed. If we have multiple
predecessors for the outer loop latch, it may be executed even if the inner
loop does not get executed.
This is a first step to support the case described in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
Reviewers: efriedma, karthikthecool, mcrosier
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43237
llvm-svn: 331037
This adds IR intrinsics for the AArch64 dot-product instructions introduced in
v8.2-A.
Differential revisioon: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46107
llvm-svn: 331036
Since PTX has grown a <2 x half> datatype vectorization has become more
important. The late LoadStoreVectorizer intentionally only does loads
and stores, but now arithmetic has to be vectorized for optimal
throughput too.
This is still very limited, SLP vectorization happily creates <2 x half>
if it's a legal type but there's still a lot of register moving
happening to get that fed into a vectorized store. Overall it's a small
performance win by reducing the amount of arithmetic instructions.
I haven't really checked what the loop vectorizer does to PTX code, the
cost model there might need some more tweaks. I didn't see it causing
harm though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46130
llvm-svn: 331035
This patch makes compiler does not fuse fmul and fadd/fsub into
fmadd/fmsub by default. Instead, -fp-contract=fast option can
be used when such behavior is desired.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46057
llvm-svn: 331033
This adds IR intrinsics for the ARM dot-product instructions introduced in
v8.2-A.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46106
llvm-svn: 331032
Back when the R52 schedule was added in rL286949, there was no way
to enable machine schedules in ARM for specific cores. Since then a
target feature has been added. This enables the feature for R52,
removing the need to manually specify compiler flags.
llvm-svn: 331027
Summary:
The value tracking analysis uses function alignment to infer that the
least significant bits of function pointers are known to be zero.
Unfortunately, this is not correct for ARM targets: the least
significant bit of a function pointer stores the ARM/Thumb state
information (i.e., the LSB is set for Thumb functions and cleared for
ARM functions).
The original approach (https://reviews.llvm.org/D44781) introduced a
new field for function pointer alignment in the DataLayout structure
to address this. But it seems unlikely that optimizations based on
function pointer alignment would bring much benefit in practice to
justify the additional maintenance burden, so this patch simply
assumes that function pointer alignment is always unknown.
Reviewers: javed.absar, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, hfinkel, rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46110
llvm-svn: 331025
Add new umin creation method which accepts a list of operands.
SCEV does not represents umin which is required in getExact, so
it transforms umin to umax with not. As a result the transformation of
tree of max to max with several operands does not work.
We just use the new introduced method for creation umin from several operands.
Reviewers: sanjoy, mkazantsev
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46047
llvm-svn: 331015
It doesn't unwind, and the wrong marking leads to the creation of an
.eh_frame section when it isn't necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46082
llvm-svn: 331008
The program might have unusual expectations for functions; for example,
the Linux kernel's build system warns if it finds references from .text
to .init.data.
I'm not sure this is something we actually want to make any guarantees
about (there isn't any explicit rule that would disallow outlining
in this case), but we might want to be conservative anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46091
llvm-svn: 331007
Summary: Also test for symbols information in test/MC/WebAssembly/debug-info.ll.
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, jgravelle-google, aheejin, sunfish, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46160
llvm-svn: 331005
Summary: If file stream arg is not captured and source is fopen, we could replace IO calls by unlocked IO ("_unlocked" function variants) to gain better speed,
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon, spatel, sanjoy, hfinkel, majnemer
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45736
llvm-svn: 331002
Summary: The instruction index was never referenced in the body. Just a minor cleanup.
Reviewers: andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46142
llvm-svn: 331001
Summary:
The '@' character is a special character in Doxygen. In a handful of cases we were not escaping this character which resulted in llvm intrinsics not being rendered properly. Specifically, the @llvm part was removed.
For example, see https://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1AssumptionCache.html. There are a few references to '.assume' without the @llvm. prefix. This patch corrects this.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45981
llvm-svn: 330998
