For the MIPS O32 ABI, the current call lowering logic naively lowers each
call, creating the reserved argument area to hold the argument spill areas for
$a0..$a3 and the outgoing parameter area if one is required at each call site.
In the case of a sufficently large byval argument, a call to memcpy is used
to write the start+16..end of the argument into the outgoing parameter area.
This is done within the CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END of the callee. The CALLSEQ
nodes are responsible for performing the necessary stack adjustments.
Since the O32/N32/N64 MIPS ABIs do not have a red-zone and writing below the
stack pointer and reading the values back is unpredictable, the call to memcpy
cannot be hoisted out of the callee's CALLSEQ nodes.
However, for the O32 ABI requires the reserved argument area for functions
which have parameters. The naive lowering of calls will then create nested
CALLSEQ sequences. For N32 and N64 these nodes are also created, but with
zero stack adjustments as those ABIs do not have a reserved argument area.
This patch addresses the correctness issue by recognizing the special case
of lowering a byval argument that uses memcpy. By recognizing that the
incoming chain already has a CALLSEQ_START node on it when calling memcpy,
the CALLSEQ nodes are not created. For the N32 and N64 ABIs, this is not an
issue, as no stack adjustment has to be performed.
For the O32 ABI, the correctness reasoning is different. In the case of a
sufficently large byval argument, registers a0..a3 are going to be used for
the callee's arguments, mandating the creation of the reserved argument area.
The call to memcpy in the naive case will also create its own reserved
argument area. However, since the reserved argument area consists of undefined
values, both calls can use the same reserved argument area.
Reviewers: abeserminji, atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44296
llvm-svn: 327388
splitMergedValStore will split a store into two if target prefers this, or if
-force-split-store is passed.
This patch adds the missing handling for endianness in this function along
with a test case.
Review: Eli Friedman
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44396
llvm-svn: 327375
The current zero extension elimination was restricted to operands of
comparison. It actually could be extended to more cases.
For example:
int *inc_p (int *p, unsigned a)
{
return p + a;
}
'a' will be promoted to i64 during addition, and the zero extension could
be eliminated as well.
For the elimination optimization, it should be much better to start
recognizing the candidate sequence from the SRL instruction instead of J*
instructions.
This patch makes it an generic zero extension elimination pass instead of
one restricted with comparison.
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 327367
There is a mistake in current code that we "break" out the optimization
when the first operand of J*_RR doesn't qualify the elimination. This
caused some elimination opportunities missed, for example the one in the
testcase.
The code should just fall through to handle the second operand.
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 327366
The current subregister definition check stops after the MOV_32_64
instruction.
This means we are thinking all the following instruction sequences
are safe to be eliminated:
MOV_32_64 rB, wA
SLL_ri rB, rB, 32
SRL_ri rB, rB, 32
However, this is *not* true. The source subregister wA of MOV_32_64 could
come from a implicit truncation of 64-bit register in which case the high
bits of the 64-bit register is not zeroed, therefore we can't eliminate
above sequence.
For example, for i32_val, we shouldn't do the elimination:
long long bar ();
int foo (int b, int c)
{
unsigned int i32_val = (unsigned int) bar();
if (i32_val < 10)
return b;
else
return c;
}
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 327365
Improve the test accuracy by adding more check directives.
Shifts are expected to be eliminated for zero extension but not for signed
extension.
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 327364
It is a revert of rL327362 which causes build bot failures with assert like
Assertion `isAvailableAtLoopEntry(RHS, L) && "RHS is not available at Loop Entry"' failed.
llvm-svn: 327363
IsKnownPredicate is updated to implement the following algorithm
proposed by @sanjoy and @mkazantsev :
isKnownPredicate(Pred, LHS, RHS) {
Collect set S all loops on which either LHS or RHS depend.
If S is non-empty
a. Let PD be the element of S which is dominated by all other elements of S
b. Let E(LHS) be value of LHS on entry of PD.
To get E(LHS), we should just take LHS and replace all AddRecs that
are attached to PD on with their entry values.
Define E(RHS) in the same way.
c. Let B(LHS) be value of L on backedge of PD.
To get B(LHS), we should just take LHS and replace all AddRecs that
are attached to PD on with their backedge values.
Define B(RHS) in the same way.
d. Note that E(LHS) and E(RHS) are automatically available on entry of PD,
so we can assert on that.
e. Return true if isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(Pred, E(LHS), E(RHS)) &&
isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond(Pred, B(LHS), B(RHS))
Return true if Pred, L, R is known from ranges, splitting etc.
}
This is follow-up for https://reviews.llvm.org/D42417.
Reviewers: sanjoy, mkazantsev, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy, mkazantsev
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43507
llvm-svn: 327362
Summary:
This change fixes PR36483. The bug was originally introduced by a change
that marked non-prevailing symbols dead. This broke LowerTypeTests
handling of available_externally functions, which are non-prevailing.
LowerTypeTests uses liveness information to avoid emitting thunks for
unused functions.
Marking available_externally functions dead is incorrect, the functions
are used though the function definitions are not. This change keeps them
live, and lets the EliminateAvailableExternally/GlobalDCE passes remove
them later instead.
(Reland with a suspected fix for a unit test failure I haven't been able
to reproduce locally)
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: grimar, mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43690
llvm-svn: 327360
Summary:
If there's a callees metadata attached to the indirect call instruction, add CallGraphEdges to the callees mentioned in the metadata when computing FunctionSummary.
* Why this is necessary:
Consider following code example:
```
(foo.c)
static int f1(int x) {...}
static int f2(int x);
static int (*fptr)(int) = f2;
static int f2(int x) {
if (x) fptr=f1; return f1(x);
}
int foo(int x) {
(*fptr)(x); // !callees metadata of !{i32 (i32)* @f1, i32 (i32)* @f2} would be attached to this call.
}
(bar.c)
int bar(int x) {
return foo(x);
}
```
At LTO time when `foo.o` is imported into `bar.o`, function `foo` might be inlined into `bar` and PGO-guided indirect call promotion will run after that. If the profile data tells that the promotion of `@f1` or `@f2` is beneficial, the optimizer will check if the "promoted" `@f1` or `@f2` (such as `@f1.llvm.0` or `@f2.llvm.0`) is available. Without this patch, importing `!callees` metadata would only add promoted declarations of `@f1` and `@f2` to the `bar.o`, but still the optimizer will assume that the function is available and perform the promotion. The result of that is link failure with `undefined reference to @f1.llvm.0`.
This patch fixes this problem by adding callees in the `!callees` metadata to CallGraphEdges so that their definition would be properly imported into.
One may ask that there already is a logic to add indirect call promotion targets to be added to CallGraphEdges. However, if profile data says "indirect call promotion is only beneficial under a certain inline context", the logic wouldn't work. In the code example above, if profile data is like
```
bar:1000000:100000
1:100000
1: foo:100000
1: 100000 f1:100000
```
, Computing FunctionSummary for `foo.o` wouldn't add `foo->f1` to CallGraphEdges. (Also, it is at least "possible" that one can provide profile data to only link step but not to compilation step).
Reviewers: tejohnson, mehdi_amini, pcc
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: inglorion, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44399
llvm-svn: 327358
This diff extends the output of -elf-section-groups
(llvm style, gnu style is unchanged since it's meant to be
compatible with binutils readelf) with sh_link and sh_info.
This change will enable us to use llvm-readobj -elf-section-groups
for testing llvm-objcopy's support for .group sections.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44280
llvm-svn: 327341
In the case that the CallInst that is being moved has an associated
operand bundle which is a funclet, the move will construct an invalid
instruction. The new site will have a different token and needs to be
reassociated with the new instruction.
Unfortunately, there is no way to alter the bundle after the
construction of the instruction. Replace the call instruction cloning
with a custom helper to clone the instruction and reassociate the
funclet token.
llvm-svn: 327336
LoopInstSimplify is unused and untested. Reading through the commit
history the pass also seems to have a high maintenance burden.
It would be best to retire the pass for now. It should be easy to
recover if we need something similar in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44053
llvm-svn: 327329
This is the FP equivalent of D42818. Use it for the few cases in InstSimplify
with -0.0 folds (that's the only current use of m_NegZero()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43792
llvm-svn: 327307
Summary:
1) Make sure to discard dangling debug info if the variable (or
variable fragment) is mapped to something new before we had a
chance to resolve the dangling debug info.
2) When resolving debug info, make sure to bump the associated
SDNodeOrder to ensure that the DBG_VALUE is emitted after the
instruction that defines the value used in the DBG_VALUE.
This will avoid a debug-use before def scenario as seen in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36417.
The new test case, test/DebugInfo/X86/sdag-dangling-dbgvalue.ll,
show some other limitations in how dangling debug info is
handled in the SelectionDAG. Since we currently only support
having one dangling dbg.value per Value, we will end up dropping
debug info when there are more than one variable that is described
by the same "dangling value".
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: aprantl, eraman, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44369
llvm-svn: 327303
This adds two features: "packets", and "nvj".
Enabling "packets" allows the compiler to generate instruction packets,
while disabling it will prevent it and disable all optimizations that
generate them. This feature is enabled by default on all subtargets.
The feature "nvj" allows the compiler to generate new-value jumps and it
implies "packets". It is enabled on all subtargets.
The exception is made for packets with endloop instructions, since they
require a certain minimum number of instructions in the packets to which
they apply. Disabling "packets" will not prevent hardware loops from
being generated.
llvm-svn: 327302
Summary:
This pattern came up in PR36682:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36682https://godbolt.org/g/LhuD9A
Tests for proposed fix in D44367.
Looking at the IR pattern in question, as per [[ https://github.com/rutgers-apl/alive-nj | alive-nj ]], for all the type combinations i checked
(input: `i16`, `i32`, `i64`; intermediate: `half`/`i16`, `float`/`i32`, `double`/`i64`)
for the following `icmp` comparisons the `sitofp`+`bitcast` can be dropped:
* `eq 0`
* `ne 0`
* `slt 0`
* `sle 0`
* `sge 0`
* `sgt 0`
* `slt 1`
* `sge 1`
* `sle -1`
* `sgt -1`
I did not check vectors, but i'm guessing it's the same there.
{F5887419}
Thus all these cases are in the testcase (along with the vector variant with additional `undef` element in the middle).
There are no negative patterns here (unless alive-nj lied/is broken), all of these should be optimized.
Generated with {F5887551}
Reviewers: spatel, majnemer, efriedma, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: nlopes, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44390
llvm-svn: 327301
Since the enqueued kernels have internal linkage, their names may be dropped.
In this case, give them unique names __amdgpu_enqueued_kernel or
__amdgpu_enqueued_kernel.n where n is a sequential number starting from 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44322
llvm-svn: 327291
This broke some Windows buildbots; see llvm-commits thread.
> These were just copies of the relevant fuzzer binary with (presumably)
> meaningful suffixes, but accounted for more than 10% of my build
> directory (> 8GB). Hard drive space is cheap, but not that cheap.
(Also reverts follow-up r326710 which didn't help.)
llvm-svn: 327266
This reverts r326908, originally landed as D44102.
Reverted for causing performance regressions on x86. (These regressions
are not yet understood.)
llvm-svn: 327252
When we replace the Phi we created with matched ones it is possible that
there are two identical phi nodes in IR. And matcher is smart enough to find that
new created phi matches both of them. So we try to replace our phi node with
matched ones twice and what is bad we delete our phi node twice causing a crash.
As soon as we found that we have two identical Phi nodes it makes sense to do
a clean-up and replace one phi node by other one.
The patch implements it.
Reviewers: john.brawn, reames
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43758
llvm-svn: 327250
64-bit MMX vector generation usually ends up lowering into SSE instructions before being spilled/reloaded as a MMX type.
This patch creates a MMX vector from MMX source values, taking the lowest element from each source and constructing broadcasts/build_vectors with direct calls to the MMX PUNPCKL/PSHUFW intrinsics.
We're missing a few consecutive load combines that could be handled in a future patch if that would be useful - my main interest here is just avoiding a lot of the MMX/SSE crossover.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43618
llvm-svn: 327247
