One of them (__memcpy_chk) was already there, the others were checked
by comparing function names.
Note that the fortified libfuncs are now part of TLI, but are always
available, because they aren't generated, only optimized into the
non-checking versions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6179
llvm-svn: 221817
This commit adds a new pass that can inject checks before indirect calls to
make sure that these calls target known locations. It supports three types of
checks and, at compile time, it can take the name of a custom function to call
when an indirect call check fails. The default failure function ignores the
error and continues.
This pass incidentally moves the function JumpInstrTables::transformType from
private to public and makes it static (with a new argument that specifies the
table type to use); this is so that the CFI code can transform function types
at call sites to determine which jump-instruction table to use for the check at
that site.
Also, this removes support for jumptables in ARM, pending further performance
analysis and discussion.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4167
llvm-svn: 221708
Summary:
In addition to the usual f128 workaround, it was also necessary to provide
a means of accessing ArgListEntry::IsFixed.
Reviewers: theraven, vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6111
llvm-svn: 221518
The problem is mostly that variadic output instruction
aren't handled, so it is rejected for having an inconsistent
number of operands, and then the right number of operands
isn't emitted.
llvm-svn: 221117
Summary:
CustomCallingConv is simply a CallingConv that tablegen should not generate the
implementation for. It allows regular CallingConv's to delegate to these custom
functions. This is (currently) necessary for Mips and we cannot use CCCustom
without having to adapt to the different API that CCCustom uses.
This brings us a bit closer to being able to remove
MipsCC::analyzeCallOperands and MipsCC::analyzeFormalArguments in favour of
the common implementation.
No functional change to the targets.
Depends on D3341
Reviewers: vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Subscribers: vmedic, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5965
llvm-svn: 221052
This patch adds an optimization in CodeGenPrepare to move an extractelement
right before a store when the target can combine them.
The optimization may promote any scalar operations to vector operations in the
way to make that possible.
** Context **
Some targets use different register files for both vector and scalar operations.
This means that transitioning from one domain to another may incur copy from one
register file to another. These copies are not coalescable and may be expensive.
For example, according to the scheduling model, on cortex-A8 a vector to GPR
move is 20 cycles.
** Motivating Example **
Let us consider an example:
define void @foo(<2 x i32>* %addr1, i32* %dest) {
%in1 = load <2 x i32>* %addr1, align 8
%extract = extractelement <2 x i32> %in1, i32 1
%out = or i32 %extract, 1
store i32 %out, i32* %dest, align 4
ret void
}
As it is, this IR generates the following assembly on armv7:
vldr d16, [r0] @vector load
vmov.32 r0, d16[1] @ cross-register-file copy: 20 cycles
orr r0, r0, #1 @ scalar bitwise or
str r0, [r1] @ scalar store
bx lr
Whereas we could generate much faster code:
vldr d16, [r0] @ vector load
vorr.i32 d16, #0x1 @ vector bitwise or
vst1.32 {d16[1]}, [r1:32] @ vector extract + store
bx lr
Half of the computation made in the vector is useless, but this allows to get
rid of the expensive cross-register-file copy.
** Proposed Solution **
To avoid this cross-register-copy penalty, we promote the scalar operations to
vector operations. The penalty will be removed if we manage to promote the whole
chain of computation in the vector domain.
Currently, we do that only when the chain of computation ends by a store and the
target is able to combine an extract with a store.
Stores are the most likely candidates, because other instructions produce values
that would need to be promoted and so, extracted as some point[1]. Moreover,
this is customary that targets feature stores that perform a vector extract (see
AArch64 and X86 for instance).
The proposed implementation relies on the TargetTransformInfo to decide whether
or not it is beneficial to promote a chain of computation in the vector domain.
Unfortunately, this interface is rather inaccurate for this level of details and
although this optimization may be beneficial for X86 and AArch64, the inaccuracy
will lead to the optimization being too aggressive.
Basically in TargetTransformInfo, everything that is legal has a cost of 1,
whereas, even if a vector type is legal, usually a vector operation is slightly
more expensive than its scalar counterpart. That will lead to too many
promotions that may not be counter balanced by the saving of the
cross-register-file copy. For instance, on AArch64 this penalty is just 4
cycles.
For now, the optimization is just enabled for ARM prior than v8, since those
processors have a larger penalty on cross-register-file copies, and the scope is
limited to basic blocks. Because of these two factors, we limit the effects of
the inaccuracy. Indeed, I did not want to build up a fancy cost model with block
frequency and everything on top of that.
[1] We can imagine targets that can combine an extractelement with other
instructions than just stores. If we want to go into that direction, the current
interfaces must be augmented and, moreover, I think this becomes a global isel
problem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5921
<rdar://problem/14170854>
llvm-svn: 220978
This is a first step for generating SSE rsqrt instructions for
reciprocal square root calcs when fast-math is allowed.
For now, be conservative and only enable this for AMD btver2
where performance improves significantly - for example, 29%
on llvm/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/n-body.c
(if we convert the data type to single-precision float).
This patch adds a two constant version of the Newton-Raphson
refinement algorithm to DAGCombiner that can be selected by any target
via a parameter returned by getRsqrtEstimate()..
See PR20900 for more details:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20900
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5658
llvm-svn: 220570
These are named following the IEEE-754 names for these
functions, rather than the libm fmin / fmax to avoid
possible ambiguities. Some languages may implement something
resembling fmin / fmax which return NaN if either operand is
to propagate errors. These implement the IEEE-754 semantics
of returning the other operand if either is a NaN representing
missing data.
llvm-svn: 220341
Summary:
Backends can use setInsertFencesForAtomic to signal to the middle-end that
montonic is the only memory ordering they can accept for
stores/loads/rmws/cmpxchg. The code lowering those accesses with a stronger
ordering to fences + monotonic accesses is currently living in
SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp. In this patch I propose moving this logic out of it
for several reasons:
- There is lots of redundancy to avoid: extremely similar logic already
exists in AtomicExpand.
- The current code in SelectionDAGBuilder does not use any target-hooks, it
does the same transformation for every backend that requires it
- As a result it is plain *unsound*, as it was apparently designed for ARM.
It happens to mostly work for the other targets because they are extremely
conservative, but Power for example had to switch to AtomicExpand to be
able to use lwsync safely (see r218331).
- Because it produces IR-level fences, it cannot be made sound ! This is noted
in the C++11 standard (section 29.3, page 1140):
```
Fences cannot, in general, be used to restore sequential consistency for atomic
operations with weaker ordering semantics.
```
It can also be seen by the following example (called IRIW in the litterature):
```
atomic<int> x = y = 0;
int r1, r2, r3, r4;
Thread 0:
x.store(1);
Thread 1:
y.store(1);
Thread 2:
r1 = x.load();
r2 = y.load();
Thread 3:
r3 = y.load();
r4 = x.load();
```
r1 = r3 = 1 and r2 = r4 = 0 is impossible as long as the accesses are all seq_cst.
But if they are lowered to monotonic accesses, no amount of fences can prevent it..
This patch does three things (I could cut it into parts, but then some of them
would not be tested/testable, please tell me if you would prefer that):
- it provides a default implementation for emitLeadingFence/emitTrailingFence in
terms of IR-level fences, that mimic the original logic of SelectionDAGBuilder.
As we saw above, this is unsound, but the best that can be done without knowing
the targets well (and there is a comment warning about this risk).
- it then switches Mips/Sparc/XCore to use AtomicExpand, relying on this default
implementation (that exactly replicates the logic of SelectionDAGBuilder, so no
functional change)
- it finally erase this logic from SelectionDAGBuilder as it is dead-code.
Ideally, each target would define its own override for emitLeading/TrailingFence
using target-specific fences, but I do not know the Sparc/Mips/XCore memory model
well enough to do this, and they appear to be dealing fine with the ARM-inspired
default expansion for now (probably because they are overly conservative, as
Power was). If anyone wants to compile fences more agressively on these
platforms, the long comment should make it clear why he should first override
emitLeading/TrailingFence.
Test Plan: make check-all, no functional change
Reviewers: jfb, t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5474
llvm-svn: 219957
Peephole optimization that generates a single conditional branch
for csinc-branch sequences like in the examples below. This is
possible when the csinc sets or clears a register based on a condition
code and the branch checks that register. Also the condition
code may not be modified between the csinc and the original branch.
Examples:
1. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>;tbnz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<invCC>
2. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>; tbz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<CC>
rdar://problem/18506500
llvm-svn: 219742
This patch removes the PBQPBuilder class and its subclasses and replaces them
with a composable constraints class: PBQPRAConstraint. This allows constraints
that are only required for optimisation (e.g. coalescing, soft pairing) to be
mixed and matched.
This patch also introduces support for target writers to supply custom
constraints for their targets by overriding a TargetSubtargetInfo method:
std::unique_ptr<PBQPRAConstraints> getCustomPBQPConstraints() const;
This patch should have no effect on allocations.
llvm-svn: 219421
The patch's author points out that, despite the function's documentation,
getSetCCResultType is only used to get the SETCC result type (with one
here-removed problematic exception). In one case, getSetCCResultType was being
used to get the predicate type to use for a SELECT node, and then
SIGN_EXTENDing (or truncating) to get the input predicate to match that type.
Unfortunately, this was happening inside visitSIGN_EXTEND, and creating new
SIGN_EXTEND nodes was causing an infinite loop. In addition, this behavior was
wrong if a target was not using ZeroOrNegativeOneBooleanContent. Lastly, the
extension/truncation seems unnecessary here: SELECT is defined as:
Select(COND, TRUEVAL, FALSEVAL). If the type of the boolean COND is not i1
then the high bits must conform to getBooleanContents.
So here we remove this use of getSetCCResultType and update
getSetCCResultType's documentation to reflect its actual uses.
Patch by deadal nix!
llvm-svn: 219141
C++14 adds new builtin signatures for 'operator delete'. This change allows
new/delete pairs to be removed in C++14 onwards, as they were in C++11 and
before.
llvm-svn: 219014
That commit was introduced in order to help investigate a problem in ARM
codegen breaking from commit 202304 (Add a limit to the heuristic that register
allocates instructions in local order). Recent analisys indicated that the
problem no longer exists, so I'm reverting this change.
See PR18996.
llvm-svn: 218981
It was hacky to use an opcode as a switch because it won't always match
(rsqrte != sqrte), and it looks like we'll need to add more special casing
per arch than I had hoped for. Eg, x86 will prefer a different NR estimate
implementation. ARM will want to use it's 'step' instructions. There also
don't appear to be any new estimate instructions in any arch in a long,
long time. Altivec vloge and vexpte may have been the first and last in
that field...
llvm-svn: 218698
This is purely refactoring. No functional changes intended. PowerPC is the only target
that is currently using this interface.
The ultimate goal is to allow targets other than PowerPC (certainly X86 and Aarch64) to turn this:
z = y / sqrt(x)
into:
z = y * rsqrte(x)
And:
z = y / x
into:
z = y * rcpe(x)
using whatever HW magic they can use. See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20900 .
There is one hook in TargetLowering to get the target-specific opcode for an estimate instruction
along with the number of refinement steps needed to make the estimate usable.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5484
llvm-svn: 218553
code generation options from TargetMachine. This will depend
upon Function + TargetSubtargetInfo based code generation at
which point resetTargetOptions and this code can be removed.
llvm-svn: 218491
Add SelectionDAG TableGen definitions for BR_CC so that targets can instruction-select
BR_CC using TableGen pattern matching.
Patch by deadal nix.
llvm-svn: 218476
Summary:
I originally tried doing this specifically for X86 in the backend in D5091,
but it was rather brittle and generally running too late to be general.
Furthermore, other targets may want to implement similar optimizations.
So I reimplemented it at the IR-level, fitting it into AtomicExpandPass
as it interacts with that pass (which could not be cleanly done before
at the backend level).
This optimization relies on a new target hook, which is only used by X86
for now, as the correctness of the optimization on other targets remains
an open question. If it is found correct on other targets, it should be
trivial to enable for them.
Details of the optimization are discussed in D5091.
Test Plan: make check-all + a new test
Reviewers: jfb
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5422
llvm-svn: 218455
Summary:
The N32/N64 ABI's require that structs passed in registers are laid out
such that spilling the register with 'sd' places the struct at the lowest
address. For little endian this is trivial but for big-endian it requires
that structs are shifted into the upper bits of the register.
We also require that structs passed in registers have the 'inreg'
attribute for big-endian N32/N64 to work correctly. This is because the
tablegen-erated calling convention implementation only has access to the
lowered form of struct arguments (one or more integers of up to 64-bits
each) and is unable to determine the original type.
Reviewers: vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5286
llvm-svn: 218451
Summary:
The goal is to eventually remove all the code related to getInsertFencesForAtomic
in SelectionDAGBuilder as it is wrong (designed for ARM, not really portable, works
mostly by accident because the backends are overly conservative), and repeats the
same logic that goes in emitLeading/TrailingFence.
In this patch, I make AtomicExpandPass insert the fences as it knows better
where to put them. Because this requires getting the fences and not just
passing an IRBuilder around, I had to change the return type of
emitLeading/TrailingFence.
This code only triggers on ARM for now. Because it is earlier in the pipeline
than SelectionDAGBuilder, it triggers and lowers atomic accesses to atomic so
SelectionDAGBuilder does not add barriers anymore on ARM.
If this patch is accepted I plan to implement emitLeading/TrailingFence for all
backends that setInsertFencesForAtomic(true), which will allow both making them
less conservative and simplifying SelectionDAGBuilder once they are all using
this interface.
This should not cause any functionnal change so the existing tests are used
and not modified.
Test Plan: make check-all, benefits from existing tests of atomics on ARM
Reviewers: jfb, t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5179
llvm-svn: 218329
This is purely a plumbing patch. No functional changes intended.
The ultimate goal is to allow targets other than PowerPC (certainly X86 and Aarch64) to turn this:
z = y / sqrt(x)
into:
z = y * rsqrte(x)
using whatever HW magic they can use. See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20900 .
The first step is to add a target hook for RSQRTE, take the already target-independent code selfishly hoarded by PPC, and put it into DAGCombiner.
Next steps:
The code in DAGCombiner::BuildRSQRTE() should be refactored further; tests that exercise that logic need to be added.
Logic in PPCTargetLowering::BuildRSQRTE() should be hoisted into DAGCombiner.
X86 and AArch64 overrides for TargetLowering.BuildRSQRTE() should be added.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5425
llvm-svn: 218219
The heuristic used by DAGCombine to form FMAs checks that the FMUL has only one
use, but this is overly-conservative on some systems. Specifically, if the FMA
and the FADD have the same latency (and the FMA does not compete for resources
with the FMUL any more than the FADD does), there is no need for the
restriction, and furthermore, forming the FMA leaving the FMUL can still allow
for higher overall throughput and decreased critical-path length.
Here we add a new TLI callback, enableAggressiveFMAFusion, false by default, to
elide the hasOneUse check. This is enabled for PowerPC by default, as most
PowerPC systems will benefit.
Patch by Olivier Sallenave, thanks!
llvm-svn: 218120
shim between the TargetTransformInfo immutable pass and the Subtarget
via the TargetMachine and Function. Migrate a single call from
BasicTargetTransformInfo as an example and provide shims where TargetMachine
begins taking a Function to determine the subtarget.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 218004
This required a new hook called hasLoadLinkedStoreConditional to know whether
to expand atomics to LL/SC (ARM, AArch64, in a future patch Power) or to
CmpXchg (X86).
Apart from that, the new code in AtomicExpandPass is mostly moved from
X86AtomicExpandPass. The main result of this patch is to get rid of that
pass, which had lots of code duplicated with AtomicExpandPass.
llvm-svn: 217928
On MachO, and MachO only, we cannot have a truly empty function since that
breaks the linker logic for atomizing the section.
When we are emitting a frame pointer, the presence of an unreachable will
create a cfi instruction pointing past the last instruction. This is perfectly
fine. The FDE information encodes the pc range it applies to. If some tool
cannot handle this, we should explicitly say which bug we are working around
and only work around it when it is actually relevant (not for ELF for example).
Given the unreachable we could omit the .cfi_def_cfa_register, but then
again, we could also omit the entire function prologue if we wanted to.
llvm-svn: 217801
Summary:
Split shouldExpandAtomicInIR() into different versions for Stores/Loads/RMWs/CmpXchgs.
Makes runOnFunction cleaner (no more redundant checking/casting), and will help moving
the X86 backend to this pass.
This requires a way of easily detecting which instructions are atomic.
I followed the pattern of mayReadFromMemory, mayWriteOrReadMemory, etc.. in making
isAtomic() a method of Instruction implemented by a switch on the opcodes.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: jfb
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5035
llvm-svn: 217080
This removes static initializers from the backends which generate this data, and also makes this struct match the other Tablegen generated structs in behaviour
Reviewed by Andy Trick and Chandler C
llvm-svn: 216919
isPow2DivCheap
That name doesn't specify signed or unsigned.
Lazy as I am, I eventually read the function and variable comments. It turns out that this is strictly about signed div. But I discovered that the comments are wrong:
srl/add/sra
is not the general sequence for signed integer division by power-of-2. We need one more 'sra':
sra/srl/add/sra
That's the sequence produced in DAGCombiner. The first 'sra' may be removed when dividing by exactly '2', but that's a special case.
This patch corrects the comments, changes the name of the flag bit, and changes the name of the accessor methods.
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5010
llvm-svn: 216237
AtomicExpandLoadLinked is currently rather ARM-specific. This patch is the first of
a group that aim at making it more target-independent. See
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-August/075873.html
for details
The command line option is "atomic-expand"
llvm-svn: 216231
This patch adds a new property: isInsertSubreg and the related target hooks:
TargetIntrInfo::getInsertSubregInputs and
TargetInstrInfo::getInsertSubregLikeInputs to specify that a target specific
instruction is a (kind of) INSERT_SUBREG.
The approach is similar to r215394.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216139
