Extend vXi1 conditions of vXi8/vXi16 selects even before type legalization gets a chance to split wide vectors. Previously we would only extend 128 and 256 bit vectors. But if we start with a 512 bit vector or wider that needs to be split we wouldn't extend until after the split had taken place. By extending early we improve the results of type legalization.
Don't widen condition of 128/256 bit vXi16/vXi8 selects when we have BWI but not VLX. We can still use a mask register by widening the select to 512-bits instead. This is similar to what we do for compares already.
llvm-svn: 322450
In addition to the existing match as part of a loop-reduction, add a
straightforward pattern match for DAG-contained patterns.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41811
llvm-svn: 322446
This avoids having the result type stick around until lowering where we have to extend the setcc and insert a truncate. If we get the types converted early we can do more to optimize it.
llvm-svn: 322432
Without a register with a size being mentioned the instruction is ambiguous in at&t syntax. With Intel syntax the memory operation caries a size that can be used to disambiguate.
llvm-svn: 322356
While the suffix isn't required to disambiguate the instructions, it is required in order to parse the instructions when the suffix is specified in order to match the GNU assembler.
llvm-svn: 322354
Summary: This is a preparatory step for D41811: refactoring code for breaking vector operands of binary operation to legal-types.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41925
llvm-svn: 322296
Primarily, this allows us to use the aggressive extraction mechanisms in combineExtractWithShuffle earlier and make use of UNDEF elements that may be lost during lowering.
llvm-svn: 322279
Summary:
As RKSimon suggested in pr35820, in the case that Src is smaller in
bit-size than Indices, need to widen Src to avoid type mismatch.
Fixes pr35820
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41865
llvm-svn: 322272
If the index is v2i64 we can use the scatter instruction that has v4i32/v4f32 data register, v2i64 index, and v2i1 mask. Similar was already done for gather.
Implement custom widening for v2i32 data to remove the code that reverses type legalization during lowering.
llvm-svn: 322254
After D41349, we can no get a MCSubtargetInfo into the MCAsmBackend constructor. This allows us to get NOPL from a subtarget feature rather than a CPU name blacklist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41721
llvm-svn: 322227
Currently we infer the scale at isel time by analyzing whether the base is a constant 0 or not. If it is we assume scale is 1, else we take it from the element size of the pass thru or stored value. This seems a little weird and I think it makes more sense to make it explicit in the DAG rather than doing tricky things in the backend.
Most of this patch is just making sure we copy the scale around everywhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40055
llvm-svn: 322210
Summary:
If the vector type is transformed to non-vector single type, the compile
may crash trying to get vector information about non-vector type.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, mkuper, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41862
llvm-svn: 322106
Normally target independent DAG combine would do this combine based on getSetCCResultType, but with VLX getSetCCResultType returns a vXi1 type preventing the DAG combining from kicking in.
But doing this combine can allow us to remove the explicit sign extend that would otherwise be emitted.
This patch adds a target specific DAG combine to combine the sext+setcc when the result type is the same size as the input to the setcc. I've restricted this to FP compares and things that can be represented with PCMPEQ and PCMPGT since we don't have full integer compare support on the older ISAs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41850
llvm-svn: 322101
CET (Control-Flow Enforcement Technology) introduces a new mechanism called IBT (Indirect Branch Tracking).
According to IBT, each Indirect branch should land on dedicated ENDBR instruction (End Branch).
The new pass adds ENDBR instructions for every indirect jmp/call (including jumps using jump tables / switches).
For more information, please see the following:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/4d/2a/control-flow-enforcement-technology-preview.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40482
Change-Id: Icb754489faf483a95248f96982a4e8b1009eb709
llvm-svn: 322062
The code that checks the immediate wasn't masking to the lower 3-bits like the code in X86InstrInfo.cpp that's used by the peephole pass does.
llvm-svn: 322060
I had to drop fast-isel-abort from a test because we can't fast isel some of the mask stuff. When we used intrinsics we implicitly fell back to SelectionDAG for the intrinsic call without triggering the abort error. But with native IR that doesn't happen the same way.
llvm-svn: 322050
The pattern was this
def : Pat<(i32 (zext (i8 (bitconvert (v8i1 VK8:$src))))),
(MOVZX32rr8 (EXTRACT_SUBREG (i32 (COPY_TO_REGCLASS VK8:$src, GR32)), sub_8bit))>, Requires<[NoDQI]>;
but if you just let (i32 (zext X)) match byte itself you'll get MOVZX32rr8. And if you let (i8 (bitconvert (v8i1 VK8:$src))) match by itself you'll get (EXTRACT_SUBREG (i32 (COPY_TO_REGCLASS VK8:$src, GR32)), sub_8bit).
So we can just let isel do the two patterns naturally.
llvm-svn: 322049
This commit does two things. Firstly, it adds a collection of flags which can
be passed along to the target to encode information about the MBB that an
instruction lives in to the outliner.
Second, it adds some of those flags to the AArch64 outliner in order to add
more stack instructions to the list of legal instructions that are handled
by the outliner. The two flags added check if
- There are calls in the MachineBasicBlock containing the instruction
- The link register is available in the entire block
If the link register is available and there are no calls, then a stack
instruction can always be outlined without fixups, regardless of what it is,
since in this case, the outliner will never modify the stack to create a
call or outlined frame.
The motivation for doing this was checking which instructions are most often
missed by the outliner. Instructions like, say
%sp<def> = ADDXri %sp, 32, 0; flags: FrameDestroy
are very common, but cannot be outlined in the case that the outliner might
modify the stack. This commit allows us to outline instructions like this.
llvm-svn: 322048
(Target)FrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves can be called multiple
times. I don't think it should have side-effects as creating stack
objects and setting global MachineFunctionInfo state as it is doing
today (in other back-ends as well).
This moves the creation of stack objects from determineCalleeSaves to
assignCalleeSavedSpillSlots.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41703
llvm-svn: 321987
I had removed the qualifiers around the autogenerated folding table so I could compare with the manual table, but didn't intend to commit the change.
llvm-svn: 321971
Summary:
There are few oddities that occur due to v1i1, v8i1, v16i1 being legal without v2i1 and v4i1 being legal when we don't have VLX. Particularly during legalization of v2i32/v4i32/v2i64/v4i64 masked gather/scatter/load/store. We end up promoting the mask argument to these during type legalization and then have to widen the promoted type to v8iX/v16iX and truncate it to get the element size back down to v8i1/v16i1 to use a 512-bit operation. Since need to fill the upper bits of the mask we have to fill with 0s at the promoted type.
It would be better if we could just have the v2i1/v4i1 types as legal so they don't undergo any promotion. Then we can just widen with 0s directly in a k register. There are no real v4i1/v2i1 instructions anyway. Everything is done on a larger register anyway.
This also fixes an issue that we couldn't implement a masked vextractf32x4 from zmm to xmm properly.
We now have to support widening more compares to 512-bit to get a mask result out so new tablegen patterns got added.
I had to hack the legalizer for widening the operand of a setcc a bit so it didn't try create a setcc returning v4i32, extract from it, then try to promote it using a sign extend to v2i1. Now we create the setcc with v4i1 if the original setcc's result type is v2i1. Then extract that and don't sign extend it at all.
There's definitely room for improvement with some follow up patches.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, guyblank
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41560
llvm-svn: 321967
The instructions that load 64-bits or an xmm register should be TB_NO_REVERSE to avoid the load being widened during unfold. The instructions that load 128-bits need to ensure 128-bit alignment.
llvm-svn: 321956
The memory form of the xmm->xmm version only writes 64-bits. If we use it in the folding tables and its get used for a stack spill, only half the slot will be written. Then a reload may read all 128-bits which will pull in garbage. But without the spill the upper bits of the register would have been zero. By not folding we would preserve the zeros.
llvm-svn: 321950
We don't do fine grained feature control like this on features prior to AVX512.
We do still have checks in place in the assembly parser itself that prevents %zmm references or %xmm16-31 from being parsed without at least -mattr=avx512f. Same for rounding control and mask operands. That will prevent the table matcher from matching for any instructions that need those features and that's probably good enough.
llvm-svn: 321947
This is the last step needed to fix PR33325:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33325
We're trading branch and compares for loads and logic ops.
This makes the code smaller and hopefully faster in most cases.
The 24-byte test shows an interesting construct: we load the trailing scalar
elements into vector registers and generate the same pcmpeq+movmsk code that
we expected for a pair of full vector elements (see the 32- and 64-byte tests).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41714
llvm-svn: 321934
