Summary:
Make sure that any new and optimized objects created during GlobalOPT copy all the attributes from the base object.
A good example of improper behavior in the current implementation is section information associated with the GlobalObject. If a section was set for it, and GlobalOpt is creating/modifying a new object based on this one (often copying the original name), without this change new object will be placed in a default section, resulting in inappropriate properties of the new variable.
The argument here is that if customer specified a section for a variable, any changes to it that compiler does should not cause it to change that section allocation.
Moreover, any other properties worth representation in copyAttributesFrom() should also be propagated.
Reviewers: jmolloy, joker-eph, joker.eph
Subscribers: slarin, joker.eph, rafael, tobiasvk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16074
llvm-svn: 258556
\src\llvm-rw\include\llvm/Support/AlignOf.h(254) :
error C2872: 'detail' : ambiguous symbol
could be 'llvm::detail'
or 'llvm::support::detail'
llvm-svn: 258553
Summary:
This change adds a `-spp-no-statepoints` flag to PlaceSafepoints that
bypasses the code that wraps newly introduced polls and existing calls
in gc.statepoint. With `-spp-no-statepoints` enabled, PlaceSafepoints
effectively becomes a safpeoint **poll** insertion pass.
The eventual goal is to "constant fold" this option, along with
`-rs4gc-use-deopt-bundles` to `true`, once clients using gc.statepoint
are okay doing so.
Reviewers: pgavlin, reames, JosephTremoulet
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16439
llvm-svn: 258551
Make the variable a member of the writer trait object owned
now by the writer. Also use a different generator interface
to pass the infoObject from the writer.
llvm-svn: 258544
The promote alloca pass didn't handle these intrinsics and crashed.
These intrinsics should accept any address space, but for now just
erase them to avoid breaking.
llvm-svn: 258537
Using an array instead of ArrayRef would allow type inference, but
(short of using C99) one would still need to write
typedef uint16_t VT[];
LE.write(VT{0x1234, 0x5678});
llvm-svn: 258535
The current behavior is incorrect, as the two CCs returned by
changeFPCCToAArch64CC, intended to be OR'ed, are instead used
in an AND ccmp chain.
Consider:
define i32 @t(float %a, float %b, float %c, float %d, i32 %e, i32 %f) {
%cc1 = fcmp one float %a, %b
%cc2 = fcmp olt float %c, %d
%and = and i1 %cc1, %cc2
%r = select i1 %and, i32 %e, i32 %f
ret i32 %r
}
Assuming (%a < %b) and (%c < %d); we used to do:
fcmp s0, s1 # nzcv <- 1000
orr w8, wzr, #0x1 # w8 <- 1
csel w9, w8, wzr, mi # w9 <- 1
csel w8, w8, w9, gt # w8 <- 1
fcmp s2, s3 # nzcv <- 1000
cset w9, mi # w9 <- 1
tst w8, w9 # (w8 & w9) == 1, so: nzcv <- 0000
csel w0, w0, w1, ne # w0 <- w0
We now do:
fcmp s2, s3 # nzcv <- 1000
fccmp s0, s1, #0, mi # mi, so: nzcv <- 1000
fccmp s0, s1, #8, le # !le, so: nzcv <- 1000
csel w0, w0, w1, pl # !pl, so: w0 <- w1
In other words, we transformed:
(c < d) && ((a < b) || (a > b))
into:
(c < d) && (a u>= b) && (a u<= b)
whereas, per De Morgan's, we wanted:
(c < d) && !((a u>= b) && (a u<= b))
Note that this problem doesn't occur in the test-suite.
changeFPCCToAArch64CC produces disjunct CCs; here, one -> mi/gt.
We can't represent that in the fccmp chain; it can't express
arbitrary OR sequences, as one comment explains:
In general we can create code for arbitrary "... (and (and A B) C)"
sequences. We can also implement some "or" expressions, because
"(or A B)" is equivalent to "not (and (not A) (not B))" and we can
implement some negation operations. [...] However there is no way
to negate the result of a partial sequence.
Instead, introduce changeFPCCToANDAArch64CC, which produces the
conjunct cond codes:
- (a one b)
== ((a olt b) || (a ogt b))
== ((a ord b) && (a une b))
- (a ueq b)
== ((a uno b) || (a oeq b))
== ((a ule b) && (a uge b))
Note that, at first, one might think that, when PushNegate is true,
we should use the disjunct CCs, in effect doing:
(a || b)
= !(!a && !(b))
= !(!a && !(b1 || b2)) <- changeFPCCToAArch64CC(b, b1, b2)
= !(!a && !b1 && !b2)
However, we can take advantage of the fact that the CC is already
negated, which lets us avoid special-casing PushNegate and doing
the simpler to reason about:
(a || b)
= !(!a && (!b))
= !(!a && (b1 && b2)) <- changeFPCCToANDAArch64CC(!b, b1, b2)
= !(!a && b1 && b2)
This makes both emitConditionalCompare cases behave identically,
and produces correct ccmp sequences for the 2-CC fcmps.
llvm-svn: 258533
We verify that the op tree is eligible for CCMP emission in
isConjunctionDisjunctionTree, but it's also possible that
emitConjunctionDisjunctionTree fails later.
The initial check is useful, as it avoids building nodes
that will get discarded.
Still, make sure that inconsistencies don't happen with
an assert.
llvm-svn: 258532
but to return object_error::parse_failed. Then made the code in llvm-nm
do for Mach-O files what is done in the darwin native tools which is to
print "bad string index" for bad string indexes. Updated the error message
in the llvm-objdump test, and added tests to show llvm-nm prints
"bad string index" and a test to print the actual bad string index value
which in this case is 0xfe000002 when printing the fields as raw hex.
llvm-svn: 258520
This reapplies r258296 and r258366, and also fixes an existing bug in
SelectionDAG.cpp's isMemSrcFromString, neglecting to account for the
offset in a GlobalAddressSDNode, which is uncovered by those patches.
llvm-svn: 258482
Summary:
Fix the issue with the most recently discovered unit receiving much less attention.
Note: I had to change the seed for one test to make it pass. Alternatively,
the number of runs could be increased. I believe that the average time of
'foo' discovery is not increased, just seed=1 was particularly convenient
for the previous PRNG scheme used.
Reviewers: aizatsky, kcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16419
llvm-svn: 258473
Summary:
SETCC with f16 vectors has OperationAction set to Expand but still gets
lowered to FCM* intrinsics based on its result type. This patch skips
lowering of VSETCC if the operand is an f16 vector.
v4 and v8 tests included.
Reviewers: ab, jmolloy
Subscribers: srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15361
llvm-svn: 258471
This reverts r258296 and the follow up r258366. With this change, we
miscompiled the following program on Windows:
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
static const char kData[] = "asdf jkl;";
int main() {
std::string s(kData + 3, sizeof(kData) - 3);
std::cout << s << '\n';
}
llvm-svn: 258465
Summary:
Since we are currently not doing incremental importing there is
no need to link metadata as a postpass. The module linker will
only link in the imported subroutines due to the functionality
added by r256003.
(Note that the metadata postpass linking functionalitiy is still
used by llvm-link, and may be needed here in the future if a more
incremental strategy is adopted.)
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16424
llvm-svn: 258458
Use the helper function added in r258428.
The check should really be hoisted to the caller of all of these
optimize* functions, but that's another step.
llvm-svn: 258446
The X86 musttail implementation finds register parameters to forward by
running the calling convention algorithm until a non-register location
is returned. However, assigning a vector memory location has the side
effect of increasing the function's stack alignment. We shouldn't
increase the stack alignment when we are only looking for register
parameters, so this change conditionalizes it.
llvm-svn: 258442
Better handling of the annoying pshuflw/pshufhw ops which only shuffle lower/upper halves of a vector.
Added vXi16 unary shuffle support for cases where i16 elements (from the same half of the source) are being splatted to the whole of one of the halves. This avoids the general lowering case which must shuffle the 32-bit elements first - meaning that we used to end up with unnecessary duplicate pshuflw/pshufhw shuffles.
Note this has the side effect of a lot of SSSE3 test cases no longer needing to use PSHUFB, as it falls below the 3 op combine threshold for when PSHUFB is typically worth it. I've raised PR26183 to discuss if the threshold should be changed and whether we need to make it more specific to the target CPU.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14901
llvm-svn: 258440
