Summary:
- Add CoreCLR to if/else ladders and switches as appropriate.
- Rename isMSVCEHPersonality to isFuncletEHPersonality to better
reflect what it captures.
Reviewers: majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor, rnk
Subscribers: pgavlin, AndyAyers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13449
llvm-svn: 249455
Most importantly, this keeps constant hoisting from preventing instruction selections ability to turn an AND with 0xffffffff into a move into a 32-bit subregister.
llvm-svn: 249370
The CATCHRET operand did not match the MachineFunction's CFG. This
mismatch happened because FrameLowering created a new MachineBasicBlock
and updated the CFG but forgot to update the CATCHRET operand.
Let's make sure this doesn't happen again by strengthing the funclet
membership analysis: it can now reason about the membership of all basic
blocks, not just those inside of funclets.
llvm-svn: 249344
The custom lowering in LowerExtendedLoad is doing the equivalent shuffle, so make use of existing lowering code to reduce duplication.
llvm-svn: 249243
This patch teaches FastIsel the following two things:
1) On SSE2, no instructions are needed for bitcasts between 128-bit vector types;
2) On AVX, no instructions are needed for bitcasts between 256-bit vector types.
Example:
%1 = bitcast <4 x i31> %V to <2 x i64>
Before (-fast-isel -fast-isel-abort=1):
FastIsel miss: %1 = bitcast <4 x i31> %V to <2 x i64>
Now we don't fall back to SelectionDAG and we correctly fold that computation
propagating the register associated to %V.
Originally reviewed here: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13347
llvm-svn: 249147
This patch teaches FastIsel the following two things:
1) On SSE2, no instructions are needed for bitcasts between 128-bit vector types;
2) On AVX, no instructions are needed for bitcasts between 256-bit vector types.
Example:
%1 = bitcast <4 x i31> %V to <2 x i64>
Before (-fast-isel -fast-isel-abort=1):
FastIsel miss: %1 = bitcast <4 x i31> %V to <2 x i64>
Now we don't fall back to SelectionDAG and we correctly fold that computation
propagating the register associated to %V.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13347
llvm-svn: 249121
We emit denormalized tables, where every range of invokes in the same
state gets a complete list of EH action entries. This is significantly
simpler than trying to infer the correct nested scoping structure from
the MI. Fortunately, for SEH, the nesting structure is really just a
size optimization.
With this, some basic __try / __except examples work.
llvm-svn: 249078
Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet.
However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is
part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet
membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node.
llvm-svn: 249052
The custom code produces incorrect results if later reassociated.
Since r221657, on x86, vNi32 uitofp is lowered using an optimized
sequence:
movdqa LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm1 ## xmm1 = [65535, ...]
pand %xmm0, %xmm1
por LCPI0_1(%rip), %xmm1 ## [0x4b000000, ...]
psrld $16, %xmm0
por LCPI0_2(%rip), %xmm0 ## [0x53000000, ...]
addps LCPI0_3(%rip), %xmm0 ## [float -5.497642e+11, ...]
addps %xmm1, %xmm0
Since r240361, the machine combiner opportunistically reassociates
2-instruction sequences (with -ffast-math). In the new code sequence,
the ADDPS' are eligible. In isolation, for simple examples (without
reassociable users), this makes no performance difference (the goal
being to enable reassociation of longer chains).
In the trivial example (just one uitofp), the reassociation doesn't
happen, because (I think) it would require the emission of a separate
movaps for a constantpool load (instead of folding it into addps).
However, when we have multiple uitofp sequences, and the constantpool
loads are CSE'd earlier, the machine combiner can do the reassociation.
When the ADDPS' are reassociated, the resulting sequence isn't correct
anymore, as we'd be adding large (2**39) constants with comparatively
smaller values (~2**23). Given that two of the three inputs are powers
of 2 larger than 2**16, and that ulp(2**39) == 2**(39-24) == 2**15,
the reassociated chain will produce 0 for any input in [0, 2**14[.
In my testing, it also produces wrong results for 99.5% of [0, 2**32[.
Avoid this by disabling the new lowering when -ffast-math. It does
mean that we'll get slower code than without it, but at least we
won't get egregiously incorrect code.
One might argue that, considering -ffast-math is all but meaningless,
uitofp producing wrong results isn't a compiler bug. But it really is.
Fixes PR24512.
...though this is really more of a workaround.
Ideally, we'd have some sort of Machine FMF, but that's a problem
that's not worth tackling until we do more with machine IR.
llvm-svn: 248965
The Win64 unwinder disassembles forwards from each PC to try to
determine if this PC is in an epilogue. If so, it skips calling the EH
personality function for that frame. Typically, this means you cannot
catch an exception in the same frame that you threw it, because 'throw'
calls a noreturn runtime function.
Previously we avoided this problem with the TrapUnreachable
TargetOption, but that's a much bigger hammer than we need. All we need
is a 1 byte non-epilogue instruction right after the call. Instead,
what we got was an unconditional branch to a shared block containing the
ud2, potentially 7 bytes instead of 1. So, this reverts r206684, which
added TrapUnreachable, and replaces it with something better.
The new code pattern matches for invoke/call followed by unreachable and
inserts an int3 into the DAG. To be 100% watertight, we would need to
insert SEH_Epilogue instructions into all basic blocks ending in a call
with no terminators or successors, but in practice this is unlikely to
come up.
llvm-svn: 248959
The XOP shifts just have logical/arithmetic versions and the left/right shifts are controlled by whether the value is positive/negative. Because of this I've added new X86ISD nodes instead of trying to force them to use the existing shift nodes.
Additionally Excavator cores (bdver4) support XOP and AVX2 - meaning that it should use the AVX2 shifts when it can and fall back to XOP in other cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8690
llvm-svn: 248878
The x64 ABI requires that epilogues do not contain code other than stack
adjustments and some limited control flow. However, we'd insert code to
initialize the return address after stack adjustments. Instead, insert
EAX/RAX with the current value before we create the stack adjustments in
the epilogue.
llvm-svn: 248839
HHVM calling convention, hhvmcc, is used by HHVM JIT for
functions in translated cache. We currently support LLVM back end to
generate code for X86-64 and may support other architectures in the
future.
In HHVM calling convention any GP register could be used to pass and
return values, with the exception of R12 which is reserved for
thread-local area and is callee-saved. Other than R12, we always
pass RBX and RBP as args, which are our virtual machine's stack pointer
and frame pointer respectively.
When we enter translation cache via hhvmcc function, we expect
the stack to be aligned at 16 bytes, i.e. skewed by 8 bytes as opposed
to standard ABI alignment. This affects stack object alignment and stack
adjustments for function calls.
One extra calling convention, hhvm_ccc, is used to call C++ helpers from
HHVM's translation cache. It is almost identical to standard C calling
convention with an exception of first argument which is passed in RBP
(before we use RDI, RSI, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12681
llvm-svn: 248832
Summary:
Funclets have been turned into functions by the time they hit the object
file. Make sure that they have decent names for the symbol table and
CFI directives explaining how to reason about their prologues.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13261
llvm-svn: 248824
alignment requirements, for example in the case of vectors.
These requirements are exploited by the code generator by using
move instructions that have similar alignment requirements, e.g.,
movaps on x86.
Although the code generator properly aligns the arguments with
respect to the displacement of the stack pointer it computes,
the displacement itself may cause misalignment. For example if
we have
%3 = load <16 x float>, <16 x float>* %1, align 64
call void @bar(<16 x float> %3, i32 0)
the x86 back-end emits:
movaps 32(%ecx), %xmm2
movaps (%ecx), %xmm0
movaps 16(%ecx), %xmm1
movaps 48(%ecx), %xmm3
subl $20, %esp <-- if %esp was 16-byte aligned before this instruction, it no longer will be afterwards
movaps %xmm3, (%esp) <-- movaps requires 16-byte alignment, while %esp is not aligned as such.
movl $0, 16(%esp)
calll __bar
To solve this, we need to make sure that the computed value with which
the stack pointer is changed is a multiple af the maximal alignment seen
during its computation. With this change we get proper alignment:
subl $32, %esp
movaps %xmm3, (%esp)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12337
llvm-svn: 248786
Fix for D12561 - we weren't correctly ensuring that the base element for extension was moved to start on a boundary suitable for UNPCKL/H
llvm-svn: 248536
Add two new ways of accessing the unsafe stack pointer:
* At a fixed offset from the thread TLS base. This is very similar to
StackProtector cookies, but we plan to extend it to other backends
(ARM in particular) soon. Bionic-side implementation here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/170988.
* Via a function call, as a fallback for platforms that provide
neither a fixed TLS slot, nor a reasonable TLS implementation (i.e.
not emutls).
This is a re-commit of a change in r248357 that was reverted in
r248358.
llvm-svn: 248405
The BEXTR comments didn't make sense before, we may want to extend the
FP logic transform to work on vectors, and this way is more beautiful.
llvm-svn: 248404
This patches removes the x86.sse41.pmovsx* intrinsics, provides a suitable upgrade path and updates relevant tests to sign extend a subvector instead.
LLVM counterpart to D12835
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13002
llvm-svn: 248368
Add two new ways of accessing the unsafe stack pointer:
* At a fixed offset from the thread TLS base. This is very similar to
StackProtector cookies, but we plan to extend it to other backends
(ARM in particular) soon. Bionic-side implementation here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/170988.
* Via a function call, as a fallback for platforms that provide
neither a fixed TLS slot, nor a reasonable TLS implementation (i.e.
not emutls).
llvm-svn: 248357
The C standard has historically not specified whether or not these functions should raise the inexact flag. Traditionally on Darwin, these functions *did* raise inexact, and the llvm lowerings followed that conventions. n1778 (C bindings for IEEE-754 (2008)) clarifies that these functions should not set inexact. This patch brings the lowerings for arm64 and x86 in line with the newly specified behavior. This also lets us fold some logic into TD patterns, which is nice.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12969
llvm-svn: 248266
This patch generalizes the lowering of shuffles as zero extensions to allow extensions that don't start from the first element. It now recognises extensions starting anywhere in the lower 128-bits or at the start of any higher 128-bit lane.
The motivation was to reduce the number of high cost pshufb calls, but it also improves the SSE2 case as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12561
llvm-svn: 248250
