In case of loops with multiple exit where all-but-one exit are deoptimizing
it might happen that the first rotation will end up with latch having a deoptimizing
exit. This makes the loop unsuitable for trip-count analysis (say, getLoopEstimatedTripCount)
as well as for loop transformations that know how to handle multple deoptimizing exits.
It pretty much means that canonical form in multple-deoptimizing-exits case should be
with non-deoptimizing exit at latch.
Teach loop-rotation to reach this canonical form by repeating rotation.
-loop-rotate-multi option introduced to control this behavior, currently disabled by default.
Reviewers: skatkov, asbirlea, reames, fhahn
Reviewed By: skatkov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73058
It is incorrect to call ValueHandleBase::ValueIsRAUWd when only one use
is replaced since it simply violates semantics of the callback and leads
to bugs like PR44320.
Previously this call was used specifically to keep LICM's cache of
AliasSetTrackers up to date across passes (as PR36801 showed, even for
that purpose it didn't work properly), but since LICM doesn't have that
cache anymore, we can safely remove this incorrect call with no
repercussions.
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44320
Reviewers: asbirlea, fhahn, efriedma, reames
Reviewed-By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73089
Currently due to the edge caching, we create wrong predicates for
branches with matching true and false successors. We will cache the
condition for the edge from the true successor, and then lookup the same
edge (src and dst are the same) for the edge to the false successor.
If both successors match, the condition should always be true. At the
moment, we cannot really create constant VPValues, but we can just
create a true condition as X | !X. Later passes will clean that up.
Fixes PR44488.
Reviewers: rengolin, hsaito, fhahn, Ayal, dorit, gilr
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73079
This patch adds a custom implementation of isLegalNTStore to AArch64TTI
that supports vector types that can be directly stored by STNP. Note
that the implementation may not catch all valid cases (e.g. because the
vector is a multiple of 256 and could be broken down to multiple valid 256 bit
stores), but it is good enough for LV to vectorize loops with NT stores,
as LV only passes in a vector with 2 elements to check. LV seems to also
be the only user of isLegalNTStore.
We should also do the same for NT loads, but before that we need to
ensure that we properly lower LDNP of vectors, similar to D72919.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, t.p.northover, ab
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73158
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44529. We already have
a combine to sink a negation through a left-shift, but it currently
only works if the shift operand is negatable without creating any
instructions. This patch introduces freelyNegateValue() as a more
powerful extension of dyn_castNegVal(), which allows negating a
value as long as this doesn't end up increasing instruction count.
Specifically, this patch adds support for negating A-B to B-A.
This mechanism could in the future be extended to handle general
negation chains that a) start at a proper 0-X negation and b) only
require one operand to be freely negatable. This would end up as a
weaker form of D68408 aimed at the most obviously profitable subset
that eliminates a negation entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72978
This is 1 of the potential folds uncovered by extending D72521.
We don't seem to do this in the backend either (unless I'm not
seeing some target-specific transform).
icc and gcc (appears to be target-specific) do this transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73057
Summary:
We don't have control/verify what will be the RHS of the division, so it might
happen to be zero, causing UB.
Reviewers: Vasilis, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: vporpo, ABataev, hiraditya, llvm-commits, vdmitrie
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72740
Summary:
New `@test13` in `Attributor/align.ll` is the main motivation - `null` pointer
really does not limit our alignment knowledge, in fact it is fully aligned
since it has no bits set.
Here we don't special-case `null` pointer because it is somewhat controversial
to add one more place where we enforce that `null` pointer is zero,
but instead we do the more general thing of trying to perform constant-fold
of pointer constant to an integer, and perform alignment inferrment on that.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, gchatelet, courbet, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, arphaman, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73131
This should be the last step needed to solve the problem in the
description of PR44153:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44153
If we're casting an FP value to int, testing its signbit, and then
choosing between a value and its negated value, that's a
complicated way of saying "copysign":
(bitcast X) < 0 ? -TC : TC --> copysign(TC, X)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72643
As mentioned in D72643, we'd like to be able to assert that any select
of equivalent constants has been removed before we're deep into InstCombine.
But there's a loophole in that assertion for vectors with undef elements
that don't match exactly.
This patch should close that gap. If we have undefs, we can't safely
propagate those unless both constants elements for that lane are undef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72958
Summary: Vectorized loop processes VFxUF number of elements in one iteration thus total number of iterations decreases proportionally. In addition epilog loop may not have more than VFxUF - 1 iterations. This patch updates profile information accordingly.
Reviewers: hsaito, Ayal, fhahn, reames, silvas, dcaballe, SjoerdMeijer, mkuper, DaniilSuchkov
Reviewed By: Ayal, DaniilSuchkov
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, hiraditya, rkruppe, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67905
Summary: Current implementation of getLoopEstimatedTripCount returns 1 iteration less than it should. The reason is that in bottom tested loop first iteration is executed before first back branch is taken. For example for loop with !{!"branch_weights", i32 1 // taken, i32 1 // exit} metadata getLoopEstimatedTripCount gives 1 while actual number of iterations is 2.
Reviewers: Ayal, fhahn
Reviewed By: Ayal
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71990
Currently there are 4 different mechanisms for controlling denormal
flushing behavior, and about as many equivalent frontend controls.
- AMDGPU uses the fp32-denormals and fp64-f16-denormals subtarget features
- NVPTX uses the nvptx-f32ftz attribute
- ARM directly uses the denormal-fp-math attribute
- Other targets indirectly use denormal-fp-math in one DAGCombine
- cl-denorms-are-zero has a corresponding denorms-are-zero attribute
AMDGPU wants a distinct control for f32 flushing from f16/f64, and as
far as I can tell the same is true for NVPTX (based on the attribute
name).
Work on consolidating these into the denormal-fp-math attribute, and a
new type specific denormal-fp-math-f32 variant. Only ARM seems to
support the two different flush modes, so this is overkill for the
other use cases. Ideally we would error on the unsupported
positive-zero mode on other targets from somewhere.
Move the logic for selecting the flush mode into the compiler driver,
instead of handling it in cc1. denormal-fp-math/denormal-fp-math-f32
are now both cc1 flags, but denormal-fp-math-f32 is not yet exposed as
a user flag.
-cl-denorms-are-zero, -fcuda-flush-denormals-to-zero and
-fno-cuda-flush-denormals-to-zero will be mapped to
-fp-denormal-math-f32=ieee or preserve-sign rather than the old
attributes.
Stop emitting the denorms-are-zero attribute for the OpenCL flag. It
has no in-tree users. The meaning would also be target dependent, such
as the AMDGPU choice to treat this as only meaning allow flushing of
f32 and not f16 or f64. The naming is also potentially confusing,
since DAZ in other contexts refers to instructions implicitly treating
input denormals as zero, not necessarily flushing output denormals to
zero.
This also does not attempt to change the behavior for the current
attribute. The LangRef now states that the default is ieee behavior,
but this is inaccurate for the current implementation. The clang
handling is slightly hacky to avoid touching the existing
denormal-fp-math uses. Fixing this will be left for a future patch.
AMDGPU is still using the subtarget feature to control the denormal
mode, but the new attribute are now emitted. A future change will
switch this and remove the subtarget features.
During the SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP pass, signed extensions are distributed
to the values that feed into them and then later recombined. The recombination
stage is somewhat problematic- it doesn't differ add and sub instructions
from another when matching the sext(a) +/- sext(b) -> sext(a +/- b) pattern
in some instances.
An example- the IR contains:
%unextendedA
%unextendedB
%subuAuB = unextendedA - unextendedB
%extA = extend A
%extB = extend B
%addeAeB = extA + extB
The problematic optimization will transform that into:
%unextendedA
%unextendedB
%subuAuB = unextendedA - unextendedB
%extA = extend A
%extB = extend B
%addeAeB = extend subuAuB ; Obviously not semantically equivalent to the IR input.
This patch fixes that.
Patch by Drew Wock <drew.wock@sas.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65967
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44552. We need to make
sure that the store is reprocessed, because performing DSE may
expose more DSE opportunities.
There is a slight caveat here though: We need to make sure that we
add back the store the worklist first, because that means it will
be processed after the operands of the removed store have been
processed. This is a general bug in InstCombine worklist management
that I hope to address at some point, but for now it means we need
to do this manually rather than just returning the instruction as
changed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72807
There are two related bugs here: First, we don't add the operand
we're replacing to the worklist, which means it may not get DCEd
(see test change). Second, usually this would just get picked up
in the next iteration, but we also do not report the instruction
as changed. This means that we do not get that extra instcombine
iteration, and more importantly, may break the pass pipeline, as
the function is not marked as changed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72864
Currently, there is no way to disable ExpensiveCombines when doing
a standalone opt -instcombine run, as that's the default, and the
opt option can currently only be used to force enable, not to force
disable. The only way to disable expensive combines is via -O1 or -O2,
but that of course also runs the rest of the kitchen sink...
This patch allows using opt -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 to
run InstCombine without ExpensiveCombines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72861
Blindly following unique-successors chain appeared to be a bad idea.
In a degenerate case when block jumps to itself that goes into endless loop.
Discovered this problem when playing with additional changes,
managed to reproduce it on existing LoopPredication code.
Fix by checking a "visited" set while iterating through unique successors.
Reviewed By: skatkov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72908
Introduce parsing, add a few instances of parameter use into GVN-PRE tests.
Reviewers: skatkov, asbirlea
Reviewed By: skatkov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72752
This reverts commit 3f3017e because there's a failure on peel-loop-nests.ll
with LLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70304
Summary:
The old pass manager separated speed optimization and size optimization
levels into two unsigned values. Coallescing both in an enum in the new
pass manager may lead to unintentional casts and comparisons.
In particular, taking a look at how the loop unroll passes were constructed
previously, the Os/Oz are now (==new pass manager) treated just like O3,
likely unintentionally.
This change disallows raw comparisons between optimization levels, to
avoid such unintended effects. As an effect, the O{s|z} behavior changes
for loop unrolling and loop unroll and jam, matching O2 rather than O3.
The change also parameterizes the threshold values used for loop
unrolling, primarily to aid testing.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: zzheng, ychen, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72547
Summary:
This commits is a rework of the patch in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67572.
The rework was requested to prevent out-of-tree performance regression
when vectorizing out-of-tree IR intrinsics. The vectorization of such
intrinsics is enquired via the static function `isTLIScalarize`. For
detail see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67572.
Reviewers: uabelho, fhahn, sdesmalen
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72734
llvm.memset intrinsics do only write memory, but are missing
IntrWriteMem, so they doesNotReadMemory() returns false for them.
The test change is due to the test checking the fn attribute ids at the
call sites, which got bumped up due to a new combination with writeonly
appearing in the test file.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, reames, efriedma, nlopes, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72789
The assume intrinsic is intentionally marked as may reading/writing
memory, to avoid passes moving them around. When flattening the CFG
for predicated blocks, we have to drop the assume calls, as they
are control-flow dependent.
There are some cases where we can do better (when control flow is
preserved), but that is follow-up work.
Fixes PR43620.
Reviewers: hsaito, rengolin, dcaballe, Ayal
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68814
Suppose an inline instance has hot total sample count but 0 entry count, and
it is an indirect call target. If the indirect call has no other call target
and inline instance associated with it and it is promoted, currently the
conditional branch generated by indirect call promotion will have invalid
branch profile which is !{!"branch_weights", i32 0, i32 0} -- because the
entry count of the promoted target is 0 and the total entry count of all
targets is also 0. This caused a SEGV in Control Height Reduction and may
cause problem in other passes.
Function entry count of an inline instance is computed by a heuristic --
using either the sample of the starting line or starting inner inline
instance. The patch changes the heuristic a little bit so that when total
sample count is larger than 0, the computed entry count will be at least 1.
Then the new branch profile will be !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 0}.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72790
Summary:
This patch could be treated as a rebase of D33960. It also fixes PR35547.
A fix for `llvm/test/Other/close-stderr.ll` is proposed in D68164. Seems
the consensus is that the test is passing by chance and I'm not
sure how important it is for us. So it is removed like in D33960 for now.
The rest of the test fixes are just adding `--crash` flag to `not` tool.
** The reason it fixes PR35547 is
`exit` does cleanup including calling class destructor whereas `abort`
does not do any cleanup. In multithreading environment such as ThinLTO or JIT,
threads may share states which mostly are ManagedStatic<>. If faulting thread
tearing down a class when another thread is using it, there are chances of
memory corruption. This is bad 1. It will stop error reporting like pretty
stack printer; 2. The memory corruption is distracting and nondeterministic in
terms of error message, and corruption type (depending one the timing, it
could be double free, heap free after use, etc.).
Reviewers: rnk, chandlerc, zturner, sepavloff, MaskRay, espindola
Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay
Subscribers: wuzish, jholewinski, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits, MaskRay, filcab, davide, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, rupprecht, seiya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67847
After extracting, fix up debug info in both the old and new functions by
1) Pointing line locations and debug intrinsics to the new subprogram
scope, and
2) Deleting intrinsics which point to values outside of the new
function.
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D72795.
Testing: check-llvm, check-clang, a build of LNT in the `-Os -g` config
with "-mllvm -hot-cold-split=1" set, and end-to-end debugging of a toy
program which undergoes splitting to verify that lldb can find
variables, single step, etc. in extracted code.
rdar://45507940
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72801
Summary:
Current peeling implementation bails out in case of loop nests.
The patch introduces a field in TargetTransformInfo structure that
certain targets can use to relax the constraints if it's
profitable (disabled by default).
Also additional option is added to enable peeling manually for
experimenting and testing purposes.
Reviewers: fhahn, lebedev.ri, xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70304
As discussed in the motivating PR44509:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44509
...we can end up with worse code using fast-math than without.
This is because the reassociate pass greedily transforms fsub
into fneg/fadd and apparently (based on the regression tests
seen here) expects instcombine to clean that up if it wasn't
profitable. But we were missing this fold:
(X - Y) - Z --> X - (Y + Z)
There's another, more specific case that I think we should
handle as shown in the "fake" fneg test (but missed with a real
fneg), but that's another patch. That may be tricky to get
right without conflicting with existing transforms for fneg.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72521
Summary:
This patch introduces `AAValueConstantRange`, which answers a possible range for integer value in a specific program point.
One of the motivations is propagating existing `range` metadata. (I think we need to change the situation that `range` metadata cannot be put to Argument).
The state is a tuple of `ConstantRange` and it is initialized to (known, assumed) = ([-∞, +∞], empty).
Currently, AAValueConstantRange is created in `getAssumedConstant` method when `AAValueSimplify` returns `nullptr`(worst state).
Supported
- BinaryOperator(add, sub, ...)
- CmpInst(icmp eq, ...)
- !range metadata
`AAValueConstantRange` is not intended to extend to polyhedral range value analysis.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: phosek, davezarzycki, baziotis, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71620
When multiple guard intrinsics are merged into one, currently the
result of eraseInstFromFunction() is returned -- however, this
should only be done if the current instruction is being removed.
In this case we're removing a different instruction and should
instead report that the current one has been modified by returning it.
For this test case, this reduces the number of instcombine iterations
from 5 to 2 (the minimum possible).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72558
This ports the MergeFunctions pass to the NewPM. This was rather
straightforward, as no analyses are used.
Additionally MergeFunctions needs to be conditionally enabled in
the PassBuilder, but I left that part out of this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72537
This fixes the issue encountered in D71164. Instead of using a
range-based for, manually iterate over the users and advance the
iterator beforehand, so we do not skip any users due to iterator
invalidation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72657
