Summary:
This patch adds initial support for the SVE calling convention such that
SVE types can be passed as arguments and return values to/from a
subroutine.
The SVE AAPCS states [1]:
z0-z7 are used to pass scalable vector arguments to a subroutine,
and to return scalable vector results from a function. If a
subroutine takes arguments in scalable vector or predicate
registers, or if it is a function that returns results in such
registers, it must ensure that the entire contents of z8-z23 are
preserved across the call. In other cases it need only preserve the
low 64 bits of z8-z15, as described in §5.1.2.
p0-p3 are used to pass scalable predicate arguments to a subroutine
and to return scalable predicate results from a function. If a
subroutine takes arguments in scalable vector or predicate
registers, or if it is a function that returns results in these
registers, it must ensure that p4-p15 are preserved across the call.
In other cases it need not preserve any scalable predicate register
contents.
SVE predicate and data registers are passed indirectly (i.e. spilled to the
stack and pass the address) if they exceed the registers used for argument
passing defined by the PCS referenced above. Until SVE stack support is merged
we can't spill SVE registers to the stack, so currently an llvm_unreachable is
used where we will eventually handle this.
[1] https://static.docs.arm.com/100986/0000/100986_0000.pdf
Reviewed By: ostannard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65448
llvm-svn: 367859
The test case is based on the example from the post-commit thread for:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc9171bd0a955
This replaces the x86-specific simple-type check from:
rL367766
with a check in the DAGCombiner. Adding the check isn't
strictly necessary after the fix from:
rL367768
...but it seems likely that we're heading for trouble if
we are creating weird types in this transform.
I combined the earlier legality check into the initial
clause to simplify the code.
So we should only try the trunc/sext transform at the
earliest combine stage, but we limit the transform to
simple types anyway because the TLI hook is probably
too lax about what it considers a free truncate.
llvm-svn: 367834
We process 2 elements at a time and expect the number of elements to be
even. Similar to D60690.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65400
llvm-svn: 367831
Summary:
This is patch is part of a serie to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet, jfb, jakehehrlich
Reviewed By: jfb
Subscribers: wuzish, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, dexonsmith, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65514
llvm-svn: 367828
Add an explicit construction of the ArrayRef, gcc 5 and earlier don't
seem to select the ArrayRef constructor which takes a C array when the
construction is implicit.
Original commit message:
- Avoid a crash when IPRA calls ARMFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves
with a null RegScavenger. Simply not updating the register scavenger
is fine because IPRA only cares about the SavedRegs vector, the acutal
code of the function has already been generated at this point.
- Add a new hook to TargetRegisterInfo to get the set of registers which
can be clobbered inside a call, even if the compiler can see both
sides, by linker-generated code.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64908
llvm-svn: 367819
Summary:
The SimplifyDemandedVectorElts function can replace with undef
when no elements are demanded, but due to how it interacts with
TargetLoweringOpts, it can only do this when the node has
no other users.
Remove a now unneeded DAG combine from the X86 backend.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65713
llvm-svn: 367788
This adds big endian MVE patterns for bitcasts. They are defined in llvm as
being the same as a store of the existing type and the load into the new. This
means that they have to become a VREV between the two types, working in the
same way that NEON works in big-endian. This also adds some example tests for
bigendian, showing where code is and isn't different.
The main difference, especially from a testing perspective is that vectors are
passed as v2f64, and so are VREV into and out of call arguments, and the
parameters are passed in a v2f64 format. Same happens for inline assembly where
the register class is used, so it is VREV to a v16i8.
So some of this is probably not correct yet, but it is (mostly) self-consistent
and seems to be consistent with how llvm treats vectors. The rest we can
hopefully fix later. More details about big endian neon can be found in
https://llvm.org/docs/BigEndianNEON.html.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65581
llvm-svn: 367780
This avoids the crash from:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42880
...and I think it's a proper constraint for the TLI hook.
But that example raises questions about what happens to get us
into this situation (created i29 types) and what happens later
(why does legalization die on those types), so I'm not sure if
we will resolve the bug based on this change.
llvm-svn: 367766
Summary:
The allocsize attribute refers to call parameters by index.
Thus, when we add the extra parameter in sjlj lowering, we
need to increment the referenced paramater in the allocsize
attribute to avoid angering the Verifier.
Reviewed By: aheejin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65470
llvm-svn: 367765
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42760. A tBR_JTr
instruction is duplicated by tail duplication, which results in
the same jumptable with the same label being emitted twice.
Fix this by marking tBR_JTr as not duplicable. The corresponding
ARM/Thumb instructions are already marked as not duplicable.
Additionally also mark tTBB_JT and tTBH_JT to be consistent with
Thumb2, even though this shouldn't be strictly necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65606
llvm-svn: 367753
This is an old commit that exposed a bug in the GISel importer, which caused
non-truncating stores to be selected for truncating store patterns. Now that's
been fixed in r367737 this can go back in.
llvm-svn: 367739
This is consistent with the target independent intrinsic handling.
Not sure this really matters since we just pull the constant out
using getZExtValue later.
llvm-svn: 367736
With newly added debuginfo type
metadata for preserve_array_access_index() intrinsic,
this patch did the following two things:
(1). checking validity before adding a new access index
to the access chain.
(2). calculating access byte offset in IR phase
BPFAbstractMemberAccess instead of when BTF is emitted.
For (1), the metadata provided by all preserve_*_access_index()
intrinsics are used to check whether the to-be-added type
is a proper struct/union member or array element.
For (2), with all available metadata, calculating access byte
offset becomes easier in BPFAbstractMemberAccess IR phase.
This enables us to remove the unnecessary complexity in
BTFDebug.cpp.
New tests are added for
. user explicit casting to array/structure/union
. global variable (or its dereference) as the source of base
. multi demensional arrays
. array access given a base pointer
. cases where we won't generate relocation if we cannot find
type name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65618
llvm-svn: 367735
These cases can come up when the extending loads combiner doesn't combine a
zext(load) to a zextload op, due to some other operation being in between, which
then gets simplified at a later stage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65360
llvm-svn: 367723
Summary:
As part of this, define DenseMapInfo for MCRegister (and Register while I'm at it)
Depends on D65599
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65605
llvm-svn: 367719
Add an equivalent ComplexRendererFns function for SelectNegArithImmed. This
allows us to select immediate adds of -1 by turning them into subtracts.
Update select-binop.mir to show that the pattern works.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65460
llvm-svn: 367700
This optimisation isn't generally profitable for ARM, because we can
save/restore many registers in the prologue and epilogue using the PUSH
and POP instructions, but mostly use individual LDR/STR instructions for
other spills.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64910
llvm-svn: 367670
- Avoid a crash when IPRA calls ARMFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves
with a null RegScavenger. Simply not updating the register scavenger
is fine because IPRA only cares about the SavedRegs vector, the acutal
code of the function has already been generated at this point.
- Add a new hook to TargetRegisterInfo to get the set of registers which
can be clobbered inside a call, even if the compiler can see both
sides, by linker-generated code.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64908
llvm-svn: 367669
Summary:
When combining `extsw` and `sldi` in `PPCMIPeephole`, we have to check
if `extsw`'s second operand is a virtual register, otherwise we might
get miscompile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65315
llvm-svn: 367645
Summary:
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42441
Used to print:
<unknown>:0: error: Cannot represent a difference across sections
(the location was null).
Now prints:
err.s:20:3: error: Cannot represent a difference across sections
i32.const foo-bar
^
Note: I looked at adding a test for this, but I don't think it is
worth it. We're not testing error formatting in the Wasm backend :)
Reviewers: sbc100, jgravelle-google
Subscribers: dschuff, aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65602
llvm-svn: 367619
AMDGPU sometimes has legal s16 and <2 x s16> operations, but all
registers are really 32-bit. An unmerge destination really should ben
widened to a 32-bit register. If widening a scalarizing vector with a
target size that matches the vector size, bitcast to integer and
extract the relevant bits with shifts.
I'm not sure if this is the right place for this. This could arguably
be part of widenScalar for the result. I also have a growing feeling
that we're missing a bitcast legalize action.
llvm-svn: 367604
If a type is larger than a legal type and needs to be split, we would previously allow the multiply to be decomposed even if the split multiply is legal. Since the shift + add/sub code would also need to be split, its not any better to decompose it.
This patch figures out what type the mul will eventually be legalized to and then uses that type for the query. I tried just returning false illegal types and letting them get handled after type legalization, but then we can't recognize and i64 constant splat on 32-bit targets since will be destroyed by type legalization. We could special case vectors of i64 to avoid that...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65533
llvm-svn: 367601
A TYPE_INDEX operand (as used by call_indirect) used to be represented
by the InstPrinter as a symbol (e.g. .Ltype_index0@TYPE_INDEX) which
was a bit of a mismatch with the WasmObjectWriter which expects an
unnamed symbol, to receive the signature from and then turn into a
reloc.
There was really no good way to round-trip this information. An earlier
version of this patch tried to attach the signature information using
a .functype, but that ran into trouble when the symbol was re-emitted
without a name. Removing the name was a giant hack also.
The current version changes the assembly syntax to have an inline
signature spec for TYPEINDEX operands that is always unnamed, which
is much more elegant both in syntax and in implementation (as now the
assembler is able to follow the same path as the regular backend)
Reviewers: sbc100, dschuff, aheejin, jgravelle-google, sunfish, tlively
Subscribers: arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64758
llvm-svn: 367590
If an operand of the `lw/sw` instructions is a symbol, these instructions
incorrectly lowered using not-position-independent chain of commands.
For PIC code we should use `lw/addiu` instructions with the `R_MIPS_GOT16`
and `R_MIPS_LO16` relocations respectively. Instead of that LLVM generates
position dependent code with the `R_MIPS_HI16` and `R_MIPS_LO16`
relocations.
This patch provides a fix for the bug by handling PIC case separately in
the `MipsAsmParser::expandMemInst`. The main idea is to generate a chain
of PIC instructions to load a symbol address into a register and then
load the address content.
The fix is not optimal and does not fix all PIC-related problems. This
is a task for subsequent patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65524
llvm-svn: 367580
This adds SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBitsForTargetNode X86 support and uses it to allow us to peek through vector insertions to avoid dependencies on entire insertion chains.
llvm-svn: 367570
Summary:
GCC Accepts both (reg) and 0(reg) for atomic instruction memory
operands. These instructions do not allow for an offset in their
encoding, so in the latter case, the 0 is silently dropped.
Due to how we have structured the RISCVAsmParser, the easiest way to add
support for parsing this offset is to add a custom AsmOperand and
parser. This parser drops all the parens, and just keeps the register.
This commit also adds a custom printer for these operands, which matches
the GCC canonical printer, printing both `(a0)` and `0(a0)` as `(a0)`.
Reviewers: asb, lewis-revill
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: s.egerton, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, jfb, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65205
llvm-svn: 367553
Summary:
While there is always a `Value::replaceAllUsesWith()`,
sometimes the replacement needs to be conditional.
I have only cleaned a few cases where `replaceUsesWithIf()`
could be used, to both add test coverage,
and show that it is actually useful.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, spatel, RKSimon, craig.topper
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, george.burgess.iv, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65528
llvm-svn: 367548
The VREV64 instruction is apparently unpredictable if Qd == Qm, due to the
cross-beat nature of the instruction. This adds an earlyclobber to Qd, which
seems to be the same way we deal with this on other instructions like the
write-back on loads and stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65502
llvm-svn: 367544
Fix an issue where the compiler still allocates an emergency spill slot even
though it already decided to spill an extra callee-save register to use
as a scratch register.
Reviewers: gberry, thegameg, mstorsjo, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: thegameg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65504
llvm-svn: 367540
Fold load/store + G_GEP + G_CONSTANT when
immediate in G_CONSTANT fits into 16 bit signed integer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65507
llvm-svn: 367535
