The commit r369122 may keep LR and FP register (aka. frame record) in
the middle of a frame, thus we must add the offsets to ensure the FP
register always points to innermost frame record on the stack.
According to AAPCS64[1], a conforming code shall construct a linked list
of stack frames that can be traversed with frame records. This commit
is also essential to frame-pointer-based stack unwinder (e.g. the stack
unwinder in linx-perf-tools.)
[1] https://github.com/ARM-software/software-standards/blob/master/abi/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst#the-frame-pointer
Test: llvm-lit ${LLVM_SRC}/test/CodeGen/AArch64/framelayout-frame-record.ll
Test: llvm-lit ${LLVM_SRC}/test/CodeGen/AArch64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70800
This refactors the if-statements handling the hashing of various
MachineOperand types into a switch-statement. The purpose is to cover
all the basis for all MachineOperand types while being very deliberate
about which MachineOperand types we are not handling and why (better
added comments). This patch is a NFC redo of https://reviews.llvm.org/D71396.
Much of the changes present in D71396 will come in smaller follow-up patches
that will add support for hashing the MachineOperand types that aren't
covered piece-meal with tests for each new case.
Summary:
In preparation of D65531 as well as the reuse of these tests for the
Attributor, we modernize them and use the update_test_checks to simplify
updates.
This was done with the update_test_checks after D68819 and D68850.
Reviewers: hfinkel, vsk, dblaikie, davidxl, tejohnson, tstellar, echristo, chandlerc, efriedma, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: bollu, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68766
This was part of D70767. When we replace the value of (call/invoke)
instructions we do not want to disturb the old call graph so we will
only replace instruction uses until we get rid of the old PM.
Accepted as part of D70767.
The Attributor can, to some degree, do what IPConstantProp does. We can
consequently use the corner cases already collected and tested for in
the IPConstantProp tests to improve Attributor test coverage.
This exposed various bugs fixed in previous Attributor patches.
Not all functionality of IPConstantProp is available in AAValueSimplify
and AAIsDead so some tests show that we cannot perform the expected
constant propagation.
Reviewers: fhahn, efriedma, mssimpso, davide
Subscribers: bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69748
The change allows clang -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer to disable frame
pointer elimination. This behavior matches X86 and Mips, and also GCC
AArch64.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71168
Extends the desciptor-based indirect call support for 32-bit codegen,
and enables indirect calls for AIX.
In-depth Description:
In a function descriptor based ABI, a function pointer points at a
descriptor structure as opposed to the function's entry point. The
descriptor takes the form of 3 pointers: 1 for the function's entry
point, 1 for the TOC anchor of the module containing the function
definition, and 1 for the environment pointer:
struct FunctionDescriptor {
void *EntryPoint;
void *TOCAnchor;
void *EnvironmentPointer;
};
An indirect call has several steps of loading the the information from
the descriptor into the proper registers for setting up the call. Namely
it has to:
1) Save the caller's TOC pointer into the TOC save slot in the linkage
area, and then load the callee's TOC pointer into the TOC register
(GPR 2 on AIX).
2) Load the function descriptor's entry point into the count register.
3) Load the environment pointer into the environment pointer register
(GPR 11 on AIX).
4) Perform the call by branching on count register.
5) Restore the caller's TOC pointer after returning from the indirect call.
A couple important caveats to the above:
- There is no way to directly load a value from memory into the count register.
Instead we populate the count register by loading the entry point address into
a gpr and then moving the gpr to the count register.
- The TOC restore has to come immediately after the branch on count register
instruction (i.e., the 1st instruction executed after we return from the
call). This is an implementation limitation. We could, in theory, schedule
the restore elsewhere as long as no uses of the TOC pointer fall in between
the call and the restore; however, to keep it simple, we insert a pseudo
instruction that represents both the indirect branch instruction and the
load instruction that restores the caller's TOC from the linkage area. As
they flow through the compiler as a single pseudo instruction, nothing can be
inserted between them and the caller's TOC is then valid at any use.
Differtential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70724
Legalization algorithm is complicated by two facts:
1) While regular instructions should be possible to legalize in
an isolated, per-instruction, context-free manner, legalization
artifacts can only be eliminated in pairs, which could be deeply, and
ultimately arbitrary nested: { [ () ] }, where which paranthesis kind
depicts an artifact kind, like extend, unmerge, etc. Such structure
can only be fully eliminated by simple local combines if they are
attempted in a particular order (inside out), or alternatively by
repeated scans each eliminating only one innermost pair, resulting in
O(n^2) complexity.
2) Some artifacts might in fact be regular instructions that could (and
sometimes should) be legalized by the target-specific rules. Which
means failure to eliminate all artifacts on the first iteration is
not a failure, they need to be tried as instructions, which may
produce more artifacts, including the ones that are in fact regular
instructions, resulting in a non-constant number of iterations
required to finish the process.
I trust the recently introduced termination condition (no new artifacts
were created during as-a-regular-instruction-retrial of artifacts not
eliminated on the previous iteration) to be efficient in providing
termination, but only performing the legalization in full if and only if
at each step such chains of artifacts are successfully eliminated in
full as well.
Which is currently not guaranteed, as the artifact combines are applied
only once and in an arbitrary order that has to do with the order of
creation or insertion of artifacts into their worklist, which is a no
particular order.
In this patch I make a small change to the artifact combiner, making it
to re-insert into the worklist immediate (modulo a look-through copies)
artifact users of each vreg that changes its definition due to an
artifact combine.
Here the first scan through the artifacts worklist, while not
being done in any guaranteed order, only needs to find the innermost
pair(s) of artifacts that could be immediately combined out. After that
the process follows def-use chains, making them shorter at each step, thus
combining everything that can be combined in O(n) time.
Reviewers: volkan, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, paquette, aemerson, dsanders
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar, paquette
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71448
and introducing new unittests/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerTest.cpp
relying on it to unit test the entire legalizer algorithm (including the
top-level main loop).
See also https://reviews.llvm.org/D71448
Summary:
To find potential opportunities to use getMemBasePlusOffset() I looked at
all ISD::ADD uses found with the regex getNode\(ISD::ADD,.+,.+Ptr
in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG. If this patch is accepted I will convert
the files in the individual backends too.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71207
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
In order to make this change, getMemBasePlusOffset() has been extended to
also take a SDNodeFlags parameter.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71206
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
Currently the function only allows integer constants offsets, but there
are cases where we can use an existing SDValue parameter.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel, craig.topper
Subscribers: craig.topper, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71205
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
Currently the function only allows positive offsets, but there are cases
where we want to subtract an offset from an existing pointer.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71204
Summary:
This copy ensures that debug location information is kept for
compressed instructions. There are places where both compressInstruction and
uncompressInstruction are called that were not doing this copy, discarding some
debug info.
This change merely moves the copy into the generated file, so you cannot forget
to copy the location over when compressing or uncompressing.
Reviewers: asb, luismarques
Reviewed By: luismarques
Subscribers: sameer.abuasal, aprantl, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67493
This reverts commit 0be81968a283fd4161cb9ac9748d5ed200926292.
The VFDatabase needs some rework to be able to handle vectorization
and subsequent scalarization of intrinsics in out-of-tree versions of
the compiler. For more details, see the discussion in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67572.
The initial attempt (rG89633320) botched the logic by reversing
the source/dest types. Added x86 tests for additional coverage.
The vector tests show a potential improvement (fold vector load
instead of broadcasting), but that's a known/existing problem.
This fold is done in IR by instcombine, and we have a special
form of it already here in DAGCombiner, but we want the more
general transform too:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/3jZm
Name: general
Pre: (C1 + zext(C2) < 64)
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%a = and i64 %s2, zext((1 << (16 - C2)) - 1)
%r = trunc %a to i16
Name: special
Pre: C1 == 48
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%r = trunc %s2 to i16
...because D58017 exposes a regression without this fold.
The big switch in `ARMBaseInstrInfo::getNumMicroOps` is missing cases for
`VLLDM` and `VLSTM`, which are currently defined with itineraries having a
dynamic count of micro-ops.
Assuming an optimistic case in which these instruction do not actually perform
loads or stores, and with the idea that Armv8-m cores are supposed to use the
new style scheduling models, this patch just sets the itinerary for those two
instructions to `NoItinerary`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71266
Fix PR44284. This is probably not valid assembly but we should not crash.
Reviewed By: luporl, #powerpc, steven.zhang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71443
Test writing and reading benchmark instructions to and from disc, and
check calculations of min, max and avg values from a list of benchmark
measures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71265
We've been marking VPT incompatible instructions as invalid for tail
predication too, though this may not strictly be true. VPT are
incompatible and, unless its the first predicate def in a loop,
they shouldn't be compatible for tail predication either.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71410
Summary:
This is a follow up for D70548.
Currently, variables with debug info coverage between 0% and 1% are put into
zero-bucket. D70548 changed the way statistics calculate a variable's coverage:
we began to use enclosing scope rather than a possible variable life range.
Thus more variables might be moved to zero-bucket despite they have some debug
info coverage.
The patch is to distinguish between a variable that has location info but
it's significantly less than its enclosing scope and a variable that doesn't
have it at all.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, dblaikie, avl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71070
GEP index size can be specified in the DataLayout, introduced in D42123. However, there were still places
in which getIndexSizeInBits was used interchangeably with getPointerSizeInBits. This notably caused issues
with Instcombine's visitPtrToInt; but the unit tests was incorrect, so this remained undiscovered.
This fixes the buildbot failures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68328
Patch by Joseph Faulls!
Summary:
This patch adds intrinsics for the following MVE instructions:
* VABAV
* VMLADAV, VMLSDAV
* VMLALDAV, VMLSLDAV
* VRMLALDAVH, VRMLSLDAVH
Each of the above 4 groups has a corresponding new LLVM IR intrinsic,
since the instructions cannot be easily represented using
general-purpose IR operations.
Reviewers: simon_tatham, ostannard, dmgreen, MarkMurrayARM
Reviewed By: MarkMurrayARM
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71062
Summary:
This changes the representation of 'coverage buckets' in llvm-dwarfdump and
llvm-locstats to one that makes more clear what the buckets contain.
See some related details in D71070.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, cmtice, jhenderson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71366
Summary:
This fills in the remaining shift operations that take a single vector
input and an immediate shift count: the `vqshl`, `vqshlu`, `vrshr` and
`vshll[bt]` families.
`vshll[bt]` (which shifts each input lane left into a double-width
output lane) is the most interesting one. There are separate MC
instruction ids for shifting by exactly the input lane width and
shifting by less than that, because the instruction encoding is so
completely different for the lane-width special case. So I had to
write two sets of patterns to match based on the immediate shift
count, which involved adding a ComplexPattern matcher to avoid the
general-case pattern accidentally matching the special case too. For
that family I've made sure to add an llc codegen test for both
versions of each instruction.
I'm experimenting with a new strategy for parametrising the isel
patterns for all these instructions: adding extra fields to the
relevant `Instruction` subclass itself, which are ignored by the
Tablegen backends that generate the MC data, but can be retrieved from
each instance of that instruction subclass when it's passed as a
template parameter to the multiclass that generates its isel patterns.
A nice effect of that is that I can fill in those informational fields
using `let` blocks, rather than having to type them out once per
instruction at `defm` time.
(As a result, quite a lot of existing instruction `def`s are
reindented by this patch, so it's clearer to read with whitespace
changes ignored.)
Reviewers: dmgreen, MarkMurrayARM, miyuki, ostannard
Reviewed By: MarkMurrayARM
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71458
We have custom lowering for operations converting to/from floating-point types
when we don't have hardware support for those types, and this doesn't interact
well with the target-independent legalization of the strict versions of these
operations. Fix this by adding similar custom lowering of the strict versions.
This fixes the last of the assertion failures in the CodeGen/ARM/fp-intrinsics
test, with the remaining failures due to poor instruction selection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71127
