MSVC seems to have problems looking up Value inside of the template. Not
really sure whether that's a bug there or Clang and GCC being too
permissive.
llvm-svn: 257288
type.
This makes it easy and safe to use a set of flags as one elmenet of
a tagged union with pointers. There is quite a bit of code that has
historically done this by casting arbitrary integers to "pointers" and
assuming that this was safe and reliable. It is neither, and has started
to rear its head by triggering safety asserts in various abstractions
like PointerLikeTypeTraits when the integers chosen are invariably poor
choices for *some* platform and *some* situation. Not to mention the
(hopefully unlikely) prospect of one of these integers actually getting
allocated!
With this, it will be straightforward to build type safe abstractions
like this without being error prone. The abstraction itself is also
remarkably simple thanks to the implicit conversion.
This use case and pattern was also independently created by the folks
working on Swift, and they're going to incrementally add any missing
functionality they find.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15844
llvm-svn: 257284
This is a much more general and powerful form of PointerUnion. It
provides a reasonably complete sum type (from type theory) for
pointer-like types. It has several significant advantages over the
existing PointerUnion infrastructure:
1) It allows more than two pointer types to participate without awkward
nesting structures.
2) It directly exposes the tag so that it is convenient to write
switches over the possible members.
3) It can re-use the same type for multiple tag values, something that
has been worked around by either abusing PointerIntPair or defining
nonce types and doing unsafe pointer casting.
4) It supports customization of the PointerLikeTypeTraits used for
specific member types. This means it could (in theory) be used even
with types that are over-aligned on allocation to expose larger
numbers of bits to the tag.
All in all, I think it is at least complimentary to the existing
infrastructure, and a strict improvement for some use cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15843
llvm-svn: 257282
JumpThreading's runOnFunction is supposed to return true if it made any
changes. JumpThreading has a call to removeUnreachableBlocks which may
result in changes to the IR but runOnFunction didn't appropriate account
for this possibility, leading to badness.
While we are here, make sure to call LazyValueInfo::eraseBlock in
removeUnreachableBlocks; JumpThreading preserves LVI.
This fixes PR26096.
llvm-svn: 257279
Summary:
This is a fix of D13718. D13718 was committed but then reverted because of the following bug:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25299
This patch fixes the issue shown in the bug.
Reviewers: majnemer, reames
Subscribers: jevinskie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14308
llvm-svn: 257277
Summary:
The code was simply ensuring that the catchpad's pred is its catchswitch,
which was letting cases slip through where the flow edge was the unwind
edge of the catchswitch rather than one of its catch clauses.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16011
llvm-svn: 257275
Summary:
Funclet-based EH personalities/tables likely can't handle these, and they
can't be generated at source, so make them officially illegal in IR as
well.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15963
llvm-svn: 257274
Summary:
A funclet EH pad may be exited by an unwind edge, which may be a
cleanupret exiting its cleanuppad, an invoke exiting a funclet, or an
unwind out of a nested funclet transitively exiting its parent. Funclet
EH personalities require all such exceptional exits from a given funclet to
have the same unwind destination, and EH preparation / state numbering /
table generation implicitly depends on this. Formalize it as a rule of
the IR in the LangRef and verifier.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15962
llvm-svn: 257273
Summary:
Funclet EH personalities require a tree-like nesting among funclets
(enforced by the ParentPad linkage in the IR), and also require that
unwind edges conform to certain rules with respect to the tree:
- An unwind edge may exit 0 or more ancestor pads
- An unwind edge must enter exactly one EH pad, which must be distinct
from any exited pads
- A cleanupret's edge must exit its cleanuppad
Describe these rules in the LangRef, and enforce them in the verifier.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15961
llvm-svn: 257272
This reverts r257221.
This caused several build bot failures
* It looks like some of the tests don't work correctly under Windows
* It looks like the lit per test timeout tests fail
So I'm reverting for now. Once the above failures are fixed running
lit's tests can be enabled again.
llvm-svn: 257268
AVX1 v8i32/v4i64 shuffles are bitcasted to v8f32/v4f64, this patch peeks through any bitcast to check for a load node to allow broadcasts to occur.
This is a re-commit of r257055 after r257264 fixed 32-bit broadcast loads of i64 scalars.
llvm-svn: 257266
managers.
Prior to this patch, recursive finalization (where finalization of one
RuntimeDyld instance triggers finalization of another instance on which the
first depends) could trigger memory access failures: When the inner (dependent)
RuntimeDyld instance and its memory manager are finalized, memory allocated
(but not yet relocated) by the outer instance is locked, and relocation in the
outer instance fails with a memory access error.
This patch adds a latch to the RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager base class that is
checked by a new method: RuntimeDyld::finalizeWithMemoryManagerLocking, ensuring
that shared memory managers are only finalized by the outermost RuntimeDyld
instance.
This allows ORC clients to supply the same memory manager to multiple calls to
addModuleSet. In particular it enables the use of user-supplied memory managers
with the CompileOnDemandLayer which must reuse the supplied memory manager for
each function that is lazily compiled.
llvm-svn: 257263
Summary:
This is analogous to r256079, which removed an overly strong assertion, and
r256812, which simplified the code by replacing three conditionals by one.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16019
llvm-svn: 257250
This patch teaches rewrite-statepoints-for-gc to relocate vector-of-pointers directly rather than trying to split them. This builds on the recent lowering/IR changes to allow vector typed gc.relocates.
The motivation for this is that we recently found a bug in the vector splitting code where depending on visit order, a vector might not be relocated at some safepoint. Specifically, the bug is that the splitting code wasn't updating the side tables (live vector) of other safepoints. As a result, a vector which was live at two safepoints might not be updated at one of them. However, if you happened to visit safepoints in post order over the dominator tree, everything worked correctly. Weirdly, it turns out that post order is actually an incredibly common order to visit instructions in in practice. Frustratingly, I have not managed to write a test case which actually hits this. I can only reproduce it in large IR files produced by actual applications.
Rather than continue to make this code more complicated, we can remove all of the complexity by just representing the relocation of the entire vector natively in the IR.
At the moment, the new functionality is hidden behind a flag. To use this code, you need to pass "-rs4gc-split-vector-values=0". Once I have a chance to stress test with this option and get feedback from other users, my plan is to flip the default and remove the original splitting code. I would just remove it now, but given the rareness of the bug, I figured it was better to leave it in place until the new approach has been stress tested.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15982
llvm-svn: 257244
directy with ``make check-lit`` and are run as part of
``make check-all``.
In principle we should run lit's testsuite before testing LLVM using lit
so that any problems with lit get discovered before testing LLVM so we
can bail out early. However this implementation (``check-all`` runs all
tests together) seemed simpler and will still report failing lit tests.
Note that the tests and the configured ``lit.site.cfg`` have to be
copied into the build directory to avoid polluting the source tree.
llvm-svn: 257221
Look for PHI/Select in the same BB of the form
bb:
%p = phi [false, %bb1], [true, %bb2], [false, %bb3], [true, %bb4], ...
%s = select p, trueval, falseval
And expand the select into a branch structure. This later enables
jump-threading over bb in this pass.
Using the similar approach of SimplifyCFG::FoldCondBranchOnPHI(), unfold
select if the associated PHI has at least one constant. If the unfolded
select is not jump-threaded, it will be folded again in the later
optimizations.
llvm-svn: 257198
It's strange that LoopInfo mostly owns the Loop objects, but that it
defers deleting them to the loop pass manager. Instead, change the
oddly named "updateUnloop" to "markAsRemoved" and have it queue the
Loop object for deletion. We can't delete the Loop immediately when we
remove it, since we need its pointer identity still, so we'll mark the
object as "invalid" so that clients can see what's going on.
llvm-svn: 257191
Summary:
r255334 matches bit-reverse pattern in InstCombine and generates calls to Instrinsic::bitreverse.
RBIT instruction is only available for ARMv6t2 and above. This patch has the intrinsic expanded during legalization for ARMv4 and ARMv5.
Patch by Z. Zheng <zhaoshiz@codeaurora.org>
Reviewers: apazos, jmolloy, weimingz
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15932
llvm-svn: 257188
