Summary:
In some cases, these operands lacked the IsDebug property, which is meant to signal that
they should not affect codegen. This patch adds a check for this property in the
MachineVerifier and adds it where it was missing.
This includes refactorings to use MachineInstrBuilder construction functions instead of
manually setting up the intrinsic everywhere.
Patch by: JesperAntonsson
Reviewers: aprantl, rnk, echristo, javed.absar
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: qcolombet, sdardis, nemanjai, JDevlieghere, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48319
llvm-svn: 335214
The alignment parameter to getExtLoad is treated as a base alignment,
not the alignment of the load (base + offset). When we infer a better
alignment for a Ptr we need to ensure that it applies to the base to
prevent the alignment on the load from being wrong.
This fixes a bug where the alignment could then be used to incorrectly
prove noalias between a load and a store, leading to a miscompile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48029
llvm-svn: 335210
r335150 should resolve the issues with the clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu
and clang-with-lto-ubuntu builders.
Original message:
This patch updates IPSCCP to use PredicateInfo to propagate
facts to true branches predicated by EQ and to false branches
predicated by NE.
As a follow up, we should be able to extend it to also propagate additional
facts about nonnull.
Reviewers: davide, mssimpso, dberlin, efriedma
Reviewed By: davide, dberlin
llvm-svn: 335206
Summary:
Fixes PR36579.
For cases where we had e.g.
DBG_VALUE 42
[...]
DBG_VALUE undef
LiveDebugVariables would discard all undef DBG_VALUEs and then it would
look like the variable had the value 42 throughout the rest of the
function, which is incorrect.
With this patch we don't remove all undef DBG_VALUEs in LiveDebugVariables
so they will be kept after register allocation just like other DBG_VALUEs
which will yield more correct debug information.
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: bjope, Ka-Ka, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48277
llvm-svn: 335205
conditions feeding a chain of `and`s or `or`s for a branch.
Much like with full non-trivial unswitching, we rely on the pass manager
to handle iterating until all of the profitable unswitches have been
done. This is to allow other more profitable unswitches to fire on any
of the cloned, simpler versions of the loop if viable.
Threading the partial unswiching through the non-trivial unswitching
logic motivated some minor refactorings. If those are too disruptive to
make it reasonable to review this patch, I can separate them out, but
it'll be somewhat timeconsuming so I wanted to send it for initial
review as-is. Feel free to tell me whether it warrants pulling apart.
I've tried to re-use (and factor out) logic form the partial trivial
unswitching, but not as much could be shared as I had haped. Still, this
wasn't as bad as I naively expected.
Some basic testing is added, but I probably need more. Suggestions for
things you'd like to see tested more than welcome. One thing I'd like to
do is add some testing that when we schedule this with loop-instsimplify
it effectively cleans up the cruft created.
Last but not least, this uncovered a bug that has been in loop cloning
the entire time for non-trivial unswitching. Specifically, we didn't
correctly add the outer-most cloned loop to the list of cloned loops.
This meant that LCSSA wouldn't be updated for it hypothetically, and
more significantly that we would never visit it in the loop pass
manager. I noticed this while checking loop-instsimplify by hand. I'll
try to separate this bugfix out into its own patch with a more focused
test. But it is just one line, so shouldn't significantly confuse the
review here.
After this patch, the only missing "feature" in this unswitch I'm aware
of us non-trivial unswitching of switches. I'll try implementing *full*
non-trivial unswitching of switches (which is at least a sound thing to
implement), but *partial* non-trivial unswitching of switches is
something I don't see any sound and principled way to implement. I also
have no interesting test cases for the latter, so I'm not really
worried. The rest of the things that need to be ported are bug-fixes and
more narrow / targeted support for specific issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47522
llvm-svn: 335203
Summary:
Since the value stored in the cache might be deleted or replaced with
something else, we need to use tracking ValueHandlers instead of plain
Value pointers. It was discovered in one of internal builds, and
unfortunately there is no small reproducer for the issue.
The cache was introduced in rL327328.
Reviewers: ahatanak, pete
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48407
llvm-svn: 335201
Summary:
Try to match udiv and urem patterns, and sink zext down to the leaves.
I'm not entirely sure why some unrelated tests change, but the added <nsw>s seem right.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: jlebar, hiraditya, bixia, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48338
llvm-svn: 335197
Errors found processing the DW_AT_ranges attribute are propagated by lower level
routines and reported by their callers.
Reviewer: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48344
llvm-svn: 335188
These are identical but use microMIPS instructions instead of MIPS instructions.
Also, flatten the 'let AdditionalPredicates = [InMicroMips]' by using the
ISA_MICROMIPS adjective. Add tests for constant materialization.
Reviewers: atanasyan, abeserminji, smaksimovic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48275
llvm-svn: 335185
Summary:
Two utils methods have essentially the same functionality. This is an attempt to merge them into one.
1. lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp : MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred
2. lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp : MergeBlockIntoPredecessor
Prior to the patch:
1. MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred
Updates either DomTree or DeferredDominance
Moves all instructions from Pred to BB, deletes Pred
Asserts BB has single predecessor
If address was taken, replace the block address with constant 1 (?)
2. MergeBlockIntoPredecessor
Updates DomTree, LoopInfo and MemoryDependenceResults
Moves all instruction from BB to Pred, deletes BB
Returns if doesn't have a single predecessor
Returns if BB's address was taken
After the patch:
Method 2. MergeBlockIntoPredecessor is attempting to become the new default:
Updates DomTree or DeferredDominance, and LoopInfo and MemoryDependenceResults
Moves all instruction from BB to Pred, deletes BB
Returns if doesn't have a single predecessor
Returns if BB's address was taken
Uses of MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred that need to be replaced:
1. lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopSimplifyCFG.cpp
Updated in this patch. No challenges.
2. lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
Updated in this patch.
i. eliminateFallThrough is straightforward, but I added using a temporary array to avoid the iterator invalidation.
ii. eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(s) methods also now use a temporary array for blocks
Some interesting aspects:
- Since Pred is not deleted (BB is), the entry block does not need updating.
- The entry block was being updated with the deleted block in eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock. Added assert to make obvious that BB=SinglePred.
- isMergingEmptyBlockProfitable assumes BB is the one to be deleted.
- eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(BB) does not delete BB on one path, it deletes its unique predecessor instead.
- adding some test owner as subscribers for the interesting tests modified:
test/CodeGen/X86/avx-cmp.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/nested-loop-conditions.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/si-annotate-cf.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/hoist-spill.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2006-11-17-IllegalMove.ll
3. lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp
Not covered in this patch. It is the only use case using the DeferredDominance.
I would defer to Brian Rzycki to make this replacement.
Reviewers: chandlerc, spatel, davide, brzycki, bkramer, javed.absar
Subscribers: qcolombet, sanjoy, nemanjai, nhaehnle, jlebar, tpr, kbarton, RKSimon, wmi, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48202
llvm-svn: 335183
Summary:
Ideally passes should not need to pass MSSA around and do all updates through the updater.
Add convenience APIs to help with that.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48334
llvm-svn: 335179
This fixes an extremely subtle non-determinism that can only be
triggered by an unfortunate alignment of passes. In my case:
- JumpThreading does large dominator tree updates
- CorrelatedValuePropagation preserves domtree now
- LICM codegen depends on the order of children on domtree nodes
The last part is non-deterministic if the update was stored in a set.
But it turns out that the set is completely unnecessary, updates are
deduplicated at an earlier stage so we can just use a vector, which is
both more efficient and doesn't destroy the input ordering.
I didn't manage to get the 240 MB IR file reduced enough, triggering
this bug requires a lot of jump threading, so landing this without a
test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48392
llvm-svn: 335176
Summary: Make the MemorySSA verify also check that all Phi incoming blocks are block predecessors.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48333
llvm-svn: 335174
I don't believe there is any real reason to have separate X86 specific opcodes for vector compares. Setcc has the same behavior just uses a different encoding for the condition code.
I had to change the CondCodeAction for SETLT and SETLE to prevent some transforms from changing SETGT lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43608
llvm-svn: 335173
As described in D48359, this patch pushes InstructionsState down the BoUpSLP call hierarchy instead of the corresponding raw OpValue. This makes it easier to track the alternate opcode etc. and avoids us having to call getAltOpcode which makes it difficult to support more than one alternate opcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48382
llvm-svn: 335170
Previously this folding was done only if select is a first operand.
However, for non-commutative operations constant may go before
select.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48223
llvm-svn: 335167
The idea of partial unswitching is to take a *part* of a branch's
condition that is loop invariant and just unswitching that part. This
primarily makes sense with i1 conditions of branches as opposed to
switches. When dealing with i1 conditions, we can easily extract loop
invariant inputs to a a branch and unswitch them to test them entirely
outside the loop.
As part of this, we now create much more significant cruft in the loop
body, so this relies on adding cleanup passes to the loop pipeline and
revisiting unswitched loops to do that cleanup before continuing to
process them.
This already appears to be more powerful at unswitching than the old
loop unswitch pass, and so I'd appreciate pretty careful review in case
I'm just missing some correctness checks. The `LIV-loop-condition` test
case is not unswitched by the old unswitch pass, but is with this pass.
Thanks to Sanjoy and Fedor for the review!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46706
llvm-svn: 335156
These instructions were renamed in version 2.2 of the user-level ISA spec, but
the old name should also be accepted by standard tools.
llvm-svn: 335154
The outliner emits debug info. Add a test that outlines a function
and uses llvm-dwarfdump to check the emitted DWARF for correctness.
llvm-svn: 335153
This utility should operate on Values, not Instructions. While I'm here,
I've also made it possible to skip emitting replacement dbg.values for
certain debug users (by having RewriteExpr return nullptr).
llvm-svn: 335152
Using OrderedInstructions::dominates as comparator for instructions in
BBs without dominance relation can cause a non-deterministic order
between such instructions. That in turn can cause us to materialize
copies in a non-deterministic order. While this does not effect
correctness, it causes some minor non-determinism in the final generated
code, because values have slightly different labels.
Without this patch, running -print-predicateinfo on a reasonably large
module produces slightly different output on each run.
This patch uses the dominator trees DFSInNum to order instruction from
different BBs, which should enforce a deterministic ordering and
guarantee that dominated instructions come after the instructions that
dominate them.
Reviewers: dberlin, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48230
llvm-svn: 335150
Summary:
Due to uniqueing of DICompositeTypes, it's possible for a type from one
module to be loaded into another earlier module without being renamed.
Then when the defining module is being IRMoved, the type can be used as
a Mapping destination before being loaded, such that when it's requested
using TypeMapTy::get() it will fail with an assertion that the type is a
source type when it's actually a type in both the source and
destination modules. Correctly handle that case by allowing a non-opaque
non-literal struct type be present in both modules.
Fix for PR37684.
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson
Reviewed By: pcc, tejohnson
Subscribers: tobiasvk, mehdi_amini, steven_wu, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47898
llvm-svn: 335145
The purpose of this utility is to make it easier for optimizations to
insert replacement dbg.values for instructions they are deleting. This
is useful in situations where salvageDebugInfo is inapplicable, say,
because the new dbg.value cannot refer to an operand of the dying value.
The utility is called insertReplacementDbgValues.
It assumes that the instruction 'From' is going to be deleted, and
inserts replacement dbg.values for each debug user of 'From'. The
newly-inserted dbg.values refer to 'To' instead of 'From'. Each
replacement dbg.value has the same location and variable as the debug
user it replaces, has a DIExpression determined by the result of
'RewriteExpr' applied to an old debug user of 'From', and is placed
before 'InsertBefore'.
This should simplify future patches, like D48331.
llvm-svn: 335144
Summary:
Found some regressions (infinite loop in DAGTypeLegalizer::RemapId)
after r334880. This patch makes sure that we do map a TableId to
itself.
Reviewers: niravd
Reviewed By: niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48364
llvm-svn: 335141
Summary:
The waterfall no longer builds .s files and no longers uses
the wasm-o when it builds object files.
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48371
llvm-svn: 335135
This is part of a move towards generalizing the alternate opcode mechanism and not just supporting (F)Add/(F)Sub counterparts.
The patch embeds the AltOpcode in the InstructionsState instead of calling getAltOpcode so often.
I'm hoping to eventually remove all uses of getAltOpcode and handle alternate opcode selection entirely within getSameOpcode, that will require us to use InstructionsState throughout the BoUpSLP call hierarchy (similar to some of the changes in D28907), which I will begin in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48359
llvm-svn: 335134
D47985 saw the old SK_Alternate 'alternating' shuffle mask replaced with the SK_Select mask which accepts either input operand for each lane, equivalent to a vector select with a constant condition operand.
This patch updates SLPVectorizer to make full use of this SK_Select shuffle pattern by removing the 'isOdd()' limitation.
The AArch64 regression will be fixed by D48172.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48174
llvm-svn: 335130
For both operands are unsigned, the following optimizations are valid, and missing:
1. X > Y && X != 0 --> X > Y
2. X > Y || X != 0 --> X != 0
3. X <= Y || X != 0 --> true
4. X <= Y || X == 0 --> X <= Y
5. X > Y && X == 0 --> false
unsigned foo(unsigned x, unsigned y) { return x > y && x != 0; }
should fold to x > y, but I found we haven't done it right now.
besides, unsigned foo(unsigned x, unsigned y) { return x < y && y != 0; }
Has been folded to x < y, so there may be a bug.
Patch by: Li Jia He!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47922
llvm-svn: 335129
