Modify ExpandStrictFPOp(...) to handle nodes that have scalar
operands.
Also, add a Strict FMA test and do some other light cleanup in the
Strict FP code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48149
llvm-svn: 334863
Summary: This patch originated from D46562 and is a proper subset, with some issues addressed.
Reviewers: spatel, hfinkel, wristow, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47954
llvm-svn: 334862
Summary:
Using associated metadata rather than llvm.used allows linkers to
perform dead stripping with -fsanitize-coverage=pc-table. Unfortunately
in my local tests, LLD was the only linker that made use of this metadata.
Partially addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34636 and fixes
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/971.
Reviewers: eugenis
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: Dor1s, hiraditya, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48203
llvm-svn: 334858
Enables using the high and high-adjusted symbol modifiers on thread local
storage modifers in powerpc assembly. Needed to be able to support 64 bit
thread-pointer and dynamic-thread-pointer access sequences.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47754
llvm-svn: 334856
Add support for the "@high" and "@higha" symbol modifiers in powerpc64 assembly.
The modifiers represent accessing the segment consiting of bits 16-31 of a
64-bit address/offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47729
llvm-svn: 334855
redundant-vf2-cost.ll is X86 specific. Moved from
test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/redundant-vf2-cost.ll to
test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/redundant-vf2-cost.ll
llvm-svn: 334854
Added a Generic x86 cpu set of resource tests to allow us to check all ISAs.
We currently use SandyBridge as our generic CPU model, but it's better if we actually duplicate these tests for if/when we change the model, it also means we don't end up polluting the SandyBridge folder with tests for ISAs it doesn't support.
llvm-svn: 334853
An earlier commit prevented folds from the peephole pass by checking for IMPLICIT_DEF. But later in the pipeline IMPLICIT_DEF just becomes and Undef flag on the input register so we need to check for that case too.
llvm-svn: 334848
When coalescing a small register into a subregister of a larger register,
if the larger register is rematerialized, the function updateRegDefUses
can add an <undef> flag to the rematerialized definition (since it's
treating it as only definining the coalesced subregister). While with that
assumption doing so is not incorrect, make sure to remove the flag later
on after the call to updateRegDefUses.
llvm-svn: 334845
Summary:
When iterating users of a multiply in processUMulZExtIdiom, the
call to setOperand in the truncation case may replace the use
being visited; make sure the iterator has been advanced before
doing that replacement.
Reviewers: majnemer, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48192
llvm-svn: 334844
We were unnecessarily going from SmallString to std::string just to
get a null-terminated C string. So just...don't do that. Crash
slightly faster!
llvm-svn: 334841
This is a minor fix for LV cost model, where the cost for VF=2 was
computed twice when the vectorization of the loop was forced without
specifying a VF.
Reviewers: xusx595, hsaito, fhahn, mkuper
Reviewed By: hsaito, xusx595
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48048
llvm-svn: 334840
Increment/decrement scalar register by (scaled) element count given by
predicate pattern, e.g. 'incw x0, all, mul #4'.
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, SjoerdMeijer, samparker, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47713
llvm-svn: 334838
Try to access pieces 4 bytes at a time. This helps
various hasOneUse extract_vector_elt combines, such
as load width reductions.
Avoids test regressions in a future commit.
llvm-svn: 334836
Summary:
While that is indeed a quite interesting summary stat,
there are cases where it does not really add anything
other than consuming extra lines.
Declutters the output of D48190.
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, craig.topper
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48209
llvm-svn: 334833
Summary:
There does not seem to be any other tests for this.
Split off from D47676.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, courbet, andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48190
llvm-svn: 334832
This is r334704 (which was reverted in r334732) with a fix for
types like x86_fp80. We need to use getTypeAllocSizeInBits and
not getTypeStoreSizeInBits to avoid dropping debug info for
such types.
Original commit msg:
> Summary:
> Do not convert a DbgDeclare to DbgValue if the store
> instruction only refer to a fragment of the variable
> described by the DbgDeclare.
>
> Problem was seen when for example having an alloca for an
> array or struct, and there were stores to individual elements.
> In the past we inserted a DbgValue intrinsics for each store,
> just as if the store wrote the whole variable.
>
> When handling store instructions we insert a DbgValue that
> indicates that the variable is "undefined", as we do not know
> which part of the variable that is updated by the store.
>
> When ConvertDebugDeclareToDebugValue is used with a load/phi
> instruction we assert that the referenced value is large enough
> to cover the whole variable. Afaict this should be true for all
> scenarios where those methods are used on trunk. If the assert
> blows in the future I guess we could simply skip to insert a
> dbg.value instruction.
>
> In the future I think we should examine which part of the variable
> that is accessed, and add a DbgValue instrinsic with an appropriate
> DW_OP_LLVM_fragment expression.
>
> Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, rnk
>
> Reviewed By: aprantl
>
> Subscribers: JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
>
> Tags: #debug-info
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48024
llvm-svn: 334830
Some instructions require of a limited set of FP immediates as operands,
for example '#0.5 or #1.0' for SVE's FADD instruction.
This patch adds support for parsing and printing such FP immediates as
exact values (e.g. #0.499999 is not accepted for #0.5).
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, SjoerdMeijer, samparker, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47711
llvm-svn: 334826
Summary:
We already do it for splat constants, but not just values.
Also, undef cases are mostly non-functional.
The original commit was reverted because
it broke tests for amdgpu backend, which i didn't check.
Now, the backed was updated to recognize these new
patterns, so we are good.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37603https://rise4fun.com/Alive/cplX
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, mareko, bogner, rampitec, nhaehnle, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel, rampitec, nhaehnle
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47980
llvm-svn: 334818
Summary: The same pattern as D48010, but this one is IR-canonical as of D47428.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48012
llvm-svn: 334817
Summary:
As a followup for D48007.
Since we already handle `x << (bitwidth - y) >> (bitwidth - y)` pattern,
which does not have ub for both the edge cases (`y == 0`, `y == bitwidth`),
i think also handling a pattern that is ub for `y == bitwidth` should be fine.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48010
llvm-svn: 334816
Summary:
D47980 will canonicalize the `x << (32 - y) >> (32 - y)`,
which is the pattern the AMDGPU expects to `x & (-1 >> (32 - y))`,
which is not recognized by AMDGPU.
Thus, it needs to be recognized, too.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48007
llvm-svn: 334815
Instruction bundling is only supported on descendants of the
MCEncodedFragment type. By moving the bundling functionality and
MCSubtargetInfo to this class it makes it easier to set and extract the
MCSubtargetInfo when it is necessary.
This is a refactoring change that will make it easier to pass the
MCSubtargetInfo through to writeNops when nop padding is required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45959
llvm-svn: 334814
Summary:
On hover, the whole asm snippet is displayed, including operands.
This requires the actual assembly output instead of just the MCInsts:
This is because some pseudo-instructions get lowered to actual target
instructions during codegen (e.g. ABS_Fp32 -> SSE or X87).
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48164
llvm-svn: 334805
I think this covers most of the unmasked vector instructions. We're still missing a lot of the masked instructions.
There are some test changes here because of the new folding support. I don't think these particular cases should be folded because it creates an undef register dependency. I think the changes introduced in r334175 are not handling stack folding. They're only blocking the peephole pass.
llvm-svn: 334800
LLVM currently assumes that Apple platforms will always use ld64. In the
future, LLD Mach-O might also be supported, so add the beginnings of
linker detection support. ld64 is currently the only detected linker,
since `ld64.lld -v` doesn't yield any useful version output, but we can
add that detection later, and in the meantime it's still useful to have
the ld64 identification.
Switch clang's order file check to use this new detection rather than
just checking for the presence of an ld64 executable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48201
llvm-svn: 334780
IEEE 754 defines the expected result on overflow. As far as I know,
hardware implementations (of f16), and compiler-rt (__floatuntisf)
correctly return +-Inf on overflow. And I can't think of any useful
transform that would take advantage of overflow being undefined here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47807
llvm-svn: 334777
