No tests; these changes aren't really interesting in the sense that the logic is the same for volatile and atomic.
I believe this completes all of the changes necessary for the optimizer to handle loads and stores correctly. I'm going to try and come up with some additional testing, though.
llvm-svn: 139533
However with this fix it does now.
Basically the operand order for the x86 target specific node
is not the same as the instruction, but since the intrinsic need that
specific order at the instruction definition, just change the order
during legalization. Also, there were some wrong invertions of condition
codes, such as GE => LE, GT => LT, fix that too. Fix PR10907.
llvm-svn: 139528
SplitKit always computes a complement live range to cover the places
where the original live range was live, but no explicit region has been
allocated.
Currently, the complement live range is created to be as small as
possible - it never overlaps any of the regions. This minimizes
register pressure, but if the complement is going to be spilled anyway,
that is not very important. The spiller will eliminate redundant
spills, and hoist others by making the spill slot live range overlap
some of the regions created by splitting. Stack slots are cheap.
This patch adds the interface to enable spill modes in SplitKit. In
spill mode, SplitKit will assume that the complement is going to spill,
so it will allow it to overlap regions in order to avoid back-copies.
By doing some of the spiller's work early, the complement live range
becomes simpler. In some cases, it can become much simpler because no
extra PHI-defs are required. This will speed up both splitting and
spilling.
This is only the interface to enable spill modes, no implementation yet.
llvm-svn: 139500
assert("not implemented for target shuffle node");
to:
assert(0 && "not implemented for target shuffle node");
This causes a test failure in CodeGen/X86/palignr.ll which has
been marked as XFAIL for the time being.
Test failure filed at PR10901.
llvm-svn: 139454
better.
Don't immediately give up when an add operation can't be trivially
sign/zero-extended within a loop. If it has NSW/NUW flags, generate a
new expression with sign extended (non-recurrent) operand. As before,
if SCEV says that all sign extends are loop invariant, then we can
widen the operation.
llvm-svn: 139453
such.
I'm doing this now for completeness because I can't think of/remember
any reason that it was left out. I'm not sure it will help anything,
but if we don't do it we need to explain why in comments.
llvm-svn: 139450
