Summary:
Fix the CLR state numbering to generate correct tables, and update the lit
test to verify them.
The CLR numbering assigns one state number to each catchpad and
cleanuppad.
It also computes two tree-like relations over states:
1) Each state has a "HandlerParentState", which is the state of the next
outer handler enclosing this state's handler (same as nearest ancestor
per the ParentPad linkage on EH pads, but skipping over catchswitches).
2) Each state has a "TryParentState", which:
a) for a catchpad that's not the last handler on its catchswitch, is
the state of the next catchpad on that catchswitch.
b) for all other pads, is the state of the pad whose try region is the
next outer try region enclosing this state's try region. The "try
regions are not present as such in the IR, but will be inferred
based on the placement of invokes and pads which reach each other
by exceptional exits.
Catchswitches do not get their own states, but each gets mapped to the
state of its first catchpad.
Table generation requires each state's "unwind dest" state to have a lower
state number than the given state.
Since HandlerParentState can be computed as a function of a pad's
ParentPad, and TryParentState can be computed as a function of its unwind
dest and the TryParentStates of its children, the CLR state numbering
algorithm first computes HandlerParentState in a top-down pass, then
computes TryParentState in a bottom-up pass.
Also reword some comments/names in the CLR EH table generation to make the
distinction between the different kinds of "parent" clear.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: AndyAyers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15325
llvm-svn: 256760
We had two bugs here:
- We might try to sink into a catchswitch, causing verifier failures.
- We will succeed in sinking into a cleanuppad but we didn't update the
funclet operand bundle.
This fixes PR26000.
llvm-svn: 256728
Summary:
There are a number of files in the tree which have been accidentally checked in with DOS line endings. Convert these to native line endings.
There are also a few files which have DOS line endings on purpose, and I have set the svn:eol-style property to 'CRLF' on those.
Reviewers: joerg, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, sanjoy, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15848
llvm-svn: 256707
Summary:
The handler list must be nonempty and consist solely of CatchPads.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15842
llvm-svn: 256691
Summary: A catchswitch cannot be a parent of a cleanuppad or another catchswitch.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15841
llvm-svn: 256690
Summary:
Add a pass to update catchrets when their successors get cloned; the
existing pass doesn't catch these because it walks the funclet whose
blocks are being cloned but the catchret is in a child funclet.
Also update the test for removing incoming PHI values; when the
predecessor is a catchret, the relevant color is the catchret's parentPad,
not its block's color.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15840
llvm-svn: 256689
LLVM's targets need to know if stack pointer adjustments occur after the
prologue. This is needed to correctly determine if the red-zone is
appropriate to use or if a frame pointer is required.
Normally, LLVM can figure this out very precisely by reasoning about the
contents of the MachineFunction. There is an interesting corner case:
inline assembly.
The vast majority of inline assembly which will perform a push or pop is
done so to pair up with pushf or popf as appropriate. Unfortunately,
this inline assembly doesn't mark the stack pointer as clobbered
because, well, it isn't. The stack pointer is decremented and then
immediately incremented. Because of this, LLVM was changed in r256456
to conservatively assume that inline assembly contain a sequence of
stack operations. This is unfortunate because the vast majority of
inline assembly will not end up manipulating the stack pointer in any
way at all.
Instead, let's provide a more principled solution: an intrinsic.
FWIW, other compilers (MSVC and GCC among them) also provide this
functionality as an intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 256685
Not folding these cases tends to avoid partial register updates:
sqrtss (%eax), %xmm0
Has a partial update of %xmm0, while
movss (%eax), %xmm0
sqrtss %xmm0, %xmm0
Has a clobber of the high lanes immediately before the partial update,
avoiding a potential stall.
Given this, we only want to fold when optimizing for size.
This is consistent with the patterns we already have for some of
the fp/int converts, and in X86InstrInfo::foldMemoryOperandImpl()
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15741
llvm-svn: 256671
The code that was meant to adjust the duplication cost based on the
terminator opcode was not being executed in cases where the initial
threshold was hit inside the loop.
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15536
llvm-svn: 256568
Summary:
* avoid generating POP {LR} in Thumb1 epilogues
* combine MOV LR, Rx + BX LR -> BX Rx in a peephole optimization pass
* combine POP {LR} + B + BX LR -> POP {PC} on v5T+
Test cases by Ana Pazos
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15707
llvm-svn: 256523
Summary:
Previously, only the outer (last) bitcast was rematerialized, resulting in a
use of the unrelocated inner (first) bitcast after the statepoint. See the
test case for an example.
Reviewers: igor-laevsky, reames
Subscribers: reames, alex, llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15789
llvm-svn: 256520
The cost is calculated for all X86 targets. When gather/scatter instruction
is not supported we calculate the cost of scalar sequence.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15677
llvm-svn: 256519
The check lines were added with:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL256458http://reviews.llvm.org/rL256460
but on a darwin target, the output looks like:
## InlineAsm Start
rorq %rdi
## InlineAsm End
## InlineAsm Start
rorq %rsi
## InlineAsm End
leaq (%rsi,%rdi), %rax
retq
llvm-svn: 256507
This adds support for the MCU psABI in a way different from r251223 and r251224,
basically reverting most of these two patches. The problem with the approach
taken in r251223/4 is that it only handled libcalls that originated from the backend.
However, the mid-end also inserts quite a few libcalls and assumes these use the
platform's default calling convention.
The previous patch tried to insert inregs when necessary both in the FE and,
somewhat hackily, in the CG. Instead, we now define a new default calling convention
for the MCU, which doesn't use inreg marking at all, similarly to what x86-64 does.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15054
llvm-svn: 256494
lower broadcast<type>x<vector> to shuffles.
there are two cases:
1.src is 128 bits and dest is 512 bits: in this case we will lower it to shuffle with imm = 0.
2.src is 256 bit and dest is 512 bits: in this case we will lower it to shuffle with imm = 01000100b (0x44) that way we will broadcast the 256bit source: ymm[0,1,2,3] => zmm[0,1,2,3,0,1,2,3] then it will mask it with the passthru value (in case it's mask op).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15790
llvm-svn: 256490
I believe this also fixes a case where a 64-bit memory form that is documented as being unsupported in 32-bit mode was able to be selected there.
llvm-svn: 256483
Fix TRUNCATE lowering vector to vector i1, use LSB and not MSB.
Implement VPMOVB/W/D/Q2M intrinsic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15675
llvm-svn: 256470
a standalone pass.
There is no call graph or even interesting analysis for this part of
function attributes -- it is literally inferring attributes based on the
target library identification. As such, we can do it using a much
simpler module pass that just walks the declarations. This can also
happen much earlier in the pass pipeline which has benefits for any
number of other passes.
In the process, I've cleaned up one particular aspect of the logic which
was necessary in order to separate the two passes cleanly. It now counts
inferred attributes independently rather than just counting all the
inferred attributes as one, and the counts are more clearly explained.
The two test cases we had for this code path are both ... woefully
inadequate and copies of each other. I've kept the superset test and
updated it. We need more testing here, but I had to pick somewhere to
stop fixing everything broken I saw here.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15676
llvm-svn: 256466
is (by default) run much earlier than FuncitonAttrs proper.
This allows forcing optnone or other widely impactful attributes. It is
also a bit simpler as the force attribute behavior needs no specific
iteration order.
I've added the pass into the default module pass pipeline and LTO pass
pipeline which mirrors where function attrs itself was being run.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15668
llvm-svn: 256465
A frame pointer must be used if stack pointer is modified after the
prologue. LLVM will emit pushf/popf if we need to save/restore the
FLAGS register, requiring us to have a frame pointer for the function.
There is a small twist: this sequence might exist in user code via
inline-assembly. For now, conservatively assume that such functions
require a frame pointer. For real world justification, please see
clang's implementation of __readeflags.
This fixes PR25945.
llvm-svn: 256456
