This is almost the same as an existing IR canonicalization in instcombine,
so I'm assuming this is a good early generic DAG combine too.
The motivation comes from reduced bit-hacking for select-of-constants in IR
after rL331486. We want to restore that functionality in the DAG as noted in
the commit comments for that change and the llvm-dev discussion here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124433.html
The PPC and AArch tests show that those targets are already doing something
similar. x86 will be neutral in the minimal case and generally better when
this pattern is extended with other ops as shown in the signbit-shift.ll tests.
Note the asymmetry: we don't include the (extend (ifneg X)) transform because
it already exists in SimplifySelectCC(), and that is verified in the later
unchanged tests in the signbit-shift.ll files. Without the 'not' op, the
general transform to use a shift is always a win because that's a single
instruction.
Alive proofs:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ysli
Name: if pos, get -1
%c = icmp sgt i16 %x, -1
%r = sext i1 %c to i16
=>
%n = xor i16 %x, -1
%r = ashr i16 %n, 15
Name: if pos, get 1
%c = icmp sgt i16 %x, -1
%r = zext i1 %c to i16
=>
%n = xor i16 %x, -1
%r = lshr i16 %n, 15
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48970
llvm-svn: 337130
See D49247, D49266
I'm only adding the sane negative tests, and not
adding the one-use tests yet. Also, not adding
negative tests for the second pattern with inverted operands yet,
since it's handling will be added in later differential.
llvm-svn: 337014
As suggested by @efriedma on D49262 - changed the extractelement to a store to prevent SimplifyDemandedVectorElts from simplifying the build vectors - this keeps the immediate generation which was the point of the tests.
llvm-svn: 336981
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D47106 for details.
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47171
This commit drops that patch's changes to:
llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/f16x2-instructions.ll
llvm/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/param-load-store.ll
For some reason, the dos line endings there prevent me from commiting
via the monorepo. A follow-up commit (not via the monorepo) will
finish the patch.
llvm-svn: 336843
Summary:
This patch adds support for the atomicrmw instructions and the strong
cmpxchg instruction to the IRTranslator.
I've left out weak cmpxchg because LangRef.rst isn't entirely clear on what
difference it makes to the backend. As far as I can tell from the code, it
only matters to AtomicExpandPass which is run at the LLVM-IR level.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, javed.absar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, javed.absar, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40092
llvm-svn: 336589
D48278
Allow to reduce redundant shift masks.
For example:
x1 = x & 0xAB00
x2 = (x >> 8) & 0xAB
can be reduced to:
x1 = x & 0xAB00
x2 = x1 >> 8
It only allows folding when the masks and shift values are constants.
llvm-svn: 336426
r336120 resulted in falling back to SelectionDAG more often due to the G_STORE
MMOs not matching the vreg size. This fixes that by explicitly any-extending the
value.
llvm-svn: 336209
We currently don't any-extend vararg parameters before storing them to the stack
locations on Darwin. However, SelectionDAG however does this, and so user code
is in the wild which inadvertently relies on this extension. This can manifest
in cases where the value stored is (int)0, but the actual parameter is interpreted
by va_arg as a pointer, and so not extending to 64 bits causes the callee to
load additional undefined bits.
llvm-svn: 336120
This adds functionality to the outliner that allows targets to
specify certain functions that should be outlined from by default.
If a target supports default outlining, then it specifies that in
its TargetOptions. In the case that it does, and the user hasn't
specified that they *never* want to outline, the outliner will
be added to the pass pipeline and will run on those default functions.
This is a preliminary patch for turning the outliner on by default
under -Oz for AArch64.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48776
llvm-svn: 336040
This is a recommit of r335887, which was erroneously committed earlier.
To enable the MachineOutliner by default on AArch64, we need to be able to
disable the MachineOutliner and also provide an option to "always" enable the
outliner.
This adds that capability. It allows the user to still use the old
-enable-machine-outliner option, which defaults to "always". This is building
up to allowing the user to specify "always" versus the target default
outlining behaviour.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48682
llvm-svn: 335986
This is a recommit of r335879.
We shouldn't add the outliner when compiling at -O0 even if
-enable-machine-outliner is passed in. This makes sure that we
don't add it in this case.
This also removes -O0 from the outliner DWARF test.
llvm-svn: 335930
This reverts commit 9c7c10e4073a0bc6a759ce5cd33afbac74930091.
It relies on r335872 since that introduces the machine outliner
flags test. I meant to commit D48683 in that commit, but got mixed
up and committed D48682 instead. So, I'm reverting this and
r335872, since D48682 hasn't made it through review yet.
llvm-svn: 335882
We shouldn't add the outliner when compiling at -O0 even if
-enable-machine-outliner is passed in. This makes sure that we
don't add it in this case.
This also updates machine-outliner-flags to reflect the change
and improves the comment describing what that test does.
llvm-svn: 335879
To enable the MachineOutliner by default on AArch64, we need to be able to
disable the MachineOutliner and also provide an option to "always" enable the
outliner.
This adds that capability. It allows the user to still use the old
-enable-machine-outliner option, which defaults to "always". This is building
up to allowing the user to specify "always" versus the target-default
outlining behaviour.
llvm-svn: 335872
Now that we have the ability to legalize based on MMO's. Add support for
legalizing based on AtomicOrdering and use it to correct the legalization
of the atomic instructions.
Also extend all() to be a variadic template as this ruleset now requires
3 and 4 argument versions.
llvm-svn: 335767
As noted in the D44909 review, the transform from (fptosi+sitofp) to ftrunc
can produce -0.0 where the original code does not:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc) {
float x;
x = -0.8 * argc;
printf("%f\n", (float)((int)x));
return 0;
}
$ clang -O0 -mavx fp.c ; ./a.out
0.000000
$ clang -O1 -mavx fp.c ; ./a.out
-0.000000
Ideally, we'd use IR/node flags to predicate the transform, but the IR parser
doesn't currently allow fast-math-flags on the cast instructions. So for now,
just use the function attribute that corresponds to clang's "-fno-signed-zeros"
option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48085
llvm-svn: 335761
It isn't safe to outline sequences of instructions where x16/x17/nzcv live
across the sequence.
This teaches the outliner to check whether or not a specific canidate has
x16/x17/nzcv live across it and discard the candidate in the case that that is
true.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37573https://reviews.llvm.org/D47655
llvm-svn: 335758
This patch adds a custom trunc store lowering for v4i8 vector types.
Since there is not v.4b register, the v4i8 is promoted to v4i16 (v.4h)
and default action for v4i8 is to extract each element and issue 4
byte stores.
A better strategy would be to extended the promoted v4i16 to v8i16
(with undef elements) and extract and store the word lane which
represents the v4i8 subvectores. The construction:
define void @foo(<4 x i16> %x, i8* nocapture %p) {
%0 = trunc <4 x i16> %x to <4 x i8>
%1 = bitcast i8* %p to <4 x i8>*
store <4 x i8> %0, <4 x i8>* %1, align 4, !tbaa !2
ret void
}
Can be optimized from:
umov w8, v0.h[3]
umov w9, v0.h[2]
umov w10, v0.h[1]
umov w11, v0.h[0]
strb w8, [x0, #3]
strb w9, [x0, #2]
strb w10, [x0, #1]
strb w11, [x0]
ret
To:
xtn v0.8b, v0.8h
str s0, [x0]
ret
The patch also adjust the memory cost for autovectorization, so the C
code:
void foo (const int *src, int width, unsigned char *dst)
{
for (int i = 0; i < width; i++)
*dst++ = *src++;
}
can be vectorized to:
.LBB0_4: // %vector.body
// =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
ldr q0, [x0], #16
subs x12, x12, #4 // =4
xtn v0.4h, v0.4s
xtn v0.8b, v0.8h
st1 { v0.s }[0], [x2], #4
b.ne .LBB0_4
Instead of byte operations.
llvm-svn: 335735
This removes debug locations from ConstantSDNode and ConstantSDFPNode.
When this kind of node is materialized we no longer create a line table
entry which jumps back to the constant's first point of use. This makes
single-stepping behavior smoother, and it matches the model used by IR,
where Constants have no locations. See this thread for more context:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-June/124164.html
I'd like to handle constant BuildVectorSDNodes and to try to eliminate
passing SDLocs to SelectionDAG::getConstant*() in follow-up commits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48468
llvm-svn: 335497
This reverts commit d8f57105010cc7e78026e511d5def873fc91e0e7.
Original Commit:
Author: Haicheng Wu <haicheng@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sun Feb 18 13:51:33 2018 +0000
[AArch64] Coalesce Copy Zero during instruction selection
Add special case for copy of zero to avoid a double copy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36104
Author's intention is to remove a BB that has one mov instruction. In
order to do that, d8f571050 pessmizes MachineSinking by introducing a
copy, such that mov instruction is NOT moved to the BB. Optimization
downstream gets rid of the BB with only mov instruction. This works well
if we have only one fall through branch as there is only one "extra"
mov instruction.
If we have multiple fall throughs, we will have a lot of redundant movs.
In such a case, it's better to have this BB which has one mov instruction.
This is causing degradation in jpeg, fft and other codebases. I believe
if we want to remove a BB with only one branch instruction, we should not
pessimize Machine Sinking at all, and find some other solution.
llvm-svn: 335251
Summary: This patch originated from D46562 and is a proper subset, with some issues addressed.
Reviewers: spatel, hfinkel, wristow, arsenm, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47909
llvm-svn: 334996
Summary: This patch originated from D47388 and is a proper subset of the originating changes, containing only the fmf optimization guard extensions.
Reviewers: spatel, hfinkel, wristow, arsenm, javed.absar, rampitec, nhaehnle, nemanjai
Reviewed By: rampitec, nhaehnle
Subscribers: tpr, nemanjai, wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47918
llvm-svn: 334876
This is r334750 (which was reverted in r334754) with a fix for an
uninitialized variable that was caught by msan.
Original commit message:
> If a copy bundle happens to involve overlapping registers, we can end
> up with emitting the copies in an order that ends up clobbering some
> of the subregisters. Since instructions in the copy bundle
> semantically happen at the same time, this is incorrect and we need to
> make sure we order the copies such that this doesn't happen.
llvm-svn: 334756
If a copy bundle happens to involve overlapping registers, we can end
up with emitting the copies in an order that ends up clobbering some
of the subregisters. Since instructions in the copy bundle
semantically happen at the same time, this is incorrect and we need to
make sure we order the copies such that this doesn't happen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48154
llvm-svn: 334750
We're constant folding here, so we shouldn't check uses. This matches
the IR optimizer behavior.
The x86 test shows the expected win. The AArch64 test shows something
else. This only seems to happen if the "generic" AArch64 CPU model is
used by MachineCombiner, so I'll file a bug report to follow-up.
llvm-svn: 334608
Register x20 is a callee-saved register which may be used for other
purposes in certain contexts, for example to hold special variables
within the kernel. This change adds support for reserving this register
both to frontend and backend to make this register usable for these
purposes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46552
llvm-svn: 334531
Apparently, MachineInstr class definition as well as pretty much all of
the machine passes assume that the only kind of MachineInstr's operands
that is variadic for variadic opcodes is explicit non-definitions.
In particular, this assumption is made by MachineInstr::defs(), uses(),
and explicit_uses() methods, as well as by MachineCSE pass.
The assumption is incorrect judging from at least TableGen backend
implementation, that recognizes variable_ops in OutOperandList, and the
very existence of G_UNMERGE_VALUES generic opcode, or ARM load multiple
instructions, all of which have variadic defs.
In particular, MachineCSE pass breaks MIR with CSE'able G_UNMERGE_VALUES
instructions in it.
This commit implements MachineInstr::getNumExplicitDefs() similar to
pre-existing MachineInstr::getNumExplicitOperands(), fixes
MachineInstr::defs(), uses(), and explicit_uses(), and fixes MachineCSE
pass.
As the issue addressed seems to affect only machine passes that could be
ran mid-GlobalISel pipeline at the moment, the other passes aren't fixed
by this commit, like MachineLICM: that could be done on per-pass basis
when (if ever) they get adopted for GlobalISel.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45640
llvm-svn: 334520
Summary:
In D47428, i propose to choose the `~(-(1 << nbits))` as the canonical form of low-bit-mask formation.
As it is seen from these tests, there is a reason for that.
AArch64 currently better handles `~(-(1 << nbits))`, but not the more traditional `(1 << nbits) - 1` (sic!).
The other way around for X86.
It would be much better to canonicalize.
It would seem that there is too much tests, but this is most of all the auto-generated possible variants
of C code that one would expect for BZHI to be formed, and then manually cleaned up a bit.
So this should be pretty representable, which somewhat good coverage...
Related links:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36419https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37603https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37610https://rise4fun.com/Alive/idM
Reviewers: javed.absar, craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47452
llvm-svn: 334124
If no alignment is set, the abi/preferred alignment of structs will be
used which may be higher than required. This can lead to extra padding
and in the end an increase in data size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47633
llvm-svn: 334099
Start by emitting remarks for very basic unsupported cases such as
irreducible CFGs and EHFunclets. The end goal is to be able to cover all
the cases where we give up with an explanation.
llvm-svn: 333972
Before we were relying on the any extend of the s1 to s32, but
for AAPCS we need to zero-extend it to at least s8.
Fixes PR36719
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47425
llvm-svn: 333747
