Incremental improvement to fast-isel for PPC64. This allows us to
select on ret, sext, and zext. Filling in sext/zext improves some of
the existing logic in handling compare-immediates that needed extends.
A simplified return convention for fast-isel is also added to the
PPC64 calling conventions. All call/return processing for DAG
selection is handled with custom code, so there isn't an existing CC
to rely on here. The include of PPCGenCallingConv.inc causes compiler
warnings due to the 32-bit calling conventions that are not used, so
the dummy function "usePPC32CCs()" is added here to silence those.
Test cases for the return and extend logic are added.
llvm-svn: 189266
First chunk of actual fast-isel selection code. This handles direct
and indirect branches, as well as feeding compares for direct
branches. PPCFastISel::PPCEmitIntExt() is just roughed in and will be
expanded in a future patch. This also corrects a problem with
selection for constant pool entries in JIT mode or with small code
model.
llvm-svn: 189202
(Patch committed on behalf of Mark Minich, whose log entry follows.)
This is a continuation of the refactorings performed in svn rev 188573
(see that rev's comments for more detail).
This is my stage 2 refactoring: I combined the emitPrologue() &
emitEpilogue() PPC32 & PPC64 code into a single flow, simplifying a
lot of the code since in essence the PPC32 & PPC64 code generation
logic is the same, only the instruction forms are different (in most
cases). This simplification is necessary because my functional changes
(yet to come) add significant complexity, and without the
simplification of my stage 2 refactoring, the overall complexity of
both emitPrologue() & emitEpilogue() would have become almost
intractable for most mortal programmers (like me).
This submission was intended to be a pure refactoring (no functional
changes whatsoever). However, in the process of combining the PPC32 &
PPC64 flows, I spotted a difference that I believe is a bug (see svn
rev 186478 line 863, or svn rev 188573 line 888): This line appears to
be restoring the BP with the original FP content, not the original BP
content. When I merged the 32-bit and 64-bit code, I used the
corresponding code from the 64-bit flow, which I believe uses the
correct offset (BPOffset) for this operation.
llvm-svn: 188741
This adds a llvm.copysign intrinsic; We already have Libfunc recognition for
copysign (which is turned into the FCOPYSIGN SDAG node). In order to
autovectorize calls to copysign in the loop vectorizer, we need a corresponding
intrinsic as well.
In addition to the expected changes to the language reference, the loop
vectorizer, BasicTTI, and the SDAG builder (the intrinsic is transformed into
an FCOPYSIGN node, just like the function call), this also adds FCOPYSIGN to a
few lists in LegalizeVector{Ops,Types} so that vector copysigns can be
expanded.
In TargetLoweringBase::initActions, I've made the default action for FCOPYSIGN
be Expand for vector types. This seems correct for all in-tree targets, and I
think is the right thing to do because, previously, there was no way to generate
vector-values FCOPYSIGN nodes (and most targets don't specify an action for
vector-typed FCOPYSIGN).
llvm-svn: 188728
copysign/copysignf never become function calls (because the SDAG expansion code
does not lower to the corresponding function call, but rather directly
implements the associated logic), but copysignl almost always is lowered into a
call to the requested libm functon (and, thus, might clobber CTR).
llvm-svn: 188727
Modern PPC cores support a floating-point copysign instruction, and we can use
this to lower the FCOPYSIGN node (which is created from calls to the libm
copysign function). A couple of extra patterns are necessary because the
operand types of FCOPYSIGN need not agree.
llvm-svn: 188653
safe on PPC32 SVR4 ABI
[Patch and following text by Mark Minich; committing on his behalf.]
There are FIXME's in PowerPC/PPCFrameLowering.cpp, method
PPCFrameLowering::emitPrologue() related to "negative offsets of R1"
on PPC32 SVR4. They're true, but the real issue is that on PPC32 SVR4
(and any ABI without a Red Zone), no spills may be made until after
the stackframe is claimed, which also includes the LR spill which is
at a positive offset. The same problem exists in emitEpilogue(),
though there's no FIXME for it. I intend to fix this issue, making
LLVM-compiled code finally safe for use on SVR4/EABI/e500 32-bit
platforms (including in particular, OS-free embedded systems & kernel
code, where interrupts may share the same stack as user code).
In preparation for making these changes, to make the diffs for the
functional changes less cluttered, I am providing the non-functional
refactorings in two stages:
Stage 1 does some minor fluffy refactorings to pull multiple method
calls up into a single bool, creating named bools for repeated uses of
obscure logic, moving some code up earlier because either stage 2 or
my final version will require it earlier, and rewording/adding some
comments. My stage 1 changes can be characterized as primarily fluffy
cleanup, the purpose of which may be unclear until the stage 2 or
final changes are made.
My stage 2 refactorings combine the separate PPC32 & PPC64 logic,
which is currently performed by largely duplicate code, into a single
flow, with the differences handled by a group of constants initialized
early in the methods.
This submission is for my stage 1 changes. There should be no
functional changes whatsoever; this is a pure refactoring.
llvm-svn: 188573
This is a follow-up to r187693, correcting that code to request the correct
register class. The previous version, with the wrong register class, was not
really correcting the constraints, but rather was removing them. Coincidentally,
this fixed the failing test case in r187693, but obviously created other
problems.
llvm-svn: 188407
this records relocation entries in the mach-o object file
for PIC code generation.
tested on powerpc-darwin8, validated against darwin otool -rvV
llvm-svn: 188004
Making use of the recently-added ISD::FROUND, which allows for custom lowering
of round(), the PPC backend will now map frin to round(). Previously, we had
been using frin to lower nearbyint() (and rint() via some custom lowering to
handle the extra fenv flags requirements), but only in fast-math mode because
frin does not tie-to-even. Several users had complained about this behavior,
and this new mapping of frin to round is certainly more appropriate (and does
not require fast-math mode).
In effect, this reverts r178362 (and part of r178337, replacing the nearbyint
mapping with the round mapping).
llvm-svn: 187960
All libm floating-point rounding functions, except for round(), had their own
ISD nodes. Recent PowerPC cores have an instruction for round(), and so here I'm
adding ISD::FROUND so that round() can be custom lowered as well.
For the most part, this is straightforward. I've added an intrinsic
and a matching ISD node just like those for nearbyint() and friends. The
SelectionDAG pattern I've named frnd (because ISD::FP_ROUND has already claimed
fround).
This will be used by the PowerPC backend in a follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 187926
The PPC backend had been missing a pattern to generate mulli for 64-bit
multiples. We had been generating it only for 32-bit multiplies. Unfortunately,
generating li + mulld unnecessarily increases register pressure.
llvm-svn: 187807
Without explicit dependencies, both per-file action and in-CommonTableGen action could run in parallel.
It races to emit *.inc files simultaneously.
llvm-svn: 187780
Internally, the PowerPC backend names the 32-bit GPRs R[0-9]+, and names the
64-bit parent GPRs X[0-9]+. When matching inline assembly constraints with
explicit register names, on PPC64 when an i64 MVT has been requested, we need
to follow gcc's convention of using r[0-9]+ to refer to the 64-bit (parent)
registers.
At some point, we'll probably want to arrange things so that the generic code
in TargetLowering uses the AsmName fields declared in *RegisterInfo.td in order
to match these inline asm register constraints. If we do that, this change can
be reverted.
llvm-svn: 187693
Function attributes are the future! So just query whether we want to realign the
stack directly from the function instead of through a random target options
structure.
llvm-svn: 187618
This is the first of many upcoming patches for PowerPC fast
instruction selection support. This patch implements the minimum
necessary for a functional (but extremely limited) FastISel pass. It
allows the table-generated portions of the selector to be created and
used, but in most cases selection will fall back to the DAG selector.
None of the block terminator instructions are implemented yet, and
most interesting instructions require some special handling.
Therefore there aren't any new test cases with this patch. There will
be quite a few tests coming with future patches.
This patch adds the make/CMake support for the new code (including
tablegen -gen-fast-isel) and creates the FastISel object for PPC64 ELF
only. It instantiates the necessary virtual functions
(TargetSelectInstruction, TargetMaterializeConstant,
TargetMaterializeAlloca, tryToFoldLoadIntoMI, and FastLowerArguments),
but of these, only TargetMaterializeConstant contains any useful
implementation. This is present since the table-generated code
requires the ability to materialize integer constants for some
instructions.
This patch has been tested by building and running the
projects/test-suite code with -O0. All tests passed with the
exception of a couple of long-running tests that time out using -O0
code generation.
llvm-svn: 187399
The tests !defined(__ppc__) && !defined(__powerpc__) are not needed
or helpful when verifying that code is being compiled for a 64-bit
target. The simpler test provided by this revision is sufficient to
tell if the target is 64-bit.
llvm-svn: 187318
Both GCC and LLVM will implicitly define __ppc__ and __powerpc__ for
all PowerPC targets, whether 32- or 64-bit. They will both implicitly
define __ppc64__ and __powerpc64__ for 64-bit PowerPC targets, and not
for 32-bit targets. We cannot be sure that all other possible
compilers used to compile Clang/LLVM define both __ppc__ and
__powerpc__, for example, so it is best to check for both when relying
on either inside the Clang/LLVM code base.
This patch makes sure we always check for both variants. In addition,
it fixes one unnecessary check in lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCJITInfo.cpp.
(At least one of __ppc__ and __powerpc__ should always be defined when
compiling for a PowerPC target, no matter which compiler is used, so
testing for them is unnecessary.)
There are some places in the compiler that check for other variants,
like __POWERPC__ and _POWER, and I have left those in place. There is
no need to add them elsewhere. This seems to be in Apple-specific
code, and I won't take a chance on breaking it.
There is no intended change in behavior; thus, no test cases are
added.
llvm-svn: 187248
This patch provides basic support for powerpc64le as an LLVM target.
However, use of this target will not actually generate little-endian
code. Instead, use of the target will cause the correct little-endian
built-in defines to be generated, so that code that tests for
__LITTLE_ENDIAN__, for example, will be correctly parsed for
syntax-only testing. Code generation will otherwise be the same as
powerpc64 (big-endian), for now.
The patch leaves open the possibility of creating a little-endian
PowerPC64 back end, but there is no immediate intent to create such a
thing.
The LLVM portions of this patch simply add ppc64le coverage everywhere
that ppc64 coverage currently exists. There is nothing of any import
worth testing until such time as little-endian code generation is
implemented. In the corresponding Clang patch, there is a new test
case variant to ensure that correct built-in defines for little-endian
code are generated.
llvm-svn: 187179
This removes the need to store the asm variant in each row of the single table that existed before. Shaves ~16K off the size of X86AsmParser.o.
llvm-svn: 187026
Support for dynamic stack alignments in the PPC backend has been unfinished, in
part because it depends on dynamic stack realignment (which I only just
recently implemented fully). Now we can also support dynamic allocas with
higher than the default target stack alignment (16 bytes).
In order to round-up the requested size to the maximum requested alignment, we
need an additional register to hold the rounded-up size. We're already using one
scavenged register to hold the previous stack-pointer value (which needs to be
stored with the signal-safe stdux update), and so when we have dynamic allocas
and a large alignment, we allocate two emergency spill slots for the scavenger.
llvm-svn: 186562
First, this changes the base-pointer implementation to remove an unnecessary
complication (and one that is incompatible with how builtin SjLj is
implemented): instead of using r31 as the base pointer when it is not needed as
a frame pointer, now the base pointer will always be r30 when needed.
Second, we introduce another pseudo register, BP, which is used just like the FP
pseudo register to refer to the base register before we know for certain what
register it will be.
Third, we now save BP into the jmp_buf, and restore r30 from that slot in
longjmp. If the function that called setjmp did not use a base pointer, then
r30 will be overwritten by the setjmp-calling-function's restore code. FP
restoration (which is restored into r31) works the same way.
llvm-svn: 186545
Because the builtin longjmp implementation uses a CTR-based indirect jump, when
the control flow arrives at the builtin setjmp call, the CTR register has
necessarily been clobbered. Correspondingly, this adds CTR to the list of
implicit definitions of the builtin setjmp pseudo instruction.
We don't need to add CTR to the implicit definitions of builtin longjmp
because, even though it does clobber the CTR register, the control flow cannot
return to inside the loop unless there is also a builtin setjmp call.
llvm-svn: 186488
This builds on some frame-lowering code that has existed since 2005 (r24224)
but was disabled in 2008 (r48188) because it needed base pointer support to
function correctly. This implementation follows the strategy suggested by Dale
Johannesen in r48188 where the following comment was added:
This does not currently work, because the delta between old and new stack
pointers is added to offsets that reference incoming parameters after the
prolog is generated, and the code that does that doesn't handle a variable
delta. You don't want to do that anyway; a better approach is to reserve
another register that retains to the incoming stack pointer, and reference
parameters relative to that.
And now we do exactly that. If we don't need a frame pointer, then we use r31
as a base pointer. If we do need a frame pointer, then we use r30 as a base
pointer. The base pointer retains the value of the stack pointer before it was
decremented in the prologue. We then use the base pointer to resolve all
negative frame indicies. The basic scheme follows that for base pointers in the
X86 backend.
We use a base pointer when we need to dynamically realign the incoming stack
pointer. This currently applies only to static objects (dynamic allocas with
large alignments, and base-pointer support in SjLj lowering will come in future
commits).
llvm-svn: 186478
This change mirrors the changes that were made to the X86 and ARM targets to
support subtarget feature changing. As indicated in r182899, the mechanism is
still undergoing revision, and so as with the X86 and ARM targets, there is no
test case yet (there is no effective functionality change).
llvm-svn: 186357
PPCInstrInfo::insertSelect and PPCInstrInfo::canInsertSelect were computing the
common subclass of the true and false inputs, and then selecting either the
32-bit or the 64-bit isel variant based on the result of calling
PPC::GPRCRegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC) and PPC::G8RCRegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC)
(where RC is the common subclass). Unfortunately, this is not quite right: if
we have something like this:
%vreg8<def> = SELECT_CC_I8 %vreg4<kill>, %vreg7<kill>, %vreg6<kill>, 76;
G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg8 CRRC:%vreg4 G8RC_NOX0:%vreg7,%vreg6
then the common subclass of G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0 and G8RC_NOX0 is G8RC_NOX0, and
G8RC_NOX0 is not a subclass of G8RC (because it also contains the ZERO8
pseudo-register). As a result, we also need to check the common subclass
against GPRC_NOR0 and G8RC_NOX0 explicitly.
This had not been a problem for clients of insertSelect that called
canInsertSelect first (because it had a compensating mistake), but insertSelect
is also used by the PPC pseudo-instruction expander, and this error was causing
a problem in that context.
This problem was found by csmith.
llvm-svn: 186343
We had patterns to match v4i32 immAllZerosV -> V_SET0, but not patterns for
v8i16 (which occurs in the test case) or v16i8. The same was true for
V_SETALLONES (so I added the associated patterns for those as well).
Another bug found by llvm-stress.
llvm-svn: 186108
This fixes a bug (found by csmith) at -O0 where we attempt to create a RLWIMI
with an out-of-range operand. Most uses of the isRunOfOnes function are guarded
by a condition that the value is not zero. This was not true in two places, and
in both places a zero input would result in an out-of-rage MB value (= 32).
To fix this, isRunOfOnes returns false on a zero input (and I've remove one
now-redundant guard).
llvm-svn: 186101
In discussing this change with Bill Schmidt, it was decided that the original
comment about negative FIs was incorrect. We'll still exclude them for now, but
now with a more-accurate explanation.
llvm-svn: 186005
A more complete example of the bug in PR16556 was recently provided,
showing that the previous fix was not sufficient. The previous fix is
reverted herein.
The real problem is that ReplaceNodeResults() uses LowerFP_TO_INT as
custom lowering for FP_TO_SINT during type legalization, without
checking whether the input type is handled by that routine.
LowerFP_TO_INT requires the input to be f32 or f64, so we fail when
the input is ppcf128.
I'm leaving the test case from the initial fix (r185821) in place, and
adding the new test as another crash-only check.
llvm-svn: 185959
in-tree implementations of TargetLoweringBase::isFMAFasterThanMulAndAdd in
order to resolve the following issues with fmuladd (i.e. optional FMA)
intrinsics:
1. On X86(-64) targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed when lowering fmuladd
intrinsics even if the subtarget does not support FMA instructions, leading
to laughably bad code generation in some situations.
2. On AArch64 targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed for operations on fp128,
resulting in a call to a software fp128 FMA implementation.
3. On PowerPC targets, FMAs are not generated from fmuladd intrinsics on types
like v2f32, v8f32, v4f64, etc., even though they promote, split, scalarize,
etc. to types that support hardware FMAs.
The function has also been slightly renamed for consistency and to force a
merge/build conflict for any out-of-tree target implementing it. To resolve,
see comments and fixed in-tree examples.
llvm-svn: 185956
In the commit message to r185476 I wrote:
>The PowerPC-specific modifiers VK_PPC_TLSGD and VK_PPC_TLSLD
>correspond exactly to the generic modifiers VK_TLSGD and VK_TLSLD.
>This causes some confusion with the asm parser, since VK_PPC_TLSGD
>is output as @tlsgd, which is then read back in as VK_TLSGD.
>
>To avoid this confusion, this patch removes the PowerPC-specific
>modifiers and uses the generic modifiers throughout. (The only
>drawback is that the generic modifiers are printed in upper case
>while the usual convention on PowerPC is to use lower-case modifiers.
>But this is just a cosmetic issue.)
This was unfortunately incorrect, there is is fact another,
serious drawback to using the default VK_TLSLD/VK_TLSGD
variant kinds: using these causes ELFObjectWriter::RelocNeedsGOT
to return true, which in turn causes the ELFObjectWriter to emit
an undefined reference to _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_.
This is a problem on powerpc64, because it uses the TOC instead
of the GOT, and the linker does not provide _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_,
so the symbol remains undefined. This means shared libraries
using TLS built with the integrated assembler are currently
broken.
While the whole RelocNeedsGOT / _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ situation
probably ought to be properly fixed at some point, for now I'm
simply reverting the r185476 commit. Now this in turn exposes
the breakage of handling @tlsgd/@tlsld in the asm parser that
this check-in was originally intended to fix.
To avoid this regression, I'm also adding a different fix for
this problem: while common code now parses @tlsgd as VK_TLSGD,
a special hack in the asm parser translates this code to the
platform-specific VK_PPC_TLSGD that the back-end now expects.
While this is not really pretty, it's self-contained and
shouldn't hurt anything else for now. One the underlying
problem is fixed, this hack can be reverted again.
llvm-svn: 185945
The PowerPC assembler is supposed to provide a directive .machine
that allows switching the supported CPU instruction set on the fly.
Since we do not yet check CPU feature sets at all and always accept
any available instruction, this is not really useful at this point.
However, it makes sense to accept (and ignore) ".machine any" to
avoid spuriously rejecting existing assembler files that use this.
llvm-svn: 185924
This adds support for the .llong PowerPC-specifc assembler directive.
In doing so, I notices that .word is currently incorrect: it is
supposed to define a 2-byte data element, not a 4-byte one.
llvm-svn: 185911
