We used to not check generic vregs, but that is actually a mistake given
nothing in the GlobalISel pipeline is going to fix the constraints on
target specific instructions. Therefore, the target has to have them
right from the start.
llvm-svn: 290380
Target specific instructions have requirements that are not compatible
with what we want to test here. Namely, target specific instructions
must have their operands properly mapped on register classes.
llvm-svn: 290379
The InstructionSelect pass will not look at target specific instructions
since they are already selected. As a result, the operands of target
specific instructions must be properly constrained, because it is not
going to fix them.
This fixes invalid register classes on call instruction.
llvm-svn: 290377
When generic virtual registers get constrained, because of a use on a
target specific operation for instance, we end up with regular virtual
registers with a type and that's perfectly fine.
llvm-svn: 290376
This is going to be needed to be able to constraint register class on
target specific instruction while the RegBankSelect pass did not run
yet.
llvm-svn: 290375
Move the logic to constraint register from InstructionSelector to a
utility function. It will be required by other passes in the GlobalISel
pipeline.
llvm-svn: 290374
Canonicalize a select with a constant to the false side. This
enables more instruction shrinking opportunities since an
inline immediate can be used for the false side of v_cndmask_b32_e32.
This seems to usually be better but causes some code size regressions
in some tests.
llvm-svn: 290372
This is a succeeding patch of https://reviews.llvm.org/D22840 to address the
issue when a value to be merged into an int64 pair is in a different BB. Redoing
the store splitting in CodeGenPrepare so we can match the pattern across multiple
BBs and move some instructions into the same BB. We still keep the code in dag
combine so that we can catch cases that show up after DAG combining runs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25914
llvm-svn: 290365
This is for splitMergedValStore in DAG Combine to share the target query interface
with similar logic in CodeGenPrepare.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24707
llvm-svn: 290363
Follow up to D27209 fix, this patch now properly handles single transient
instruction in basic block.
Patch by Aleksandar Beserminji.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27856
llvm-svn: 290361
COFF has a 2**16 section limit, and on Win64, every COMDAT function
creates at least 3 sections: .text, .pdata, and .xdata. For MSVC, we
enable bigobj on a file-by-file basis, but GCC appears to hit the limit
on different files.
Fixes PR25953
llvm-svn: 290358
When the pipeliner is renaming phi values, it may need to iterate through
the phi operands to check for other phis. However, the pipeliner should
stop once it reaches a phi that is outside the pipelined loop.
Also, when the generateExistingPhis code is unable to reuse an existing
phi, the default code that computes the PhiOp2 is only to be used when
the pipeliner is generating the kernel. Otherwise, the phi may be a value
computed earlier in the same epilog.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 290355
The code have been developed by Daniel Berlin over the years, and
the new implementation goal is that of addressing shortcomings of
the current GVN infrastructure, i.e. long compile time for large
testcases, lack of phi predication, no load/store value numbering
etc...
The current code just implements the "core" GVN algorithm, although
other pieces (load coercion, phi handling, predicate system) are
already implemented in a branch out of tree. Once the core is stable,
we'll start adding pieces on top of the base framework.
The test currently living in test/Transform/NewGVN are a copy
of the ones in GVN, with proper `XFAIL` (missing features in NewGVN).
A flag will be added in a future commit to enable NewGVN, so that
interested parties can exercise this code easily.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26224
llvm-svn: 290346
Summary: This is needed for later SDWA support in CodeGen.
Reviewers: vpykhtin, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tony-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27412
llvm-svn: 290338
Summary: Real instruction should copy constraints from real instruction. This allows auto-generated disassembler to correctly process tied operands.
Reviewers: nhaustov, vpykhtin, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tony-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27847
llvm-svn: 290336
Replacing the memory operand in the ymm version of VPMADDWD from i128mem to i256mem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28024
llvm-svn: 290333
I was staring at these and didn't realize these were module-layer
proxies as opposed to some other layer. Justin and I have a plan to
rename things to make the names themselves much easier to reason about,
but I at least want the CHECK lines to be precise for now.
llvm-svn: 290328
declarations.
We're using a custom class here instead of the helper template, these
bits just didn't get deleted when the other bits did get deleted. This
was found by a really nice MSVC warning about explicitly instantiating
a template where some member functions aren't defined and thus can't be
instantiatied.
llvm-svn: 290327
from the old pass manager in the new one.
I'm not trying to support (initially) the numerous options that are
currently available to customize the pass pipeline. If we end up really
wanting them, we can add them later, but I suspect many are no longer
interesting. The simplicity of omitting them will help a lot as we sort
out what the pipeline should look like in the new PM.
I've also documented to the best of my ability *why* each pass or group
of passes is used so that reading the pipeline is more helpful. In many
cases I think we have some questionable choices of ordering and I've
left FIXME comments in place so we know what to come back and revisit
going forward. But for now, I've left it as similar to the current
pipeline as I could.
Lastly, I've had to comment out several places where passes are not
ported to the new pass manager or where the loop pass infrastructure is
not yet ready. I did at least fix a few bugs in the loop pass
infrastructure uncovered by running the full pipeline, but I didn't want
to go too far in this patch -- I'll come back and re-enable these as the
infrastructure comes online. But I'd like to keep the comments in place
because I don't want to lose track of which passes need to be enabled
and where they go.
One thing that seemed like a significant API improvement was to require
that we don't build pipelines for O0. It seems to have no real benefit.
I've also switched back to returning pass managers by value as at this
API layer it feels much more natural to me for composition. But if
others disagree, I'm happy to go back to an output parameter.
I'm not 100% happy with the testing strategy currently, but it seems at
least OK. I may come back and try to refactor or otherwise improve this
in subsequent patches but I wanted to at least get a good starting point
in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28042
llvm-svn: 290325
When DwarfExpression is emitting a fragment that is located in a
register and that fragment is smaller than the register, and the
register must be composed from sub-registers (are you still with me?)
the last DW_OP_piece operation must not be larger than the size of the
fragment itself, since the last piece of the fragment could be smaller
than the last subregister that is being emitted.
rdar://problem/29779065
llvm-svn: 290324
There are helpers for testing for constant or constant build_vector,
and for splat ConstantFP vectors, but not for a constantfp or
non-splat ConstantFP vector.
llvm-svn: 290317
