Summary:
`DAGCombiner::visitADDLikeCommutative()` already has a sibling fold:
`(add X, Carry) -> (addcarry X, 0, Carry)`
This fold, as suggested by @efriedma, helps recover from //some//
of the regressions of D62266
Reviewers: efriedma, deadalnix
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, efriedma
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62392
llvm-svn: 372259
Summary:
I don't have a direct motivational case for this,
but it would be good to have this for completeness/symmetry.
This pattern is basically the motivational pattern from
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43251
but with different predicate that requires that the offset is non-zero.
The completeness bit comes from the fact that a similar pattern (offset != zero)
will be needed for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43259,
so it'd seem to be good to not overlook very similar patterns..
Proofs: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/21b
Also, there is something odd with `isKnownNonZero()`, if the non-zero
knowledge was specified as an assumption, it didn't pick it up (PR43267)
With this, i see no other missing folds for
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43251
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, xbolva00
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67412
llvm-svn: 372257
Summary:
AArch64 GlobalISel doesn't support MachO's large code model, so this patch
adds a check for that combination before implicitly enabling it.
Reviewers: paquette
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, ributzka, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67724
llvm-svn: 372256
Summary:
As it can be see in the changed test, while `div` is really costly,
we were speculating it. This does not seem correct.
Also, the old code would run for every single insturuction in BB,
instead of eagerly bailing out as soon as there are too many instructions.
This function still has a problem that `PHINodeFoldingThreshold` is
per-basic-block, while it should be for all the basic blocks.
Reviewers: efriedma, craig.topper, dmgreen, jmolloy
Reviewed By: jmolloy
Subscribers: xbolva00, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67315
llvm-svn: 372255
Summary:
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D62341#1515637,
for MIPS `add %x, -1` isn't optimal. Unlike X86 there
are no fastpaths to matearialize such `-1`/`1` vector constants,
and `sub %x, 1` results in better codegen,
so undo canonicalization
Reviewers: atanasyan, Petar.Avramovic, RKSimon
Reviewed By: atanasyan
Subscribers: sdardis, arichardson, hiraditya, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66805
llvm-svn: 372254
In case of using 32-bit GOT access to the table requires two instructions
with attached %got_hi and %got_lo relocations. This patch implements
correct expansion of 'lw/sw' instructions in that case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67705
llvm-svn: 372251
For patterns c/d/e we too can deal with the pattern even if we can't
just drop the mask, we can just apply it afterwars:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/gslRa
llvm-svn: 372244
Summary:
Also fixup rL371928 for cases that occur on our out-of-tree backend
There were still quite a few intermediate APInts and this caused the
compile time of MCCodeEmitter for our target to jump from 16s up to
~5m40s. This patch, brings it back down to ~17s by eliminating pretty
much all of them using two new APInt functions (extractBitsAsZExtValue(),
insertBits() but with a uint64_t). The exact conditions for eliminating
them is that the field extracted/inserted must be <=64-bit which is
almost always true.
Note: The two new APInt API's assume that APInt::WordSize is at least
64-bit because that means they touch at most 2 APInt words. They
statically assert that's true. It seems very unlikely that someone
is patching it to be smaller so this should be fine.
Reviewers: jmolloy
Reviewed By: jmolloy
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67686
llvm-svn: 372243
Summary:
This is the first patch in a series of patches that will implement data dependence graph in LLVM. Many of the ideas used in this implementation are based on the following paper:
D. J. Kuck, R. H. Kuhn, D. A. Padua, B. Leasure, and M. Wolfe (1981). DEPENDENCE GRAPHS AND COMPILER OPTIMIZATIONS.
This patch contains support for a basic DDGs containing only atomic nodes (one node for each instruction). The edges are two fold: def-use edges and memory-dependence edges.
The implementation takes a list of basic-blocks and only considers dependencies among instructions in those basic blocks. Any dependencies coming into or going out of instructions that do not belong to those basic blocks are ignored.
The algorithm for building the graph involves the following steps in order:
1. For each instruction in the range of basic blocks to consider, create an atomic node in the resulting graph.
2. For each node in the graph establish def-use edges to/from other nodes in the graph.
3. For each pair of nodes containing memory instruction(s) create memory edges between them. This part of the algorithm goes through the instructions in lexicographical order and creates edges in reverse order if the sink of the dependence occurs before the source of it.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewer: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu, xtian, dmgreen, kbarton, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu
Subscribers: ychen, arphaman, simoll, a.elovikov, mgorny, hiraditya, jfb, wuzish, llvm-commits, jsji, Whitney, etiotto
Tag: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65350
llvm-svn: 372238
is enabled.
We can save memory and reduce binary size significantly by enabling
ProfileSampleAccurate. However when ProfileSampleAccurate is true,
function without sample will be regarded as cold and this could
potentially cause performance regression.
To minimize the potential negative performance impact, we want to be
a little conservative here saying if a function shows up in the profile,
no matter as outline instance, inline instance or call targets, treat
the function as not being cold. This will handle the cases such as most
callsites of a function are inlined in sampled binary (thus outline copy
don't get any sample) but not inlined in current build (because of source
code drift, imprecise debug information, or the callsites are all cold
individually but not cold accumulatively...), so that the outline function
showing up as cold in sampled binary will actually not be cold after current
build. After the change, such function will be treated as not cold even
profile-sample-accurate is enabled.
At the same time we lower the hot criteria of callsiteIsHot check when
profile-sample-accurate is enabled. callsiteIsHot is used to determined
whether a callsite is hot and qualified for early inlining. When
profile-sample-accurate is enabled, functions without profile will be
regarded as cold and much less inlining will happen in CGSCC inlining pass,
so we can worry less about size increase and be aggressive to allow more
early inlining to happen for warm callsites and it is helpful for performance
overall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67561
llvm-svn: 372232
Summary:
This fixes B42473 and B42706.
This patch makes the SDA propagate branch divergence until the end of the RPO traversal. Before, the SyncDependenceAnalysis propagated divergence only until the IPD in rpo order. RPO is incompatible with post dominance in the presence of loops. This made the SDA crash because blocks were missed in the propagation.
Reviewers: foad, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: foad
Subscribers: jvesely, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65274
llvm-svn: 372223
We need "xgot" flag in the MipsAsmParser to implement correct expansion
of some pseudo instructions in case of using 32-bit GOT (XGOT).
MipsAsmParser does not have reference to MipsSubtarget but has a
reference to "feature bit set".
llvm-svn: 372220
This patch fixes a bug exposed by D65653 where a subsequent invocation
of `determineCalleeSaves` ends up with a different size for the callee
save area, leading to different frame-offsets in debug information.
In the invocation by PEI, `determineCalleeSaves` tries to determine
whether it needs to spill an extra callee-saved register to get an
emergency spill slot. To do this, it calls 'estimateStackSize' and
manually adds the size of the callee-saves to this. PEI then allocates
the spill objects for the callee saves and the remaining frame layout
is calculated accordingly.
A second invocation in LiveDebugValues causes estimateStackSize to return
the size of the stack frame including the callee-saves. Given that the
size of the callee-saves is added to this, these callee-saves are counted
twice, which leads `determineCalleeSaves` to believe the stack has
become big enough to require spilling an extra callee-save as emergency
spillslot. It then updates CalleeSavedStackSize with a larger value.
Since CalleeSavedStackSize is used in the calculation of the frame
offset in getFrameIndexReference, this leads to incorrect offsets for
variables/locals when this information is recalculated after PEI.
Reviewers: omjavaid, eli.friedman, thegameg, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66935
llvm-svn: 372204
This generates worse code, but matches what is done for avx2 and
prevents crashes when more arguments are passed than we have
registers for.
llvm-svn: 372200
Currently, not all user specified relocations
(with clang intrinsic __builtin_preserve_access_index())
will turn into relocations.
In the current implementation, a __builtin_preserve_access_index()
chain is turned into relocation only if the result of the clang
intrinsic is used in a function call or a nonzero offset computation
of getelementptr. For all other cases, the relocatiion request
is ignored and the __builtin_preserve_access_index() is turned
into regular getelementptr instructions.
The main reason is to mimic bpf_probe_read() requirement.
But there are other use cases where relocatable offset is
generated but not used for bpf_probe_read(). This patch
relaxed previous constraints when to generate relocations.
Now, all user __builtin_preserve_access_index() will have
relocations generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67688
llvm-svn: 372198
Summary:
The PGO counter reading will add cold and inlinehint (hot) attributes
to functions that are very cold or hot. This was using hardcoded
thresholds, instead of the profile summary cutoffs which are used in
other hot/cold detection and are more dynamic and adaptable. Switch
to using the summary-based cold/hot detection.
The hardcoded limits were causing some code that had a medium level of
hotness (per the summary) to be incorrectly marked with a cold
attribute, blocking inlining.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67673
llvm-svn: 372189
r361845 changed the way we handle "D16" vs. "D32" targets; there used to
be a negative "d16" which removed instructions from the instruction set,
and now there's a "d32" feature which adds instructions to the
instruction set. This is good, but there was an oversight in the
implementation: the behavior of VFPv2 was changed. In particular, the
"vfp2" feature was changed to imply "d32". This is wrong: VFPv2 only
supports 16 D registers.
In practice, this means if you specify -mfpu=vfpv2, the compiler will
generate illegal instructions.
This patch gets rid of "vfp2d16" and "vfp2d16sp", and fixes "vfp2" and
"vfp2sp" so they don't imply "d32".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67375
llvm-svn: 372186
For COFF, a comdat group is really a symbol marked
IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ANY and zero or more other symbols marked
IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ASSOCIATIVE. Typically the associative symbols in
the group are not external and are not referenced by other TUs, they are
things like debug info, C++ dynamic initializers, or other section
registration schemes. The Visual C++ linker reports a duplicate symbol
error for symbols marked IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ASSOCIATIVE even if they
would be discarded after handling the leader symbol.
Fixes coverage-inline.cpp in check-profile after r372020.
llvm-svn: 372182
This adds support for `-tailcallopt` tail calls to CallLowering. This
piggy-backs off the changes from D67577, since doing it without a bit of
refactoring gets extremely ugly.
Support is basically ported from AArch64ISelLowering. The main difference here
is that tail calls in `-tailcallopt` change the ABI, so there's some extra
bookkeeping for the stack.
Show that we are correctly lowering these by updating tail-call.ll.
Also show that we don't do anything strange in general by updating
fastcc-reserved.ll, which passes `-tailcallopt`, but doesn't emit any tail
calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67580
llvm-svn: 372177
While we already fold that pattern if the sum of shift amounts is not
smaller than bitwidth, there's painfully obvious generalization:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/F5R
I.e. the "sub of shift amounts" tells us how many bits will be left
in the output. If it's less than bitwidth, we simply need to
apply a mask, which is constant.
llvm-svn: 372170
Summary:
This is the first patch in a series of patches that will implement data dependence graph in LLVM. Many of the ideas used in this implementation are based on the following paper:
D. J. Kuck, R. H. Kuhn, D. A. Padua, B. Leasure, and M. Wolfe (1981). DEPENDENCE GRAPHS AND COMPILER OPTIMIZATIONS.
This patch contains support for a basic DDGs containing only atomic nodes (one node for each instruction). The edges are two fold: def-use edges and memory-dependence edges.
The implementation takes a list of basic-blocks and only considers dependencies among instructions in those basic blocks. Any dependencies coming into or going out of instructions that do not belong to those basic blocks are ignored.
The algorithm for building the graph involves the following steps in order:
1. For each instruction in the range of basic blocks to consider, create an atomic node in the resulting graph.
2. For each node in the graph establish def-use edges to/from other nodes in the graph.
3. For each pair of nodes containing memory instruction(s) create memory edges between them. This part of the algorithm goes through the instructions in lexicographical order and creates edges in reverse order if the sink of the dependence occurs before the source of it.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewer: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu, xtian, dmgreen, kbarton, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu
Subscribers: ychen, arphaman, simoll, a.elovikov, mgorny, hiraditya, jfb, wuzish, llvm-commits, jsji, Whitney, etiotto
Tag: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65350
llvm-svn: 372162
We currently produce a load, followed by (possibly a move for integers and) a
splat as separate instructions. VSX has always had a splatting load for
doublewords, but as of Power9, we have it for words as well. This patch just
exploits these instructions.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63624
llvm-svn: 372139
Summary:
When inserting a Def, the current algorithm is walking edges backward
and inserting new Phis where needed. There may be additional Phis needed
in the IDF of the newly inserted Def and Phis.
Adding Phis in the IDF of the Def was added ina previous patch, but we
may also need other Phis in the IDF of the newly added Phis.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67637
llvm-svn: 372138
Summary:
Regularly when moving an instruction that may not read or write memory,
the instruction is not modelled in MSSA, so not action is necessary.
For a non-conventional AA pipeline, MSSA needs to explicitly check when
creating accesses, so as to not model instructions that may not read and
write memory.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67562
llvm-svn: 372137
We were previously using the SelectT2AddrModeImm7 for both normal and narrowing
MVE loads/stores. As the narrowing instructions do not accept sp as a register,
it makes little sense to optimise a FrameIndex into the load, only to have to
recover that later on. This adds a SelectTAddrModeImm7 which does not do that
folding, and uses it for narrowing load/store patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67489
llvm-svn: 372134
Similar to D67327, but this time for the FP16 VLDR and VSTR instructions that
use the AddrMode5FP16 addressing mode. We need to reserve an emergency spill
slot for instructions that will be out of range to use sp directly.
AddrMode5FP16 is 8 bits with a scale of 2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67483
llvm-svn: 372132
Remove setPreservesCFG from ARMConstantIslandPass and add a couple
of -verify-machine-dom-info instances into the existing codegen
tests.
llvm-svn: 372126
Before this patch we gave a priority to a dynamic table found
from the section header.
It was discussed (here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67078?id=218356#inline-602082)
that probably preferring the table from PT_DYNAMIC is better,
because it is what runtime loader sees.
This patch makes the table from PT_DYNAMIC be chosen at first place if it is available.
But also it adds logic to fall back to SHT_DYNAMIC if the table from the dynamic segment is
broken or fall back to use no table if both are broken.
It adds a few more diagnostic warnings for the logic above.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67547
llvm-svn: 372122
MVE loads and stores have a 7 bit immediate range, scaled by the length of the type. This needs to be taught to the stack estimation code to ensure that an emergency spill slot is reserved in case we run out of registers when materialising stack indices.
Also the narrowing loads/stores can be created with frame indices even though they do not accept SP as a register. We need in those cases to make sure we have an emergency register to use as the frame base, as SP can never be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67327
llvm-svn: 372114
Converting the *LoopStart pseudo instructions into DLS/WLS results in
LR being defined. These instructions were inserted on the assumption
that LR would already contain the loop counter because a mov is
introduced during ISel as the the consumers in the loop can only use
LR. That assumption proved wrong!
So perform a safety check, finding an appropriate place to insert the
DLS/WLS instructions or revert if this isn't possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67539
llvm-svn: 372111
We had a precompiled binary committed and not all of the relocations
supported were tested. This patch fixes this.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67617
llvm-svn: 372110
We do not support them and fail with llvm_unreachable currently.
This is not the only target we do not support and also seems we are missing
the tests for those we have already. But I needed this one for another patch,
so posted it separatelly.
Relocation names are taken from llvm\include\llvm\BinaryFormat\ELFRelocs\PowerPC64.def
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67615
llvm-svn: 372109
Currently we only allow using a known named constants
for `Machine` field in YAML documents.
This patch allows using any numbers (valid or "unknown")
and adds test cases for current and new functionality.
With this it is possible to write a test cases for really unknown
EM_* targets.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67652
llvm-svn: 372108
