I'm not convinced the patterns for the rm_Int was correct anyway. It had a tied source that should't exist for the unmasked version. The load form of MOVSS always zeros the most significant bits. I've left the patterns off the masked load instructions as I'm not sure what the correct pattern should be and we don't have any tests currently. Nor do we implement masked scalar load intrinsics in clang currently.
llvm-svn: 277098
This patch fixes an assertion that fires when we try to add non-pointer
Values to the CFLGraph. Centralizing the check for whether something
is/isn't a pointer type isn't completely trivial (and, in some cases,
would end up being entirely redundant), but it may be beneficial to do
so if this trips us up more in the future.
Patch by Jia Chen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22947
llvm-svn: 277096
Summary:
copypasta doc of ImportedFunctionsInliningStatistics class
\brief Calculate and dump ThinLTO specific inliner stats.
The main statistics are:
(1) Number of inlined imported functions,
(2) Number of imported functions inlined into importing module (indirect),
(3) Number of non imported functions inlined into importing module
(indirect).
The difference between first and the second is that first stat counts
all performed inlines on imported functions, but the second one only the
functions that have been eventually inlined to a function in the importing
module (by a chain of inlines). Because llvm uses bottom-up inliner, it is
possible to e.g. import function `A`, `B` and then inline `B` to `A`,
and after this `A` might be too big to be inlined into some other function
that calls it. It calculates this statistic by building graph, where
the nodes are functions, and edges are performed inlines and then by marking
the edges starting from not imported function.
If `Verbose` is set to true, then it also dumps statistics
per each inlined function, sorted by the greatest inlines count like
- number of performed inlines
- number of performed inlines to importing module
Reviewers: eraman, tejohnson, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22491
llvm-svn: 277089
This broke some out-of-tree AMDGPU tests that relied on the old behavior
wherein isIntrinsic() would return true for any function that starts
with "llvm.". And in general that change will not play nicely with
out-of-tree backends.
llvm-svn: 277087
Sanitizers set nobuiltin attribute on certain library functions to
avoid a situation where such function is neither instrumented nor
intercepted.
At the moment the list of interesting functions is hardcoded. This
change replaces it with logic based on
TargetLibraryInfo::hasOptimizedCodegen and the presense of readnone
function attribute (sanitizers are generally interested in memory
behavior of library functions).
This is expected to be a no-op change: the new logic matches exactly
the same set of functions.
r276771 (currently reverted) added mempcpy() to the list, breaking
MSan tests. With this change, r276771 can be safely re-landed.
llvm-svn: 277086
Summary:
This change adds a `ni` specifier in the `datalayout` string to denote
pointers in some given address spaces as "non-integral", and adds some
typing rules around these special pointers.
Reviewers: majnemer, chandlerc, atrick, dberlin, eli.friedman, tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22488
llvm-svn: 277085
Summary:
The motivation is the same as in D22141: In order to add the hotness
attribute to optimization remarks we need BFI to be available in all
passes that emit optimization remarks. BFI depends on BPI so unless we
make this lazy as well we would still compute BPI unconditionally.
The solution is to use the new LazyBPI pass in LazyBFI and only compute
BPI when computation of BFI is requested by the client.
I extended the laziness test using a LoopDistribute test to also cover
BPI.
Reviewers: hfinkel, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22835
llvm-svn: 277083
Summary:
Asan stack-use-after-scope check should poison alloca even if there is
no access between start and end.
This is possible for code like this:
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
int x;
p = &x;
}
"Loop Invariant Code Motion" will move "p = &x;" out of the loop, making
start/end range empty.
PR27453
Reviewers: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22842
llvm-svn: 277072
Summary:
Asan stack-use-after-scope check should poison alloca even if there is
no access between start and end.
This is possible for code like this:
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
int x;
p = &x;
}
"Loop Invariant Code Motion" will move "p = &x;" out of the loop, making
start/end range empty.
PR27453
Reviewers: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22842
llvm-svn: 277068
Summary:
Depends on D22841
We now use a much simpler CFG simplification routine for bugpoint,
because SimplifyCFG is no longer a good match for what bugpoint wants
to do.
At the same time, to make sure we don't lose anything valuable it was doing,
SimplifyCFG is now run as a per-BB reduction pass.
With this and D22841 combined, bugpoint operates both much faster on
the large testcases i have, and reduces them to pretty much minimal
testcases (in one case, bugpoint used to leave about 6000 useless blocks, and
now it leaves 3 ...)
Reviewers: chandlerc, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22845
llvm-svn: 277063
Summary:
TargetBaseAlign is no longer required since LSV checks if target allows misaligned accesses.
A constant defining a base alignment is still needed for stack accesses where alignment can be adjusted.
Reviewers: llvm-commits, jlebar
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22936
llvm-svn: 277038
This adds boilerplate code for all coroutine passes,
the passes are no-ops for now.
Also, a small test has been added to verify that passes execute in
the expected order or not at all if coroutine support is disabled.
Patch by Gor Nishanov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22847
llvm-svn: 277033
Normally, CFI instructions should be inserted after allocframe, but
if allocframe is in the same packet with a call, the CFI instructions
should be inserted before that packet.
llvm-svn: 277020
This was a pure virtual base class whose purpose was to abstract
away the notion of how you retrieve the layout of a discontiguous
stream of blocks in an Msf file. This led to too many layers of
abstraction making it difficult to figure out what was going on
and extend things. Ultimately, a stream's layout is decided by
its length and the array of block numbers that it lives on. So
rather than have an abstract base class which can return this in
any number of ways, it's more straightforward to simply store them
as fields of a trivial struct, and also to give a more appropriate
name.
This patch does that. It renames IMsfStreamData to MsfStreamLayout,
and deletes the 2 concrete implementations, DirectoryStreamData
and IndexedStreamData. MsfStreamLayout is a trivial struct
with the necessary data.
llvm-svn: 277018
LLT() has a particular meaning: it's one invalid type. But we really
want selected instructions to have no type whatsoever.
Also verify that types don't linger after ISel, and enable the verifier
on the AArch64 select test.
llvm-svn: 277001
