This adds the patterns required to transform xor P0, -1 to a VPNOT. The
instruction operands have to change a little for this, adding an in and an out
VCCR reg and using a custom DecodeMVEVPNOT for the decode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65133
llvm-svn: 367192
Summary:
According to the new Armv8-M specification
https://static.docs.arm.com/ddi0553/bh/DDI0553B_h_armv8m_arm.pdf the
instructions SQRSHRL and UQRSHLL now have an additional immediate
operand <saturate>. The new assembly syntax is:
SQRSHRL<c> RdaLo, RdaHi, #<saturate>, Rm
UQRSHLL<c> RdaLo, RdaHi, #<saturate>, Rm
where <saturate> can be either 64 (the existing behavior) or 48, in
that case the result is saturated to 48 bits.
The new operand is encoded as follows:
#64 Encoded as sat = 0
#48 Encoded as sat = 1
sat is bit 7 of the instruction bit pattern.
This patch adds a new assembler operand class MveSaturateOperand which
implements parsing and encoding. Decoding is implemented in
DecodeMVEOverlappingLongShift.
Reviewers: ostannard, simon_tatham, t.p.northover, samparker, dmgreen, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, pbarrio, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64810
llvm-svn: 366555
The BF and WLS/WLSTP instructions have various branch-offset fields
occupying different positions and lengths in the instruction encoding,
and all of them were decoded at disassembly time by the function
DecodeBFLabelOffset() which returned SoftFail if the offset was zero.
In fact, it's perfectly fine and not even a SoftFail for most of those
offset fields to be zero. The only one that can't be zero is the 4-bit
field labelled `boff` in the architecture spec, occupying bits {26-23}
of the BF instruction family. If that one is zero, the encoding
overlaps other instructions (WLS, DLS, LETP, VCTP), so it ought to be
a full Fail.
Fixed by adding an extra template parameter to DecodeBFLabelOffset
which controls whether a zero offset is accepted or rejected. Adjusted
existing tests (only in error messages for bad disassemblies); added
extra tests to demonstrate zero offsets being accepted in all the
right places, and a few demonstrating rejection of zero `boff`.
Reviewers: DavidSpickett, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63864
llvm-svn: 364533
Different versions of the Arm architecture disallow the use of generic
coprocessor instructions like MCR and CDP on different sets of
coprocessors. This commit centralises the check of the coprocessor
number so that it's consistent between assembly and disassembly, and
also updates it for the new restrictions in Arm v8.1-M.
New tests added that check all the coprocessor numbers; old tests
updated, where they used a number that's now become illegal in the
context in question.
Reviewers: DavidSpickett, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63863
llvm-svn: 364532
In the `CSEL Rd,Rm,Rn` instruction family (also including CSINC, CSINV
and CSNEG), the architecture lists it as CONSTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE
(i.e. SoftFail) to use SP in the Rd or Rm slot, but outright illegal
to use it in the Rn slot, not least because some encodings of that
form are used by MVE instructions such as UQRSHLL.
MC was treating all three slots the same, as SoftFail. So the only
reason UQRSHLL was disassembled correctly at all was because the MVE
decode table is separate from the Thumb2 one and takes priority; if
you turned off MVE, then encodings such as `[0x5f,0xea,0x0d,0x83]`
would disassemble as spurious CSELs.
Fixed by inventing another version of the `GPRwithZR` register class,
which disallows SP completely instead of just SoftFailing it.
Reviewers: DavidSpickett, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63862
llvm-svn: 364531
This final batch includes the tail-predicated versions of the
low-overhead loop instructions (LETP); the VPSEL instruction to select
between two vector registers based on the predicate mask without
having to open a VPT block; and VPNOT which complements the predicate
mask in place.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62681
llvm-svn: 364292
This adds the rest of the vector memory access instructions. It
includes contiguous loads/stores, with an ordinary addressing mode
such as [r0,#offset] (plus writeback variants); gather loads and
scatter stores with a scalar base address register and a vector of
offsets from it (written [r0,q1] or similar); and gather/scatters with
a vector of base addresses (written [q0,#offset], again with
writeback). Additionally, some of the loads can widen each loaded
value into a larger vector lane, and the corresponding stores narrow
them again.
To implement these, we also have to add the addressing modes they
need. Also, in AsmParser, the `isMem` query function now has
subqueries `isGPRMem` and `isMVEMem`, according to which kind of base
register is used by a given memory access operand.
I've also had to add an extra check in `checkTargetMatchPredicate` in
the AsmParser, without which our last-minute check of `rGPR` register
operands against SP and PC was failing an assertion because Tablegen
had inserted an immediate 0 in place of one of a pair of tied register
operands. (This matches the way the corresponding check for `MCK_rGPR`
in `validateTargetOperandClass` is guarded.) Apparently the MVE load
instructions were the first to have ever triggered this assertion, but
I think only because they were the first to have a combination of the
usual Arm pre/post writeback system and the `rGPR` class in particular.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62680
llvm-svn: 364291
This adds the family of loads and stores with names like VLD20.8 and
VST42.32, which load and store parts of multiple q-registers in such a
way that executing both VLD20 and VLD21, or all four of VLD40..VLD43,
will distribute 2 or 4 vectors' worth of memory data across the lanes
of the same number of registers but in a transposed order.
In addition to the Tablegen descriptions of the instructions
themselves, this patch also adds encode and decode support for the
QQPR and QQQQPR register classes (representing the range of loaded or
stored vector registers), and tweaks to the parsing system for lists
of vector registers to make it return the right format in this case
(since, unlike NEON, MVE regards q-registers as primitive, and not
just an alias for two d-registers).
llvm-svn: 364172
These instructions let you load half a vector register at once from
two general-purpose registers, or vice versa.
The assembly syntax for these instructions mentions the vector
register name twice. For the move _into_ a vector register, the MC
operand list also has to mention the register name twice (once as the
output, and once as an input to represent where the unchanged half of
the output register comes from). So we can conveniently assign one of
the two asm operands to be the output $Qd, and the other $QdSrc, which
avoids confusing the auto-generated AsmMatcher too much. For the move
_from_ a vector register, there's no way to get round the fact that
both instances of that register name have to be inputs, so we need a
custom AsmMatchConverter to avoid generating two separate output MC
operands. (And even that wouldn't have worked if it hadn't been for
D60695.)
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62679
llvm-svn: 364041
This adds the `MVE_qDest_rSrc` superclass and all its instances, plus
a few other instructions that also take a scalar input register or two.
I've also belatedly added custom diagnostic messages to the operand
classes for odd- and even-numbered GPRs, which required matching
changes in two of the existing MVE assembly test files.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62678
llvm-svn: 364040
Summary:
This adds the `MVE_qDest_qSrc` superclass and all instructions that
inherit from it. It's not the complete class of _everything_ with a
q-register as both destination and source; it's a subset of them that
all have similar encodings (but it would have been hopelessly unwieldy
to call it anything like MVE_111x11100).
This category includes add/sub with carry; long multiplies; halving
multiplies; multiply and accumulate, and some more complex
instructions.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62677
llvm-svn: 364037
Summary:
These take a pair of vector register to compare, and a comparison type
(written in the form of an Arm condition suffix); they output a vector
of booleans in the VPR register, where predication can conveniently
use them.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62676
llvm-svn: 364027
This includes integer arithmetic of various kinds (add/sub/multiply,
saturating and not), and the immediate forms of VMOV and VMVN that
load an immediate into all lanes of a vector.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62674
llvm-svn: 363936
The ARMDisassembler changes allow changing between ARM and Thumb mode
based on the MCSubtargetInfo, rather than the Target, which simplifies
the other changes a bit.
I'm not really happy with adding more target-specific logic to
tools/llvm-objdump/, but there isn't any easy way around it: the logic
in question specifically applies to disassembling an object file, and
that code simply isn't located in lib/Target, at least at the moment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60927
llvm-svn: 363903
This includes all the obvious bitwise operations (AND, OR, BIC, ORN,
MVN) in register-to-register forms, and the immediate forms of
AND/OR/BIC/ORN; byte-order reverse instructions; and the VMOVs that
access a single lane of a vector.
Some of those VMOVs (specifically, the ones that access a 32-bit lane)
share an encoding with existing instructions that were disassembled as
accessing half of a d-register (e.g. `vmov.32 r0, d1[0]`), but in
8.1-M they're now written as accessing a quarter of a q-register (e.g.
`vmov.32 r0, q0[2]`). The older syntax is still accepted by the
assembler.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62673
llvm-svn: 363838
Summary:
Their names began with a mishmash of `MVE_`, `t2` and no prefix at
all. Now they all start with `MVE_`, which seems like a reasonable
choice on the grounds that (a) NEON is the thing they're most at risk
of being confused with, and (b) MVE implies Thumb-2, so a prefix
indicating MVE is strictly more specific than one indicating Thumb-2.
Reviewers: ostannard, SjoerdMeijer, dmgreen
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63492
llvm-svn: 363690
This commit prepares the way to start adding the main collection of
MVE instructions, which operate on the 128-bit vector registers.
The most obvious thing that's needed, and the simplest, is to add the
MQPR register class, which is like the existing QPR except that it has
fewer registers in it.
The more complicated part: MVE defines a system of vector predication,
in which instructions operating on 128-bit vector registers can be
constrained to operate on only a subset of the lanes, using a system
of prefix instructions similar to the existing Thumb IT, in that you
have one prefix instruction which designates up to 4 following
instructions as subject to predication, and within that sequence, the
predicate can be inverted by means of T/E suffixes ('Then' / 'Else').
To support instructions of this type, we've added two new Tablegen
classes `vpred_n` and `vpred_r` for standard clusters of MC operands
to add to a predicated instruction. Both include a flag indicating how
the instruction is predicated at all (options are T, E and 'not
predicated'), and an input register field for the register controlling
the set of active lanes. They differ from each other in that `vpred_r`
also includes an input operand for the previous value of the output
register, for instructions that leave inactive lanes unchanged.
`vpred_n` lacks that extra operand; it will be used for instructions
that don't preserve inactive lanes in their output register (either
because inactive lanes are zeroed, as the MVE load instructions do, or
because the output register isn't a vector at all).
This commit also adds the family of prefix instructions themselves
(VPT / VPST), and all the machinery needed to work with them in
assembly and disassembly (e.g. generating the 't' and 'e' mnemonic
suffixes on disassembled instructions within a predicated block)
I've added a couple of demo instructions that derive from the new
Tablegen base classes and use those two operand clusters. The bulk of
the vector instructions will come in followup commits small enough to
be manageable. (One exception is that I've added the full version of
`isMnemonicVPTPredicable` in the AsmParser, because it seemed
pointless to carefully split it up.)
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62669
llvm-svn: 363258
During assembly, the mask operand to an IT instruction (storing the
sequence of T/E for 'Then' and 'Else') is parsed out of the mnemonic
into a representation that encodes 'Then' and 'Else' in the same way
regardless of the condition code. At some point during encoding it has
to be converted into the instruction encoding used in the
architecture, in which the mask encodes a sequence of replacement
low-order bits for the condition code, so that which bit value means
'then' and which 'else' depends on whether the original condition code
had its low bit set.
Previously, that transformation was done by processInstruction(), half
way through assembly. So an MCOperand storing an IT mask would
sometimes store it in one format, and sometimes in the other,
depending on where in the assembly pipeline you were. You can see this
in diagnostics from `llvm-mc -debug -triple=thumbv8a -show-inst`, for
example: if you give it an instruction such as `itete eq`, you'd see
an `<MCOperand Imm:5>` in a diagnostic become `<MCOperand Imm:11>` in
the final output.
Having the same data structure store values with time-dependent
semantics is confusing already, and it will get more confusing when we
introduce the MVE VPT instruction which reuses the Then/Else bitmask
idea in a different context. So I'm refactoring: now, all `ARMOperand`
and `MCOperand` representations of an IT mask work exactly the same
way, namely, 0 means 'Then' and 1 means 'Else', regardless of what
original predicate is being referred to. The architectural encoding of
IT that depends on the original condition is now constructed at the
point when we turn the `MCOperand` into the final instruction bit
pattern, and decoded similarly in the disassembler.
The previous condition-independent parse-time format used 0 for Else
and 1 for Then. I've taken the opportunity to flip the sense of it
while I'm changing all of this anyway, because it seems to me more
natural to use 0 for 'leave the starting condition unchanged' and 1
for 'invert it', as if those bits were an XOR mask.
Reviewers: ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63219
llvm-svn: 363244
This introduces a new decoding table for MVE instructions, and starts
by adding the family of scalar shift instructions that are part of the
MVE architecture extension: saturating shifts within a single GPR, and
long shifts across a pair of GPRs (both saturating and normal).
Some of these shift instructions have only 3-bit register fields in
the encoding, with the low bit fixed. So they can only address an odd
or even numbered GPR (depending on the operand), and therefore I add
two new register classes, GPREven and GPROdd.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62668
Change-Id: Iad95d5f83d26aef70c674027a184a6b1e0098d33
llvm-svn: 363051
This adds support for the new family of conditional selection /
increment / negation instructions; the low-overhead branch
instructions (e.g. BF, WLS, DLS); the CLRM instruction to zero a whole
list of registers at once; the new VMRS/VMSR and VLDR/VSTR
instructions to get data in and out of 8.1-M system registers,
particularly including the new VPR register used by MVE vector
predication.
To support this, we also add a register name 'zr' (used by the CSEL
family to force one of the inputs to the constant 0), and operand
types for lists of registers that are also allowed to include APSR or
VPR (used by CLRM). The VLDR/VSTR instructions also need a new
addressing mode.
The low-overhead branch instructions exist in their own separate
architecture extension, which we treat as enabled by default, but you
can say -mattr=-lob or equivalent to turn it off.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: samparker
Subscribers: miyuki, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62667
llvm-svn: 363039
This reverts r362990 (git commit 374571301dc8e9bc9fdd1d70f86015de198673bd)
This was causing linker warnings on Darwin:
ld: warning: direct access in function 'llvm::initializeEvexToVexInstPassPass(llvm::PassRegistry&)'
from file '../../lib/libLLVMX86CodeGen.a(X86EvexToVex.cpp.o)' to global weak symbol
'void std::__1::__call_once_proxy<std::__1::tuple<void* (&)(llvm::PassRegistry&),
std::__1::reference_wrapper<llvm::PassRegistry>&&> >(void*)' from file '../../lib/libLLVMCore.a(Verifier.cpp.o)'
means the weak symbol cannot be overridden at runtime. This was likely caused by different translation
units being compiled with different visibility settings.
llvm-svn: 363028
Summary:
For builds with LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON and BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF
this change makes all symbols in the target specific libraries hidden
by default.
A new macro called LLVM_EXTERNAL_VISIBILITY has been added to mark symbols in these
libraries public, which is mainly needed for the definitions of the
LLVMInitialize* functions.
This patch reduces the number of public symbols in libLLVM.so by about
25%. This should improve load times for the dynamic library and also
make abi checker tools, like abidiff require less memory when analyzing
libLLVM.so
One side-effect of this change is that for builds with
LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON some unittests that
access symbols that are no longer public will need to be statically linked.
Before and after public symbol counts (using gcc 8.2.1, ld.bfd 2.31.1):
nm before/libLLVM-9svn.so | grep ' [A-Zuvw] ' | wc -l
36221
nm after/libLLVM-9svn.so | grep ' [A-Zuvw] ' | wc -l
26278
Reviewers: chandlerc, beanz, mgorny, rnk, hans
Reviewed By: rnk, hans
Subscribers: Jim, hiraditya, michaelplatings, chapuni, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, kristina, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54439
llvm-svn: 362990
These caused a build failure because I managed not to notice they
depended on a later unpushed commit in my current stack. Sorry about
that.
llvm-svn: 362956
This adds support for the new family of conditional selection /
increment / negation instructions; the low-overhead branch
instructions (e.g. BF, WLS, DLS); the CLRM instruction to zero a whole
list of registers at once; the new VMRS/VMSR and VLDR/VSTR
instructions to get data in and out of 8.1-M system registers,
particularly including the new VPR register used by MVE vector
predication.
To support this, we also add a register name 'zr' (used by the CSEL
family to force one of the inputs to the constant 0), and operand
types for lists of registers that are also allowed to include APSR or
VPR (used by CLRM). The VLDR/VSTR instructions also need some new
addressing modes.
The low-overhead branch instructions exist in their own separate
architecture extension, which we treat as enabled by default, but you
can say -mattr=-lob or equivalent to turn it off.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: samparker
Subscribers: miyuki, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62667
llvm-svn: 362953
Those two subtarget features were awkward because their semantics are
reversed: each one indicates the _lack_ of support for something in
the architecture, rather than the presence. As a consequence, you
don't get the behavior you want if you combine two sets of feature
bits.
Each SubtargetFeature for an FP architecture version now comes in four
versions, one for each combination of those options. So you can still
say (for example) '+vfp2' in a feature string and it will mean what
it's always meant, but there's a new string '+vfp2d16sp' meaning the
version without those extra options.
A lot of this change is just mechanically replacing positive checks
for the old features with negative checks for the new ones. But one
more interesting change is that I've rearranged getFPUFeatures() so
that the main FPU feature is appended to the output list *before*
rather than after the features derived from the Restriction field, so
that -fp64 and -d32 can override defaults added by the main feature.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, zzheng, Petar.Avramovic, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60691
llvm-svn: 361845
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360718
The manual says that Thumb2 add/sub instructions are only allowed to modify sp
if the first source is also sp. This is slightly different from the usual rGPR
restriction since it's context-sensitive, so implement it in C++.
llvm-svn: 358987
The indexed variant of vfmal.f16 and vfmsl.f16
instructions use the uppser bits of the indexed
operand to store the index (1 bit for the double
variant, 2 bits for the quad).
This limits the usable registers to d0 - d7 or
s0 - s15. This patch enforces this limitation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59021
llvm-svn: 355707
More or less all the instructions defined in the v8.2a full-fp16
extension are defined as UNPREDICTABLE if you put them in an IT block
(Thumb) or use with any condition other than AL (ARM). LLVM didn't
know that, and was happy to conditionalise them.
In order to force these instructions to count as not predicable, I had
to make a small Tablegen change. The code generation back end mostly
decides if an instruction was predicable by looking for something it
can identify as a predicate operand; there's an isPredicable bit flag
that overrides that check in the positive direction, but nothing that
overrides it in the negative direction.
(I considered the alternative approach of actually removing the
predicate operand from those instructions, but thought that it would
be more painful overall for instructions differing only in data type
to have different shapes of operand list. This way, the only code that
has to notice the difference is the if-converter.)
So I've added an isUnpredicable bit alongside isPredicable, and set
that bit on the right subset of FP16 instructions, and also on the
VSEL, VMAXNM/VMINNM and VRINT[ANPM] families which should be
unpredicable for all data types.
I've included a couple of representative regression tests, both of
which previously caused an fp16 instruction to be conditionalised in
ARM state and (with -arm-no-restrict-it) to be put in an IT block in
Thumb.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: jdoerfert, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57823
llvm-svn: 354768
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
When the condition code for an IT instruction is "AL" we get strange "15"
predicates on subsequent instructions. These are dealt with for most
instructions by treating them as "ARMCC::AL", but VFP takes a different path
which didn't have this code.
llvm-svn: 335594
IT instructions are allowed to have the 'AL' predicate, but it must never
result in an 'NV' predicated instruction. Essentially this means that all
branches must be 't' rather than 'e' if the predicate is 'AL'.
This patch adds a diagnostic for this during assembly (error because parsing
hits an assertion if allowed to continue) and an annotation during disassembly.
llvm-svn: 335593
This patch handling:
Enable parsing of raw encodings of system registers .
Allows UNPREDICTABLE sysregs to be decoded to a raw number in the same way that disasslib does, rather than llvm crashing.
Disassemble msr/mrs with unpredictable sysregs as SoftFail.
Fix regression due to SoftFailing some encodings.
Patch by Chris Ryder
Differential revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D43374
llvm-svn: 326803
ARMDisassembler now depends on the banked register tables in ARMUtils, so the
LLVMBuild.txt needed updating to reflect this.
Original commit mesage:
[ARM] Fix disassembly of invalid banked register moves
When disassembling banked register move instructions, we don't have an
assembly syntax for the unallocated register numbers, so we have to
return Fail rather than SoftFail. Previously we were returning SoftFail,
then crashing in the InstPrinter as we have no way to represent these
encodings in an assembly string.
This also switches the decoder to use the table-generated list of banked
registers, removing the duplicated list of encodings.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43066
llvm-svn: 324606
The broken bot (clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage) is doign a shared-object build,
so I guess using lookupBankedRegByEncoding in the disassembler is a layering
violation?
llvm-svn: 324604
When disassembling banked register move instructions, we don't have an
assembly syntax for the unallocated register numbers, so we have to
return Fail rather than SoftFail. Previously we were returning SoftFail,
then crashing in the InstPrinter as we have no way to represent these
encodings in an assembly string.
This also switches the decoder to use the table-generated list of banked
registers, removing the duplicated list of encodings.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43066
llvm-svn: 324600
This is the groundwork for Armv8.2-A FP16 code generation .
Clang passes and returns _Float16 values as floats, together with the required
bitconverts and truncs etc. to implement correct AAPCS behaviour, see D42318.
We will implement half-precision argument passing/returning lowering in the ARM
backend soon, but for now this means that this:
_Float16 sub(_Float16 a, _Float16 b) {
return a + b;
}
gets lowered to this:
define float @sub(float %a.coerce, float %b.coerce) {
entry:
%0 = bitcast float %a.coerce to i32
%tmp.0.extract.trunc = trunc i32 %0 to i16
%1 = bitcast i16 %tmp.0.extract.trunc to half
<SNIP>
%add = fadd half %1, %3
<SNIP>
}
When FullFP16 is *not* supported, we don't make f16 a legal type, and we get
legalization for "free", i.e. nothing changes and everything works as before.
And also f16 argument passing/returning is handled.
When FullFP16 is supported, we do make f16 a legal type, and have 2 places that
we need to patch up: f16 argument passing and returning, which involves minor
tweaks to avoid unnecessary code generation for some bitcasts.
As a "demonstrator" that this works for the different FP16, FullFP16, softfp
modes, etc., I've added match rules to the VSUB instruction description showing
that we can codegen this instruction from IR, but more importantly, also to
some conversion instructions. These conversions were causing issue before in
the FP16 and FullFP16 cases.
I've also added match rules to the VLDRH and VSTRH desriptions, so that we can
actually compile the entire half-precision sub code example above. This showed
that these loads and stores had the wrong addressing mode specified: AddrMode5
instead of AddrMode5FP16, which turned out not be implemented at all, so that
has also been added.
This is the minimal patch that shows all the different moving parts. In patch
2/3 I will add some efficient lowering of bitcasts, and in 2/3 I will add the
remaining Armv8.2-A FP16 instruction descriptions.
Thanks to Sam Parker and Oliver Stannard for their help and reviews!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38315
llvm-svn: 323512
New instructions are added to AArch32 and AArch64 to aid
floating-point multiplication and addition of complex numbers, where
the complex numbers are packed in a vector register as a pair of
elements. The Imaginary part of the number is placed in the more
significant element, and the Real part of the number is placed in the
less significant element.
This patch adds assembler for the ARM target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36789
llvm-svn: 314511
This reverts r310243. Only MVFR2 is actually restricted to v8 and it'll be a
little while before we can get a proper fix together. Better that we allow
incorrect code than reject correct in the meantime.
llvm-svn: 310384
