Otherwise, the debug info is incorrect. On its own, this is mostly
harmless, but the safe-stack also later inlines the call to
__safestack_pointer_address, which leads to debug info with the wrong
scope, which eventually causes an assertion failure (and incorrect debug
info in release mode).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51075
llvm-svn: 340651
This (partially) fixes a regression introduced by
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43945 / r327399, which parallelized
DwarfLinker. This patch avoids parsing and allocating the memory for
all input DIEs up front and instead only allocates them in the
concurrent loop in the AnalyzeLambda. At the end of the loop the
memory from the LinkContext is cleared again.
This reduces the peak memory needed to link the debug info of a
non-modular build of the Swift compiler by >3GB.
rdar://problem/43444464
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51078
llvm-svn: 340650
Firstly, require the symbol to be used within the module. If a
symbol is unused within a module, then by definition it cannot be
address-significant within that module. This condition is useful on all
platforms because it could make symbol tables smaller -- without this
change, emitting an address-significance table could cause otherwise
unused undefined symbols to be added to the object file.
But this change is necessary with COFF specifically in order to
preserve the property that an unreferenced undefined symbol in an IR
module does not result in a link failure. This is already the case for
ELF because ELF linkers only reject links with unresolved symbols if
there is a relocation to that symbol, but COFF linkers require all
undefined symbols to be resolved regardless of relocations. So if
a module contains an unreferenced undefined symbol, we need to make
sure not to add it to the address-significance table (and thus the
symbol table) in case it doesn't end up resolved at link time.
Secondly, do not add dllimport symbols to the table. These symbols
won't be able to be resolved because their definitions live in another
module and are accessed via the IAT, and the address-significance
table has no effect on other modules anyway. It wouldn't make sense
to add the IAT entry symbol to the address-significance table either
because the IAT entry isn't address-significant -- the generated code
never takes its address.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51199
llvm-svn: 340648
My previoust test case had skipped CUs from one TU out of a two-TU LTO
scenario, which meant the CU index wasn't needed (as it was unambiguous
which CU a table entry applied to) - expanding the test to use 3 TUs,
skipping one (so long as it's not the last one) shows the indexes are
miscomputed. Fix that with a little indirection for the index.
llvm-svn: 340646
This patch will address using the xscpsgndp instruction to copy floating point
scalar registers instead of the xxlor (specifically XXLORf) instruction that is
currently used. Additionally, this patch of utilizing xscpsgndp will apply to
P9, while pre-P9 will still use xxlor.
Patch by amyk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50004
llvm-svn: 340643
Previously we allowed the store to be Custom. But without knowing for sure that the Custom handling won't split the store, we shouldn't convert a volatile store. We also probably shouldn't be creating a store the requires custom handling after LegalizeOps. This could lead to an infinite loop if the custom handling was to insert a bitcast. Though I guess isStoreBitCastBeneficial could be used to block such a loop.
The test changes here are due to the volatile part of this. The stores in the test are all volatile and i32 stores are marked custom, So we are no longer converting them
This is related to D50491 where I was trying to allow some bitcasting of volatile loads
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50578
llvm-svn: 340626
Summary:
Sometimes reading an output *.ll file it is not easy to understand why some callsites are not inlined. We can read output of inline remarks (option --pass-remarks-missed=inline) and try correlating its messages with the callsites.
An easier way proposed by this patch is to add to every callsite processed by Inliner an attribute with the latest message that describes the cause of not inlining this callsite. The attribute is called //inline-remark//. By default this feature is off. It can be switched on by the option //-inline-remark-attribute//.
For example in the provided test the result method //@test1// has two callsites //@bar// and inline remarks report different inlining missed reasons:
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because too costly to inline (cost=-5, threshold=-6)
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because it should never be inlined (cost=never): recursive
It is not clear which remark correspond to which callsite. With the inline remark attribute enabled we get the reasons attached to their callsites:
define void @test1() {
call void @bar(i1 true) #0
call void @bar(i1 false) #2
ret void
}
attributes #0 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=-5, threshold=-6)" }
..
attributes #2 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=never): recursive" }
Patch by: yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Reviewers: xbolva00, tejohnson, apilipenko
Reviewed By: xbolva00, tejohnson
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50435
llvm-svn: 340618
Once the invariant_start is reached, we know that no instruction *after* it can modify the memory. So, if we can prove the location isn't read *between entry into the loop and the execution of the invariant_start*, we can execute the invariant_start before entering the loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51181
llvm-svn: 340617
The way that PhiValues is integrated with BasicAA it is possible for a pass
which uses BasicAA to pick up an instance of BasicAA that uses PhiValues without
intending to, and then delete values from a function in a way that causes
PhiValues to return dangling pointers to these deleted values. Fix this by
having a set of callback value handles to invalidate values when they're
deleted.
llvm-svn: 340613
When used in cross-DSO mode, CFI will generate calls to special functions rather than trap instructions. For example, instead of generating
if (!InlinedFastCheck(f))
abort();
call *f
CFI generates
if (!InlinedFastCheck(f))
__cfi_slowpath(CallSiteTypeId, f);
call *f
This patch teaches cfi-verify to recognize calls to __cfi_slowpath and abort and treat them as trap functions.
In addition to normal symbols, we also parse the dynamic relocations to handle cross-DSO calls in libraries.
We also extend cfi-verify to recognize other patterns that occur using cross-DSO. For example, some indirect calls are not guarded by a branch to a trap but instead follow a call to __cfi_slowpath. For example:
if (!InlinedFastCheck(f))
call *f
else {
__cfi_slowpath(CallSiteTypeId, f);
call *f
}
In this case, the second call to f is not marked as protected by the current code. We thus recognize if indirect calls directly follow a call to a function that will trap on CFI violations and treat them as protected.
We also ignore indirect calls in the PLT, since on AArch64 each entry contains an indirect call that should not be protected by CFI, and these are labeled incorrectly when debug information is not present.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49383
llvm-svn: 340612
This adds a new method to ELFObjectFileBase that returns the symbols and addresses of PLT entries.
This design was suggested by pcc and eugenis in https://reviews.llvm.org/D49383.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50203
llvm-svn: 340610
This patch makes the DoesKMove argument non-optional, to force people
to think about it. Most cases where it is false are either code hoisting
or code sinking, where we pick one instruction from a set of
equal instructions among different code paths.
Reviewers: dberlin, nlopes, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47475
llvm-svn: 340606
This patch splits the file trace loading function into two versions, one
that takes a filename and one that takes a `DataExtractor`.
This change is a precursor to larger changes to increase test coverage
for the trace loading implementation.
llvm-svn: 340603
Having the KnownBits as an output parameter is kind of awkward to use
and a holdover from when it was two separate APInts. Instead, just
return a KnownBits object.
I'm leaving the existing interface in place for now, since updating
the callers all at once would be thousands of lines of diff.
llvm-svn: 340594
Per LLVM's CommandGuide, llvm-profdata show -text is supposed to produce
textual output that can be passed as input to further llvm-profdata
invocations. This previously didn't work for two reasons:
1) -text was not sufficient to enable the machine-readable text format output;
instead, -text was effectively ignored if -counts was not also specified. (With
this patch, -counts is instead ignored if -text is specified, because the
machine-readable text format always includes counts.)
2) When the input data was an IR-level profile, the :ir marker was missing from
the output, resulting in a text format output that would not be usable as
profiling data due to function hash mismatches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51188
llvm-svn: 340592
Fix a set of related bugs:
* Considering two locations as equivalent when their lines are the same
but their scopes are different causes erroneous debug info that
attributes a commoned call to be attributed to one of the two calls it
was commoned from.
* The previous code to compute a new location's scope was inaccurate and
would use the inlinedAt that was the /parent/ of the inlinedAt that is
the nearest common one, and also used that parent scope instead of the
nearest common scope.
* Not generating new locations generally seemed like a lower quality
choice
There was some risk that generating more new locations could hurt object
size by making more fine grained line table entries, but it looks like
that was offset by the decrease in line table (& address & ranges) size
caused by more accurately computing the scope - which likely lead to
fewer range entries (more contiguous ranges) & reduced size that way.
All up with these changes I saw minor reductions (-1.21%, -1.77%) in
.rela.debug_ranges and .rela.debug_addr (in a fission, compressed debug
info build) as well as other minor size changes (generally reductinos)
across the board (-1.32% debug_info.dwo, -1.28% debug_loc.dwo). Measured
in an optimized (-O2) build of the clang binary.
If you are investigating a size regression in an optimized debug builds,
this is certainly a patch to look into - and I'd be happy to look into
any major regressions found & see what we can do to address them.
llvm-svn: 340583
In order for more complex updates of MSSA to happen (e.g. those in
D45299), MemoryDefs need to be actual `Use`s of what they're optimized
to. This patch makes that happen.
In addition, this patch changes our optimization behavior for Defs
slightly: we'll now consider a Def optimization invalid if the
MemoryAccess it's optimized to changes. That we weren't doing this
before was a bug, but given that we were tracking these with a WeakVH
before, it was sort of difficult for that to matter.
We're already have both of these behaviors for MemoryUses. The
difference is that a MemoryUse's defining access is always its optimized
access, and defining accesses are always `Use`s (in the LLVM sense).
Nothing exploded when testing a stage3 clang+llvm locally, so...
This also includes the test-case promised in r340461.
llvm-svn: 340577
Lower integer arguments smaller than i32.
Support both register and stack arguments.
Define setLocInfo function for setting LocInfo field in ArgLocs vector.
Patch by Petar Avramovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51031
llvm-svn: 340572
Summary:
Splats are fewer bytes than v128.consts, so use them when either could
apply.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51179
llvm-svn: 340569
Summary:
Remove the use of pair inside the tuple in concat_iterator, and create separate begins and ends tuples instead.
This fixes the failure for llvm <= 3.7 and libstd++ that broke the hexagon build.
Reviewers: timshen
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, dexonsmith, kparzysz, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51067
llvm-svn: 340567
The variable index pattern is different than the constant index
cases as shown in D51125. We might want to splat regardless of
whether the scalar is loaded from memory or transferred from GPR.
llvm-svn: 340565
Summary:
Avoid "count" if possible -> use "find" to check for the existence of keys.
Passed llvm test suite.
Reviewers: fhahn, dcaballe, mkuper, rengolin
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51054
llvm-svn: 340563
The previous change ignored the latter resulting in crash dumps being generated when LLVM_ENABLE_CRASH_DUMPS was
set, but coreFilesPrevented was true.
llvm-svn: 340561
Summary:
I got "Use not jointly dominated by defs" when removePartialRedundancy
attempted to prune then re-extend a subrange whose only liveness was a
dead def at the copy being removed.
V2: Removed junk from test. Improved comment.
V3: Addressed minor review comments.
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50914
Change-Id: I6f894e9f517f71e921e0c6d81d28c5f344db8dad
llvm-svn: 340549
We need to allow ConstantExpr Selects in addition to SelectInst.
I'll try to put together a test case, but I wanted to fix the issues being reported.
Fixes PR38677
llvm-svn: 340546
Thanks to @waltl for reporting this issue.
I have also added an assert to check for invalid null strategy objects, and I
have reworded a couple of code comments in Scheduler.h
llvm-svn: 340545
The commit that added this functionality:
rL322957
may be causing/exposing a miscompile in PR38648:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38648
so allow enabling/disabling to make debugging easier.
llvm-svn: 340540
These changes expand the FunctionAttr logic in order to mark functions as
WriteOnly when appropriate. This is done through an additional bool variable
and extended logic.
Reviewers: hfinkel, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48387
llvm-svn: 340537
