managers.
Prior to this patch, recursive finalization (where finalization of one
RuntimeDyld instance triggers finalization of another instance on which the
first depends) could trigger memory access failures: When the inner (dependent)
RuntimeDyld instance and its memory manager are finalized, memory allocated
(but not yet relocated) by the outer instance is locked, and relocation in the
outer instance fails with a memory access error.
This patch adds a latch to the RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager base class that is
checked by a new method: RuntimeDyld::finalizeWithMemoryManagerLocking, ensuring
that shared memory managers are only finalized by the outermost RuntimeDyld
instance.
This allows ORC clients to supply the same memory manager to multiple calls to
addModuleSet. In particular it enables the use of user-supplied memory managers
with the CompileOnDemandLayer which must reuse the supplied memory manager for
each function that is lazily compiled.
llvm-svn: 257263
It's strange that LoopInfo mostly owns the Loop objects, but that it
defers deleting them to the loop pass manager. Instead, change the
oddly named "updateUnloop" to "markAsRemoved" and have it queue the
Loop object for deletion. We can't delete the Loop immediately when we
remove it, since we need its pointer identity still, so we'll mark the
object as "invalid" so that clients can see what's going on.
llvm-svn: 257191
Due to the new in-place ThinLTO symbol handling support added in
r257174, we now invoke renameModuleForThinLTO on the current
module from within the FunctionImport pass.
Additionally, renameModuleForThinLTO no longer needs to return the
Module as it is performing the renaming in place on the one provided.
This commit will be immediately preceeded by a companion clang patch to
remove its invocation of renameModuleForThinLTO.
llvm-svn: 257181
Summary:
Move ThinLTO global value processing functions out of ModuleLinker and
into a new ThinLTOGlobalProcessor class, which performs any necessary
linkage and naming changes on the given module in place.
As a result, renameModuleForThinLTO no longer needs to create a new
Module when performing any necessary local to global promotion on a
module that we are possibly exporting from during a ThinLTO backend
compilation.
During function importing the ThinLTO processing is still invoked from
the ModuleLinker (via the new class), as it needs to perform renaming and
linkage changes on the source module, e.g. in order to get the correct
renaming during local to global promotion.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15696
llvm-svn: 257174
a top-down manner into a true top-down or RPO pass over the call graph.
There are specific patterns of function attributes, notably the
norecurse attribute, which are most effectively propagated top-down
because all they us caller information.
Walk in RPO over the call graph SCCs takes the form of a module pass run
immediately after the CGSCC pass managers postorder walk of the SCCs,
trying again to deduce norerucrse for each singular SCC in the call
graph.
This removes a very legacy pass manager specific trick of using a lazy
revisit list traversed during finalization of the CGSCC pass. There is
no analogous finalization step in the new pass manager, and a lazy
revisit list is just trying to produce an RPO iteration of the call
graph. We can do that more directly if more expensively. It seems
unlikely that this will be the expensive part of any compilation though
as we never examine the function bodies here. Even in an LTO run over
a very large module, this should be a reasonable fast set of operations
over a reasonably small working set -- the function call graph itself.
In the future, if this really is a compile time performance issue, we
can look at building support for both post order and RPO traversals
directly into a pass manager that builds and maintains the PO list of
SCCs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15785
llvm-svn: 257163
For a new record with weight != 1, only edge profiling
counters are scaled, VP data is not properly scaled.
This patch refactors the code and fixes the problem.
Also added sort by count interface (for follow up patch).
llvm-svn: 257143
This remove the need for locking when deleting a function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15988
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 257139
The new leader is known anyway so we can return it for some micro
optimization in code where it is easy to pass along the result to the
next join().
llvm-svn: 257130
Coverage mapping data may reference names of functions
that are skipped by FE (e.g, unused inline functions). Since
those functions are skipped, normal instr-prof function lowering
pass won't put those names in the right section, so special
handling is needed to walk through coverage mapping structure
and recollect the references.
With this patch, only names that are skipped are processed. This
simplifies the lowering code and it no longer needs to make
assumptions coverage mapping data layout. It should also be
more efficient.
llvm-svn: 257091
Currently, we try to split vectors of pointers back into their component pointer elements during rewrite-statepoints-for-gc. This is less than ideal since presumably the vectorizer chose to vectorize for a reason. :) It's also been a source of bugs - in particular, the relocation logic as currently implemented was recently discovered to be wrong.
The alternate approach is to allow gc.relocates of vector-of-pointer type and update the backend to handle them. That's what this patch tries to do. This won't actually enable vector-of-pointers in practice - there are some RS4GC changes needed - but the lowering is standalone and testable so it makes sense to separate.
Note that there are some known cases around vector constants which this patch does not handle. Once this is in, I'll send another patch with individual fixes and test cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15632
llvm-svn: 257022
The functionality that calculateCatchReturnSuccessorColors provides was
once non-trivial: it was a computation layered on top of funclet
coloring.
These days, LLVM IR directly encodes what
calculateCatchReturnSuccessorColors computed, obsoleting the need for
it.
No functionality change is intended.
llvm-svn: 256965
Summary:
This patch implements "-print-funcs" option to support function filtering for IR printing like -print-after-all, -print-before etc.
Examples:
-print-after-all -print-funcs=foo,bar
Reviewers: mcrosier, joker.eph
Subscribers: tejohnson, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15776
llvm-svn: 256952
...and mark it as merely an input_iterator rather than a forward_iterator,
since it is destructive. And then rewrite == to take advantage of that.
Patch by Alex Denisov!
llvm-svn: 256913
If we replace one call-site with another, be sure to move over any
operand bundles that lingered on the old call-site.
This fixes PR26036.
llvm-svn: 256912
In the discussion on http://reviews.llvm.org/D15730, Andy pointed out we had a utility function for merging MMO lists. Since it turned we actually had two copies and there's another review in progress (http://reviews.llvm.org/D15230) which needs the same, extract it into a utility function and clean up the interfaces to make it easier to use with a MachineInstBuilder.
I introduced a pair here to track size and allocation together. I think we should probably move in the direction of the MachineOperandsRef helper class, but I'm leaving that for further work. I want to get the poison state introduced before I make major changes to the interface.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15757
llvm-svn: 256909
Summary:
Hi Rafael,
Would you be able to review this patch, please?
(Clang part of the patch is D15832).
When clang runs an external tool, e.g. a linker, it may create a command line that exceeds the length limit.
Clang uses the llvm::sys::argumentsFitWithinSystemLimits function to check if command line length fits the OS
limitation. There are two problems in this function that may cause exceeding of the limit:
1. It ignores the length of the program path in its calculations. On the other hand, clang adds the program
path to the command line when it runs the program.
2. It assumes no space character is inserted after the last argument, which is not true for Windows. The flattenArgs function adds the trailing space for *each* argument. The result of this is that the terminating NULL character is not counted and may be placed beyond the length limit if the command line is exactly 32768 characters long. The WinAPI's CreateProcess does not find the NULL character and fails.
Reviewers: rafael, ygao, probinson
Subscribers: asl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15831
llvm-svn: 256866
SubtargetFeatures::ApplyFeatureFlag to be static, so that
MCSubtargetInfo doesn't need to instantiate SubtargetFeatures
for nothing. Also change the return type to void, as it
wasn't ever used.
This is a partial commit of http://reviews.llvm.org/D15746
llvm-svn: 256823
Summary:
This commit renames GCRelocateOperands to GCRelocateInst and makes it an
intrinsic wrapper, similar to e.g. MemCpyInst. Also, all users of
GCRelocateOperands were changed to use the new intrinsic wrapper instead.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Subscribers: reames, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15762
llvm-svn: 256811
Summary:
At least for CoreCLR, a catchpad which immediately executes an
`unreachable` instruction indicates that the exception can never have a
matching type, and so such catchpads can be removed, and so can their
catchswitches if the catchswitch becomes empty.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15846
llvm-svn: 256809
Update some comments to be more explicit.
Change bypassSlowDivision and the functions it calls so that they take
BasicBlock*s and Instruction*s, rather than Function::iterator&s and
BasicBlock::iterator&s.
Change the APIs so that the caller is responsible for updating the
iterator, rather than the callee. This makes control flow much easier
to follow.
Patch by Justin Lebar!
llvm-svn: 256789
This patch removes the isOperatorNewLike predicate since it was only being used to establish a non-null return value and we have attributes specifically for that purpose with generic handling. To keep approximate the same behaviour for existing frontends, I added the various operator new like (i.e. instances of operator new) to InferFunctionAttrs. It's not really clear to me why this isn't handled in Clang, but I didn't want to break existing code and any subtle assumptions it might have.
Once this patch is in, I'm going to start separating the isAllocLike family of predicates. These appear to be being used for a mixture of things which should be more clearly separated and documented. Today, they're being used to indicate (at least) aliasing facts, CSE-ability, and default values from an allocation site.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15820
llvm-svn: 256787
Summary:
Fix the CLR state numbering to generate correct tables, and update the lit
test to verify them.
The CLR numbering assigns one state number to each catchpad and
cleanuppad.
It also computes two tree-like relations over states:
1) Each state has a "HandlerParentState", which is the state of the next
outer handler enclosing this state's handler (same as nearest ancestor
per the ParentPad linkage on EH pads, but skipping over catchswitches).
2) Each state has a "TryParentState", which:
a) for a catchpad that's not the last handler on its catchswitch, is
the state of the next catchpad on that catchswitch.
b) for all other pads, is the state of the pad whose try region is the
next outer try region enclosing this state's try region. The "try
regions are not present as such in the IR, but will be inferred
based on the placement of invokes and pads which reach each other
by exceptional exits.
Catchswitches do not get their own states, but each gets mapped to the
state of its first catchpad.
Table generation requires each state's "unwind dest" state to have a lower
state number than the given state.
Since HandlerParentState can be computed as a function of a pad's
ParentPad, and TryParentState can be computed as a function of its unwind
dest and the TryParentStates of its children, the CLR state numbering
algorithm first computes HandlerParentState in a top-down pass, then
computes TryParentState in a bottom-up pass.
Also reword some comments/names in the CLR EH table generation to make the
distinction between the different kinds of "parent" clear.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: AndyAyers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15325
llvm-svn: 256760
