This is important for the correct lowering of unwind instructions
(which doesn't matter at all) and llvm.eh.resume calls (which does).
Take 2, now with more basic competence.
llvm-svn: 132295
This is important for the correct lowering of unwind instructions
(which doesn't matter at all) and llvm.eh.resume calls (which does).
llvm-svn: 132291
to load/store i64 values. Since there's no current support to explicitly
declare such restrictions, implement it by using specific hardcoded register
pairs during isel.
llvm-svn: 132248
register allocation dependent and will occasionally break. WIP in the
register allocator to model paired/etc registers.
rdar://9119939
llvm-svn: 132242
The practical effects here are that x86-64 fast-isel can now handle trunc from i8 to i1, and ARM fast-isel can handle many more constructs involving integers narrower than 32 bits (including loads, stores, and many integer casts).
rdar://9437928 .
llvm-svn: 132099
target register, matching BX. I filed this bug because I was confused at first:
PR10007 - ARM branch instructions have inconsistent predicate operand placement
<http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10007>
llvm-svn: 132041
text section.
Assume the following bit of annotated assembly:
.section .data.rel.ro,"aw",%progbits
.align 2
.LAlpha:
.long startval(GOTOFF)
.text
.align 2
.type main,%function
.align 4
main: ;;; assume "main" starts at offset 0x20
0x0 push {r11, lr}
0x4 movw r0, :lower16:(.LAlpha-(.LBeta+8))
;;; ==> (.AddrOf(.LAlpha) - ((.AddrOf(.LBeta) - .AddrOf(".")) + 8)
;;; ==> (??? - ((16-4) + 8) = -20
0x8 movt r0, :upper16:(.LAlpha-(.LBeta+8))
;;; ==> (.AddrOf(.LAlpha) - ((.AddrOf(.LBeta) - .AddrOf(".")) + 8)
;;; ==> (??? - ((16-8) + 8) = -16
0xc ... blah
.LBeta:
0x10 add r0, pc, r0
0x14 ... blah
.LGamma:
0x18 add r1, pc, r1
Above snippet results in the following relocs in the .o file for the
first pair of movw/movt instructions
00000024 R_ARM_MOVW_PREL_NC .LAlpha
00000028 R_ARM_MOVT_PREL .LAlpha
And the encoded instructions in the .o file for main: must be
00000020 <main>:
20: e92d4800 push {fp, lr}
24: e30f0fec movw r0, #65516 ; 0xffec i.e. -20
28: e34f0ff0 movt r0, #65520 ; 0xfff0 i.e. -16
However, llc (prior to this commit) generates the following sequence
00000020 <main>:
20: e92d4800 push {fp, lr}
24: e30f0fec movw r0, #65516 ; 0xffec - i.e. -20
28: e34f0fff movt r0, #65535 ; 0xffff - i.e. -1
What has to happen in the ArmAsmBackend is that if the relocation is PC
relative, the 16 bits encoded as part of movw and movt must be both addends,
not addresses. It makes sense to encode addresses by right shifting the value
by 16, but the result is incorrect for PIC.
i.e., the right shift by 16 for movt is ONLY valid for the NON-PCRel case.
This change agrees with what GNU as does, and makes the PIC code run.
MC/ARM/elf-movt.s covers this case.
llvm-svn: 131674
